A powerful 70B instruction-tuned model from NVIDIA, offering high intelligence but at a premium price and slower inference speeds.
The Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B model, developed by NVIDIA, emerges as a significant contender in the landscape of open-weight, non-reasoning large language models. Positioned with a substantial 70 billion parameters, this instruction-tuned variant demonstrates an impressive capacity for general intelligence, scoring 24 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index. This places it comfortably above the average for comparable models, indicating its strong performance across a broad spectrum of tasks.
However, its capabilities come with notable trade-offs. While its intelligence is a clear strength, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B is characterized by its relatively high operational costs and slower inference speeds. With a blended price of $0.60 per 1M tokens for both input and output on Deepinfra, it sits at the more expensive end of the spectrum when compared to the average for similar models. Its output speed of 40 tokens per second is also considerably slower than many peers, which can impact real-time applications and throughput-sensitive workloads.
Despite these considerations, the model's 128k token context window and knowledge cutoff up to November 2023 provide a robust foundation for handling complex and lengthy prompts. Its open-source nature further enhances its appeal, offering flexibility for developers and researchers to fine-tune and deploy in diverse environments. The Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B is best suited for applications where high-quality, intelligent responses are paramount, and where the budget and latency constraints are less stringent, making it a powerful tool for specific, demanding use cases.
24 (#15 / 33 / 70B)
40 tokens/s
$0.60 per 1M tokens
$0.60 per 1M tokens
9.2M tokens
0.41 seconds
| Spec | Details |
|---|---|
| Owner | NVIDIA |
| License | Open |
| Context Window | 128k tokens |
| Knowledge Cutoff | November 2023 |
| Parameters | 70 Billion |
| Intelligence Index | 24 (Rank #15/33) |
| Output Speed | 40 tokens/s (Rank #17/33) |
| Latency (TTFT) | 0.41 seconds |
| Input Price | $0.60 per 1M tokens (Rank #25/33) |
| Output Price | $0.60 per 1M tokens (Rank #20/33) |
| Verbosity | 9.2M tokens (Rank #9/33) |
| Blended Price (3:1) | $0.60 per 1M tokens |
Choosing the right provider for Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B involves balancing its high intelligence with its higher cost and slower speed. Deepinfra is currently a primary benchmarked provider, offering a consistent experience.
| Priority | Pick | Why | Tradeoff to accept |
|---|---|---|---|
| General Purpose | Deepinfra | Reliable access to a high-intelligence model. | Higher cost and slower speed. |
| Cost-Conscious (Intelligence Focus) | Deepinfra | Best available option for this model, despite its price. | Still relatively expensive for high volume. |
| Low Latency Applications | Deepinfra | Consistent latency, but not optimized for speed. | May not meet strict real-time requirements. |
| High Throughput Needs | Deepinfra | Offers access, but model speed is a bottleneck. | Throughput will be limited by the model's 40 tokens/s. |
| Development & Prototyping | Deepinfra | Easy API access for testing and integration. | Cost can add up during extensive testing. |
Note: Deepinfra is the primary provider benchmarked for Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B. Other providers may offer different pricing or performance characteristics not reflected here.
Understanding the real-world cost implications of Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B requires considering its per-token pricing, verbosity, and typical usage patterns. Below are estimated costs for common scenarios, assuming Deepinfra's pricing of $0.60 per 1M tokens for both input and output.
| Scenario | Input | Output | What it represents | Estimated cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scenario | Input | Output | What it represents | Estimated cost |
| Short Q&A | 100 tokens | 200 tokens | Simple question and concise answer. | $0.00018 |
| Content Generation | 500 tokens | 1,500 tokens | Generating a short blog post or product description. | $0.00120 |
| Document Summarization | 5,000 tokens | 500 tokens | Summarizing a medium-length article. | $0.00330 |
| Long-form Article Draft | 1,000 tokens | 3,000 tokens | Drafting a detailed article or report section. | $0.00240 |
| Code Generation/Review | 200 tokens | 800 tokens | Generating a function or reviewing a code snippet. | $0.00060 |
| Extended Chat Session | 2,000 tokens | 4,000 tokens | A longer, multi-turn conversation. | $0.00360 |
While individual requests might seem inexpensive, the cumulative cost for Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B can quickly escalate, especially with high-volume, verbose, or long-context applications. Its higher per-token price means that optimizing prompt and response lengths is crucial for cost management.
Given Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B's premium pricing and slower inference, strategic cost management is essential. Here are key strategies to optimize your spend while leveraging its high intelligence.
Crafting concise and effective prompts can significantly reduce input token count, directly impacting costs.
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B can be verbose. Controlling output length is crucial for managing output token costs.
max_tokens parameter to cap response length.Reserve this model for tasks where its superior intelligence truly adds value, rather than for simpler, routine operations.
While the model is slow, batching requests where possible can improve overall throughput efficiency, especially for non-real-time applications.
Regularly track your token consumption and costs to identify patterns and areas for optimization.
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B is a large language model developed by NVIDIA, featuring 70 billion parameters. It is an instruction-tuned, open-weight model known for its high intelligence and a 128k token context window, with knowledge up to November 2023.
It scores 24 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it above average among comparable models (average 22). This indicates strong performance across a wide range of general language tasks.
Yes, at $0.60 per 1M tokens for both input and output on Deepinfra, it is considered somewhat expensive compared to the average for similar models. Its verbosity can also contribute to higher costs.
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B has a median output speed of 40 tokens per second and a latency of 0.41 seconds. This makes it notably slower than many other models, which can affect real-time applications.
The model features a substantial 128k token context window, allowing it to process and generate very long and complex inputs and outputs, making it suitable for tasks requiring extensive context.
The model is owned by NVIDIA and is released under an open license, providing flexibility for developers and researchers to use and adapt it for various applications.
You should consider Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B when your application demands high-quality, intelligent responses, requires a very large context window, and can tolerate higher costs and slower inference speeds. It's ideal for complex content generation, detailed analysis, or sophisticated conversational AI where accuracy and depth are prioritized.