Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning)

NVIDIA's compact Llama 3.1 for efficient reasoning

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning)

A compact, open-weight Llama 3.1 variant from NVIDIA, optimized for reasoning tasks with a 128k context window and effectively free token costs when self-hosted.

Open-WeightReasoning FocusNVIDIA4B Parameters128k ContextCost-EffectiveLlama 3.1 Family

The Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) model represents NVIDIA's contribution to the compact, open-weight language model landscape, specifically engineered for reasoning-intensive applications. As part of the Llama 3.1 family, this 4-billion parameter model is designed to offer a balance of capability and efficiency, making it an attractive option for developers and organizations looking to deploy sophisticated AI solutions without the overhead of larger, more resource-intensive models.

Scoring 26 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, this model positions itself below the average for its class (which also averages 26). This score indicates that while it may not excel at general knowledge or broad creative tasks, its 'Reasoning' variant designation suggests a specialized focus. Users should interpret this intelligence score in the context of its intended purpose: to perform specific analytical and logical tasks effectively, rather than aiming for broad, human-like conversational fluency.

One of the most compelling aspects of the Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 is its pricing structure, or rather, its lack thereof. With an input price of $0.00 per 1M tokens and an output price of $0.00 per 1M tokens, this model is effectively free in terms of token usage when self-hosted. This makes it an exceptionally cost-competitive option, especially when compared to commercial API-based models that charge per token. The primary cost associated with this model will be the computational resources required for deployment and operation.

The model supports text input and produces text output, making it versatile for a wide range of natural language processing tasks. A significant feature is its generous 128k token context window, allowing it to process and understand very long documents or complex conversational histories. Its knowledge base extends up to May 2023, providing a solid foundation for current information, though users should be mindful of its cutoff for real-time or very recent events.

In summary, the Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) is an intriguing choice for applications where reasoning capabilities are paramount, and cost-efficiency through self-hosting is a priority. Its open-weight nature provides flexibility for fine-tuning and deployment in various environments, from edge devices to private cloud infrastructure, empowering developers to tailor the model precisely to their needs.

Scoreboard

Intelligence

26 (#44 / 84 / 4B Parameters)

Below average for its class, but specialized for reasoning tasks.
Output speed

N/A tokens/sec

Speed data not available; performance depends heavily on self-hosting environment and hardware.
Input price

$0.00 per 1M tokens

Effectively free for token usage, primary cost is compute for self-hosting.
Output price

$0.00 per 1M tokens

Effectively free for token usage, primary cost is compute for self-hosting.
Verbosity signal

N/A tokens

Verbosity metrics are not available for this model.
Provider latency

N/A ms

Latency data is not available; highly dependent on deployment specifics and hardware.

Technical specifications

Spec Details
Model Name Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1
Owner NVIDIA
License Open
Model Size 4 Billion Parameters
Context Window 128k tokens
Knowledge Cutoff May 2023
Input Type Text
Output Type Text
Intelligence Index Score 26
Input Price (per 1M tokens) $0.00
Output Price (per 1M tokens) $0.00
Primary Use Case Reasoning tasks
Model Family Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano

What stands out beyond the scoreboard

Where this model wins
  • **Unbeatable Token Cost:** With $0.00 per 1M tokens, the primary cost is compute, making it highly economical for high-volume use cases when self-hosted.
  • **Deep Context Understanding:** A 128k token context window allows for processing and reasoning over extensive documents and complex dialogues.
  • **Open-Weight Flexibility:** Provides full control for fine-tuning, customization, and deployment in diverse environments, including on-premise or edge devices.
  • **Specialized Reasoning Capabilities:** Designed and optimized for tasks requiring logical deduction, analysis, and problem-solving, making it efficient for its niche.
  • **NVIDIA Ecosystem Integration:** Benefits from NVIDIA's expertise and potential optimizations for NVIDIA hardware, offering strong performance potential on compatible GPUs.
Where costs sneak up
  • **Compute Infrastructure Costs:** While tokens are free, self-hosting requires significant investment in GPUs, servers, and ongoing electricity/maintenance.
  • **Lower General Intelligence:** Its specialized 'Reasoning' focus means it may underperform on broader creative, summarization, or general knowledge tasks compared to larger, more versatile models.
  • **Deployment Complexity:** Self-hosting an open-weight model demands technical expertise in MLOps, infrastructure management, and model serving.
  • **Lack of Managed API:** No out-of-the-box, fully managed API service means no instant scalability or vendor support for operational issues.
  • **Performance Benchmarking Required:** 'N/A' for speed and latency means you must conduct your own benchmarks to understand real-world performance in your specific setup.

Provider pick

As an open-weight model, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) is not typically offered through third-party API providers in the same way proprietary models are. Instead, its strength lies in self-hosting, allowing organizations to deploy it on their own infrastructure. This section focuses on strategic considerations for self-deployment rather than comparing external API services.

The 'pricing' for this model primarily refers to the cost of the computational resources (GPUs, servers, electricity) required to run it, as the token usage itself is free. Therefore, provider picks revolve around infrastructure choices and deployment strategies.

Priority Pick Why Tradeoff to accept
**Priority** **Pick** **Why** **Tradeoff**
Cost-Effective Deployment Self-Hosting (Cloud/On-Premise) Zero token cost, full control over infrastructure and scaling. Requires significant upfront investment in hardware and ongoing operational costs.
Maximum Customization Fine-tuning & Local Deployment Tailor the model precisely to specific datasets and use cases, optimizing performance and output. Demands deep ML expertise, data engineering, and substantial compute resources for training.
Data Privacy & Security On-Premise Deployment Ensures data never leaves your controlled environment, crucial for sensitive information. Higher initial setup costs, complex maintenance, and potential scaling limitations.
Performance Optimization NVIDIA GPU Infrastructure Leverages NVIDIA's own hardware and software stack for potentially optimized inference speed and efficiency. Can be a significant capital expenditure, requires specialized hardware knowledge.

Note: 'Pricing' for open-weight models refers to the cost of compute resources for self-hosting, not per-token charges.

Real workloads cost table

Estimating costs for Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) involves understanding that the token cost is $0.00. Therefore, the primary cost driver will be the computational resources (GPUs, CPU, memory, storage, and electricity) required to run the model. The 'Estimated cost' below reflects only the token cost, emphasizing that compute is the real variable.

These scenarios illustrate how the model's free token usage can translate into significant savings for high-volume applications, provided you manage your infrastructure efficiently.

Scenario Input Output What it represents Estimated cost
**Scenario** **Input** **Output** **What it represents** **Estimated cost (token)**
Basic Code Generation 500 tokens (prompt) 1,000 tokens (code) Generating small functions or script snippets. $0.00
Long-form Content Summarization 50,000 tokens (document) 2,000 tokens (summary) Summarizing a detailed report or research paper. $0.00
Complex Reasoning Query 1,000 tokens (problem description) 500 tokens (logical solution) Solving a multi-step logic puzzle or analytical problem. $0.00
Data Extraction from Text 10,000 tokens (log file) 1,000 tokens (extracted data) Parsing structured information from unstructured text. $0.00
Multi-turn Chatbot (average) 2,000 tokens (conversation history) 300 tokens (response) Handling an average user interaction over several turns. $0.00

The key takeaway is that for Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning), the cost is entirely driven by your compute infrastructure, not by the volume of tokens processed. This makes it highly attractive for applications with predictable, high-volume usage where infrastructure can be amortized.

How to control cost (a practical playbook)

Optimizing the total cost of ownership for an open-weight model like Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) means focusing on compute efficiency. Since token costs are zero, every strategy should aim to reduce the hardware requirements, inference time, or operational overhead.

Here are several strategies to minimize your compute expenditure and maximize the value from this powerful, compact model:

Optimize Hardware Selection

Choosing the right hardware is paramount for self-hosted models. For a 4B parameter model, dedicated GPUs are often necessary for efficient inference, but the specific model and quantity can vary.

  • **GPU Selection:** Invest in GPUs that offer a good balance of VRAM (to fit the model) and computational power (for speed). NVIDIA's own GPUs are often well-optimized for their models.
  • **CPU & RAM:** Ensure your server's CPU and RAM are sufficient to handle the data loading, pre-processing, and post-processing, even if the GPU does the heavy lifting for inference.
  • **Cloud vs. On-Premise:** Evaluate the cost-benefit of cloud GPU instances (flexibility, scalability) versus on-premise hardware (lower long-term cost for consistent load, data privacy).
Implement Batch Processing

Batching multiple inference requests together can significantly improve GPU utilization and overall throughput, especially for applications with fluctuating or high-volume demand.

  • **Increase Throughput:** Instead of processing one request at a time, group several requests into a single batch to be processed by the GPU simultaneously.
  • **Optimize Batch Size:** Experiment with different batch sizes to find the sweet spot that maximizes throughput without introducing excessive latency for individual requests.
  • **Asynchronous Processing:** Design your application to handle requests asynchronously, allowing the model to process batches while new requests are queued.
Leverage Quantization Techniques

Quantization reduces the precision of the model's weights (e.g., from FP16 to INT8 or INT4), significantly decreasing its memory footprint and potentially increasing inference speed with minimal impact on performance.

  • **Reduced Memory Footprint:** A smaller model requires less VRAM, potentially allowing you to use cheaper GPUs or run more models on the same hardware.
  • **Faster Inference:** Lower precision computations can be faster on modern hardware, leading to quicker response times.
  • **Evaluate Impact:** Always benchmark the quantized model against the full-precision version to ensure the reduction in quality is acceptable for your use case.
Fine-tune for Efficiency

While the model is already specialized for reasoning, fine-tuning it on your specific domain data can further enhance its performance and potentially reduce the need for complex prompting, leading to shorter inputs/outputs.

  • **Domain Adaptation:** Fine-tuning makes the model more proficient in your specific language, jargon, and task requirements, improving accuracy and relevance.
  • **Prompt Engineering Reduction:** A well-fine-tuned model may require simpler, shorter prompts to achieve desired results, indirectly saving on input processing time.
  • **Targeted Output:** Fine-tuning can help the model generate more concise and relevant outputs, reducing unnecessary token generation.
Implement Caching and Deduplication

For applications where the same or very similar prompts are frequently submitted, caching previous results can eliminate redundant inference calls, saving significant compute resources.

  • **Response Caching:** Store the output of common queries and serve them directly from the cache when the same input is received again.
  • **Semantic Deduplication:** Use embedding similarity to identify semantically identical queries, even if their exact wording differs, and serve cached responses.
  • **Time-to-Live (TTL):** Implement a TTL for cached entries to ensure data freshness, especially for dynamic information.

FAQ

What is Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning)?

It is a compact, 4-billion parameter open-weight language model from NVIDIA, part of the Llama 3.1 family. It is specifically designed and optimized for tasks requiring strong reasoning and analytical capabilities.

What are its primary strengths?

Its main strengths include its specialization in reasoning tasks, a very large 128k token context window, its open-weight nature allowing for full customization and self-hosting, and effectively zero token costs when deployed on your own infrastructure.

How does its intelligence compare to other models?

It scores 26 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, which is below the average for comparable models. This indicates it's not a general-purpose powerhouse but is highly effective within its specialized domain of reasoning tasks.

What does "open-weight" mean for this model?

"Open-weight" means that the model's parameters (weights) are publicly available, allowing anyone to download, inspect, modify, fine-tune, and deploy the model on their own hardware without per-token usage fees. This provides immense flexibility and control.

What are the real costs of using this model?

While the token usage itself is free ($0.00 per 1M tokens), the real costs come from the computational resources required for self-hosting. This includes hardware (GPUs, servers), electricity, cooling, maintenance, and the operational expertise needed to deploy and manage the model.

Can I fine-tune this model?

Yes, as an open-weight model, it is fully fine-tunable. This allows you to adapt the model to your specific datasets, domain language, and task requirements, potentially improving its performance and efficiency for your particular use case.

What is the context window size?

The Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) boasts a substantial 128k token context window, enabling it to process and understand very long inputs, such as entire documents, codebases, or extended conversational histories.

What is its knowledge cutoff?

The model's knowledge base extends up to May 2023. This means it has been trained on data available up to that point and will not have inherent knowledge of events or information that occurred after this date.


Subscribe