A compact, open-weight Llama 3.1 variant from NVIDIA, optimized for reasoning tasks with a 128k context window and effectively free token costs when self-hosted.
The Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) model represents NVIDIA's contribution to the compact, open-weight language model landscape, specifically engineered for reasoning-intensive applications. As part of the Llama 3.1 family, this 4-billion parameter model is designed to offer a balance of capability and efficiency, making it an attractive option for developers and organizations looking to deploy sophisticated AI solutions without the overhead of larger, more resource-intensive models.
Scoring 26 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, this model positions itself below the average for its class (which also averages 26). This score indicates that while it may not excel at general knowledge or broad creative tasks, its 'Reasoning' variant designation suggests a specialized focus. Users should interpret this intelligence score in the context of its intended purpose: to perform specific analytical and logical tasks effectively, rather than aiming for broad, human-like conversational fluency.
One of the most compelling aspects of the Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 is its pricing structure, or rather, its lack thereof. With an input price of $0.00 per 1M tokens and an output price of $0.00 per 1M tokens, this model is effectively free in terms of token usage when self-hosted. This makes it an exceptionally cost-competitive option, especially when compared to commercial API-based models that charge per token. The primary cost associated with this model will be the computational resources required for deployment and operation.
The model supports text input and produces text output, making it versatile for a wide range of natural language processing tasks. A significant feature is its generous 128k token context window, allowing it to process and understand very long documents or complex conversational histories. Its knowledge base extends up to May 2023, providing a solid foundation for current information, though users should be mindful of its cutoff for real-time or very recent events.
In summary, the Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) is an intriguing choice for applications where reasoning capabilities are paramount, and cost-efficiency through self-hosting is a priority. Its open-weight nature provides flexibility for fine-tuning and deployment in various environments, from edge devices to private cloud infrastructure, empowering developers to tailor the model precisely to their needs.
26 (#44 / 84 / 4B Parameters)
N/A tokens/sec
$0.00 per 1M tokens
$0.00 per 1M tokens
N/A tokens
N/A ms
| Spec | Details |
|---|---|
| Model Name | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 |
| Owner | NVIDIA |
| License | Open |
| Model Size | 4 Billion Parameters |
| Context Window | 128k tokens |
| Knowledge Cutoff | May 2023 |
| Input Type | Text |
| Output Type | Text |
| Intelligence Index Score | 26 |
| Input Price (per 1M tokens) | $0.00 |
| Output Price (per 1M tokens) | $0.00 |
| Primary Use Case | Reasoning tasks |
| Model Family | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano |
As an open-weight model, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) is not typically offered through third-party API providers in the same way proprietary models are. Instead, its strength lies in self-hosting, allowing organizations to deploy it on their own infrastructure. This section focuses on strategic considerations for self-deployment rather than comparing external API services.
The 'pricing' for this model primarily refers to the cost of the computational resources (GPUs, servers, electricity) required to run it, as the token usage itself is free. Therefore, provider picks revolve around infrastructure choices and deployment strategies.
| Priority | Pick | Why | Tradeoff to accept |
|---|---|---|---|
| **Priority** | **Pick** | **Why** | **Tradeoff** |
| Cost-Effective Deployment | Self-Hosting (Cloud/On-Premise) | Zero token cost, full control over infrastructure and scaling. | Requires significant upfront investment in hardware and ongoing operational costs. |
| Maximum Customization | Fine-tuning & Local Deployment | Tailor the model precisely to specific datasets and use cases, optimizing performance and output. | Demands deep ML expertise, data engineering, and substantial compute resources for training. |
| Data Privacy & Security | On-Premise Deployment | Ensures data never leaves your controlled environment, crucial for sensitive information. | Higher initial setup costs, complex maintenance, and potential scaling limitations. |
| Performance Optimization | NVIDIA GPU Infrastructure | Leverages NVIDIA's own hardware and software stack for potentially optimized inference speed and efficiency. | Can be a significant capital expenditure, requires specialized hardware knowledge. |
Note: 'Pricing' for open-weight models refers to the cost of compute resources for self-hosting, not per-token charges.
Estimating costs for Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) involves understanding that the token cost is $0.00. Therefore, the primary cost driver will be the computational resources (GPUs, CPU, memory, storage, and electricity) required to run the model. The 'Estimated cost' below reflects only the token cost, emphasizing that compute is the real variable.
These scenarios illustrate how the model's free token usage can translate into significant savings for high-volume applications, provided you manage your infrastructure efficiently.
| Scenario | Input | Output | What it represents | Estimated cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| **Scenario** | **Input** | **Output** | **What it represents** | **Estimated cost (token)** |
| Basic Code Generation | 500 tokens (prompt) | 1,000 tokens (code) | Generating small functions or script snippets. | $0.00 |
| Long-form Content Summarization | 50,000 tokens (document) | 2,000 tokens (summary) | Summarizing a detailed report or research paper. | $0.00 |
| Complex Reasoning Query | 1,000 tokens (problem description) | 500 tokens (logical solution) | Solving a multi-step logic puzzle or analytical problem. | $0.00 |
| Data Extraction from Text | 10,000 tokens (log file) | 1,000 tokens (extracted data) | Parsing structured information from unstructured text. | $0.00 |
| Multi-turn Chatbot (average) | 2,000 tokens (conversation history) | 300 tokens (response) | Handling an average user interaction over several turns. | $0.00 |
The key takeaway is that for Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning), the cost is entirely driven by your compute infrastructure, not by the volume of tokens processed. This makes it highly attractive for applications with predictable, high-volume usage where infrastructure can be amortized.
Optimizing the total cost of ownership for an open-weight model like Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) means focusing on compute efficiency. Since token costs are zero, every strategy should aim to reduce the hardware requirements, inference time, or operational overhead.
Here are several strategies to minimize your compute expenditure and maximize the value from this powerful, compact model:
Choosing the right hardware is paramount for self-hosted models. For a 4B parameter model, dedicated GPUs are often necessary for efficient inference, but the specific model and quantity can vary.
Batching multiple inference requests together can significantly improve GPU utilization and overall throughput, especially for applications with fluctuating or high-volume demand.
Quantization reduces the precision of the model's weights (e.g., from FP16 to INT8 or INT4), significantly decreasing its memory footprint and potentially increasing inference speed with minimal impact on performance.
While the model is already specialized for reasoning, fine-tuning it on your specific domain data can further enhance its performance and potentially reduce the need for complex prompting, leading to shorter inputs/outputs.
For applications where the same or very similar prompts are frequently submitted, caching previous results can eliminate redundant inference calls, saving significant compute resources.
It is a compact, 4-billion parameter open-weight language model from NVIDIA, part of the Llama 3.1 family. It is specifically designed and optimized for tasks requiring strong reasoning and analytical capabilities.
Its main strengths include its specialization in reasoning tasks, a very large 128k token context window, its open-weight nature allowing for full customization and self-hosting, and effectively zero token costs when deployed on your own infrastructure.
It scores 26 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, which is below the average for comparable models. This indicates it's not a general-purpose powerhouse but is highly effective within its specialized domain of reasoning tasks.
"Open-weight" means that the model's parameters (weights) are publicly available, allowing anyone to download, inspect, modify, fine-tune, and deploy the model on their own hardware without per-token usage fees. This provides immense flexibility and control.
While the token usage itself is free ($0.00 per 1M tokens), the real costs come from the computational resources required for self-hosting. This includes hardware (GPUs, servers), electricity, cooling, maintenance, and the operational expertise needed to deploy and manage the model.
Yes, as an open-weight model, it is fully fine-tunable. This allows you to adapt the model to your specific datasets, domain language, and task requirements, potentially improving its performance and efficiency for your particular use case.
The Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B v1.1 (Reasoning) boasts a substantial 128k token context window, enabling it to process and understand very long inputs, such as entire documents, codebases, or extended conversational histories.
The model's knowledge base extends up to May 2023. This means it has been trained on data available up to that point and will not have inherent knowledge of events or information that occurred after this date.