Llama Nemotron Ultra (Reasoning)

NVIDIA's Open-Weight Reasoning Powerhouse

Llama Nemotron Ultra (Reasoning)

Llama Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) is NVIDIA's large open-weight model, designed for complex analytical tasks, offering a substantial context window and competitive pricing through API providers like Nebius Base.

Open-WeightReasoning Focus128k ContextText-to-TextNVIDIA ModelCompetitive Output Price

The Llama Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) model, developed by NVIDIA, represents a significant entry into the open-weight large language model landscape. Specifically engineered for complex analytical and reasoning tasks, this model aims to provide robust capabilities for developers and enterprises seeking powerful, flexible AI solutions. Benchmarked on Nebius Base, it demonstrates a balanced profile across performance, intelligence, and cost, making it a compelling option for a variety of applications.

With a substantial 128k token context window, Llama Nemotron Ultra is well-suited for processing and generating extensive content, from detailed code analysis to comprehensive document summarization. Its 'Reasoning' variant emphasizes its design for tasks requiring logical inference and structured problem-solving, positioning it as a valuable tool for advanced AI workflows. While its intelligence index places it slightly below the average for comparable models, its open-weight nature and NVIDIA's backing offer significant advantages in terms of customization and deployment flexibility.

Performance-wise, the model exhibits a median output speed of 37 tokens per second and a latency of 0.72 seconds on Nebius Base. These metrics indicate a solid, though not leading, performance profile. From a cost perspective, Llama Nemotron Ultra offers a moderately priced output token rate at $1.80 per 1M tokens, which is more competitive than the average. However, its input token price of $0.60 per 1M tokens is slightly above average, suggesting a need for careful prompt engineering to optimize costs, especially for input-heavy applications.

Overall, Llama Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) stands out as a capable open-weight model for those prioritizing deep reasoning and large context handling. Its blend of performance, pricing, and the inherent flexibility of an open-weight architecture makes it a strong contender for applications where control, customization, and cost-effectiveness are key considerations, despite some areas for improvement in raw speed and intelligence ranking.

Scoreboard

Intelligence

38 (#31 / 51 / 2 out of 4 units)

Below average among comparable models (average: 42), indicating room for improvement in raw intelligence scores.
Output speed

37 tokens/s

Slower than average (45 tokens/s), ranking #20/51. May impact real-time or high-throughput applications.
Input price

$0.60 per 1M tokens

Somewhat expensive compared to the average of $0.57, ranking #27/51.
Output price

$1.80 per 1M tokens

Moderately priced, better than the average of $2.10, ranking #24/51.
Verbosity signal

59M tokens

Somewhat verbose, generating significantly more tokens than the average of 22M during intelligence evaluation, ranking #23/51.
Provider latency

0.72 seconds

A reasonable time to first token, contributing to a responsive user experience.

Technical specifications

Spec Details
Model Name Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Variant Reasoning
Owner NVIDIA
License Open
Context Window 128k tokens
Input Type Text
Output Type Text
Primary Provider Nebius Base
Blended Price (3:1) $0.90 / 1M tokens
Intelligence Index 38 (Rank #31/51)
Output Speed 37 tokens/s (Rank #20/51)
Input Token Price $0.60 / 1M tokens (Rank #27/51)
Output Token Price $1.80 / 1M tokens (Rank #24/51)

What stands out beyond the scoreboard

Where this model wins
  • **Open-Weight Flexibility:** As an open-weight model, it offers unparalleled control for fine-tuning, deployment, and integration into custom workflows.
  • **Large Context Window:** The 128k token context window is ideal for processing extensive documents, complex codebases, or lengthy conversations without losing coherence.
  • **Competitive Output Pricing:** Its output token price of $1.80 per 1M tokens is more favorable than the average, making it cost-effective for applications with high output generation.
  • **Dedicated Reasoning Capabilities:** The 'Reasoning' variant is specifically optimized for tasks requiring logical inference, problem-solving, and structured analysis.
  • **NVIDIA Backing:** Developed by NVIDIA, it benefits from strong research and development, often leading to optimized performance on NVIDIA hardware.
Where costs sneak up
  • **Below-Average Intelligence:** A lower intelligence index (38) might necessitate more iterative prompting or longer, more detailed instructions, potentially increasing input token usage.
  • **Slower Output Speed:** At 37 tokens/s, it's slower than many peers, which could lead to higher latency for users or increased compute costs for high-volume, real-time applications.
  • **Somewhat Expensive Input Tokens:** The $0.60 per 1M input tokens is slightly above average, making it crucial to optimize prompt length and efficiency.
  • **Higher Verbosity:** The model's tendency towards verbosity (59M tokens generated during evaluation) can directly translate to higher output costs if not managed through careful prompt design or post-processing.
  • **Single Benchmarked Provider:** While Nebius Base offers competitive pricing, the lack of diverse benchmark data for other providers means less comparative insight for cost optimization across different platforms.

Provider pick

When considering Llama Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning), Nebius Base stands out as the benchmarked API provider, offering a direct route to leverage this powerful open-weight model. While the data presented focuses solely on Nebius Base, its performance and pricing metrics provide a solid foundation for evaluating its suitability across various deployment priorities.

For open-weight models, the choice of provider often balances ease of use, managed services, and the flexibility to potentially self-host. Nebius Base offers a managed API experience, abstracting away the complexities of infrastructure while providing access to the model's capabilities.

Priority Pick Why Tradeoff to accept
Cost-Efficiency (Output-Heavy) Nebius Base Competitive output token pricing ($1.80/1M) makes it attractive for applications generating significant responses. Input token price is slightly higher, requiring careful prompt optimization.
Reasoning & Complex Tasks Nebius Base Direct access to the 'Reasoning' variant, ideal for analytical and problem-solving applications with its large context window. Intelligence index is below average, potentially requiring more sophisticated prompt engineering.
Managed API Access Nebius Base Provides a convenient, managed API for deploying and scaling the model without infrastructure overhead. Limited provider options benchmarked, reducing competitive pricing insights across platforms.
Large Context Workloads Nebius Base The 128k context window is fully supported, enabling deep analysis of extensive documents and data. Slower output speed might affect the processing time for very large outputs from long contexts.
Open-Weight Foundation Nebius Base Offers a pathway to utilize an open-weight model through a reliable API, balancing flexibility with ease of use. While open-weight, using an API means some control over the underlying infrastructure is abstracted away.

Note: This analysis is based on benchmark data from Nebius Base. Performance and pricing may vary with other providers or self-hosted deployments.

Real workloads cost table

Understanding the real-world cost implications of Llama Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) requires looking beyond raw token prices. Its performance characteristics, such as verbosity and speed, combined with its pricing structure, dictate how efficiently it handles different types of tasks. Here are a few scenarios illustrating potential costs.

These estimates highlight the importance of optimizing both input and output token usage, especially given the model's slightly higher input price and tendency towards verbosity. Strategic prompt engineering can significantly reduce overall operational expenses.

Scenario Input Output What it represents Estimated cost
Complex Code Review 50k tokens 5k tokens Analyzing a large codebase for bugs, vulnerabilities, and best practices, generating detailed feedback. $0.039
Legal Document Analysis 100k tokens 10k tokens Summarizing a lengthy legal contract, extracting key clauses and potential risks. $0.078
Creative Story Generation 2k tokens 20k tokens Generating a detailed narrative draft from a short prompt and character outline. $0.0372
Customer Support Interaction 1k tokens 1k tokens Responding to a complex customer query, synthesizing information from a knowledge base. $0.0024
Research Paper Summarization 80k tokens 8k tokens Condensing a scientific paper into an executive summary with key findings. $0.0624

For Llama Nemotron Ultra, tasks with high output token counts benefit from its competitive output pricing, but input-heavy or verbose scenarios demand careful cost management.

How to control cost (a practical playbook)

Optimizing costs for Llama Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) involves a multi-faceted approach, leveraging its strengths while mitigating its less favorable characteristics. Given its open-weight nature, there are opportunities for deeper optimization beyond typical API usage.

The following strategies focus on maximizing efficiency and minimizing token usage, crucial for a model with slightly higher input costs and a tendency towards verbosity.

Prompt Engineering for Conciseness

Given the model's verbosity and slightly higher input token price, crafting precise and concise prompts is paramount. Avoid overly conversational or vague instructions that might lead to unnecessary input or verbose outputs.

  • **Specify Output Length:** Explicitly instruct the model on desired output length (e.g., "Summarize in 3 sentences," "Provide a bulleted list of 5 items").
  • **Direct Questions:** Frame prompts as direct questions rather than open-ended requests to guide the model to a focused answer.
  • **Few-Shot Examples:** Provide examples of desired input-output pairs to train the model on your preferred style and conciseness.
Output Truncation & Post-Processing

If the model tends to generate more text than needed, implement post-processing steps to trim or filter outputs before they are consumed or stored. This directly reduces output token costs.

  • **Character/Token Limits:** Apply hard limits on the number of characters or tokens in the output.
  • **Keyword Extraction:** For summarization tasks, extract only the most relevant keywords or phrases rather than full sentences.
  • **Redundancy Removal:** Develop algorithms to identify and remove repetitive phrases or information from the generated text.
Batching & Asynchronous Processing

For applications that don't require immediate real-time responses, batching multiple requests can improve overall throughput and potentially reduce per-request overhead, especially if the provider offers volume discounts.

  • **Group Similar Tasks:** Combine multiple similar prompts into a single API call if the provider supports it, or process them in batches.
  • **Asynchronous Calls:** Utilize asynchronous processing to send multiple requests concurrently, maximizing the utilization of the model's processing capacity.
Leverage the Large Context Window Wisely

While the 128k context window is a powerful feature, using it efficiently is key. Avoid stuffing the context with irrelevant information, as every token costs money.

  • **Contextual Compression:** Implement techniques to summarize or extract only the most relevant parts of a document before feeding it into the prompt.
  • **Dynamic Context Loading:** Load only the necessary historical conversation or document segments based on the current user query.
  • **Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG):** Combine the model with a robust RAG system to retrieve precise information, reducing the need to put entire knowledge bases into the prompt.

FAQ

What is Llama Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning)?

Llama Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) is a large, open-weight language model developed by NVIDIA. The '253B' refers to its parameter count, and '(Reasoning)' indicates its specialization in tasks requiring logical inference, problem-solving, and complex analysis. It's designed to handle extensive contexts and provide detailed, structured outputs.

How does its 'Reasoning' variant differ from other models?

The 'Reasoning' variant implies that the model has been specifically trained or fine-tuned to excel at tasks that demand more than just factual recall or simple generation. This includes tasks like logical deduction, mathematical problem-solving, code analysis, and complex data interpretation, where understanding relationships and drawing conclusions are critical.

What are the primary use cases for a 128k context window?

A 128k token context window is ideal for applications requiring the processing of very long documents or extensive conversational histories. This includes:

  • Summarizing entire books, legal contracts, or research papers.
  • Analyzing large codebases for review, refactoring, or debugging.
  • Maintaining long-form, coherent conversations in advanced chatbots.
  • Extracting detailed information from vast datasets.
Is Llama Nemotron Ultra truly open-source?

The model is described as 'open-weight,' which typically means the model weights are publicly available, allowing for local deployment, fine-tuning, and modification. While not always synonymous with 'open-source' in the strictest sense (which includes the training code and data), it offers significant transparency and flexibility compared to proprietary models.

How does its intelligence index of 38 compare to other models?

An intelligence index of 38 places Llama Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) below the average of 42 for comparable models in the benchmark. This suggests that while capable, it might not consistently outperform top-tier models in raw intelligence benchmarks. However, its specialized 'Reasoning' capabilities and large context window can still make it highly effective for specific, complex tasks where these features are prioritized.

What are the cost implications of its verbosity?

The model's verbosity, indicated by generating 59M tokens during evaluation (compared to an average of 22M), means it tends to produce longer outputs. Since output tokens are charged, this directly translates to higher costs if not managed. Users should employ prompt engineering techniques to guide the model towards more concise responses or implement post-processing to trim unnecessary text.

Can I fine-tune Llama Nemotron Ultra for specific tasks?

As an open-weight model, Llama Nemotron Ultra is designed to be fine-tunable. This allows developers to adapt the model to specific domains, styles, or tasks using their own datasets. Fine-tuning can significantly improve performance for niche applications and potentially reduce token usage by making the model more efficient at generating desired outputs.


Subscribe