Llama Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) is NVIDIA's large open-weight model, designed for complex analytical tasks, offering a substantial context window and competitive pricing through API providers like Nebius Base.
The Llama Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) model, developed by NVIDIA, represents a significant entry into the open-weight large language model landscape. Specifically engineered for complex analytical and reasoning tasks, this model aims to provide robust capabilities for developers and enterprises seeking powerful, flexible AI solutions. Benchmarked on Nebius Base, it demonstrates a balanced profile across performance, intelligence, and cost, making it a compelling option for a variety of applications.
With a substantial 128k token context window, Llama Nemotron Ultra is well-suited for processing and generating extensive content, from detailed code analysis to comprehensive document summarization. Its 'Reasoning' variant emphasizes its design for tasks requiring logical inference and structured problem-solving, positioning it as a valuable tool for advanced AI workflows. While its intelligence index places it slightly below the average for comparable models, its open-weight nature and NVIDIA's backing offer significant advantages in terms of customization and deployment flexibility.
Performance-wise, the model exhibits a median output speed of 37 tokens per second and a latency of 0.72 seconds on Nebius Base. These metrics indicate a solid, though not leading, performance profile. From a cost perspective, Llama Nemotron Ultra offers a moderately priced output token rate at $1.80 per 1M tokens, which is more competitive than the average. However, its input token price of $0.60 per 1M tokens is slightly above average, suggesting a need for careful prompt engineering to optimize costs, especially for input-heavy applications.
Overall, Llama Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) stands out as a capable open-weight model for those prioritizing deep reasoning and large context handling. Its blend of performance, pricing, and the inherent flexibility of an open-weight architecture makes it a strong contender for applications where control, customization, and cost-effectiveness are key considerations, despite some areas for improvement in raw speed and intelligence ranking.
38 (#31 / 51 / 2 out of 4 units)
37 tokens/s
$0.60 per 1M tokens
$1.80 per 1M tokens
59M tokens
0.72 seconds
| Spec | Details |
|---|---|
| Model Name | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 |
| Variant | Reasoning |
| Owner | NVIDIA |
| License | Open |
| Context Window | 128k tokens |
| Input Type | Text |
| Output Type | Text |
| Primary Provider | Nebius Base |
| Blended Price (3:1) | $0.90 / 1M tokens |
| Intelligence Index | 38 (Rank #31/51) |
| Output Speed | 37 tokens/s (Rank #20/51) |
| Input Token Price | $0.60 / 1M tokens (Rank #27/51) |
| Output Token Price | $1.80 / 1M tokens (Rank #24/51) |
When considering Llama Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning), Nebius Base stands out as the benchmarked API provider, offering a direct route to leverage this powerful open-weight model. While the data presented focuses solely on Nebius Base, its performance and pricing metrics provide a solid foundation for evaluating its suitability across various deployment priorities.
For open-weight models, the choice of provider often balances ease of use, managed services, and the flexibility to potentially self-host. Nebius Base offers a managed API experience, abstracting away the complexities of infrastructure while providing access to the model's capabilities.
| Priority | Pick | Why | Tradeoff to accept |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost-Efficiency (Output-Heavy) | Nebius Base | Competitive output token pricing ($1.80/1M) makes it attractive for applications generating significant responses. | Input token price is slightly higher, requiring careful prompt optimization. |
| Reasoning & Complex Tasks | Nebius Base | Direct access to the 'Reasoning' variant, ideal for analytical and problem-solving applications with its large context window. | Intelligence index is below average, potentially requiring more sophisticated prompt engineering. |
| Managed API Access | Nebius Base | Provides a convenient, managed API for deploying and scaling the model without infrastructure overhead. | Limited provider options benchmarked, reducing competitive pricing insights across platforms. |
| Large Context Workloads | Nebius Base | The 128k context window is fully supported, enabling deep analysis of extensive documents and data. | Slower output speed might affect the processing time for very large outputs from long contexts. |
| Open-Weight Foundation | Nebius Base | Offers a pathway to utilize an open-weight model through a reliable API, balancing flexibility with ease of use. | While open-weight, using an API means some control over the underlying infrastructure is abstracted away. |
Note: This analysis is based on benchmark data from Nebius Base. Performance and pricing may vary with other providers or self-hosted deployments.
Understanding the real-world cost implications of Llama Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) requires looking beyond raw token prices. Its performance characteristics, such as verbosity and speed, combined with its pricing structure, dictate how efficiently it handles different types of tasks. Here are a few scenarios illustrating potential costs.
These estimates highlight the importance of optimizing both input and output token usage, especially given the model's slightly higher input price and tendency towards verbosity. Strategic prompt engineering can significantly reduce overall operational expenses.
| Scenario | Input | Output | What it represents | Estimated cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complex Code Review | 50k tokens | 5k tokens | Analyzing a large codebase for bugs, vulnerabilities, and best practices, generating detailed feedback. | $0.039 |
| Legal Document Analysis | 100k tokens | 10k tokens | Summarizing a lengthy legal contract, extracting key clauses and potential risks. | $0.078 |
| Creative Story Generation | 2k tokens | 20k tokens | Generating a detailed narrative draft from a short prompt and character outline. | $0.0372 |
| Customer Support Interaction | 1k tokens | 1k tokens | Responding to a complex customer query, synthesizing information from a knowledge base. | $0.0024 |
| Research Paper Summarization | 80k tokens | 8k tokens | Condensing a scientific paper into an executive summary with key findings. | $0.0624 |
For Llama Nemotron Ultra, tasks with high output token counts benefit from its competitive output pricing, but input-heavy or verbose scenarios demand careful cost management.
Optimizing costs for Llama Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) involves a multi-faceted approach, leveraging its strengths while mitigating its less favorable characteristics. Given its open-weight nature, there are opportunities for deeper optimization beyond typical API usage.
The following strategies focus on maximizing efficiency and minimizing token usage, crucial for a model with slightly higher input costs and a tendency towards verbosity.
Given the model's verbosity and slightly higher input token price, crafting precise and concise prompts is paramount. Avoid overly conversational or vague instructions that might lead to unnecessary input or verbose outputs.
If the model tends to generate more text than needed, implement post-processing steps to trim or filter outputs before they are consumed or stored. This directly reduces output token costs.
For applications that don't require immediate real-time responses, batching multiple requests can improve overall throughput and potentially reduce per-request overhead, especially if the provider offers volume discounts.
While the 128k context window is a powerful feature, using it efficiently is key. Avoid stuffing the context with irrelevant information, as every token costs money.
Llama Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) is a large, open-weight language model developed by NVIDIA. The '253B' refers to its parameter count, and '(Reasoning)' indicates its specialization in tasks requiring logical inference, problem-solving, and complex analysis. It's designed to handle extensive contexts and provide detailed, structured outputs.
The 'Reasoning' variant implies that the model has been specifically trained or fine-tuned to excel at tasks that demand more than just factual recall or simple generation. This includes tasks like logical deduction, mathematical problem-solving, code analysis, and complex data interpretation, where understanding relationships and drawing conclusions are critical.
A 128k token context window is ideal for applications requiring the processing of very long documents or extensive conversational histories. This includes:
The model is described as 'open-weight,' which typically means the model weights are publicly available, allowing for local deployment, fine-tuning, and modification. While not always synonymous with 'open-source' in the strictest sense (which includes the training code and data), it offers significant transparency and flexibility compared to proprietary models.
An intelligence index of 38 places Llama Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 (Reasoning) below the average of 42 for comparable models in the benchmark. This suggests that while capable, it might not consistently outperform top-tier models in raw intelligence benchmarks. However, its specialized 'Reasoning' capabilities and large context window can still make it highly effective for specific, complex tasks where these features are prioritized.
The model's verbosity, indicated by generating 59M tokens during evaluation (compared to an average of 22M), means it tends to produce longer outputs. Since output tokens are charged, this directly translates to higher costs if not managed. Users should employ prompt engineering techniques to guide the model towards more concise responses or implement post-processing to trim unnecessary text.
As an open-weight model, Llama Nemotron Ultra is designed to be fine-tunable. This allows developers to adapt the model to specific domains, styles, or tasks using their own datasets. Fine-tuning can significantly improve performance for niche applications and potentially reduce token usage by making the model more efficient at generating desired outputs.