Mistral Large 2 (Jul) (non-reasoning)

High Context, High Cost, General Purpose Model

Mistral Large 2 (Jul) (non-reasoning)

Mistral Large 2 (Jul) offers a substantial context window but positions itself as a below-average performer in intelligence with a premium price tag, particularly for a non-reasoning model.

Non-ReasoningGeneral PurposeHigh ContextMistral AIJuly 2024 ReleaseAmazon Bedrock

Mistral Large 2 (Jul) emerges as a significant offering from Mistral AI, characterized by its expansive 128k token context window. Released in July 2024, this model is positioned for general-purpose applications, particularly those requiring the processing of large volumes of text. However, initial benchmarks reveal a nuanced performance profile, placing it below average in intelligence compared to its peers, while simultaneously presenting a notably high cost structure.

The model's intelligence, as measured by the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, scores 22 out of a possible 100, ranking it 17th among 33 models evaluated. This places Mistral Large 2 (Jul) in the lower half of the intelligence spectrum, suggesting it may not be the optimal choice for highly complex reasoning tasks. Despite this, its substantial context window could make it suitable for tasks like extensive document summarization, information extraction from long texts, or handling multi-turn conversations where the breadth of information is more critical than deep analytical capabilities.

From a cost perspective, Mistral Large 2 (Jul) is notably expensive. With an input token price of $2.00 per 1M tokens and an output token price of $6.00 per 1M tokens on Amazon Bedrock, it significantly exceeds the average pricing for comparable models. This high cost, coupled with its below-average intelligence, necessitates careful consideration for budget-conscious applications. The blended price, calculated at a 3:1 input-to-output token ratio, stands at $3.00 per 1M tokens, reinforcing its premium positioning.

Performance metrics indicate a median output speed of 29 tokens per second and a latency (time to first token) of 0.46 seconds when deployed on Amazon. While these speeds are respectable, they must be weighed against the model's intelligence and cost. Organizations considering Mistral Large 2 (Jul) should evaluate whether its large context window and moderate speed justify the higher expenditure, especially when alternative models might offer better intelligence-to-cost ratios for specific use cases.

Scoreboard

Intelligence

22 (#17 / 33 / General Purpose Models)

Scores below average on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index. Suitable for tasks where context breadth outweighs reasoning depth.
Output speed

29 tokens/s

Median output speed observed on Amazon Bedrock. Offers consistent throughput for generation tasks.
Input price

$2.00 per 1M tokens

Significantly higher than the average input price for comparable models.
Output price

$6.00 per 1M tokens

Substantially above the average output price, making generation costly.
Verbosity signal

N/A tokens

Verbosity data not available for this model at this time.
Provider latency

0.46 seconds

Time to first token on Amazon Bedrock. Offers a reasonably quick initial response.

Technical specifications

Spec Details
Owner Mistral
License Open
Context Window 128k tokens
Model Type Non-Reasoning
Median Output Speed 29 tokens/s
Latency (TTFT) 0.46 seconds
Input Token Price $2.00 per 1M tokens
Output Token Price $6.00 per 1M tokens
Blended Price (3:1) $3.00 per 1M tokens
Intelligence Index Score 22
Intelligence Rank #17 / 33

What stands out beyond the scoreboard

Where this model wins
  • Expansive Context Window: Its 128k token context window is ideal for processing and understanding very long documents or complex, multi-turn conversations.
  • Mistral Ecosystem Integration: Benefits from Mistral's ongoing development and potential future integrations within their model family.
  • Reliable Provider Access: Available on Amazon Bedrock, offering enterprise-grade infrastructure and support.
  • Consistent Throughput: Achieves a respectable median output speed, ensuring generated content is delivered efficiently.
  • General Purpose Utility: Capable of handling a wide array of common NLP tasks, from summarization to content generation, where deep reasoning is not the primary requirement.
Where costs sneak up
  • High Per-Token Pricing: Both input and output token prices are significantly above average, leading to high operational costs for frequent or large-scale usage.
  • Below-Average Intelligence for Cost: Its intelligence score is modest, meaning users pay a premium for a model that may not excel in complex analytical or reasoning tasks.
  • Inefficient for Short, Complex Queries: For tasks requiring high intelligence on short inputs, the cost-to-performance ratio is unfavorable.
  • Output-Heavy Workloads: The $6.00/1M output token price makes applications that generate substantial amounts of text particularly expensive.
  • Potential for Cheaper Alternatives: For many general tasks, other models might offer similar or better intelligence at a fraction of the cost.

Provider pick

Mistral Large 2 (Jul) is currently benchmarked and available on Amazon Bedrock. Given its specific performance and pricing profile, strategic provider selection is key to optimizing its use.

Priority Pick Why Tradeoff to accept
General Use & High Context Amazon Bedrock Leverage Amazon's robust infrastructure and security for deploying the model, especially for applications requiring its large context window. Higher cost per token compared to alternatives, requiring careful budget management.
Cost-Sensitive Projects Consider alternatives For projects where budget is a primary concern and deep reasoning isn't critical, explore other models with better intelligence-to-cost ratios. May require re-evaluation of model capabilities and potential trade-offs in context window size.
Specific Mistral Features Amazon Bedrock If your application specifically benefits from Mistral's architectural strengths or future ecosystem features, Bedrock provides direct access. Still subject to the model's inherent pricing and intelligence limitations.

Note: Provider recommendations are based on current benchmark data and model availability. Always consider your specific application requirements and conduct your own testing.

Real workloads cost table

Understanding the real-world cost implications of Mistral Large 2 (Jul) requires examining various common LLM workloads. The high per-token prices, especially for output, can quickly accumulate, making cost-efficient design crucial.

Scenario Input Output What it represents Estimated cost
Scenario Input Output What it represents Estimated Cost
Short Q&A 200 tokens 100 tokens Answering a concise question based on a short prompt. $0.00046
Article Summarization 10,000 tokens 500 tokens Condensing a medium-length article into a summary. $0.0230
Content Generation 500 tokens 1,500 tokens Generating a blog post or marketing copy from a detailed prompt. $0.0100
Long Document Analysis 50,000 tokens 1,000 tokens Extracting key insights or data points from an extensive report. $0.1060
Chatbot Interaction (Multi-turn) 2,000 tokens 800 tokens A typical multi-turn conversation with a chatbot. $0.0098
Code Generation (Small) 1,000 tokens 300 tokens Generating a small function or script from a prompt. $0.0038

These examples highlight that while Mistral Large 2 (Jul) can handle diverse tasks, its high token prices mean that even moderately sized workloads can incur significant costs. Output-heavy applications, in particular, will see costs escalate rapidly.

How to control cost (a practical playbook)

To effectively manage costs when using Mistral Large 2 (Jul), a strategic approach is essential. Given its pricing and intelligence profile, optimizing prompts and output generation is paramount.

Minimize Output Tokens

Since output tokens are three times more expensive than input tokens, focus on generating only the necessary information. Use precise instructions to guide the model to produce concise, relevant responses.

  • Instruct the model to be brief and to the point.
  • Specify desired output formats that are compact (e.g., bullet points, short summaries).
  • Avoid open-ended prompts that encourage verbose responses.
Pre-process Inputs for Efficiency

While the context window is large, feeding the model only essential information can reduce input token count and improve relevance, potentially leading to more concise outputs.

  • Summarize or extract key information from long documents before passing them to the model.
  • Remove irrelevant boilerplate text or redundant data from prompts.
  • Use embeddings for semantic search to retrieve only the most relevant context.
Strategic Task Allocation

Given its below-average intelligence for the cost, reserve Mistral Large 2 (Jul) for tasks where its large context window is a distinct advantage, and where deep reasoning is not the primary requirement.

  • Prioritize tasks like long-form summarization, data extraction from extensive documents, or maintaining context in lengthy conversations.
  • For tasks requiring high intelligence or complex reasoning, consider more cost-effective, higher-performing models if available.
Implement Caching Mechanisms

For frequently asked questions or common prompts, cache responses to avoid repeatedly incurring inference costs. This is especially effective for static or semi-static content generation.

  • Store common model outputs in a database or cache.
  • Implement a lookup system before making an API call to the model.
  • Regularly review cached content for freshness and relevance.

FAQ

What is Mistral Large 2 (Jul) best suited for?

Mistral Large 2 (Jul) is best suited for applications requiring a very large context window, such as summarizing extensive documents, analyzing long reports, or managing complex, multi-turn conversations where the breadth of information is more critical than deep analytical reasoning. Its general-purpose nature allows it to handle a variety of NLP tasks.

How does its intelligence compare to other models?

Mistral Large 2 (Jul) scores 22 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it below average among comparable models. This suggests it may not be the optimal choice for highly complex reasoning, problem-solving, or nuanced understanding tasks where other models might offer superior performance.

Is Mistral Large 2 (Jul) cost-effective?

No, Mistral Large 2 (Jul) is considered expensive, with input tokens at $2.00/1M and output tokens at $6.00/1M. Its blended price is $3.00/1M tokens. This high cost, especially for output, means that applications generating significant amounts of text or requiring frequent inferences will incur substantial expenses.

What is the context window size of Mistral Large 2 (Jul)?

Mistral Large 2 (Jul) features an impressive 128k token context window. This allows it to process and retain a vast amount of information within a single interaction, making it highly capable for tasks involving very long inputs or maintaining extensive conversational history.

What are the typical latency and speed metrics?

On Amazon Bedrock, Mistral Large 2 (Jul) exhibits a median output speed of 29 tokens per second and a latency (time to first token) of 0.46 seconds. These metrics indicate a reasonably responsive model capable of consistent generation throughput.

Who owns Mistral Large 2 (Jul) and what is its license?

Mistral Large 2 (Jul) is owned by Mistral AI. The model is available under an Open license, which typically implies more permissive usage terms, though specific details should always be verified with the official Mistral AI documentation.


Subscribe