Mistral Large 3 offers a compelling blend of high intelligence, competitive pricing, and strong performance, making it a versatile choice for a wide range of applications.
Mistral Large 3 emerges as a formidable contender in the large language model landscape, striking an impressive balance across intelligence, speed, and cost-efficiency. Positioned above average in intelligence and reasonably priced compared to other non-reasoning models of similar scale, it offers a compelling package for developers and enterprises. Its capabilities extend to text and image input, generating text outputs, all within a substantial 256k token context window.
Our comprehensive analysis places Mistral Large 3 with a score of 38 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, securing it the 13th position out of 30 models benchmarked. This score signifies an above-average intelligence quotient, surpassing the average model score of 33. During the evaluation of its intelligence, the model demonstrated a concise output, generating 11 million tokens, aligning perfectly with the average verbosity observed across the index.
From a pricing perspective, Mistral Large 3 is highly competitive. Input tokens are priced at $0.50 per 1 million tokens, which is moderately priced against an average of $0.56. Output tokens are set at $1.50 per 1 million tokens, also moderately priced compared to the $1.67 average. The total cost to evaluate Mistral Large 3 on the Intelligence Index amounted to $36.72, underscoring its cost-effectiveness for extensive tasks.
Performance-wise, Mistral Large 3 excels in speed, achieving an output rate of 51 tokens per second, which is notably faster than the average of 45 tokens per second. When it comes to responsiveness, Mistral's direct API offers an impressive latency of just 0.55 seconds to the first token, making it a leader in quick response times. Amazon Bedrock, another key provider, follows closely with a latency of 0.69 seconds.
Provider benchmarking reveals interesting dynamics: Amazon Bedrock stands out for its raw output speed, delivering 77 tokens per second, making it the fastest option for high-throughput scenarios. However, Mistral's own API provides superior latency. Both providers offer identical blended pricing at $0.75 per million tokens, with matching input and output token prices, giving users flexibility based on their specific performance priorities.
38 (13 / 30 / 30)
51.2 tokens/s
$0.50 /M tokens
$1.50 /M tokens
11M tokens
0.55 s
| Spec | Details |
|---|---|
| Owner | Mistral |
| License | Open |
| Context Window | 256k tokens |
| Input Modalities | Text, Image |
| Output Modalities | Text |
| Intelligence Index Score | 38 (out of 100) |
| Intelligence Index Rank | #13 / 30 |
| Average Output Speed | 51.2 tokens/s (Mistral API) |
| Input Token Price | $0.50 / 1M tokens |
| Output Token Price | $1.50 / 1M tokens |
| Average Latency (TTFT) | 0.55s (Mistral API) |
| Evaluation Cost | $36.72 (for Intelligence Index) |
| Model Type | Large Language Model (LLM) |
| Primary Use Case | General-purpose text generation, analysis, summarization |
Choosing the right API provider for Mistral Large 3 can significantly impact your application's performance and cost-efficiency. Our analysis highlights key differences to help you make an informed decision based on your priorities.
| Priority | Pick | Why | Tradeoff to accept |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority | Pick | Why | Tradeoff |
| Maximum Output Speed | Amazon Bedrock | Achieves the fastest output speed at 77 tokens/s, ideal for high-throughput tasks. | Slightly higher latency (0.69s) compared to Mistral's direct API. |
| Lowest Latency (TTFT) | Mistral (Direct API) | Offers the lowest Time To First Token (0.55s), crucial for real-time and interactive applications. | Output speed (51 t/s) is lower than Amazon Bedrock's. |
| Cost-Efficiency | Amazon Bedrock / Mistral | Both providers offer identical blended pricing ($0.75/M tokens) and matching input/output token prices. | Performance characteristics (speed vs. latency) differ, requiring a choice based on other priorities. |
| Balanced Performance | Mistral (Direct API) | Provides a strong balance of low latency and above-average output speed, suitable for general-purpose use. | Not the absolute fastest in either metric, but consistently strong. |
Performance metrics are based on our benchmark tests and may vary with specific workloads, network conditions, and API versions.
Understanding the real-world cost of Mistral Large 3 involves considering typical usage patterns and token consumption. Here are some common scenarios and their estimated costs based on the $0.50/M input and $1.50/M output token prices:
| Scenario | Input | Output | What it represents | Estimated cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scenario | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | What it represents | Estimated Cost |
| Blog Post Generation | 500 | 1,500 | Drafting a medium-length blog post from a prompt. | $0.00025 + $0.00225 = $0.0025 |
| Long Document Summarization | 100,000 | 1,000 | Summarizing a detailed report or research paper. | $0.05 + $0.0015 = $0.0515 |
| Chatbot Interaction (per turn) | 100 | 200 | A single user query and model response in a conversational AI. | $0.00005 + $0.0003 = $0.00035 |
| Image Captioning | 50 (image prompt) | 100 | Generating a concise description for an uploaded image. | $0.000025 + $0.00015 = $0.000175 |
| Code Generation | 2,000 | 500 | Generating a small code snippet or function based on requirements. | $00.001 + $0.00075 = $0.00175 |
| Complex Data Analysis | 50,000 | 5,000 | Analyzing a dataset and generating a detailed summary or insights. | $0.025 + $0.0075 = $0.0325 |
These scenarios illustrate that while input costs are relatively low, extensive output generation and high context window utilization are the primary cost drivers for Mistral Large 3. Strategic prompt engineering and output management are key to cost optimization.
Optimizing your usage of Mistral Large 3 can lead to significant cost savings without sacrificing performance. By understanding the model's pricing structure and capabilities, you can implement strategies to maximize efficiency.
The clearer and more direct your prompts, the less 'thinking' and unnecessary output the model will generate, directly impacting token consumption.
With a 256k context window, it's easy to send large amounts of data. However, every input token costs money.
While pricing is similar, performance varies. Choose your provider based on your primary application requirements.
Since output tokens are more expensive, actively manage the length and content of the model's responses.
For tasks that don't require immediate real-time responses, batching requests can improve overall efficiency.
Mistral Large 3's primary strength lies in its balanced performance across intelligence, speed, and competitive pricing. It offers above-average intelligence, fast output generation, low latency, and a substantial 256k token context window, making it highly versatile.
It scores 38 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it above the average of 33 among comparable models. This indicates strong reasoning and generation capabilities for its class.
The best provider depends on your priority. Amazon Bedrock offers the fastest output speed (77 t/s), while Mistral's direct API provides the lowest latency (0.55s TTFT). Both offer identical competitive pricing, so choose based on whether speed or responsiveness is more critical for your application.
Yes, Mistral Large 3 supports both text and image inputs, allowing for a broader range of applications such as image captioning or visual question answering, with text as the output modality.
Mistral Large 3 boasts a substantial 256k token context window, enabling it to process and generate responses based on very long documents, extensive conversations, or complex datasets.
Absolutely. With its low latency of 0.55 seconds (via Mistral API) and above-average output speed, Mistral Large 3 is well-suited for many real-time use cases, including chatbots, interactive assistants, and dynamic content generation.
To reduce costs, focus on concise prompt engineering to minimize unnecessary output, strategically manage the context window to avoid sending redundant tokens, select the optimal provider based on your performance needs, and implement output filtering or truncation.