Mistral Large 3 (non-reasoning)

Balanced Performance, Competitive Pricing, Multimodal

Mistral Large 3 (non-reasoning)

Mistral Large 3 offers a compelling blend of high intelligence, competitive pricing, and strong performance, making it a versatile choice for a wide range of applications.

IntelligenceSpeedCost-Effective256k ContextMultimodal InputOpen License

Mistral Large 3 emerges as a formidable contender in the large language model landscape, striking an impressive balance across intelligence, speed, and cost-efficiency. Positioned above average in intelligence and reasonably priced compared to other non-reasoning models of similar scale, it offers a compelling package for developers and enterprises. Its capabilities extend to text and image input, generating text outputs, all within a substantial 256k token context window.

Our comprehensive analysis places Mistral Large 3 with a score of 38 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, securing it the 13th position out of 30 models benchmarked. This score signifies an above-average intelligence quotient, surpassing the average model score of 33. During the evaluation of its intelligence, the model demonstrated a concise output, generating 11 million tokens, aligning perfectly with the average verbosity observed across the index.

From a pricing perspective, Mistral Large 3 is highly competitive. Input tokens are priced at $0.50 per 1 million tokens, which is moderately priced against an average of $0.56. Output tokens are set at $1.50 per 1 million tokens, also moderately priced compared to the $1.67 average. The total cost to evaluate Mistral Large 3 on the Intelligence Index amounted to $36.72, underscoring its cost-effectiveness for extensive tasks.

Performance-wise, Mistral Large 3 excels in speed, achieving an output rate of 51 tokens per second, which is notably faster than the average of 45 tokens per second. When it comes to responsiveness, Mistral's direct API offers an impressive latency of just 0.55 seconds to the first token, making it a leader in quick response times. Amazon Bedrock, another key provider, follows closely with a latency of 0.69 seconds.

Provider benchmarking reveals interesting dynamics: Amazon Bedrock stands out for its raw output speed, delivering 77 tokens per second, making it the fastest option for high-throughput scenarios. However, Mistral's own API provides superior latency. Both providers offer identical blended pricing at $0.75 per million tokens, with matching input and output token prices, giving users flexibility based on their specific performance priorities.

Scoreboard

Intelligence

38 (13 / 30 / 30)

Above average intelligence, scoring 38 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.
Output speed

51.2 tokens/s

Faster than average, delivering 51.2 tokens/s (Mistral API). Amazon Bedrock reaches 77 tokens/s.
Input price

$0.50 /M tokens

Moderately priced for input, matching the lowest providers at $0.50/M tokens.
Output price

$1.50 /M tokens

Moderately priced for output, matching the lowest providers at $1.50/M tokens.
Verbosity signal

11M tokens

Fairly concise, generating 11M tokens during intelligence evaluation, matching the average.
Provider latency

0.55 s

Achieves low latency, with Mistral's API offering 0.55s Time To First Token (TTFT).

Technical specifications

Spec Details
Owner Mistral
License Open
Context Window 256k tokens
Input Modalities Text, Image
Output Modalities Text
Intelligence Index Score 38 (out of 100)
Intelligence Index Rank #13 / 30
Average Output Speed 51.2 tokens/s (Mistral API)
Input Token Price $0.50 / 1M tokens
Output Token Price $1.50 / 1M tokens
Average Latency (TTFT) 0.55s (Mistral API)
Evaluation Cost $36.72 (for Intelligence Index)
Model Type Large Language Model (LLM)
Primary Use Case General-purpose text generation, analysis, summarization

What stands out beyond the scoreboard

Where this model wins
  • Strong Overall Intelligence: Scores 38 on the Intelligence Index, placing it above average among comparable models.
  • Competitive Pricing: Offers attractive input ($0.50/M) and output ($1.50/M) token prices, making it cost-effective.
  • Above-Average Output Speed: Delivers 51.2 tokens/s via Mistral API, with Amazon Bedrock reaching 77 tokens/s for high-throughput needs.
  • Excellent Low Latency: Mistral's direct API provides a rapid 0.55s Time To First Token, ideal for real-time applications.
  • Generous Context Window: A substantial 256k token context window supports complex, long-form tasks and detailed analysis.
  • Multimodal Input Capabilities: Supports both text and image inputs, expanding its utility for diverse applications.
Where costs sneak up
  • High Context Window Usage: While powerful, consistently utilizing the full 256k context window can quickly escalate costs due to increased input token consumption.
  • Output Token Dominance: The output token price ($1.50/M) is three times that of input tokens, making verbose outputs a primary cost driver.
  • Provider Performance Trade-offs: Choosing a provider solely on speed (e.g., Amazon Bedrock) might mean slightly higher latency, which could impact user experience in real-time applications.
  • Multimodal Processing Overhead: While versatile, processing image inputs alongside text might incur additional computational costs, even if tokenized similarly.
  • Unoptimized Prompt Engineering: Poorly designed prompts can lead to unnecessary token generation, both input (for clarity) and output (for verbosity), inflating costs.

Provider pick

Choosing the right API provider for Mistral Large 3 can significantly impact your application's performance and cost-efficiency. Our analysis highlights key differences to help you make an informed decision based on your priorities.

Priority Pick Why Tradeoff to accept
Priority Pick Why Tradeoff
Maximum Output Speed Amazon Bedrock Achieves the fastest output speed at 77 tokens/s, ideal for high-throughput tasks. Slightly higher latency (0.69s) compared to Mistral's direct API.
Lowest Latency (TTFT) Mistral (Direct API) Offers the lowest Time To First Token (0.55s), crucial for real-time and interactive applications. Output speed (51 t/s) is lower than Amazon Bedrock's.
Cost-Efficiency Amazon Bedrock / Mistral Both providers offer identical blended pricing ($0.75/M tokens) and matching input/output token prices. Performance characteristics (speed vs. latency) differ, requiring a choice based on other priorities.
Balanced Performance Mistral (Direct API) Provides a strong balance of low latency and above-average output speed, suitable for general-purpose use. Not the absolute fastest in either metric, but consistently strong.

Performance metrics are based on our benchmark tests and may vary with specific workloads, network conditions, and API versions.

Real workloads cost table

Understanding the real-world cost of Mistral Large 3 involves considering typical usage patterns and token consumption. Here are some common scenarios and their estimated costs based on the $0.50/M input and $1.50/M output token prices:

Scenario Input Output What it represents Estimated cost
Scenario Input Tokens Output Tokens What it represents Estimated Cost
Blog Post Generation 500 1,500 Drafting a medium-length blog post from a prompt. $0.00025 + $0.00225 = $0.0025
Long Document Summarization 100,000 1,000 Summarizing a detailed report or research paper. $0.05 + $0.0015 = $0.0515
Chatbot Interaction (per turn) 100 200 A single user query and model response in a conversational AI. $0.00005 + $0.0003 = $0.00035
Image Captioning 50 (image prompt) 100 Generating a concise description for an uploaded image. $0.000025 + $0.00015 = $0.000175
Code Generation 2,000 500 Generating a small code snippet or function based on requirements. $00.001 + $0.00075 = $0.00175
Complex Data Analysis 50,000 5,000 Analyzing a dataset and generating a detailed summary or insights. $0.025 + $0.0075 = $0.0325

These scenarios illustrate that while input costs are relatively low, extensive output generation and high context window utilization are the primary cost drivers for Mistral Large 3. Strategic prompt engineering and output management are key to cost optimization.

How to control cost (a practical playbook)

Optimizing your usage of Mistral Large 3 can lead to significant cost savings without sacrificing performance. By understanding the model's pricing structure and capabilities, you can implement strategies to maximize efficiency.

Concise Prompt Engineering

The clearer and more direct your prompts, the less 'thinking' and unnecessary output the model will generate, directly impacting token consumption.

  • Be specific about the desired output format and length.
  • Use examples (few-shot prompting) to guide the model precisely.
  • Avoid open-ended questions that encourage verbose responses unless explicitly needed.
Strategic Context Window Management

With a 256k context window, it's easy to send large amounts of data. However, every input token costs money.

  • Summarize previous turns in a conversation rather than sending the entire history.
  • Only include relevant information in the prompt; prune unnecessary details.
  • Implement sliding window techniques for long conversations or documents to keep context fresh and minimal.
Provider Selection for Specific Needs

While pricing is similar, performance varies. Choose your provider based on your primary application requirements.

  • For high-throughput batch processing, Amazon Bedrock's higher output speed might be more cost-effective due to faster completion times.
  • For real-time, interactive applications, Mistral's lower latency API could provide a better user experience, indirectly saving costs by reducing user wait times.
Output Filtering and Truncation

Since output tokens are more expensive, actively manage the length and content of the model's responses.

  • Specify maximum output token limits in your API calls.
  • Implement post-processing to trim or summarize model outputs if they exceed your requirements.
  • Guide the model to provide only the essential information, e.g., "Provide a 3-sentence summary."
Batch Processing for Efficiency

For tasks that don't require immediate real-time responses, batching requests can improve overall efficiency.

  • Combine multiple smaller prompts into a single, larger request where appropriate.
  • This can sometimes lead to better utilization of API resources and potentially lower effective costs per token, especially for providers optimized for throughput.

FAQ

What is Mistral Large 3's primary strength?

Mistral Large 3's primary strength lies in its balanced performance across intelligence, speed, and competitive pricing. It offers above-average intelligence, fast output generation, low latency, and a substantial 256k token context window, making it highly versatile.

How does its intelligence compare to other models?

It scores 38 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it above the average of 33 among comparable models. This indicates strong reasoning and generation capabilities for its class.

Which API provider is best for Mistral Large 3?

The best provider depends on your priority. Amazon Bedrock offers the fastest output speed (77 t/s), while Mistral's direct API provides the lowest latency (0.55s TTFT). Both offer identical competitive pricing, so choose based on whether speed or responsiveness is more critical for your application.

Can Mistral Large 3 handle multimodal inputs?

Yes, Mistral Large 3 supports both text and image inputs, allowing for a broader range of applications such as image captioning or visual question answering, with text as the output modality.

What is the context window size for Mistral Large 3?

Mistral Large 3 boasts a substantial 256k token context window, enabling it to process and generate responses based on very long documents, extensive conversations, or complex datasets.

Is Mistral Large 3 suitable for real-time applications?

Absolutely. With its low latency of 0.55 seconds (via Mistral API) and above-average output speed, Mistral Large 3 is well-suited for many real-time use cases, including chatbots, interactive assistants, and dynamic content generation.

How can I reduce costs when using Mistral Large 3?

To reduce costs, focus on concise prompt engineering to minimize unnecessary output, strategically manage the context window to avoid sending redundant tokens, select the optimal provider based on your performance needs, and implement output filtering or truncation.


Subscribe