Mistral Medium offers a solid balance of speed and cost-effectiveness for non-reasoning tasks, though its intelligence ranks lower than many peers.
Mistral Medium positions itself as a capable workhorse for a variety of general-purpose language tasks. While not designed for complex reasoning, it excels in areas where speed, a generous context window, and a balanced cost structure are paramount. This model is a strong contender for applications requiring efficient text generation, summarization, and data extraction without the need for advanced analytical capabilities.
Performance-wise, Mistral Medium demonstrates impressive efficiency. It achieves a median output speed of 76 tokens per second, significantly faster than the average of 59 tokens/s observed across benchmarked models. This makes it well-suited for high-throughput applications where rapid content delivery is crucial. Furthermore, its low latency of 0.41 seconds (time to first token) ensures a responsive user experience, making it a viable choice for interactive applications like chatbots or real-time content generation.
From a pricing perspective, Mistral Medium presents a mixed but generally competitive picture. Its input token price of $2.75 per 1 million tokens is somewhat higher than the average of $2.00, suggesting careful prompt engineering can yield cost savings. However, its output token price of $8.10 per 1 million tokens is moderately priced, falling below the average of $10.00. The blended price, calculated at a 3:1 input-to-output ratio, stands at $4.09 per 1 million tokens, offering a reasonable overall cost for many common use cases.
With an Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index score of 8, Mistral Medium is categorized among the least intelligent models, ranking 53rd out of 54. This clearly indicates its focus on non-reasoning tasks. However, it compensates with a substantial 33,000-token context window, allowing it to process and generate content based on extensive input. This makes it effective for tasks that require understanding and summarizing large documents, despite its lower reasoning capabilities.
8 (53 / 54)
76 tokens/s
$2.75 per 1M tokens
$8.10 per 1M tokens
N/A units
0.41 seconds
| Spec | Details |
|---|---|
| Owner | Mistral |
| License | Proprietary |
| Context Window | 33,000 tokens |
| Model Type | Non-Reasoning |
| Primary Use Case | General text generation, summarization, data extraction |
| API Provider | Mistral |
| Input Token Price | $2.75 / 1M tokens |
| Output Token Price | $8.10 / 1M tokens |
| Blended Price (3:1) | $4.09 / 1M tokens |
| Median Output Speed | 76 tokens/s |
| Median Latency | 0.41 seconds |
| Intelligence Index Score | 8 |
| Intelligence Rank | #53 / 54 |
Mistral Medium is exclusively offered via Mistral's API, meaning the choice isn't between providers, but rather how to best leverage Mistral's API for your specific needs. The following considerations help optimize its use or determine when to consider alternative models.
| Priority | Pick | Why | Tradeoff to accept |
|---|---|---|---|
| Balanced Performance | Mistral API (Standard) | Direct access to the model, optimized for general use cases. | Standard pricing applies; requires careful prompt engineering. |
| Cost Optimization | Mistral API (Batch Processing) | Group multiple smaller requests into one larger API call to reduce overhead and potentially lower overall cost for high volume. | Increased latency for individual requests; requires application-level batching logic. |
| Low Latency | Mistral API (Regional Endpoint) | Choose the closest available Mistral API endpoint to minimize network delay for time-sensitive applications. | May incur regional data transfer costs or require specific infrastructure setup. |
| High Throughput | Mistral API (Concurrent Requests) | Scale parallel requests within Mistral's rate limits to process large datasets or user loads faster. | Requires careful management of API rate limits, error handling, and resource allocation. |
| Advanced Reasoning | Consider Alternative Models/Providers | Mistral Medium is not designed for complex reasoning; for such tasks, explore models from other providers with higher intelligence scores. | Potentially higher per-token costs or different performance profiles with alternative models. |
The optimal approach depends heavily on your application's specific requirements for speed, cost, and complexity. Always benchmark with your actual workloads.
Understanding the real-world cost implications of Mistral Medium requires looking at typical usage scenarios. Below are estimated costs for common tasks, based on its input and output token pricing.
| Scenario | Input | Output | What it represents | Estimated cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Summarize a Long Document | 10,000 | 1,000 | Information extraction, content condensation from extensive text. | $0.0356 |
| Generate Marketing Copy | 100 | 500 | Creative content generation for ads, social media, or product descriptions. | $0.0043 |
| Simple Chatbot Interaction | 50 | 150 | Basic Q&A, conversational AI for customer support or information retrieval. | $0.0014 |
| Data Extraction from Structured Text | 500 | 200 | Parsing logs, extracting entities from emails, or structured data from reports. | $0.0030 |
| Translate a Short Article | 2,000 | 2,500 | Language translation for localization or cross-cultural communication. | $0.0258 |
These examples illustrate that while individual interactions can be very affordable, costs can quickly accumulate with high volumes or extensive input documents. Optimizing prompt length and output verbosity is key to managing expenses with Mistral Medium.
To maximize cost-efficiency when using Mistral Medium, strategic planning and continuous optimization are essential. Here are key strategies to keep your expenses in check without compromising performance.
Since input tokens are relatively expensive, crafting concise and effective prompts is crucial. Avoid unnecessary preamble or verbose instructions.
The 33k context window is powerful, but filling it unnecessarily increases input costs. Only include information truly relevant to the task.
For applications with many small, independent tasks, batching requests can reduce API call overhead and potentially optimize processing.
Understand how your specific use case's input-to-output token ratio compares to the 3:1 blended pricing assumption. Adjust strategies accordingly.
While output tokens are moderately priced, generating overly verbose responses can still add up. Guide the model to be concise.
Mistral Medium is best suited for non-reasoning tasks such as summarization, content generation, data extraction, and simple Q&A. Its strengths lie in its speed, moderate cost, and large context window, making it ideal for high-throughput applications where complex analytical capabilities are not required.
It scores 8 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it among the lower-tier models. This means it's not designed for tasks requiring deep reasoning, complex problem-solving, or intricate logical deductions, unlike more advanced reasoning-focused models.
No, Mistral Medium's lower intelligence score indicates it is not optimized for complex problem-solving, mathematical challenges, or intricate logical tasks. For such applications, you would typically need to consider models with higher intelligence benchmarks.
Mistral Medium features a substantial 33,000 token context window. This allows it to process and generate content based on relatively long documents or extensive conversational histories, making it versatile for tasks requiring broad contextual understanding.
Its input tokens are somewhat expensive at $2.75 per 1 million tokens, while output tokens are moderately priced at $8.10 per 1 million tokens. This results in a blended price of $4.09 per 1 million tokens (based on a 3:1 input-to-output ratio), offering a balanced cost for many common use cases.
Mistral Medium is a proprietary model offered exclusively via Mistral's API. Self-hosting is not an option for this specific model, meaning access and usage are managed through Mistral's cloud infrastructure.
Mistral Medium boasts a median output speed of 76 tokens per second. This performance is faster than the average for benchmarked models, making it an efficient choice for applications that require rapid text generation and high throughput.