Mistral Medium (non-reasoning)

Balanced Performance, Moderate Cost

Mistral Medium (non-reasoning)

Mistral Medium offers a solid balance of speed and cost-effectiveness for non-reasoning tasks, though its intelligence ranks lower than many peers.

Non-Reasoning76 tokens/s33k ContextModerate PriceMistral APIProprietary

Mistral Medium positions itself as a capable workhorse for a variety of general-purpose language tasks. While not designed for complex reasoning, it excels in areas where speed, a generous context window, and a balanced cost structure are paramount. This model is a strong contender for applications requiring efficient text generation, summarization, and data extraction without the need for advanced analytical capabilities.

Performance-wise, Mistral Medium demonstrates impressive efficiency. It achieves a median output speed of 76 tokens per second, significantly faster than the average of 59 tokens/s observed across benchmarked models. This makes it well-suited for high-throughput applications where rapid content delivery is crucial. Furthermore, its low latency of 0.41 seconds (time to first token) ensures a responsive user experience, making it a viable choice for interactive applications like chatbots or real-time content generation.

From a pricing perspective, Mistral Medium presents a mixed but generally competitive picture. Its input token price of $2.75 per 1 million tokens is somewhat higher than the average of $2.00, suggesting careful prompt engineering can yield cost savings. However, its output token price of $8.10 per 1 million tokens is moderately priced, falling below the average of $10.00. The blended price, calculated at a 3:1 input-to-output ratio, stands at $4.09 per 1 million tokens, offering a reasonable overall cost for many common use cases.

With an Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index score of 8, Mistral Medium is categorized among the least intelligent models, ranking 53rd out of 54. This clearly indicates its focus on non-reasoning tasks. However, it compensates with a substantial 33,000-token context window, allowing it to process and generate content based on extensive input. This makes it effective for tasks that require understanding and summarizing large documents, despite its lower reasoning capabilities.

Scoreboard

Intelligence

8 (53 / 54)

Ranks at the lower end among comparable models, averaging 30 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.
Output speed

76 tokens/s

Faster than the average model speed of 59 tokens/s, offering good throughput for generation tasks.
Input price

$2.75 per 1M tokens

Somewhat expensive compared to the average input price of $2.00 per 1M tokens.
Output price

$8.10 per 1M tokens

Moderately priced, below the average output token cost of $10.00 per 1M tokens.
Verbosity signal

N/A units

Data on verbosity is not available for this model, making direct comparison difficult.
Provider latency

0.41 seconds

Achieves a low time to first token, indicating responsiveness for interactive applications.

Technical specifications

Spec Details
Owner Mistral
License Proprietary
Context Window 33,000 tokens
Model Type Non-Reasoning
Primary Use Case General text generation, summarization, data extraction
API Provider Mistral
Input Token Price $2.75 / 1M tokens
Output Token Price $8.10 / 1M tokens
Blended Price (3:1) $4.09 / 1M tokens
Median Output Speed 76 tokens/s
Median Latency 0.41 seconds
Intelligence Index Score 8
Intelligence Rank #53 / 54

What stands out beyond the scoreboard

Where this model wins
  • Excellent output speed for its class, enabling high-throughput applications.
  • Competitive output token pricing, making generation tasks more cost-effective.
  • Low latency ensures responsiveness, ideal for interactive user experiences.
  • Generous 33,000-token context window for processing extensive documents.
  • Well-suited for non-reasoning tasks like summarization, content generation, and data extraction.
Where costs sneak up
  • Higher input token price means inefficient prompting can quickly escalate costs.
  • Lower intelligence score indicates it may struggle with complex reasoning, leading to more retries or longer prompts.
  • Not ideal for tasks requiring deep analytical capabilities or intricate problem-solving.
  • Proprietary license limits deployment flexibility and vendor lock-in is a consideration.
  • Blended pricing can be misleading if your specific input/output token ratio deviates significantly from 3:1.

Provider pick

Mistral Medium is exclusively offered via Mistral's API, meaning the choice isn't between providers, but rather how to best leverage Mistral's API for your specific needs. The following considerations help optimize its use or determine when to consider alternative models.

Priority Pick Why Tradeoff to accept
Balanced Performance Mistral API (Standard) Direct access to the model, optimized for general use cases. Standard pricing applies; requires careful prompt engineering.
Cost Optimization Mistral API (Batch Processing) Group multiple smaller requests into one larger API call to reduce overhead and potentially lower overall cost for high volume. Increased latency for individual requests; requires application-level batching logic.
Low Latency Mistral API (Regional Endpoint) Choose the closest available Mistral API endpoint to minimize network delay for time-sensitive applications. May incur regional data transfer costs or require specific infrastructure setup.
High Throughput Mistral API (Concurrent Requests) Scale parallel requests within Mistral's rate limits to process large datasets or user loads faster. Requires careful management of API rate limits, error handling, and resource allocation.
Advanced Reasoning Consider Alternative Models/Providers Mistral Medium is not designed for complex reasoning; for such tasks, explore models from other providers with higher intelligence scores. Potentially higher per-token costs or different performance profiles with alternative models.

The optimal approach depends heavily on your application's specific requirements for speed, cost, and complexity. Always benchmark with your actual workloads.

Real workloads cost table

Understanding the real-world cost implications of Mistral Medium requires looking at typical usage scenarios. Below are estimated costs for common tasks, based on its input and output token pricing.

Scenario Input Output What it represents Estimated cost
Summarize a Long Document 10,000 1,000 Information extraction, content condensation from extensive text. $0.0356
Generate Marketing Copy 100 500 Creative content generation for ads, social media, or product descriptions. $0.0043
Simple Chatbot Interaction 50 150 Basic Q&A, conversational AI for customer support or information retrieval. $0.0014
Data Extraction from Structured Text 500 200 Parsing logs, extracting entities from emails, or structured data from reports. $0.0030
Translate a Short Article 2,000 2,500 Language translation for localization or cross-cultural communication. $0.0258

These examples illustrate that while individual interactions can be very affordable, costs can quickly accumulate with high volumes or extensive input documents. Optimizing prompt length and output verbosity is key to managing expenses with Mistral Medium.

How to control cost (a practical playbook)

To maximize cost-efficiency when using Mistral Medium, strategic planning and continuous optimization are essential. Here are key strategies to keep your expenses in check without compromising performance.

Optimize Input Prompts

Since input tokens are relatively expensive, crafting concise and effective prompts is crucial. Avoid unnecessary preamble or verbose instructions.

  • Be direct and specific in your requests.
  • Use few-shot examples sparingly, only when necessary for quality.
  • Pre-process input text to remove irrelevant information before sending it to the model.
Leverage the Context Window Wisely

The 33k context window is powerful, but filling it unnecessarily increases input costs. Only include information truly relevant to the task.

  • Dynamically manage context to include only the most recent or pertinent conversation history.
  • Summarize previous turns in a conversation to reduce token count for ongoing context.
  • Employ retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to fetch only relevant snippets, rather than passing entire documents.
Batch Requests for Efficiency

For applications with many small, independent tasks, batching requests can reduce API call overhead and potentially optimize processing.

  • Combine multiple summarization tasks or content generation prompts into a single API call.
  • Ensure your application logic can handle the aggregated input and parse the combined output effectively.
  • Be mindful of potential latency increases for individual items within a batch.
Monitor Input/Output Ratios

Understand how your specific use case's input-to-output token ratio compares to the 3:1 blended pricing assumption. Adjust strategies accordingly.

  • If your tasks are heavily input-bound, focus more on input token reduction.
  • If output-heavy, ensure the model's verbosity is controlled to avoid excessive output tokens.
  • Regularly analyze your actual token usage patterns to identify areas for improvement.
Control Output Verbosity

While output tokens are moderately priced, generating overly verbose responses can still add up. Guide the model to be concise.

  • Explicitly instruct the model on desired output length (e.g., "summarize in 3 sentences").
  • Use parameters like `max_tokens` to cap response length, though this can sometimes truncate responses.
  • Iterate on prompts to find the sweet spot between informative and concise output.

FAQ

What is Mistral Medium best suited for?

Mistral Medium is best suited for non-reasoning tasks such as summarization, content generation, data extraction, and simple Q&A. Its strengths lie in its speed, moderate cost, and large context window, making it ideal for high-throughput applications where complex analytical capabilities are not required.

How does its intelligence compare to other models?

It scores 8 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it among the lower-tier models. This means it's not designed for tasks requiring deep reasoning, complex problem-solving, or intricate logical deductions, unlike more advanced reasoning-focused models.

Is Mistral Medium good for complex problem-solving?

No, Mistral Medium's lower intelligence score indicates it is not optimized for complex problem-solving, mathematical challenges, or intricate logical tasks. For such applications, you would typically need to consider models with higher intelligence benchmarks.

What is its context window size?

Mistral Medium features a substantial 33,000 token context window. This allows it to process and generate content based on relatively long documents or extensive conversational histories, making it versatile for tasks requiring broad contextual understanding.

How does its pricing compare?

Its input tokens are somewhat expensive at $2.75 per 1 million tokens, while output tokens are moderately priced at $8.10 per 1 million tokens. This results in a blended price of $4.09 per 1 million tokens (based on a 3:1 input-to-output ratio), offering a balanced cost for many common use cases.

Can I self-host Mistral Medium?

Mistral Medium is a proprietary model offered exclusively via Mistral's API. Self-hosting is not an option for this specific model, meaning access and usage are managed through Mistral's cloud infrastructure.

What is its typical speed?

Mistral Medium boasts a median output speed of 76 tokens per second. This performance is faster than the average for benchmarked models, making it an efficient choice for applications that require rapid text generation and high throughput.


Subscribe