Mistral Small 3.1 offers a compelling balance of speed, intelligence, and cost-efficiency for general-purpose text generation and analysis tasks, supporting multimodal input.
Mistral Small 3.1 emerges as a highly competitive model in the landscape of general-purpose language models, striking an impressive balance between performance, intelligence, and cost. Positioned above average in intelligence for its class, it distinguishes itself with remarkable speed and conciseness, making it an excellent choice for applications requiring efficient and direct responses. Its ability to process both text and image inputs, coupled with a substantial 128k token context window, further enhances its versatility across a wide array of use cases.
Our comprehensive analysis places Mistral Small 3.1 at a score of 25 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, significantly outperforming the average of 20 for comparable models. This score reflects its robust understanding and generation capabilities, demonstrating a strong aptitude for complex tasks without being classified as a dedicated 'reasoning' model. A notable characteristic observed during this evaluation was its exceptional conciseness; it generated only 6.3 million tokens to achieve its intelligence score, a stark contrast to the average of 13 million tokens, indicating highly efficient and focused output generation.
From a pricing perspective, Mistral Small 3.1 presents a mixed but generally favorable profile. Input tokens are priced at a competitive $0.10 per 1 million tokens, aligning perfectly with the market average and making it an economical choice for processing large inputs. Output tokens, however, are priced at $0.30 per 1 million tokens, which is somewhat above the average of $0.20. Despite this, the model's overall cost-effectiveness is bolstered by its conciseness, which naturally reduces the total number of output tokens generated. The total cost to evaluate Mistral Small 3.1 on the Intelligence Index was $8.47, reflecting its efficiency.
Speed is another area where Mistral Small 3.1 truly shines. Operating at an impressive 119 tokens per second, it significantly surpasses the average model speed of 93 tokens per second. This high output velocity ensures that applications leveraging Mistral Small 3.1 can deliver rapid responses, crucial for interactive user experiences and time-sensitive processing. The combination of above-average intelligence, superior speed, and efficient output generation positions Mistral Small 3.1 as a powerful and practical solution for developers and businesses seeking high-performance language AI.
25 (19 / 55 / 3 / 4 units)
118.6 tokens/s
$0.10 /M tokens
$0.30 /M tokens
6.3M tokens
0.16s TTFT
| Spec | Details |
|---|---|
| Owner | Mistral |
| License | Open |
| Context Window | 128k tokens |
| Input Modalities | Text, Image |
| Output Modalities | Text |
| Model Type | General Purpose LLM |
| Intelligence Index Score | 25 |
| Output Speed | 118.6 tokens/s |
| Input Token Price | $0.10 / 1M tokens |
| Output Token Price | $0.30 / 1M tokens |
| Conciseness | 6.3M tokens (Intelligence Index) |
| Multilingual Support | Yes (implied) |
Choosing the right API provider for Mistral Small 3.1 is crucial, as performance and cost metrics can vary significantly. Our benchmarking reveals distinct advantages for different priorities, allowing you to optimize for speed, latency, or cost-effectiveness.
| Priority | Pick | Why | Tradeoff to accept |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority | Pick | Why | Tradeoff |
| Lowest Latency | Google Vertex | Achieves the fastest Time-To-First-Token (0.16s), critical for real-time interactions. | Slightly higher blended price than CompactifAI. |
| Highest Output Speed | Google Vertex | Delivers the highest output tokens per second (160 t/s), maximizing throughput. | Similar to latency, a minor price premium compared to the absolute cheapest. |
| Best Blended Price | CompactifAI | Offers the most cost-effective blended price ($0.13/M tokens), balancing input and output costs. | Lower output speed (70 t/s) and slightly higher latency (0.28s) than Google Vertex. |
| Lowest Input Price | Mistral / Google Vertex | Both offer the lowest input token price ($0.10/M tokens). | Mistral has lower output speed; Google Vertex has a higher output token price. |
| Lowest Output Price | CompactifAI | Provides the cheapest output tokens ($0.17/M tokens), ideal for output-heavy tasks. | Compromise on speed and latency compared to top performers. |
| Balanced Performance | Mistral | Good balance across speed (119 t/s), latency (0.29s), and competitive pricing ($0.15/M blended). | Not the absolute best in any single category, but consistently strong. |
Note: Performance metrics and pricing are subject to change and may vary based on region, specific API configurations, and workload characteristics. Always verify current rates and performance with providers.
Understanding the real-world cost implications of Mistral Small 3.1 requires looking beyond raw token prices and considering typical usage patterns. The following scenarios illustrate estimated costs for common applications, assuming a blended price of $0.15 per million tokens (based on Mistral's own offering) for simplicity, though provider choice will impact actual costs.
| Scenario | Input | Output | What it represents | Estimated cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scenario | Input | Output | What it represents | Estimated Cost (per 1000 interactions) |
| Short Q&A / Chatbot | 200 tokens | 50 tokens | Quick, concise user queries and responses. | $0.000375 |
| Email Summarization | 1,000 tokens | 150 tokens | Summarizing a medium-length email or document snippet. | $0.001725 |
| Content Generation (Short) | 50 tokens | 500 tokens | Generating a short article, social media post, or product description. | $0.000825 |
| Long Document Analysis | 50,000 tokens | 200 tokens | Extracting key insights or answering questions from a large document. | $0.0753 |
| Customer Support Ticket Analysis | 2,000 tokens | 100 tokens | Categorizing or summarizing customer support interactions. | $0.00315 |
| Code Explanation | 5,000 tokens | 300 tokens | Explaining a block of code or generating documentation. | $0.00795 |
These scenarios highlight that Mistral Small 3.1 is highly cost-effective for short, frequent interactions and even for processing moderately long inputs. Its conciseness helps mitigate the slightly higher output token price, making it a strong contender for applications where efficiency and speed are paramount.
Optimizing costs for Mistral Small 3.1 involves strategic choices across prompt engineering, provider selection, and usage patterns. Implementing these tactics can significantly reduce your operational expenses while maintaining high performance.
While Mistral Small 3.1 has a large context window, every input token costs money. Design prompts to be as concise and effective as possible without sacrificing necessary context.
As shown in our provider analysis, the choice of API provider dramatically impacts both cost and performance. Match your provider to your primary objective.
Mistral Small 3.1 is inherently concise, but you can further control output to manage costs, especially given its slightly higher output token price.
max_tokens parameter in your API calls to prevent unnecessarily long generations.For non-real-time applications, batching multiple independent requests into a single API call can sometimes reduce overhead and improve efficiency, though this depends on the provider's API design.
If your application frequently asks the same or very similar questions, implementing a caching layer can eliminate redundant API calls and save significant costs.
Mistral Small 3.1 is a general-purpose language model developed by Mistral AI. It is designed for a wide range of text generation and analysis tasks, offering a strong balance of intelligence, speed, and cost-efficiency. It also supports multimodal input, meaning it can process both text and images.
Mistral Small 3.1 scores 25 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it above average among comparable models (average of 20). This indicates robust comprehension and generation capabilities, making it highly effective for many complex tasks, though it's not specifically categorized as a 'reasoning' model.
Its primary strengths include exceptional output speed (119 tokens/s), above-average intelligence, highly concise outputs (reducing token usage), competitive input token pricing, a large 128k token context window, and multimodal input capabilities (text and image).
While input tokens are competitively priced, output tokens are slightly above average ($0.30/M). This means applications with very high output generation might see higher costs. However, its conciseness often mitigates this by reducing the total number of output tokens needed.
Yes, Mistral Small 3.1 supports multimodal input, allowing it to process both text and image data. This expands its utility for applications that require understanding or generating content based on visual information.
Mistral Small 3.1 features a substantial 128k token context window. This allows it to process and maintain context over very long documents or extended conversational histories, making it suitable for complex tasks requiring broad contextual understanding.
The best provider depends on your priority. Google Vertex offers the lowest latency and highest output speed. CompactifAI provides the best blended and lowest output token prices. Mistral's own API offers a strong, balanced performance across speed, latency, and cost. It's recommended to evaluate providers based on your specific application's needs.
Yes, its high output speed (119 tokens/s) and excellent time-to-first-token (as low as 0.16s with top providers) make Mistral Small 3.1 highly suitable for real-time applications such as chatbots, interactive assistants, and dynamic content generation where quick responses are critical.