Mistral Small 3 offers a compelling balance of speed and above-average intelligence, making it a strong contender for high-throughput applications where cost-efficiency is key, especially when paired with the right provider.
Mistral Small 3 emerges as a highly competitive model in the landscape of efficient, general-purpose language models. Positioned above average in intelligence with a score of 21 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, it demonstrates a solid understanding and generation capability for a wide array of tasks. Its most striking feature is its exceptional speed, clocking in at an average of 222.7 tokens per second, making it one of the fastest models available for high-volume processing.
While its raw output token pricing can appear somewhat expensive at $0.30 per 1M tokens on average, a deeper dive into provider-specific benchmarks reveals significant opportunities for cost optimization. Providers like Deepinfra offer highly competitive rates, bringing the blended price down to as low as $0.06 per 1M tokens. This variability underscores the importance of strategic provider selection to fully leverage Mistral Small 3's potential without incurring prohibitive costs.
With a generous 32k token context window, Mistral Small 3 is well-suited for applications requiring substantial input or generating longer outputs, from detailed content creation to complex summarization tasks. Its 'open' license further enhances its appeal, offering flexibility for integration into diverse commercial and research projects. This model is particularly strong for use cases prioritizing rapid response and high throughput, such as real-time chatbots, dynamic content generation, and efficient data processing pipelines, provided the right provider is chosen to align with specific performance and budget requirements.
21 (#27 / 55 / 3 out of 4 units)
222.7 tokens/s
$0.10 per 1M tokens
$0.30 per 1M tokens
N/A
0.23s seconds (TTFT)
| Spec | Details |
|---|---|
| Owner | Mistral |
| License | Open |
| Context Window | 32k tokens |
| Input Type | Text |
| Output Type | Text |
| Intelligence Index Score | 21 (Above Average) |
| Average Output Speed | 222.7 tokens/s |
| Average Input Price | $0.10 / 1M tokens |
| Average Output Price | $0.30 / 1M tokens |
| Fastest Provider (Output) | Mistral (190 t/s) |
| Lowest Latency Provider | Together.ai (0.23s TTFT) |
| Most Cost-Effective Provider (Blended) | Deepinfra ($0.06 / 1M tokens) |
| Model Type | Small, General Purpose |
Choosing the right API provider for Mistral Small 3 is crucial, as performance and cost metrics vary significantly. Your optimal choice will depend heavily on whether your primary concern is raw speed, minimal latency, or the lowest possible cost.
The benchmarks reveal a diverse landscape, with each provider offering a distinct advantage. Understanding these trade-offs is key to maximizing the model's efficiency for your specific application.
| Priority | Pick | Why | Tradeoff to accept |
|---|---|---|---|
| Output Speed Priority | Mistral | Mistral offers the fastest raw output speed at 190 t/s, ensuring rapid content generation. | Slightly higher latency (0.35s) and moderate blended price ($0.15/M). |
| Lowest Latency Priority | Together.ai | Together.ai provides the lowest time to first token (TTFT) at 0.23s, ideal for interactive applications. | Significantly higher blended price ($0.80/M) and slower output speed (93 t/s). |
| Cost-Effectiveness (Blended) | Deepinfra | Deepinfra boasts the lowest blended price at $0.06 per 1M tokens, making it the most economical choice overall. | Slower output speed (46 t/s) and slightly higher latency (0.25s) compared to Together.ai. |
| Input Price Focus | Deepinfra | Deepinfra offers the lowest input token price at $0.05 per 1M tokens, beneficial for input-heavy tasks. | Trade-offs similar to overall cost-effectiveness: slower output speed. |
| Balanced Performance | Mistral | Mistral provides a good balance of decent speed (190 t/s), moderate latency (0.35s), and a reasonable blended price ($0.15/M). | Not the absolute best in any single metric, but a solid all-rounder. |
Note: Prices and performance metrics are subject to change and may vary based on specific usage patterns and API versions. Always verify current rates and benchmarks.
To illustrate the practical implications of Mistral Small 3's pricing and performance, let's examine its estimated costs across several common real-world scenarios. We'll use Deepinfra's highly cost-effective pricing ($0.05/1M input, $0.08/1M output) as a benchmark for optimized deployment.
These examples highlight how even with a model of above-average intelligence and high speed, careful cost management through provider selection can lead to extremely efficient operations.
| Scenario | Input | Output | What it represents | Estimated cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short Query/Command | 100 tokens | 50 tokens | Quick user interaction, simple request. | ~$0.000009 |
| Content Generation (Short Article) | 500 tokens | 1,000 tokens | Generating a blog post or product description. | ~$0.000105 |
| Document Summarization | 5,000 tokens | 200 tokens | Condensing a lengthy report or article. | ~$0.000266 |
| Chatbot Interaction (Per Turn) | 200 tokens | 200 tokens | A single back-and-forth exchange in a conversational AI. | ~$0.000026 |
| Data Extraction/Formatting | 1,000 tokens | 300 tokens | Extracting key information from unstructured text. | ~$0.000074 |
| Long-form Content (Chapter) | 2,000 tokens | 5,000 tokens | Generating a significant piece of creative or technical writing. | ~$0.000500 |
These examples demonstrate that with an optimized provider like Deepinfra, Mistral Small 3 can be incredibly cost-effective for a wide range of applications, from micro-interactions to substantial content generation. The per-request costs are remarkably low, making it suitable for high-volume deployments.
Optimizing the cost of using Mistral Small 3 involves more than just picking the cheapest provider. A strategic approach combines provider selection with smart prompt engineering and output management. Here are key strategies to keep your expenses in check while maximizing performance.
The most impactful decision for cost optimization is choosing the right API provider. As seen in the benchmarks, prices vary wildly.
The way you construct your prompts directly impacts input token count and, consequently, cost.
Managing the length and content of the model's output is critical, especially given that output tokens can be more expensive.
max_tokens parameter to prevent the model from generating excessively long responses.For certain workloads, batching requests and caching common responses can significantly reduce API calls and costs.
Mistral Small 3 is a highly efficient, general-purpose language model developed by Mistral AI. It is known for its exceptional speed and above-average intelligence, making it suitable for a wide range of text-based tasks.
Mistral Small 3 scores 21 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it above average among comparable models. This indicates strong performance across various language understanding and generation tasks.
Its primary strengths include outstanding output speed (222.7 tokens/s), above-average intelligence, a generous 32k token context window, and the availability of highly cost-effective provider options like Deepinfra.
While intelligent, it is classified as a non-reasoning model, meaning it may not excel at complex logical deduction or multi-step problem-solving. Also, its average output token price can be high if not optimized through provider selection.
For raw output speed, Mistral's own API is the fastest at 190 tokens/second. For the lowest time to first token (latency), Together.ai leads with 0.23 seconds.
Deepinfra offers the most cost-effective solution for Mistral Small 3, with a blended price of $0.06 per 1M tokens, and the lowest input token price at $0.05 per 1M tokens.
Mistral Small 3 features a 32k token context window, allowing it to process and generate substantial amounts of text in a single interaction.
While it has above-average intelligence, Mistral Small 3 is generally considered a non-reasoning model. For highly complex logical reasoning or multi-step problem-solving, more specialized or larger reasoning models might be more appropriate.