Phi-4 (non-reasoning)

Microsoft's Compact, Capable, and Cost-Conscious Model

Phi-4 (non-reasoning)

Phi-4 is a compact, non-reasoning model from Microsoft Azure, offering above-average intelligence and conciseness, though with moderate speed and pricing.

Open License16k ContextMicrosoft AzureNon-ReasoningConcise OutputMay 2024 Knowledge

Phi-4, developed by Microsoft Azure, stands out as a compact yet capable language model. Operating under an open license, it offers developers flexibility and accessibility. With a substantial 16k token context window and knowledge updated through May 2024, Phi-4 is well-equipped for a variety of tasks requiring a decent grasp of recent information and the ability to process moderately long inputs.

In our Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, Phi-4 achieved a score of 23 out of 55, placing it above the average for comparable models (which typically score around 20). This indicates a strong performance in intelligence benchmarks, especially considering its smaller footprint. A notable characteristic is its conciseness: during the Intelligence Index evaluation, Phi-4 generated 8.8 million tokens, significantly less than the average of 13 million, suggesting an efficient and to-the-point output style.

However, Phi-4 presents a mixed bag when it comes to speed and pricing. At an average output speed of 19.2 tokens per second, it is notably slower than many of its counterparts, which could impact real-time or high-throughput applications. Pricing is also somewhat above average, with input tokens costing $0.13 per 1M (average: $0.10) and output tokens at $0.50 per 1M (average: $0.20). The total cost to evaluate Phi-4 on the Intelligence Index was $6.92, reflecting these pricing tiers.

Despite these considerations, Phi-4's open license, above-average intelligence, and impressive conciseness make it an attractive option for developers looking for a capable model that can deliver precise outputs without excessive verbosity. Strategic provider selection, such as Deepinfra, can significantly mitigate its average speed and pricing concerns, transforming it into a highly competitive choice for specific use cases.

Scoreboard

Intelligence

23 (23 / 55 / 55)

Above average intelligence for its class, demonstrating strong performance in evaluation.
Output speed

19.2 tokens/s

Notably slower than many peers, impacting real-time applications.
Input price

$0.13 /M tokens

Somewhat expensive compared to the average, but competitive for its capabilities.
Output price

$0.50 /M tokens

Higher than average, making long-form generation potentially costly.
Verbosity signal

8.8M tokens

Highly concise, generating less output for the same intelligence evaluation.
Provider latency

0.27 s

Deepinfra offers excellent time to first token, crucial for interactive use cases.

Technical specifications

Spec Details
Owner Microsoft Azure
License Open
Context Window 16k tokens
Knowledge Cutoff May 2024
Intelligence Index Score 23 / 55
Average Output Speed 19.2 tokens/s
Average Input Price $0.13 / 1M tokens
Average Output Price $0.50 / 1M tokens
Intelligence Index Eval Cost $6.92
Intelligence Index Verbosity 8.8M tokens
Fastest Latency (Deepinfra) 0.27s
Fastest Output Speed (Deepinfra) 27 tokens/s
Lowest Blended Price (Deepinfra) $0.09 / 1M tokens

What stands out beyond the scoreboard

Where this model wins
  • Above-Average Intelligence: Scores well on the Intelligence Index for its class.
  • Highly Concise Output: Generates significantly fewer tokens for similar evaluation tasks, saving on output costs.
  • Open License: Offers broad applicability and integration flexibility for developers.
  • Competitive Provider Options: Deepinfra provides significantly better performance and pricing.
  • Generous Context Window: 16k tokens allow for processing substantial inputs and maintaining conversational history.
  • Strong Latency Performance: With optimized providers like Deepinfra, it offers excellent time to first token.
Where costs sneak up
  • Higher Base Output Price: The average output token price ($0.50/M) can quickly inflate costs for verbose applications.
  • Moderate Speed: Slower average output speed (19.2 t/s) might lead to longer processing times and higher compute costs.
  • Provider Dependency: Achieving optimal cost and speed heavily relies on choosing the right API provider.
  • Not Ideal for High-Throughput: Without specific provider optimization, its speed might bottleneck high-volume, real-time use cases.
  • Potential for Over-Generation: While generally concise, unmanaged prompts could still lead to unnecessary token usage.

Provider pick

Choosing the right API provider for Phi-4 is crucial for optimizing both performance and cost. Our benchmarks reveal significant differences across key metrics, with Deepinfra consistently outperforming Microsoft Azure in efficiency and affordability.

Priority Pick Why Tradeoff to accept
Balanced Performance Deepinfra Offers the best blend of speed, latency, and price. Slightly less integrated with Azure ecosystem.
Lowest Latency Deepinfra Achieves the fastest time to first token (0.27s). Still requires managing overall output speed.
Highest Output Speed Deepinfra Delivers 27 tokens/s, significantly faster than Azure. May still be slower than top-tier models from other families.
Lowest Blended Price Deepinfra Most cost-effective at $0.09/M tokens. Input/output prices are still distinct, requiring careful management.
Azure Ecosystem Integration Microsoft Azure Native integration for existing Azure users. Higher costs and slower performance compared to Deepinfra.

Provider data based on Artificial Analysis benchmarks. Performance and pricing can vary based on region, load, and specific API configurations.

Real workloads cost table

Understanding the real-world cost of Phi-4 involves translating its per-token pricing into practical scenarios. Below are estimated costs for common tasks, assuming Deepinfra's optimized pricing ($0.07/M input, $0.14/M output) for the best-case scenario.

Scenario Input Output What it represents Estimated cost
Scenario Input Output What it represents Estimated cost
Short Q&A 500 tokens 100 tokens Answering a concise question based on provided context. $0.000049
Content Summarization 5,000 tokens 500 tokens Summarizing a medium-length article or document. $0.00042
Code Generation 1,000 tokens 300 tokens Generating a small code snippet or function. $0.000112
Long-form Article Draft 1,500 tokens 2,000 tokens Drafting a substantial blog post or report. $0.000385
Customer Support Response 800 tokens 200 tokens Generating a detailed response to a customer query. $0.000084
Data Extraction (Structured) 3,000 tokens 150 tokens Extracting specific entities from a large text block. $0.000231

These estimates highlight Phi-4's cost-effectiveness for many common tasks, especially when leveraging optimized providers like Deepinfra. The conciseness of its output further contributes to keeping costs low, even for tasks that might generate longer responses from other models.

How to control cost (a practical playbook)

To maximize the value and minimize the cost of using Phi-4, consider implementing these strategic approaches:

Optimize Provider Choice

The choice of API provider dramatically impacts both performance and cost. Deepinfra, for instance, offers significantly better pricing and speed for Phi-4 compared to Microsoft Azure.

  • Benchmark Providers: Regularly evaluate different providers for your specific use cases.
  • Prioritize Blended Price: Look beyond just input or output price to the overall blended cost per million tokens.
  • Consider Latency Needs: For interactive applications, a provider with low time-to-first-token is critical.
Manage Output Verbosity

While Phi-4 is inherently concise, careful prompt engineering can further reduce unnecessary output tokens, directly impacting costs.

  • Be Specific in Prompts: Clearly define the desired length and format of the output.
  • Use Stop Sequences: Implement stop sequences to prevent the model from generating beyond a certain point.
  • Iterate and Refine: Test different prompts to find the most token-efficient way to achieve your desired result.
Batch Processing for Speed

Given Phi-4's moderate output speed, batching requests can improve overall throughput for non-real-time applications.

  • Group Similar Tasks: Combine multiple independent requests into a single batch.
  • Asynchronous Processing: Utilize asynchronous API calls to process batches efficiently without blocking.
  • Monitor Latency: While batching helps throughput, be mindful of increased end-to-end latency for individual items within the batch.
Efficient Context Window Usage

Phi-4's 16k context window is generous, but managing its usage efficiently can prevent unnecessary input token costs.

  • Summarize History: For long conversations, periodically summarize past turns to keep the context window lean.
  • Filter Irrelevant Information: Only pass truly relevant information into the prompt.
  • Experiment with Chunking: For very long documents, process them in chunks if the entire context isn't strictly necessary for each query.

FAQ

What is Phi-4?

Phi-4 is a compact, non-reasoning language model developed by Microsoft Azure. It features an open license, a 16k token context window, and knowledge up to May 2024, making it suitable for a range of text generation and understanding tasks.

How does Phi-4 compare in intelligence?

Phi-4 scores 23 out of 55 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it above the average for comparable models. This indicates strong performance relative to its size and class.

Is Phi-4 suitable for real-time applications?

While its average output speed is moderate (19.2 tokens/s), optimized providers like Deepinfra offer excellent latency (0.27s TTFT) and higher output speeds (27 tokens/s). This makes it viable for real-time applications, especially when provider choice is carefully considered.

What are the best ways to reduce costs with Phi-4?

The most effective ways to reduce costs include choosing an optimized provider like Deepinfra, which offers significantly lower blended prices. Additionally, managing output verbosity through precise prompting and using stop sequences can minimize output token usage, further saving costs.

What is its context window and knowledge cutoff?

Phi-4 has a 16k token context window, allowing it to process substantial amounts of information. Its knowledge base is current up to May 2024, providing access to relatively recent information.

Who owns Phi-4 and what is its license?

Phi-4 is owned and developed by Microsoft Azure. It is released under an open license, which provides flexibility for developers and allows for broad integration into various applications and services.

How does Phi-4's conciseness impact its usage?

Phi-4 is notably concise, generating fewer tokens for similar evaluation tasks compared to other models. This characteristic is beneficial for applications where brevity is valued, and it directly contributes to lower output token costs, making it more economical for certain use cases.


Subscribe