Qwen2.5 Coder 32B (non-reasoning)

Code Generation Powerhouse with Deepinfra Edge

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B (non-reasoning)

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B is a highly capable code generation model, offering a vast context window and strong intelligence, with Deepinfra providing exceptional performance and value.

Code Generation32 Billion ParametersOpen-Source131k ContextAbove Average IntelligenceCost-Effective (Deepinfra)Alibaba Model

The Qwen2.5 Coder 32B model, developed by Alibaba, stands out as a formidable contender in the realm of code generation. This open-source, 32-billion parameter model is specifically engineered for complex coding tasks, boasting an impressive 131,000-token context window that allows it to handle extensive codebases and intricate programming challenges. Its performance on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, scoring 22, places it comfortably above the average for comparable models, indicating a strong understanding of programming logic and problem-solving capabilities.

While Qwen2.5 Coder 32B demonstrates superior intelligence for its class, its overall output speed, averaging around 49.6 tokens per second, is considered notably slow compared to other models in the benchmark. This characteristic suggests that while it can produce high-quality code, it may not be the fastest option for high-throughput, real-time code generation scenarios. However, specific providers like Deepinfra manage to push this model to a faster 58 tokens/s, significantly improving its practical utility.

From a cost perspective, the model presents a nuanced picture. Its average input token price of $0.13 per 1M tokens is somewhat higher than the benchmark average of $0.10, and its output token price of $0.17 per 1M tokens is moderately priced compared to the average of $0.20. However, provider optimization plays a critical role here. Deepinfra, for instance, offers a highly competitive blended price of $0.08 per 1M tokens, with an input price of $0.06 and an output price of $0.15, making it a significantly more economical choice for deploying Qwen2.5 Coder 32B.

Deepinfra also leads in performance metrics, providing the lowest latency at just 0.30 seconds and the fastest output speed at 58 tokens per second. This makes Deepinfra the preferred provider for those seeking to maximize both cost-efficiency and responsiveness from Qwen2.5 Coder 32B. Despite its general slowness, the model's high intelligence and massive context window, especially when paired with an optimized provider, position it as an excellent choice for developers and organizations requiring robust and accurate code generation for large-scale projects.

Scoreboard

Intelligence

22 (#26 / 55 / 32B)

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B scores 22 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it above average among comparable models (average: 20).
Output speed

49.6 tokens/s

At an average of 49.6 tokens per second, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B is notably slow compared to other models. Deepinfra offers the fastest speed at 58 t/s.
Input price

$0.13 USD/M tokens

The average input token price is $0.13/M, which is somewhat expensive (average: $0.10). Deepinfra offers a significantly lower $0.06/M.
Output price

$0.17 USD/M tokens

The average output token price is $0.17/M, which is moderately priced (average: $0.20). Deepinfra offers a competitive $0.15/M.
Verbosity signal

N/A

Verbosity metrics are not available for this model at this time, preventing a direct comparison of output length efficiency.
Provider latency

0.30s seconds

Deepinfra provides the lowest latency for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B at an impressive 0.30 seconds, crucial for interactive applications.

Technical specifications

Spec Details
Owner Alibaba
License Open
Context Window 131,000 tokens
Model Size 32 Billion Parameters
Model Type Coder / Code Generation
Intelligence Index Score 22 (Above Average)
Intelligence Index Rank #26 / 55
Average Output Speed 49.6 tokens/s
Fastest Output Speed (Deepinfra) 58 tokens/s
Lowest Latency (Deepinfra) 0.30 seconds
Average Input Price $0.13 / 1M tokens
Average Output Price $0.17 / 1M tokens
Blended Price (Deepinfra) $0.08 / 1M tokens

What stands out beyond the scoreboard

Where this model wins
  • Exceptional Code Generation: Qwen2.5 Coder 32B is purpose-built for coding tasks, demonstrating strong capabilities in generating, completing, and debugging code across various languages and paradigms.
  • Massive Context Window: With a 131k token context, it can process and understand extremely large codebases, entire project files, or extensive documentation, enabling more coherent and contextually relevant outputs.
  • Above-Average Intelligence: Scoring 22 on the Intelligence Index, this model exhibits a superior grasp of logical reasoning and problem-solving within the coding domain, leading to more accurate and robust solutions.
  • Cost-Effectiveness with Deepinfra: When deployed via Deepinfra, the model becomes remarkably affordable, offering a blended price of just $0.08 per 1M tokens, significantly undercutting other providers and the market average.
  • Low Latency for Interactive Use: Deepinfra's optimized infrastructure delivers an impressive 0.30s latency, making Qwen2.5 Coder 32B viable for real-time coding assistants, IDE integrations, and other interactive development tools.
  • Open-Source Flexibility: Being an open-source model from Alibaba, it offers transparency, community support, and the potential for fine-tuning and customization to specific enterprise needs.
Where costs sneak up
  • Overall Slower Output Speed: Despite Deepinfra's optimization, the model's inherent average output speed of ~50 tokens/s is on the slower side, which can accumulate costs and increase wait times for high-volume or time-sensitive tasks.
  • Higher Base Pricing: Without provider optimization, the model's average input price of $0.13/M tokens is above the benchmark average, meaning costs can quickly escalate if not carefully managed or if using less competitive providers.
  • Provider-Dependent Performance: The significant performance and price disparities between providers (e.g., Deepinfra vs. Hyperbolic) mean that choosing the wrong provider can lead to substantially higher costs and poorer user experience.
  • Large Context Window Utilization: While a strength, fully utilizing the 131k context window means sending more input tokens, which directly translates to higher costs, especially for models with higher input token prices.
  • Potential for Long Outputs: Code generation can sometimes lead to verbose outputs. If not carefully prompted, generating extensive code blocks can quickly consume output tokens, driving up costs, particularly with providers charging more for output.
  • Debugging Iterations: Iterative debugging or refinement cycles, where the model is repeatedly prompted with code and error messages, can lead to a rapid accumulation of both input and output token usage, impacting overall project expenditure.

Provider pick

Choosing the right API provider for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B is paramount to optimizing both performance and cost. Our analysis highlights significant differences across providers, with Deepinfra consistently emerging as the top choice for most use cases.

Deepinfra offers a compelling combination of speed, low latency, and aggressive pricing, making it the clear frontrunner. Hyperbolic provides an alternative, but at a higher cost and slower performance metrics.

Priority Pick Why Tradeoff to accept
Overall Best Value & Performance Deepinfra Deepinfra offers the fastest output speed (58 t/s), lowest latency (0.30s), and the most competitive blended price ($0.08/M tokens). None significant; it's the optimal choice.
Cost-Sensitive Projects Deepinfra With an input price of $0.06/M and output price of $0.15/M, Deepinfra provides the lowest per-token cost, ideal for budget-conscious deployments. Requires careful monitoring of context window usage to maintain cost efficiency.
Low Latency Applications Deepinfra Its 0.30s time to first token is critical for interactive coding assistants, real-time suggestions, and responsive developer tools. Even with low latency, the overall output speed can still be a factor for very long generations.
Balanced Performance (Alternative) Hyperbolic Offers a viable alternative with 41 t/s output speed and 1.81s latency, suitable if Deepinfra is not an option. Significantly higher blended price ($0.20/M tokens) and slower performance compared to Deepinfra.

Note: Pricing and performance metrics are subject to change and may vary based on region, load, and specific API configurations. Always verify current rates with providers.

Real workloads cost table

Understanding the real-world cost of using Qwen2.5 Coder 32B requires translating token usage into practical scenarios. Below are estimated costs for common coding tasks, assuming Deepinfra's optimized pricing ($0.06/M input, $0.15/M output) due to its superior value.

These examples illustrate how the model's capabilities, combined with its pricing structure, impact the total expenditure for various development activities.

Scenario Input Output What it represents Estimated cost
Scenario Input Output What it represents Estimated Cost (Deepinfra)
Generate a Python function 500 tokens (prompt + existing code context) 200 tokens (new function) A typical request for a small, self-contained code snippet or utility function. $0.000030 + $0.000030 = $0.000060
Refactor a large component 10,000 tokens (full file context + instructions) 3,000 tokens (refactored code) Analyzing and rewriting a significant portion of a codebase for optimization or clarity. $0.000600 + $0.000450 = $0.001050
Debug an error in a module 20,000 tokens (module code + error logs + prompt) 500 tokens (explanation + suggested fix) Providing context for a bug and receiving a detailed analysis and solution. $0.001200 + $0.000075 = $0.001275
Generate API endpoint boilerplate 1,500 tokens (schema + requirements) 800 tokens (full endpoint code) Creating standard API routes, request/response models, and basic logic. $00.000090 + $0.000120 = $0.000210
Code Review & Suggestions 50,000 tokens (large PR diff + guidelines) 1,000 tokens (review comments + improved snippets) Automated review of a substantial code change, identifying issues and proposing improvements. $0.003000 + $0.000150 = $0.003150
Translate code (e.g., Python to Go) 15,000 tokens (Python code + target language) 10,000 tokens (Go equivalent) Converting a moderately sized application or library from one language to another. $0.000900 + $0.001500 = $0.002400

These examples demonstrate that while individual requests are inexpensive, costs can quickly accumulate with larger context windows and extensive output generation. Strategic use of the model, especially for tasks involving large codebases, requires careful consideration of input size and the potential for iterative refinement, which can multiply token usage.

How to control cost (a practical playbook)

Optimizing costs for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B involves a combination of smart provider selection, efficient prompting, and strategic workload management. Given its large context window and varying provider costs, a thoughtful approach can yield significant savings.

Here are key strategies to ensure you get the most value from this powerful code generation model without overspending.

Provider Optimization: Leverage Deepinfra's Advantage

The most impactful cost-saving measure for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B is selecting the right API provider. Deepinfra offers significantly lower prices and better performance compared to alternatives.

  • Prioritize Deepinfra: Always default to Deepinfra for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B to benefit from its $0.08/M blended rate, lowest latency, and fastest output speed.
  • Monitor Provider Changes: Keep an eye on provider benchmarks as pricing and performance can fluctuate. Regularly re-evaluate your provider choice.
  • Regional Considerations: If Deepinfra's region doesn't align with your infrastructure, evaluate the trade-offs between latency/speed and the cost savings it provides.
Context Window Management: Smart Input Utilization

While the 131k context window is a powerful feature, sending unnecessary tokens is a primary driver of cost. Be judicious about what you include in your prompts.

  • Prune Irrelevant Code: Only include the code snippets, files, or documentation directly relevant to the task at hand. Avoid sending entire repositories if only a function needs attention.
  • Summarize Large Contexts: For extremely large contexts, consider using a smaller, cheaper model to summarize or extract key information before feeding it to Qwen2.5 Coder 32B.
  • Iterative Refinement: Instead of sending the full context repeatedly, send only the changed code or specific error messages during iterative debugging or refinement cycles.
Prompt Engineering for Brevity & Precision

Well-crafted prompts can reduce both input and output token usage, leading to more efficient and cost-effective interactions with the model.

  • Be Specific: Clearly define the desired output format, length, and content. Avoid open-ended prompts that might lead to verbose or off-topic generations.
  • Request Concise Outputs: Explicitly ask the model to be concise, to the point, or to provide only the code without extensive explanations if not needed. Phrases like "Return only the code," or "Provide a brief explanation" can be effective.
  • Use Few-Shot Examples: Provide examples of desired input-output pairs to guide the model towards generating outputs that match your preferred style and length.
Output Handling: Filtering and Truncation

Sometimes, the model might generate more output than strictly necessary. Implementing post-processing can help manage costs associated with output tokens.

  • Implement Output Truncation: If you only need a specific part of the output (e.g., just the code block), programmatically truncate or parse the response to only store and process the essential information.
  • Filter Explanations: If the model provides both code and explanations, and you only need the code, filter out the explanatory text before further processing or storage.
  • Batch Processing: For tasks that don't require immediate responses, batching multiple requests can sometimes lead to better utilization of API calls and potentially lower per-token costs if providers offer volume discounts.

FAQ

What is Qwen2.5 Coder 32B best suited for?

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B excels in advanced code generation, completion, and debugging tasks. Its large context window makes it ideal for working with extensive codebases, refactoring large components, generating complex functions, and providing detailed code reviews. It's particularly strong for developers and teams needing robust, context-aware coding assistance.

How does its 131k context window benefit code generation?

A 131,000-token context window allows Qwen2.5 Coder 32B to process and understand entire project files, multiple related modules, or extensive documentation simultaneously. This deep contextual awareness leads to more accurate, coherent, and relevant code suggestions, reducing the need for manual context provision and improving the quality of generated code by understanding the broader project structure and dependencies.

Is Qwen2.5 Coder 32B an open-source model?

Yes, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B is an open-source model developed by Alibaba. This means it offers transparency, can be self-hosted (though API providers offer convenience), and benefits from community contributions and scrutiny. Its open nature also allows for greater flexibility in fine-tuning and integration into proprietary systems.

Why is its output speed considered 'notably slow'?

While Qwen2.5 Coder 32B is highly intelligent, its average output speed of around 49.6 tokens per second is slower compared to some other models in its class. This can lead to longer wait times for generating extensive code blocks or handling high volumes of requests. However, providers like Deepinfra have optimized its deployment to achieve faster speeds (up to 58 t/s), mitigating this limitation to some extent.

How can I minimize costs when using Qwen2.5 Coder 32B?

The primary way to minimize costs is to choose an optimized provider like Deepinfra, which offers significantly lower per-token rates. Additionally, practice smart context window management by only including essential information in your prompts, using precise prompt engineering to guide the model towards concise outputs, and implementing post-processing to truncate or filter unnecessary generated text.

What are the main differences between Deepinfra and Hyperbolic for this model?

Deepinfra offers superior performance and cost-efficiency for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B. It boasts the fastest output speed (58 t/s), lowest latency (0.30s), and the most competitive blended price ($0.08/M tokens). Hyperbolic, while a viable alternative, has slower performance (41 t/s output, 1.81s latency) and a higher blended price ($0.20/M tokens), making Deepinfra the preferred choice for most users.

Can Qwen2.5 Coder 32B be used for non-coding tasks?

While primarily optimized for code generation, its strong intelligence and large context window mean it can handle some general language tasks, especially those requiring logical reasoning or structured output. However, for purely non-coding applications, other models specifically trained for general text generation or reasoning might offer better performance or cost-efficiency.


Subscribe