Qwen2.5 Coder 32B is a highly capable code generation model, offering a vast context window and strong intelligence, with Deepinfra providing exceptional performance and value.
The Qwen2.5 Coder 32B model, developed by Alibaba, stands out as a formidable contender in the realm of code generation. This open-source, 32-billion parameter model is specifically engineered for complex coding tasks, boasting an impressive 131,000-token context window that allows it to handle extensive codebases and intricate programming challenges. Its performance on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, scoring 22, places it comfortably above the average for comparable models, indicating a strong understanding of programming logic and problem-solving capabilities.
While Qwen2.5 Coder 32B demonstrates superior intelligence for its class, its overall output speed, averaging around 49.6 tokens per second, is considered notably slow compared to other models in the benchmark. This characteristic suggests that while it can produce high-quality code, it may not be the fastest option for high-throughput, real-time code generation scenarios. However, specific providers like Deepinfra manage to push this model to a faster 58 tokens/s, significantly improving its practical utility.
From a cost perspective, the model presents a nuanced picture. Its average input token price of $0.13 per 1M tokens is somewhat higher than the benchmark average of $0.10, and its output token price of $0.17 per 1M tokens is moderately priced compared to the average of $0.20. However, provider optimization plays a critical role here. Deepinfra, for instance, offers a highly competitive blended price of $0.08 per 1M tokens, with an input price of $0.06 and an output price of $0.15, making it a significantly more economical choice for deploying Qwen2.5 Coder 32B.
Deepinfra also leads in performance metrics, providing the lowest latency at just 0.30 seconds and the fastest output speed at 58 tokens per second. This makes Deepinfra the preferred provider for those seeking to maximize both cost-efficiency and responsiveness from Qwen2.5 Coder 32B. Despite its general slowness, the model's high intelligence and massive context window, especially when paired with an optimized provider, position it as an excellent choice for developers and organizations requiring robust and accurate code generation for large-scale projects.
22 (#26 / 55 / 32B)
49.6 tokens/s
$0.13 USD/M tokens
$0.17 USD/M tokens
N/A
0.30s seconds
| Spec | Details |
|---|---|
| Owner | Alibaba |
| License | Open |
| Context Window | 131,000 tokens |
| Model Size | 32 Billion Parameters |
| Model Type | Coder / Code Generation |
| Intelligence Index Score | 22 (Above Average) |
| Intelligence Index Rank | #26 / 55 |
| Average Output Speed | 49.6 tokens/s |
| Fastest Output Speed (Deepinfra) | 58 tokens/s |
| Lowest Latency (Deepinfra) | 0.30 seconds |
| Average Input Price | $0.13 / 1M tokens |
| Average Output Price | $0.17 / 1M tokens |
| Blended Price (Deepinfra) | $0.08 / 1M tokens |
Choosing the right API provider for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B is paramount to optimizing both performance and cost. Our analysis highlights significant differences across providers, with Deepinfra consistently emerging as the top choice for most use cases.
Deepinfra offers a compelling combination of speed, low latency, and aggressive pricing, making it the clear frontrunner. Hyperbolic provides an alternative, but at a higher cost and slower performance metrics.
| Priority | Pick | Why | Tradeoff to accept |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Best Value & Performance | Deepinfra | Deepinfra offers the fastest output speed (58 t/s), lowest latency (0.30s), and the most competitive blended price ($0.08/M tokens). | None significant; it's the optimal choice. |
| Cost-Sensitive Projects | Deepinfra | With an input price of $0.06/M and output price of $0.15/M, Deepinfra provides the lowest per-token cost, ideal for budget-conscious deployments. | Requires careful monitoring of context window usage to maintain cost efficiency. |
| Low Latency Applications | Deepinfra | Its 0.30s time to first token is critical for interactive coding assistants, real-time suggestions, and responsive developer tools. | Even with low latency, the overall output speed can still be a factor for very long generations. |
| Balanced Performance (Alternative) | Hyperbolic | Offers a viable alternative with 41 t/s output speed and 1.81s latency, suitable if Deepinfra is not an option. | Significantly higher blended price ($0.20/M tokens) and slower performance compared to Deepinfra. |
Note: Pricing and performance metrics are subject to change and may vary based on region, load, and specific API configurations. Always verify current rates with providers.
Understanding the real-world cost of using Qwen2.5 Coder 32B requires translating token usage into practical scenarios. Below are estimated costs for common coding tasks, assuming Deepinfra's optimized pricing ($0.06/M input, $0.15/M output) due to its superior value.
These examples illustrate how the model's capabilities, combined with its pricing structure, impact the total expenditure for various development activities.
| Scenario | Input | Output | What it represents | Estimated cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scenario | Input | Output | What it represents | Estimated Cost (Deepinfra) |
| Generate a Python function | 500 tokens (prompt + existing code context) | 200 tokens (new function) | A typical request for a small, self-contained code snippet or utility function. | $0.000030 + $0.000030 = $0.000060 |
| Refactor a large component | 10,000 tokens (full file context + instructions) | 3,000 tokens (refactored code) | Analyzing and rewriting a significant portion of a codebase for optimization or clarity. | $0.000600 + $0.000450 = $0.001050 |
| Debug an error in a module | 20,000 tokens (module code + error logs + prompt) | 500 tokens (explanation + suggested fix) | Providing context for a bug and receiving a detailed analysis and solution. | $0.001200 + $0.000075 = $0.001275 |
| Generate API endpoint boilerplate | 1,500 tokens (schema + requirements) | 800 tokens (full endpoint code) | Creating standard API routes, request/response models, and basic logic. | $00.000090 + $0.000120 = $0.000210 |
| Code Review & Suggestions | 50,000 tokens (large PR diff + guidelines) | 1,000 tokens (review comments + improved snippets) | Automated review of a substantial code change, identifying issues and proposing improvements. | $0.003000 + $0.000150 = $0.003150 |
| Translate code (e.g., Python to Go) | 15,000 tokens (Python code + target language) | 10,000 tokens (Go equivalent) | Converting a moderately sized application or library from one language to another. | $0.000900 + $0.001500 = $0.002400 |
These examples demonstrate that while individual requests are inexpensive, costs can quickly accumulate with larger context windows and extensive output generation. Strategic use of the model, especially for tasks involving large codebases, requires careful consideration of input size and the potential for iterative refinement, which can multiply token usage.
Optimizing costs for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B involves a combination of smart provider selection, efficient prompting, and strategic workload management. Given its large context window and varying provider costs, a thoughtful approach can yield significant savings.
Here are key strategies to ensure you get the most value from this powerful code generation model without overspending.
The most impactful cost-saving measure for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B is selecting the right API provider. Deepinfra offers significantly lower prices and better performance compared to alternatives.
While the 131k context window is a powerful feature, sending unnecessary tokens is a primary driver of cost. Be judicious about what you include in your prompts.
Well-crafted prompts can reduce both input and output token usage, leading to more efficient and cost-effective interactions with the model.
Sometimes, the model might generate more output than strictly necessary. Implementing post-processing can help manage costs associated with output tokens.
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B excels in advanced code generation, completion, and debugging tasks. Its large context window makes it ideal for working with extensive codebases, refactoring large components, generating complex functions, and providing detailed code reviews. It's particularly strong for developers and teams needing robust, context-aware coding assistance.
A 131,000-token context window allows Qwen2.5 Coder 32B to process and understand entire project files, multiple related modules, or extensive documentation simultaneously. This deep contextual awareness leads to more accurate, coherent, and relevant code suggestions, reducing the need for manual context provision and improving the quality of generated code by understanding the broader project structure and dependencies.
Yes, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B is an open-source model developed by Alibaba. This means it offers transparency, can be self-hosted (though API providers offer convenience), and benefits from community contributions and scrutiny. Its open nature also allows for greater flexibility in fine-tuning and integration into proprietary systems.
While Qwen2.5 Coder 32B is highly intelligent, its average output speed of around 49.6 tokens per second is slower compared to some other models in its class. This can lead to longer wait times for generating extensive code blocks or handling high volumes of requests. However, providers like Deepinfra have optimized its deployment to achieve faster speeds (up to 58 t/s), mitigating this limitation to some extent.
The primary way to minimize costs is to choose an optimized provider like Deepinfra, which offers significantly lower per-token rates. Additionally, practice smart context window management by only including essential information in your prompts, using precise prompt engineering to guide the model towards concise outputs, and implementing post-processing to truncate or filter unnecessary generated text.
Deepinfra offers superior performance and cost-efficiency for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B. It boasts the fastest output speed (58 t/s), lowest latency (0.30s), and the most competitive blended price ($0.08/M tokens). Hyperbolic, while a viable alternative, has slower performance (41 t/s output, 1.81s latency) and a higher blended price ($0.20/M tokens), making Deepinfra the preferred choice for most users.
While primarily optimized for code generation, its strong intelligence and large context window mean it can handle some general language tasks, especially those requiring logical reasoning or structured output. However, for purely non-coding applications, other models specifically trained for general text generation or reasoning might offer better performance or cost-efficiency.