A powerful, large-scale coding-focused model from Alibaba, offering strong intelligence and a vast context window, albeit at a premium price point.
The Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct model, developed by Alibaba, stands out as a formidable contender in the domain of large language models specifically fine-tuned for coding tasks. With an impressive 480 billion parameters, this model is designed to handle complex programming challenges, code generation, debugging, and understanding intricate code structures. Its 'Instruct' variant indicates a focus on following instructions effectively, making it a valuable asset for developers and technical teams seeking robust AI assistance.
Benchmarking reveals that Qwen3 Coder 480B performs commendably in terms of intelligence, scoring 42 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, which places it above the average for comparable models. This suggests a strong capability in understanding and generating high-quality code and related text. The model also boasts an exceptionally large context window of 262,000 tokens, allowing it to process and maintain context over very long codebases or extensive documentation, a critical feature for complex software development projects.
However, this advanced capability comes with a significant trade-off in cost. Qwen3 Coder 480B is noted as particularly expensive, both for input and output tokens, when compared to other open-weight, non-reasoning models of similar scale. While its raw output speed is slower than average, certain providers like Together.ai and Google Vertex manage to deliver competitive speeds, and Deepinfra (Turbo, FP4) offers excellent latency, indicating that provider choice is crucial for optimizing performance and cost.
Despite the higher price, the model's open license and strong performance in coding-specific tasks make it an attractive option for enterprises and developers who prioritize accuracy, context handling, and advanced code generation capabilities over strict budget constraints. Its concise output, as measured by verbosity, also suggests an efficiency in generating relevant and to-the-point responses, which can indirectly contribute to cost savings by reducing unnecessary token consumption in certain applications.
42 (11 / 30 / 3 / 4 units)
45.2 tokens/s
$1.50 per 1M tokens
$7.50 per 1M tokens
9.7M tokens
0.28s TTFT
| Spec | Details |
|---|---|
| Model Name | Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct |
| Developer | Alibaba |
| Model Size | 480 Billion Parameters |
| License | Open |
| Context Window | 262,000 tokens |
| Input Modality | Text |
| Output Modality | Text |
| Intelligence Index | 42 (Rank #11/30) |
| Output Speed (Avg) | 45.2 tokens/s |
| Input Price (Avg) | $1.50 per 1M tokens |
| Output Price (Avg) | $7.50 per 1M tokens |
| Primary Use Case | Code Generation, Analysis, Debugging |
| Model Type | Non-Reasoning, Instruct |
Selecting the right API provider for Qwen3 Coder 480B is paramount to balancing performance, cost, and latency. Given the model's premium pricing, optimizing provider choice can lead to substantial savings and improved user experience.
| Priority | Pick | Why | Tradeoff to accept |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Value | Deepinfra (Turbo, FP4) | Offers the best blended price and excellent latency. | Slightly lower raw output speed compared to top performers. |
| Highest Output Speed | Together.ai (FP8) | Delivers the fastest output speed at 158 t/s. | Higher blended price than Deepinfra (Turbo, FP4). |
| Lowest Latency (TTFT) | Deepinfra (Turbo, FP4) | Achieves the lowest time to first token at 0.28s. | Not the absolute fastest in output speed. |
| Most Cost-Effective (Blended) | Deepinfra (Turbo, FP4) / Novita | Both offer the lowest blended price at $0.52/M tokens. | Novita's latency and output speed are not top-tier. |
| Lowest Input Price | Amazon | Offers the cheapest input tokens at $0.22/M. | Higher output token price and potentially higher latency. |
| Lowest Output Price | Deepinfra (Turbo, FP4) / Novita | Both provide the lowest output token price at $1.20/M. | Similar tradeoffs as blended price leaders. |
Note: Performance metrics like FP8/FP4 indicate quantization levels, which can affect speed and cost. Always test with your specific workload.
Understanding the real-world cost implications of Qwen3 Coder 480B requires analyzing typical coding-related workloads. The high per-token cost means that even seemingly small tasks can accumulate significant expenses over time, especially with its large context window.
| Scenario | Input | Output | What it represents | Estimated cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scenario | Input | Output | What it represents | Estimated cost |
| Code Generation (Small Function) | 500 tokens (prompt) | 200 tokens (code) | Generating a utility function or script snippet. | ~$0.00095 |
| Code Review/Refinement | 10,000 tokens (code + prompt) | 500 tokens (suggestions) | Analyzing a medium-sized code block for improvements. | ~$0.01875 |
| Complex Feature Development | 50,000 tokens (spec + existing code) | 2,000 tokens (new code) | Developing a new feature requiring extensive context. | ~$0.0900 |
| Large Codebase Analysis | 200,000 tokens (multiple files + query) | 1,000 tokens (summary/insights) | Understanding architecture or identifying bugs across a large project. | ~$0.3075 |
| Documentation Generation | 15,000 tokens (code + prompt) | 3,000 tokens (documentation) | Generating API docs or user guides from code. | ~$0.0450 |
| Interactive Debugging Session | 5,000 tokens (per turn, 5 turns) | 500 tokens (per turn, 5 turns) | An iterative back-and-forth debugging process. | ~$0.0375 (per turn) |
The estimated costs highlight that while individual small tasks are inexpensive, the cumulative cost of using Qwen3 Coder 480B for extensive or iterative coding workflows can quickly become substantial due to its premium pricing and large context window. Strategic prompt engineering and efficient usage are critical.
Optimizing the cost of using Qwen3 Coder 480B involves a multi-faceted approach, focusing on smart provider selection, efficient prompt engineering, and strategic usage patterns. Given its higher price point, these strategies are not just beneficial but essential.
The choice of API provider dramatically impacts both cost and performance. Benchmarking shows significant differences in pricing and speed across providers.
Given the high per-token cost, every token counts. Efficient prompting can significantly reduce your overall expenditure.
Integrate Qwen3 Coder 480B into your applications with cost-efficiency in mind from the outset.
Explore different quantization levels offered by providers, as they can impact performance and cost.
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct is a large language model developed by Alibaba, specifically fine-tuned for coding tasks. It features 480 billion parameters and an exceptionally large 262k token context window, designed to understand, generate, and debug code effectively following instructions.
The model scores 42 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it above average (rank #11/30) among comparable models. This indicates strong capabilities in complex coding challenges and general language understanding within its domain.
Yes, it is considered particularly expensive. Both its input token price ($1.50/M tokens) and output token price ($7.50/M tokens) are significantly higher than the average for similar open-weight, non-reasoning models. Cost optimization through provider choice and efficient prompting is crucial.
It has an impressive 262,000 token context window. This large window allows the model to process and retain context over very long inputs, such as entire codebases, extensive documentation, or complex project specifications, which is highly beneficial for sophisticated coding tasks.
For raw output speed, Together.ai (FP8) is fastest (158 t/s). For lowest latency (TTFT) and best blended price, Deepinfra (Turbo, FP4) is a top contender. Novita also offers competitive blended and output token pricing.
While its average speed is slower, providers like Deepinfra (Turbo, FP4) offer very low latency (0.28s TTFT), making it suitable for interactive or real-time applications where quick initial responses are important. However, sustained high-throughput real-time applications might require careful optimization.
Its primary use cases include advanced code generation, intelligent code completion, code review and refinement, debugging assistance, understanding complex code structures, and generating technical documentation from code. Its large context window makes it ideal for large-scale software projects.