Ring-1T (open-weight)

Open-Weight, High Context, Moderate Performance

Ring-1T (open-weight)

Ring-1T is an open-weight, text-to-text model offering a substantial 128k token context window, positioned as a cost-effective option despite its below-average intelligence and speed.

Open-WeightText-to-Text128k ContextGeneral PurposeBelow Average IntelligenceCost-Effective Input

Ring-1T emerges as a notable contender in the open-weight model landscape, primarily distinguished by its generous 128k token context window and an open license from InclusionAI. While it positions itself as a reasonably priced alternative, particularly for input tokens, our benchmarks reveal a nuanced performance profile. It consistently ranks below average in intelligence and output speed when compared to its peers, suggesting it may be better suited for tasks where context length and cost efficiency are paramount over raw cognitive ability or rapid generation.

Our comprehensive analysis, leveraging the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, places Ring-1T at a score of 42, which is below the average for comparable models. This performance is coupled with a significant verbosity, generating 85 million tokens during evaluation—a stark contrast to the average of 22 million. This verbosity can impact overall operational costs, especially for output-heavy applications, despite its competitive input token pricing.

From a speed perspective, Ring-1T delivers a median output of 36 tokens per second, falling short of the average 45 tokens per second observed across the benchmarked models. Its latency, measured at 2.42 seconds for time to first token (TTFT) on ZenMux, further indicates that real-time, highly interactive applications might experience noticeable delays. These speed metrics, combined with its verbosity, necessitate careful consideration for use cases requiring rapid, concise responses.

Pricing for Ring-1T is a mixed bag: input tokens are moderately priced at $0.56 per 1 million tokens, aligning closely with the market average. However, output tokens are somewhat more expensive at $2.26 per 1 million tokens. This pricing structure, combined with its high verbosity, means that while initial input costs might be attractive, the total cost of ownership can escalate quickly for applications generating extensive outputs. The model's open license, however, offers flexibility for self-hosting and fine-tuning, potentially mitigating long-term costs for organizations with the necessary infrastructure and expertise.

Scoreboard

Intelligence

42 (#26 / 51 / 51)

Ring-1T scores 42 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it below average among comparable models. It demonstrates significant verbosity during evaluation, generating 85M tokens.
Output speed

36 tokens/s

At 36 tokens per second, Ring-1T is slower than the average output speed of 45 tokens/s, impacting applications requiring rapid generation.
Input price

$0.56 /M tokens

Input tokens are moderately priced at $0.56 per 1M, aligning with the market average of $0.57.
Output price

$2.26 /M tokens

Output tokens are somewhat expensive at $2.26 per 1M, exceeding the average of $2.10, which can be exacerbated by its verbosity.
Verbosity signal

85M tokens

Ring-1T is highly verbose, generating 85M tokens during intelligence evaluation, significantly above the average of 22M.
Provider latency

2.42 seconds

With a Time to First Token (TTFT) of 2.42 seconds on ZenMux, Ring-1T exhibits moderate latency, which may affect real-time interactive applications.

Technical specifications

Spec Details
Owner InclusionAI
License Open
Context Window 128k tokens
Input Modality Text
Output Modality Text
Primary Provider ZenMux
Median Output Speed 36 tokens/s
Latency (TTFT) 2.42 seconds
Blended Price (3:1) $0.98 / 1M tokens
Input Token Price $0.56 / 1M tokens
Output Token Price $2.26 / 1M tokens
Intelligence Index Score 42
Intelligence Index Rank #26 / 51
Verbosity (Intelligence Index) 85M tokens

What stands out beyond the scoreboard

Where this model wins
  • Expansive Context Window: A 128k token context window allows for processing and generating extremely long documents or complex conversations, ideal for summarization, analysis, or long-form content creation.
  • Open License: Being an open-weight model with an open license provides unparalleled flexibility for self-hosting, fine-tuning, and integration into proprietary systems without recurring per-token costs.
  • Cost-Effective Input: Its competitive input token pricing makes it attractive for applications that involve processing large volumes of user-provided text or data.
  • Suitable for Non-Realtime Batch Processing: Given its moderate speed and latency, it's well-suited for asynchronous tasks like document analysis, report generation, or content drafting where immediate responses aren't critical.
  • Foundation for Customization: The open nature allows developers to fine-tune the model for specific domain knowledge or stylistic requirements, potentially improving its intelligence and conciseness for niche applications.
Where costs sneak up
  • High Output Verbosity: Ring-1T's tendency to generate extensive outputs means that even with moderately priced output tokens, total costs can quickly accumulate, especially for tasks requiring concise responses.
  • Below-Average Intelligence: For tasks demanding high accuracy, complex reasoning, or nuanced understanding, Ring-1T may require more extensive prompting, post-processing, or multiple iterations, increasing both token usage and development effort.
  • Slower Output Speed: Its 36 tokens/s output speed can lead to longer processing times for large generation tasks, potentially impacting user experience in interactive applications or increasing infrastructure costs for batch processing.
  • Moderate Latency: A 2.42-second Time to First Token (TTFT) can introduce noticeable delays in real-time applications, making it less ideal for conversational AI or instant content generation.
  • Higher Output Token Price: While input is reasonable, the $2.26/M output token price is above average, making output-heavy use cases disproportionately expensive compared to models with more balanced pricing.
  • Potential for Over-Generation: Due to its verbosity, users might pay for tokens that are ultimately edited out or deemed unnecessary, leading to inefficient spending.

Provider pick

Choosing the right provider for Ring-1T largely depends on your operational priorities, whether it's ease of deployment, cost efficiency, or the flexibility of self-management. ZenMux offers a straightforward API experience, while self-hosting unlocks maximum control and long-term cost savings for high-volume users.

Priority Pick Why Tradeoff to accept
Ease of Use ZenMux ZenMux provides a managed API, abstracting away infrastructure complexities and offering a quick start for development teams. Slightly higher per-token costs and less control over the underlying model.
Cost Efficiency (High Volume) Self-Hosted For organizations with significant usage, self-hosting Ring-1T can drastically reduce per-token costs over time, leveraging the model's open license. Requires significant upfront investment in infrastructure, MLOps expertise, and ongoing maintenance.
Flexibility & Customization Self-Hosted Direct access to the model allows for extensive fine-tuning, custom integrations, and specialized deployments tailored to unique business needs. Increased complexity in deployment, scaling, and ensuring high availability.
Rapid Prototyping ZenMux The API-based access on ZenMux enables developers to quickly integrate Ring-1T into prototypes and test applications without managing infrastructure. May incur higher costs during extensive testing phases due to per-token pricing.

Note: Provider recommendations are based on general performance characteristics and pricing structures. Actual optimal choice may vary based on specific project requirements, existing infrastructure, and operational budget.

Real workloads cost table

Understanding the real-world cost implications of Ring-1T requires looking beyond raw token prices and considering its performance characteristics like verbosity and speed. Below are estimated costs for common scenarios, assuming a 3:1 input-to-output token ratio for blended pricing where applicable, and using ZenMux pricing.

Scenario Input Output What it represents Estimated cost
Scenario Input Output What it represents Estimated Cost
Long Document Summarization 100k tokens (e.g., a detailed report) 20k tokens (verbose summary) Summarizing a large technical document or legal brief into a comprehensive overview. $0.56 (input) + $0.45 (output) = $1.01
Content Generation (Blog Post) 500 tokens (prompt) 5k tokens (full article) Generating a detailed blog post from a short outline or topic. $0.00028 (input) + $0.0113 (output) = $0.0116
Customer Support Response 1k tokens (customer query + history) 500 tokens (detailed response) Generating a personalized, comprehensive response to a complex customer service inquiry. $0.00056 (input) + $0.00113 (output) = $0.00169
Code Generation/Refinement 5k tokens (code snippet + instructions) 2k tokens (refined code) Assisting developers by generating or refactoring code based on specific requirements. $0.0028 (input) + $0.00452 (output) = $0.00732
Data Extraction & Structuring 20k tokens (unstructured text) 5k tokens (structured JSON) Extracting key entities and relationships from a large body of text and formatting them. $0.0112 (input) + $0.0113 (output) = $0.0225
Creative Writing (Short Story) 2k tokens (plot outline) 10k tokens (story draft) Drafting a short story or creative piece based on a detailed prompt. $0.00112 (input) + $0.0226 (output) = $0.02372

Ring-1T's cost-effectiveness shines in scenarios with high input-to-output ratios or where the extensive context window is fully utilized. However, its verbosity and higher output token price mean that tasks requiring frequent, short, or highly concise outputs can quickly become more expensive than anticipated. Strategic prompt engineering to guide conciseness is crucial for managing costs.

How to control cost (a practical playbook)

Optimizing costs with Ring-1T involves leveraging its strengths while mitigating its weaknesses, particularly its verbosity and output pricing. Here are strategies to ensure efficient usage:

Master Prompt Engineering for Conciseness

Given Ring-1T's verbosity, explicit instructions for brevity are paramount. Guide the model to produce only necessary information.

  • Include phrases like "be concise," "provide only the key points," "limit response to X sentences/words."
  • Use few-shot examples that demonstrate the desired output length and style.
  • Specify output formats (e.g., bullet points, JSON) that naturally enforce structure and reduce extraneous text.
Leverage the Large Context Window Strategically

The 128k context window is a powerful asset, but using it efficiently is key to cost management.

  • Prioritize tasks where the full context is genuinely beneficial, such as summarizing very long documents or analyzing extensive conversation histories.
  • For shorter tasks, consider if a smaller, more cost-effective model might suffice, or if the input can be condensed without losing critical information.
  • Implement retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to fetch only relevant chunks of information into the prompt, rather than feeding entire databases.
Monitor and Analyze Output Token Usage

Regularly review the actual output token counts for your applications to identify areas of inefficiency.

  • Implement logging for input and output token counts for each API call.
  • Analyze patterns where the model generates excessive text and refine prompts accordingly.
  • Set up alerts for unusually high token usage in specific workflows to catch runaway costs early.
Consider Self-Hosting for High-Volume Workloads

As an open-weight model, Ring-1T presents a compelling case for self-hosting if your usage scales significantly.

  • Evaluate the total cost of ownership for self-hosting (hardware, infrastructure, MLOps staff) versus API costs at your projected volume.
  • Self-hosting eliminates per-token charges, offering predictable infrastructure costs and potentially significant savings for very high throughput.
  • Gain full control over model deployment, security, and fine-tuning, which can further optimize performance and cost.
Batch Processing for Efficiency

Given its moderate speed and latency, Ring-1T is well-suited for batch processing, which can be more cost-effective than real-time requests.

  • Queue up multiple requests and process them in batches, especially for tasks like document summarization or content generation.
  • This approach can optimize resource utilization and potentially reduce overall operational costs compared to numerous individual, real-time calls.

FAQ

What is Ring-1T's primary strength?

Ring-1T's primary strength lies in its exceptionally large 128k token context window and its open-weight, open-license nature. This makes it ideal for processing and generating very long documents or complex, multi-turn conversations, while also offering unparalleled flexibility for self-hosting and customization.

How does Ring-1T's intelligence compare to other models?

Ring-1T scores 42 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it below average among comparable models. While capable, it may require more explicit prompting or additional processing for tasks demanding high-level reasoning or nuanced understanding compared to top-tier models.

Is Ring-1T suitable for real-time applications?

With a Time to First Token (TTFT) of 2.42 seconds and an output speed of 36 tokens per second, Ring-1T is slower than average. While usable, these metrics suggest it might introduce noticeable delays in highly interactive or real-time applications. It's generally better suited for asynchronous or batch processing tasks.

How can I manage costs with Ring-1T, given its verbosity?

To manage costs, focus on aggressive prompt engineering to enforce conciseness. Explicitly instruct the model to be brief, use structured output formats (like bullet points or JSON), and provide few-shot examples of desired output length. Regularly monitor output token counts to identify and address areas of over-generation.

What are the benefits of Ring-1T's open license?

The open license allows organizations to self-host Ring-1T, eliminating per-token API costs for high-volume usage. It also provides the freedom to fine-tune the model with proprietary data, integrate it deeply into existing systems, and customize its behavior without vendor lock-in, offering significant long-term flexibility and control.

What kind of tasks is Ring-1T best suited for?

Ring-1T excels in tasks requiring extensive context processing, such as summarizing very long documents, analyzing large datasets, or drafting long-form content like reports and articles. It's also a strong candidate for applications where cost-effective input processing and the flexibility of an open-weight model are prioritized over bleeding-edge intelligence or speed.

How does Ring-1T's pricing compare to other models?

Ring-1T offers moderately priced input tokens ($0.56/M), which are competitive with the market average. However, its output tokens are somewhat more expensive ($2.26/M). This means it can be cost-effective for input-heavy tasks, but its verbosity combined with the higher output price can lead to increased total costs for output-intensive applications.


Subscribe