Solar Pro 2 is a high-speed, non-reasoning model from Upstage, offering above-average intelligence for focused text generation and processing tasks.
Solar Pro 2 (Non-reasoning) stands out as a robust offering from Upstage, specifically engineered for tasks that demand high throughput and efficient text generation without complex logical inference. This model excels in scenarios where rapid content production, summarization, or data extraction are paramount. Its performance metrics, particularly in output speed and latency, position it as a strong contender for applications requiring quick responses and high-volume processing.
Benchmarked across critical performance indicators, Solar Pro 2 demonstrates an impressive median output speed of 124 tokens per second, significantly faster than the average for comparable models. This speed is complemented by a low latency of just 1.20 seconds to the first token, making it highly responsive. Such characteristics are invaluable for real-time applications, interactive user experiences, and batch processing where time is a critical factor.
In terms of intelligence, Solar Pro 2 scores 30 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it comfortably above the average of 28 for its class. This indicates a strong capability in understanding and generating relevant text, even for a non-reasoning model. While it is noted for being somewhat verbose, generating 12M tokens during evaluation compared to an average of 11M, this verbosity can be an advantage in tasks requiring detailed or expansive outputs, provided it is managed effectively.
The model supports text input and output, featuring a substantial 66k token context window. This large context allows it to process and generate longer pieces of text, maintain coherence over extended dialogues, or handle complex documents without losing track of the broader narrative. This makes it suitable for a wide array of text-based applications, from content creation to sophisticated data processing pipelines.
From a pricing perspective, Solar Pro 2 is positioned with an input token price of $0.50 per 1M tokens and an output token price of $0.50 per 1M tokens. While its input token price is considered expensive compared to the average, its output token price is moderately priced. The blended price of $0.50 per 1M tokens (based on a 3:1 ratio) reflects a balanced cost structure, but users should be mindful of the input cost for token-heavy prompts. Overall, Solar Pro 2 offers a compelling blend of speed, intelligence, and context for non-reasoning tasks, making it a valuable asset for developers and businesses leveraging the Upstage ecosystem.
30 (#30 / 77 / 77)
124.4 tokens/s
$0.50 per 1M tokens
$0.50 per 1M tokens
12M tokens
1.20 seconds
| Spec | Details |
|---|---|
| Owner | Upstage |
| License | Proprietary |
| Context Window | 66k tokens |
| Input Type | Text |
| Output Type | Text |
| Model Type | Non-reasoning |
| API Provider | Upstage |
| Blended Price | $0.50 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) |
| Input Token Price | $0.50 per 1M tokens |
| Output Token Price | $0.50 per 1M tokens |
| Intelligence Index Score | 30 / 77 |
| Median Output Speed | 124.4 tokens/s |
| Latency (TTFT) | 1.20 seconds |
| Total Evaluation Cost | $24.07 (on Intelligence Index) |
Choosing the right model involves balancing performance, cost, and specific application requirements. For Solar Pro 2, its strengths lie in speed and non-reasoning intelligence within the Upstage ecosystem. Here's how it stacks up for various priorities:
| Priority | Pick | Why | Tradeoff to accept |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority | Pick | Why | Tradeoff |
| Maximum Output Speed | Upstage (Solar Pro 2) | Unmatched 124.4 tokens/s and low latency make it ideal for high-throughput generation. | Higher input token cost compared to some alternatives. |
| Cost-Effective Non-Reasoning | Alternative (e.g., smaller, open-source model) | If budget is the absolute top priority and slightly lower performance is acceptable. | Likely lower intelligence score, slower output speed, and smaller context window. |
| Balanced Performance & Cost | Upstage (Solar Pro 2) | Offers a strong blend of speed and above-average intelligence for its class, with a moderate blended price. | Input token price can be a factor for very long prompts. |
| Large Context Processing | Upstage (Solar Pro 2) | The 66k context window is excellent for handling extensive documents or maintaining long conversational threads. | Verbosity might lead to higher output token usage for some tasks. |
| Upstage Ecosystem Integration | Upstage (Solar Pro 2) | Native integration and optimization within the Upstage platform for seamless development and deployment. | Proprietary nature means less flexibility for multi-cloud or open-source strategies. |
Note: 'Alternative' models are hypothetical and represent general categories that might offer different trade-offs depending on specific market offerings.
Understanding the real-world cost implications of using Solar Pro 2 requires looking at typical application scenarios. The following examples illustrate estimated costs based on the model's pricing and performance characteristics, assuming a 3:1 input-to-output token ratio for the blended price.
| Scenario | Input | Output | What it represents | Estimated cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scenario | Input | Output | What it represents | Estimated Cost |
| Product Description Generation | 500 tokens (product features) | 1,500 tokens (description) | Generating marketing copy for e-commerce listings. | $0.0010 per description |
| Short Article Summarization | 5,000 tokens (article text) | 1,000 tokens (summary) | Condensing news articles or reports for quick consumption. | $0.0030 per summary |
| Customer Support Response Draft | 1,000 tokens (customer query, history) | 2,000 tokens (draft response) | Assisting agents by drafting initial replies to common inquiries. | $0.0015 per response |
| Data Extraction (Structured Text) | 10,000 tokens (document scan) | 500 tokens (extracted data) | Pulling specific fields from invoices or legal documents. | $0.0050 per document |
| Content Rephrasing/Paraphrasing | 2,000 tokens (original text) | 2,500 tokens (rephrased text) | Rewriting content for different tones or audiences. | $0.0015 per rephrase |
| Large Document Analysis (Chunked) | 60,000 tokens (document chunk) | 5,000 tokens (analysis notes) | Processing large reports in segments within the context window. | $0.0325 per chunk |
These examples highlight that while Solar Pro 2's input price is higher, its efficiency and speed can still make it cost-effective for many non-reasoning tasks, especially where output volume is high or latency is critical. Careful prompt engineering and output management are key to optimizing costs.
Optimizing the cost of using Solar Pro 2 involves strategic prompt design and understanding its unique characteristics. Here are key strategies to maximize efficiency and minimize expenditure:
Given Solar Pro 2's higher input token price, it's crucial to be concise with your prompts. Avoid unnecessary context or verbose instructions that don't directly contribute to the desired output.
Solar Pro 2 is noted for its verbosity. While this can be beneficial for detailed outputs, it can also lead to higher costs if not managed. Explicitly guide the model on desired output length and format.
The model's exceptional output speed is a significant advantage. Design your workflows to capitalize on this for high-volume tasks.
The 66k context window is powerful but should be used judiciously to balance cost and performance.
Solar Pro 2 (Non-reasoning) is ideal for tasks requiring high-speed text generation and processing without complex logical inference. This includes content creation (e.g., product descriptions, marketing copy), summarization, data extraction from structured text, rephrasing, and drafting responses in customer support or communication applications. Its speed and context window make it excellent for high-throughput and real-time scenarios.
As a non-reasoning model, Solar Pro 2 excels at pattern recognition, text generation, and understanding based on its training data, but it does not perform complex logical deduction, problem-solving, or deep analytical tasks that require multi-step reasoning. For tasks like mathematical calculations, complex code debugging, or strategic planning, a reasoning-capable model would be more appropriate.
Yes, Solar Pro 2 can be highly cost-effective, especially for applications that prioritize speed and require above-average intelligence for non-reasoning tasks. While its input token price is higher, its moderate output price and exceptional output speed can lead to overall efficiency gains. Strategic prompt engineering to minimize input tokens and control output verbosity is key to optimizing costs.
A 66k token context window allows Solar Pro 2 to process and generate significantly longer pieces of text while maintaining coherence. This is crucial for tasks involving lengthy documents, extended conversations, or complex data inputs where the model needs to retain a broad understanding of the information provided. It reduces the need for frequent summarization or chunking compared to models with smaller context windows.
Solar Pro 2 is notably fast, with a median output speed of 124.4 tokens per second, which is significantly above the average of 93 tokens per second for comparable models. This makes it one of the leading choices for applications where rapid content generation and low latency (1.20 seconds TTFT) are critical performance requirements.
When integrating Solar Pro 2, consider its strengths in speed and non-reasoning intelligence for appropriate task mapping. Pay close attention to prompt engineering to manage input costs and control output verbosity. Leverage its large context window for complex documents, and design your application to capitalize on its high throughput for scalable solutions within the Upstage ecosystem.
While the provided data doesn't explicitly detail multilingual capabilities, most modern large language models, including those from Upstage, are trained on diverse datasets and often support multiple languages. However, for critical multilingual applications, it's always recommended to test its performance thoroughly with your specific language pairs and use cases to ensure accuracy and fluency.