DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B (Distilled)

A high-speed Llama distillation with a premium price tag.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B (Distilled)

An exceptionally fast, distilled 70B parameter model with a massive 128k context window, offering strong intelligence but at a significantly higher cost than its open-weight peers.

70B Parameters128k ContextDistilled ModelHigh SpeedText GenerationOpen License

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is a specialized large language model developed by DeepSeek AI. As its name implies, this model is a “distilled” version of the powerful Llama 70B architecture. Distillation is a process where a smaller, more efficient model is trained to replicate the performance of a much larger one. The goal is to capture the intelligence and capabilities of the original while significantly improving inference speed and reducing computational requirements. This makes the model particularly well-suited for applications that demand rapid responses without sacrificing the quality expected from a 70-billion-parameter model.

The standout features of this model are its impressive speed and vast context window. With an average output speed of over 100 tokens per second and top providers pushing past 300 t/s, it ranks among the fastest models in its class. This performance is coupled with a 128,000-token context window, enabling it to process and reason over extensive documents, long conversations, or complex codebases in a single pass. This combination makes it a compelling choice for real-time analysis, advanced RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) systems, and interactive chatbots that need to maintain long-term memory.

However, this performance comes at a considerable cost. The model is priced at a premium, with both input and output tokens costing substantially more than the average for comparable open-weight models. Its intelligence score of 30 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index is solid, placing it above average, but it doesn't necessarily lead its class. Furthermore, the model exhibits a tendency towards verbosity, generating significantly more tokens in benchmark tests than the average model. This trait can inadvertently drive up operational costs, as more output tokens directly translate to a higher bill. Therefore, prospective users must weigh the model's raw speed and context capabilities against its higher operational expenses.

The provider ecosystem for DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is diverse, but performance varies dramatically. Benchmarks show a wide spectrum of results for speed, latency, and price across providers like SambaNova, Together.ai, Deepinfra, and Scaleway. For instance, time-to-first-token can range from an excellent 0.23 seconds to an unworkable 77 seconds. This highlights the critical importance of selecting a provider that aligns with the specific needs of an application, whether the priority is minimizing latency, maximizing throughput, or controlling costs.

Scoreboard

Intelligence

30 (13 / 44)

Scores above the average of 26 for comparable models, indicating strong reasoning and instruction-following capabilities.
Output speed

101.5 tokens/s

Notably fast, ranking 8th out of 44 models. This speed is a key advantage for real-time applications.
Input price

$0.80 / 1M tokens

Significantly more expensive than the average of $0.20 for comparable models.
Output price

$1.05 / 1M tokens

Also expensive compared to the average of $0.57, making high-volume generation costly.
Verbosity signal

52M tokens

Generates significantly more tokens than the average (13M) on intelligence tests, indicating a tendency towards verbosity.
Provider latency

0.23s TTFT

Best-case latency is excellent, but varies dramatically between providers, from 0.23s to over 77s.

Technical specifications

Spec Details
Model Name DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
Owner DeepSeek
License Open License
Parameters ~70 Billion (Distilled)
Context Window 128,000 tokens
Model Type Decoder-only Transformer
Architecture Distilled Llama
Input Modalities Text
Output Modalities Text
Primary Use Cases Chat, RAG, Summarization, Code Generation

What stands out beyond the scoreboard

Where this model wins
  • Blazing Speed: With top providers hitting over 300 tokens/second and an average of over 100 t/s, it's exceptionally fast for a 70B-class model, ideal for interactive applications.
  • Massive Context Window: A 128k context window allows it to process and analyze very large documents, from legal contracts to entire codebases, in a single prompt.
  • Strong Intelligence: Its intelligence score of 30 places it comfortably above average, making it capable of complex reasoning, summarization, and instruction-following tasks.
  • Provider Choice: Being available on multiple platforms like SambaNova, Together.ai, and Deepinfra gives users options to optimize for speed, cost, or latency based on their specific needs.
Where costs sneak up
  • Premium Pricing: Both input and output token prices are significantly higher than the average for open-weight models, making it one of the more expensive options in its class.
  • High Verbosity: The model's tendency to be verbose (generating 4x the average token count in tests) can dramatically increase output costs for any given task if not managed.
  • Inconsistent Provider Performance: There's a massive variance in performance across providers. For example, latency ranges from a snappy 0.23s to an unusable 77s, requiring careful provider selection.
  • Expensive Input: The high cost of input tokens makes leveraging its large 128k context window a costly proposition, especially for RAG applications that feed large amounts of text.
  • Distillation Trade-offs: While fast, as a distilled model, it may exhibit subtle performance differences or limitations compared to its non-distilled Llama 70B base model in highly nuanced tasks.

Provider pick

Choosing the right API provider for DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is crucial, as performance and cost vary dramatically. Your ideal choice depends entirely on whether your application prioritizes raw speed, immediate responsiveness (low latency), or budget efficiency. The data reveals clear winners for each of these scenarios.

Priority Pick Why Tradeoff to accept
Max Speed SambaNova Unmatched output speed at 338 tokens/s, over 3x faster than the next competitor. Ideal for high-throughput batch processing. Higher latency (0.97s) and not the cheapest option.
Lowest Latency Deepinfra Exceptional time-to-first-token at just 0.23s, making it feel instantaneous and perfect for real-time chat. Slower output speed (103 t/s) compared to the top performer.
Lowest Cost Deepinfra The most cost-effective provider with the lowest blended price ($0.63/M) and cheapest input tokens ($0.50/M). Output tokens are slightly more expensive than Novita's, but the overall package is superior.
Balanced Performance Together.ai Offers a good combination of low latency (0.54s) and high speed (106 t/s) for general-purpose use. The most expensive provider by a significant margin ($2.00/M blended price).
Budget Output (with caution) Novita Offers the absolute cheapest output tokens at $0.80/M. Extremely high latency (77.62s) and very low speed (27 t/s) make it unsuitable for almost any interactive use case.

Provider performance and pricing are subject to change and were captured during a specific benchmark period. Your own results may vary based on workload, region, and current server load.

Real workloads cost table

To understand the real-world financial impact of using DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B, let's estimate the cost for a few common tasks. These calculations use the most cost-effective provider, Deepinfra, with rates of $0.50 per 1M input tokens and $1.00 per 1M output tokens.

Scenario Input Output What it represents Estimated cost
Summarize a long report 20,000 tokens 1,000 tokens Document analysis where a large text is condensed into key points. ~$0.011
Moderate chatbot session 5,000 tokens 5,000 tokens An interactive conversation with balanced input and output. ~$0.0075
Generate a Python script 500 tokens 2,000 tokens A typical code generation task from a detailed prompt. ~$0.0023
RAG query on a large document 100,000 tokens 500 tokens Leveraging the large context window to find and synthesize an answer from a dense source. ~$0.0505
Multi-turn technical support 15,000 tokens 8,000 tokens A lengthy, complex support interaction requiring significant context. ~$0.0155

The model's high input price makes large-context tasks, like the RAG query, noticeably more expensive than individual interactions. Similarly, its tendency towards verbosity can inflate costs on generative tasks if not carefully managed through prompting.

How to control cost (a practical playbook)

Given its premium pricing and verbose nature, managing the cost of DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is essential for sustainable deployment. Here are several strategies to keep your expenses in check without sacrificing performance.

Choose Your Provider Wisely

Your choice of provider has the single biggest impact on cost and performance. Don't default to one provider for all tasks.

  • For cost-sensitive batch jobs: Use Deepinfra. It offers the lowest blended price and is ideal for asynchronous tasks where latency is not a primary concern.
  • For speed-critical applications: Use SambaNova. The higher cost is justified by its industry-leading throughput, which can be crucial for user-facing features.
  • For real-time chat: Use Deepinfra. Its sub-second latency provides the best user experience for interactive applications.
Actively Control Output Verbosity

This model tends to be verbose, which directly increases output token costs. Use prompt engineering to enforce brevity.

  • Include explicit instructions in your prompts, such as "Be concise," "Answer in one paragraph," or "Use bullet points."
  • Set a lower max_tokens limit in your API call to create a hard cap on the output length, preventing runaway generation.
  • Experiment with temperature settings; lower temperatures often lead to more focused and less rambling responses.
Optimize Your Context Window Usage

The 128k context window is powerful but expensive to fill. Avoid passing unnecessary information to the model.

  • Instead of feeding an entire document, use a pre-processing step (like embeddings-based search) to identify and send only the most relevant chunks of text.
  • For chat applications, implement a context summarization strategy. Periodically summarize the conversation history and use the summary as context for future turns, rather than the full transcript.
Implement Caching Strategies

Many user queries are repetitive. Caching responses to common prompts can eliminate redundant API calls and save significant costs.

  • Implement a simple key-value store (like Redis) to cache results for identical prompts.
  • For similar but not identical prompts, consider semantic caching, which uses embeddings to find and return cached responses for semantically similar queries.

FAQ

What is DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B?

It is a large language model from DeepSeek AI that has been "distilled" from the Llama 70B architecture. This process aims to create a faster, more efficient model that retains the core intelligence of its larger predecessor, making it suitable for high-speed applications.

What does "distilled" mean for an AI model?

Distillation is a training technique where a smaller "student" model learns to mimic the outputs and behavior of a larger, more complex "teacher" model. The result is a student model that is significantly faster and requires fewer computational resources for inference, often with only a minor trade-off in performance quality.

How does it compare to the original Llama 70B?

It is designed to be much faster at generating responses. While it aims to match the intelligence of the original, there may be subtle differences or slight performance degradation on highly specific or nuanced tasks. The primary trade-off is sacrificing a small amount of potential capability for a large gain in speed.

What is the main advantage of this model?

Its primary advantage is speed. With some providers achieving over 300 tokens per second, it is one of the fastest models in the 70B parameter class, making it excellent for real-time, interactive use cases where response time is critical.

What is its main disadvantage?

Its main disadvantage is cost. Both input and output token prices are substantially higher than the average for other open-weight models of a similar size. Its tendency to be verbose can further amplify these costs if not properly managed.

Is the 128k context window always useful?

The 128k context window is incredibly powerful for tasks requiring analysis of large documents or long conversation histories. However, due to the high input token price, filling this window is expensive. It is most effective when used judiciously for specific, high-value tasks rather than as a default for all queries.

Which provider is the best for this model?

There is no single "best" provider; it depends on your priority:

  • Lowest Cost: Deepinfra
  • Highest Speed: SambaNova
  • Lowest Latency: Deepinfra
  • Balanced (but expensive): Together.ai

Subscribe