An exceptionally fast, distilled 70B parameter model with a massive 128k context window, offering strong intelligence but at a significantly higher cost than its open-weight peers.
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is a specialized large language model developed by DeepSeek AI. As its name implies, this model is a “distilled” version of the powerful Llama 70B architecture. Distillation is a process where a smaller, more efficient model is trained to replicate the performance of a much larger one. The goal is to capture the intelligence and capabilities of the original while significantly improving inference speed and reducing computational requirements. This makes the model particularly well-suited for applications that demand rapid responses without sacrificing the quality expected from a 70-billion-parameter model.
The standout features of this model are its impressive speed and vast context window. With an average output speed of over 100 tokens per second and top providers pushing past 300 t/s, it ranks among the fastest models in its class. This performance is coupled with a 128,000-token context window, enabling it to process and reason over extensive documents, long conversations, or complex codebases in a single pass. This combination makes it a compelling choice for real-time analysis, advanced RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) systems, and interactive chatbots that need to maintain long-term memory.
However, this performance comes at a considerable cost. The model is priced at a premium, with both input and output tokens costing substantially more than the average for comparable open-weight models. Its intelligence score of 30 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index is solid, placing it above average, but it doesn't necessarily lead its class. Furthermore, the model exhibits a tendency towards verbosity, generating significantly more tokens in benchmark tests than the average model. This trait can inadvertently drive up operational costs, as more output tokens directly translate to a higher bill. Therefore, prospective users must weigh the model's raw speed and context capabilities against its higher operational expenses.
The provider ecosystem for DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is diverse, but performance varies dramatically. Benchmarks show a wide spectrum of results for speed, latency, and price across providers like SambaNova, Together.ai, Deepinfra, and Scaleway. For instance, time-to-first-token can range from an excellent 0.23 seconds to an unworkable 77 seconds. This highlights the critical importance of selecting a provider that aligns with the specific needs of an application, whether the priority is minimizing latency, maximizing throughput, or controlling costs.
30 (13 / 44)
101.5 tokens/s
$0.80 / 1M tokens
$1.05 / 1M tokens
52M tokens
0.23s TTFT
| Spec | Details |
|---|---|
| Model Name | DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B |
| Owner | DeepSeek |
| License | Open License |
| Parameters | ~70 Billion (Distilled) |
| Context Window | 128,000 tokens |
| Model Type | Decoder-only Transformer |
| Architecture | Distilled Llama |
| Input Modalities | Text |
| Output Modalities | Text |
| Primary Use Cases | Chat, RAG, Summarization, Code Generation |
Choosing the right API provider for DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is crucial, as performance and cost vary dramatically. Your ideal choice depends entirely on whether your application prioritizes raw speed, immediate responsiveness (low latency), or budget efficiency. The data reveals clear winners for each of these scenarios.
| Priority | Pick | Why | Tradeoff to accept |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max Speed | SambaNova | Unmatched output speed at 338 tokens/s, over 3x faster than the next competitor. Ideal for high-throughput batch processing. | Higher latency (0.97s) and not the cheapest option. |
| Lowest Latency | Deepinfra | Exceptional time-to-first-token at just 0.23s, making it feel instantaneous and perfect for real-time chat. | Slower output speed (103 t/s) compared to the top performer. |
| Lowest Cost | Deepinfra | The most cost-effective provider with the lowest blended price ($0.63/M) and cheapest input tokens ($0.50/M). | Output tokens are slightly more expensive than Novita's, but the overall package is superior. |
| Balanced Performance | Together.ai | Offers a good combination of low latency (0.54s) and high speed (106 t/s) for general-purpose use. | The most expensive provider by a significant margin ($2.00/M blended price). |
| Budget Output (with caution) | Novita | Offers the absolute cheapest output tokens at $0.80/M. | Extremely high latency (77.62s) and very low speed (27 t/s) make it unsuitable for almost any interactive use case. |
Provider performance and pricing are subject to change and were captured during a specific benchmark period. Your own results may vary based on workload, region, and current server load.
To understand the real-world financial impact of using DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B, let's estimate the cost for a few common tasks. These calculations use the most cost-effective provider, Deepinfra, with rates of $0.50 per 1M input tokens and $1.00 per 1M output tokens.
| Scenario | Input | Output | What it represents | Estimated cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Summarize a long report | 20,000 tokens | 1,000 tokens | Document analysis where a large text is condensed into key points. | ~$0.011 |
| Moderate chatbot session | 5,000 tokens | 5,000 tokens | An interactive conversation with balanced input and output. | ~$0.0075 |
| Generate a Python script | 500 tokens | 2,000 tokens | A typical code generation task from a detailed prompt. | ~$0.0023 |
| RAG query on a large document | 100,000 tokens | 500 tokens | Leveraging the large context window to find and synthesize an answer from a dense source. | ~$0.0505 |
| Multi-turn technical support | 15,000 tokens | 8,000 tokens | A lengthy, complex support interaction requiring significant context. | ~$0.0155 |
The model's high input price makes large-context tasks, like the RAG query, noticeably more expensive than individual interactions. Similarly, its tendency towards verbosity can inflate costs on generative tasks if not carefully managed through prompting.
Given its premium pricing and verbose nature, managing the cost of DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is essential for sustainable deployment. Here are several strategies to keep your expenses in check without sacrificing performance.
Your choice of provider has the single biggest impact on cost and performance. Don't default to one provider for all tasks.
This model tends to be verbose, which directly increases output token costs. Use prompt engineering to enforce brevity.
max_tokens limit in your API call to create a hard cap on the output length, preventing runaway generation.The 128k context window is powerful but expensive to fill. Avoid passing unnecessary information to the model.
Many user queries are repetitive. Caching responses to common prompts can eliminate redundant API calls and save significant costs.
It is a large language model from DeepSeek AI that has been "distilled" from the Llama 70B architecture. This process aims to create a faster, more efficient model that retains the core intelligence of its larger predecessor, making it suitable for high-speed applications.
Distillation is a training technique where a smaller "student" model learns to mimic the outputs and behavior of a larger, more complex "teacher" model. The result is a student model that is significantly faster and requires fewer computational resources for inference, often with only a minor trade-off in performance quality.
It is designed to be much faster at generating responses. While it aims to match the intelligence of the original, there may be subtle differences or slight performance degradation on highly specific or nuanced tasks. The primary trade-off is sacrificing a small amount of potential capability for a large gain in speed.
Its primary advantage is speed. With some providers achieving over 300 tokens per second, it is one of the fastest models in the 70B parameter class, making it excellent for real-time, interactive use cases where response time is critical.
Its main disadvantage is cost. Both input and output token prices are substantially higher than the average for other open-weight models of a similar size. Its tendency to be verbose can further amplify these costs if not properly managed.
The 128k context window is incredibly powerful for tasks requiring analysis of large documents or long conversation histories. However, due to the high input token price, filling this window is expensive. It is most effective when used judiciously for specific, high-value tasks rather than as a default for all queries.
There is no single "best" provider; it depends on your priority: