DeepSeek V3 0324 (non-reasoning)

An analysis of performance and cost across 11 API providers.

DeepSeek V3 0324 (non-reasoning)

An updated, open-weight model with a large context window, offering above-average intelligence but with a complex and varied pricing landscape across providers.

Open License128k ContextText GenerationMarch 2025 UpdateHigh Throughput

DeepSeek V3 0324, launched on March 24, 2025, is an iterative update to the original DeepSeek V3 model from late 2024. While architecturally identical to its predecessor, this version represents a refinement and has been made available through a wide array of API providers, creating a diverse ecosystem for developers. As an open-license model, it offers significant flexibility for customization and deployment. Its most notable technical feature is a massive 128,000-token context window, enabling applications that require understanding and processing of very large amounts of information in a single pass.

In terms of cognitive ability, DeepSeek V3 0324 performs admirably. It achieves a score of 41 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it comfortably above the average score of 33 for comparable open-weight, non-reasoning models. This makes it a strong contender for tasks requiring nuanced understanding and generation, such as summarization, content creation, and complex Q&A. During the evaluation, it generated 11 million tokens, a figure that suggests it is fairly concise and less prone to excessive verbosity than some of its peers. The total cost to run this evaluation was $61.23, a metric that hints at the model's overall operational expense.

However, the story of DeepSeek V3 0324 is one of extreme variance. The choice of an API provider has a dramatic impact on performance and cost. For raw speed, providers like Fireworks (252 tokens/s) and Nebius Fast (236 tokens/s) lead the pack, offering blazing-fast throughput. For applications where responsiveness is critical, Fireworks also delivers the lowest latency with a time-to-first-token (TTFT) of just 0.33 seconds. On the other end of the spectrum, cost-conscious developers will gravitate towards Deepinfra, which boasts the lowest blended price at just $0.41 per million tokens. This fragmentation means there is no single 'best' provider; the optimal choice is entirely dependent on the specific needs of an application.

This analysis dives deep into the performance of 11 different API providers, including Nebius, Microsoft Azure, SambaNova, Together.ai, and Replicate, among others. For developers considering DeepSeek V3 0324, this page serves as a critical guide to navigating the complex trade-offs between speed, latency, and price. Making an informed decision requires understanding not just the model's capabilities, but also the distinct advantages and disadvantages offered by each platform hosting it.

Scoreboard

Intelligence

41 (12 / 30)

Scores 41 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it above the class average of 33.
Output speed

252 tokens/s

Fastest provider (Fireworks). Performance varies significantly, from 106 to 252 t/s across providers.
Input price

0.25 $/M tokens

Lowest provider (Deepinfra). Prices range widely, up to an average of $1.14/M tokens on some platforms.
Output price

0.88 $/M tokens

Lowest providers (GMI, Deepinfra). Output costs can be as high as $1.25/M tokens on other services.
Verbosity signal

11M tokens

Total tokens generated during intelligence testing. Considered fairly concise for its class.
Provider latency

0.33 s

Lowest latency provider (Fireworks). Time to first token can reach 0.80s on other platforms.

Technical specifications

Spec Details
Model Name DeepSeek V3 0324
Owner DeepSeek
License Open License
Release Date March 24, 2025
Architecture Transformer-based, identical to DeepSeek V3 (Dec 2024)
Context Window 128,000 tokens
Input Modalities Text
Output Modalities Text
Fastest Provider (Speed) Fireworks (252 tokens/s)
Fastest Provider (Latency) Fireworks (0.33s TTFT)
Cheapest Provider (Blended) Deepinfra ($0.41 / M tokens)
Cheapest Provider (Input) Deepinfra ($0.25 / M tokens)
Cheapest Provider (Output) GMI & Deepinfra ($0.88 / M tokens)

What stands out beyond the scoreboard

Where this model wins
  • Exceptional Context Window: With 128k tokens of context, it can process and analyze entire books, extensive legal documents, or massive codebases in a single prompt, enabling complex, long-range reasoning.
  • Strong Intelligence: A score of 41 on the Intelligence Index puts it in the upper echelon of open-weight models, making it reliable for tasks that require nuance and accuracy.
  • High Throughput Potential: When deployed on optimized infrastructure like Fireworks or Nebius Fast, the model achieves very high output speeds (over 230 tokens/s), ideal for applications requiring rapid generation.
  • Cost-Effective Options: The availability on low-cost providers like Deepinfra and GMI (under $0.50/M blended) makes it accessible for startups, researchers, and projects with tight budgets.
  • Open License Flexibility: The open license grants developers the freedom to self-host, fine-tune, and modify the model, avoiding vendor lock-in and allowing for deep integration.
Where costs sneak up
  • Extreme Provider Price Variance: The blended price can vary by more than 2x between the cheapest ($0.41/M at Deepinfra) and more premium providers ($0.90/M at Fireworks). Choosing the wrong provider for a high-volume task can dramatically inflate costs.
  • Input vs. Output Price Traps: Providers often price input and output tokens differently. A workload heavy on input (like RAG) can become expensive on a provider with cheap output but costly input tokens.
  • The Large Context Trap: While the 128k context window is powerful, using it fully is expensive. A single prompt with 100k input tokens costs over $0.025 even on the cheapest provider, which adds up quickly.
  • Speed Comes at a Premium: The fastest providers are not the cheapest. Achieving the lowest latency and highest throughput requires paying for premium infrastructure, creating a direct trade-off between user experience and operational cost.
  • Inconsistent Performance: The performance gap is stark. An application developed on a fast provider like SambaNova (234 t/s) may feel sluggish and unresponsive if later moved to a slower one like Azure (106 t/s) to save costs.

Provider pick

Choosing the right API provider for DeepSeek V3 0324 is a critical decision that directly impacts your application's performance and budget. There is no single 'best' choice; the optimal provider depends entirely on your primary business objective. Is your priority raw speed for a real-time application, the lowest possible cost for batch processing, or a balanced approach?

Priority Pick Why Tradeoff to accept
Maximum Throughput Fireworks Delivers the highest output speed at 252 tokens/second, making it ideal for generating large volumes of text quickly. It is one of the more expensive options, with a blended price of $0.90 per million tokens.
Lowest Latency Fireworks With a time-to-first-token of only 0.33 seconds, it provides the most responsive user experience for interactive applications like chatbots. This top-tier responsiveness comes at a higher price point compared to budget providers.
Lowest Overall Cost Deepinfra Offers the most cost-effective solution with a blended price of $0.41 per million tokens and the cheapest input price at $0.25. Performance is not top-tier; latency is double that of Fireworks (0.66s) and output speed is lower than the fastest options.
Balanced Performance SambaNova Provides an excellent balance of very high speed (234 t/s) and low latency (0.57s), making it a strong all-around choice. Pricing is not in the budget category, so it represents a mid-to-high tier investment for its premium performance.
Cheap, Long-Context Tasks Deepinfra Its market-leading input price of $0.25/M tokens makes it the go-to for RAG or document analysis workloads that are input-heavy. The trade-off is moderate latency and throughput, which may not be suitable for real-time use cases.

Note: Provider benchmarks reflect performance at a specific point in time. Pricing and speeds can change as providers update their infrastructure and pricing models. Always verify current rates before committing to a provider.

Real workloads cost table

Theoretical prices per million tokens can be abstract. To make these costs more tangible, let's estimate the expense of several common real-world tasks using DeepSeek V3 0324. These calculations are based on the most cost-effective provider, Deepinfra, with prices of $0.25 per 1M input tokens and $0.88 per 1M output tokens.

Scenario Input Output What it represents Estimated cost
Article Summarization 10,000 tokens 500 tokens Condensing a long news article or blog post into a concise summary. ~$0.0029
RAG Chatbot Response 4,000 tokens 200 tokens A single turn in a chat application using retrieval-augmented generation for context. ~$0.0012
Code Generation Snippet 500 tokens 1,500 tokens Generating a function or class based on a descriptive comment prompt. ~$0.0014
Long-Form Content Draft 200 tokens 3,000 tokens Creating a first draft of a marketing email or short blog post from an outline. ~$0.0027
Large Document Analysis 100,000 tokens 1,000 tokens Analyzing a lengthy legal document or research paper to extract key findings. ~$0.0259

The takeaway is clear: while individual API calls are fractions of a cent, costs are driven by scale and context size. The 'Large Document Analysis' scenario demonstrates how quickly expenses can rise when leveraging the model's 128k context window. For high-volume applications, even these small costs can accumulate into a significant monthly bill.

How to control cost (a practical playbook)

Effectively managing the cost of using DeepSeek V3 0324 is crucial for building a sustainable application. The key is to move beyond default settings and implement strategies that align your usage patterns with the provider's pricing structure. Below are several tactics to help you optimize your spending without sacrificing essential performance.

Profile Your Workload First

Before choosing a provider, analyze your application's token ratio. Is it input-heavy or output-heavy?

  • Input-Heavy (e.g., RAG, document analysis): Your prompts are much larger than the model's responses. Prioritize providers with the lowest input token prices, like Deepinfra ($0.25/M).
  • Output-Heavy (e.g., content creation, code generation): The model generates significantly more tokens than it receives. Focus on providers with competitive output prices, like GMI or Deepinfra (both $0.88/M).

Mismatching your workload to a provider's pricing model is one of the most common sources of budget overruns.

Use Tiered Providers for Different Tasks

A single application may have different performance requirements. Consider using multiple providers for different features to optimize both cost and user experience.

  • User-Facing Features: For interactive chatbots or real-time features, use a high-performance, low-latency provider like Fireworks or SambaNova. The higher cost is justified by the improved user experience.
  • Asynchronous & Batch Jobs: For background tasks like summarizing articles, generating reports, or data analysis, use a low-cost provider like Deepinfra or GMI. Since speed is not critical, you can benefit from the lowest possible prices.
Actively Manage the 128k Context Window

The 128k context window is a powerful tool, but also a significant cost driver. Do not pass large contexts to the model unnecessarily.

  • Prompt Engineering: Be as concise as possible in your instructions.
  • Context Pruning: Before sending a large document, use a cheaper model or a keyword-based algorithm to extract only the most relevant sections.
  • Summarization Chains: For extremely large texts, break them into chunks, summarize each chunk, and then feed the summaries to the model for a final analysis. This is often cheaper than a single massive prompt.
Implement a Caching Layer

Many applications receive repetitive user queries. A caching layer stores the results of previous API calls, allowing you to serve the same response again without re-running the model. This is highly effective for:

  • Frequently asked questions in a support bot.
  • Common search queries.
  • Identical requests from different users.

Implementing a simple key-value store (like Redis) to cache prompt-result pairs can dramatically reduce API calls and lower both cost and latency.

FAQ

What is DeepSeek V3 0324?

DeepSeek V3 0324 is an open-license large language model released in March 2025. It is an updated version of the original DeepSeek V3, sharing the same core architecture but offered through a wider range of API providers. Its key features are a 128,000-token context window and strong performance on intelligence benchmarks.

How intelligent is this model?

It scores 41 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index. This places it above the average of 33 for its class of open-weight, non-reasoning models, making it a capable choice for tasks requiring comprehension, summarization, and nuanced text generation.

Why is there such a big difference in provider performance?

The performance variance across providers is due to several factors:

  • Hardware: The type and generation of GPUs (e.g., NVIDIA H100 vs. A100) used to run the model.
  • Software Optimization: The efficiency of the provider's inference stack, including technologies like quantization, kernel fusion, and batching strategies.
  • Network Infrastructure: The geographic location of the data centers and the quality of the network can affect latency (time-to-first-token).
  • Load: The number of concurrent users on a platform can also impact performance during peak times.
Who is the best provider for DeepSeek V3 0324?

There is no single 'best' provider. The ideal choice depends on your application's specific needs:

  • For maximum speed and responsiveness, choose Fireworks.
  • For the absolute lowest cost, especially for batch processing, choose Deepinfra.
  • For a strong balance of speed and latency at a moderate price, consider SambaNova.

You must analyze the trade-offs between performance and price to find the right fit for your use case.

Is the 128k context window always a good thing?

The 128k context window is a double-edged sword. It's incredibly powerful for analyzing large documents or maintaining long conversational histories. However, it can also be a major cost driver, as input tokens are priced per token. Using the full context window for every call is inefficient and expensive. It's best used strategically for tasks that genuinely require it, while smaller, more relevant contexts should be used for routine queries.

What does 'Open License' mean for a developer?

An 'Open License' (often referred to as 'open weight') means the model's weights—the parameters that contain its learned knowledge—are publicly available. This gives developers the freedom to download the model and run it on their own infrastructure (self-hosting), fine-tune it on their private data to create a specialized version, and modify its architecture. This avoids vendor lock-in associated with closed, proprietary models and allows for greater control and customization.


Subscribe