DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Non-reasoning)

Elite intelligence in a flexible, open-weight package.

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Non-reasoning)

A highly capable open-source model offering top-tier intelligence and a massive 128k context window, with diverse provider options balancing cost and speed.

Open Source128k ContextText GenerationDeepSeekHigh Intelligence

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Non-reasoning) emerges as a formidable contender in the landscape of open-weight large language models. Developed by DeepSeek AI, this model distinguishes itself through a potent combination of high-level intelligence, a vast 128,000-token context window, and an accessible open license. It is engineered for a wide array of text generation tasks, positioning itself as a powerful alternative to both proprietary models and other open-source giants. The "Non-reasoning" designation suggests it is optimized for direct generation, comprehension, and summarization tasks rather than complex, multi-step logical problem-solving, making it a workhorse for content creation and data processing.

On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus achieves an impressive score of 46, placing it firmly in the upper echelon of models in its class, which average a score of 33. This high score indicates a strong capability for understanding nuance, generating coherent and contextually relevant text, and performing complex instruction-following. Its performance in our tests shows it can produce high-quality output across a variety of domains. In terms of output length, it generated 11 million tokens during the index evaluation, which is right on par with the class average, suggesting it provides a standard level of detail without being excessively terse or verbose by default.

The provider ecosystem for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus is a study in trade-offs, offering users a clear choice between raw performance and cost efficiency. On one end of the spectrum, providers like SambaNova deliver blistering output speeds, reaching up to 236 tokens per second, but at a premium price point. On the other end, providers such as Novita and Deepinfra offer quantized versions (FP8 and FP4, respectively) that slash prices to as low as $0.27 per million input tokens. This makes the model exceptionally affordable for developers on a budget, though it comes at the cost of significantly reduced generation speed. This diversity allows teams to select an inference provider that aligns perfectly with their specific application needs, whether it's real-time chat, batch processing, or cost-sensitive internal tools.

Scoreboard

Intelligence

46 (5 / 30)

Scoring 46 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, this model ranks in the top tier, significantly outperforming the class average of 33.
Output speed

18 - 236 tokens/s

Speed varies drastically by provider. SambaNova offers the highest throughput, while quantized versions from Deepinfra and Novita are on the slower end.
Input price

0.27 $/M tokens

The lowest prices are available from providers offering quantized versions, such as Novita (FP8) and Deepinfra (FP4).
Output price

1.00 $/M tokens

Output tokens are more expensive than input. The most cost-effective rates are found with quantized model providers.
Verbosity signal

11M tokens

Generated 11 million tokens during intelligence testing, placing it right at the average for its peer group, indicating a standard level of detail in its responses.
Provider latency

0.67 s

Deepinfra's FP4 quantized version provides the fastest time-to-first-token, making it ideal for interactive applications where initial response time is critical.

Technical specifications

Spec Details
Owner DeepSeek
License Open License (DeepSeek License)
Context Window 128,000 tokens
Input Modality Text
Output Modality Text
Model Type Generative Pre-trained Transformer
Intelligence Score 46 (Ranked #5 of 30)
Quantization FP4 and FP8 versions available via select providers
Fastest Provider (Speed) SambaNova (236 tokens/s)
Fastest Provider (Latency) Deepinfra (0.67s TTFT)
Cheapest Provider Novita & Deepinfra ($0.45/M blended)

What stands out beyond the scoreboard

Where this model wins
  • Exceptional Intelligence: With a score of 46 on the Intelligence Index, it stands out as one of the smarter open-weight models available, capable of handling complex instructions and generating high-quality text.
  • Massive Context Window: The 128k context window is a significant advantage, allowing the model to process and reference extremely long documents, codebases, or chat histories in a single pass.
  • Cost-Effective Options: The availability of heavily quantized versions (FP8/FP4) from providers like Novita and Deepinfra makes it one of the most budget-friendly models in its performance tier for teams prioritizing low cost.
  • Provider Flexibility: Users can choose from a range of providers, optimizing for either maximum speed (SambaNova), lowest latency (Deepinfra), lowest cost (Novita), or a balanced profile (Eigen AI, Fireworks).
  • Open and Permissive License: The open license encourages wide adoption, modification, and deployment, including for commercial use, fostering a vibrant community and ecosystem around the model.
Where costs sneak up
  • High-Performance Pricing: Opting for the fastest provider, SambaNova, results in a blended price over 7 times higher than the cheapest options. High-throughput needs come with a steep cost premium.
  • Output Token Premium: Across all providers, output tokens are significantly more expensive than input tokens. Applications that generate lengthy responses will see costs accumulate quickly.
  • The 128k Context Trap: While powerful, consistently using the large context window for tasks that don't require it will dramatically inflate input costs. It's a tool to be used judiciously.
  • Speed vs. Cost Trade-off: The cheapest providers are also the slowest. For applications requiring real-time user interaction, the low-cost quantized models may introduce unacceptable lag.
  • Balanced Can Still Be Pricey: While providers like Eigen AI and Fireworks offer a good balance, their prices are still nearly double that of the most cost-effective quantized options, a difference that adds up at scale.

Provider pick

Choosing the right API provider for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus depends entirely on your primary goal. The diverse ecosystem means you can prioritize raw speed, immediate responsiveness, rock-bottom costs, or a strategic balance of all three. Below is a breakdown of our top picks based on different operational priorities.

Priority Pick Why Tradeoff to accept
Lowest Cost Novita (FP8) or Deepinfra (FP4) These providers offer identical, unbeatable blended pricing at just $0.45 per million tokens. They are the clear choice for batch processing, offline analysis, and any non-time-sensitive task where budget is the main constraint. Very low output speed (18-25 tokens/s) and higher latency, making them unsuitable for real-time conversational applications.
Highest Speed SambaNova At 236 tokens per second, SambaNova is over 50% faster than the next-closest competitor. This is the premier choice for applications that need to generate large amounts of text as quickly as possible. Extreme cost. It is by far the most expensive provider, with a blended price of $3.38 per million tokens, making it a specialized choice for high-value, performance-critical workloads.
Lowest Latency Deepinfra (FP4) With a time-to-first-token (TTFT) of just 0.67 seconds, Deepinfra delivers the fastest initial response. This is critical for chatbots and interactive tools where users expect an immediate sign that the model is working. While the first token is fast, the overall output speed is the lowest of all benchmarked providers at 18 tokens/s. The conversation starts fast but proceeds slowly.
Balanced Performance Eigen AI Eigen AI strikes an excellent compromise. It boasts the second-highest output speed (144 t/s) and second-lowest latency (1.01s) while maintaining a very reasonable blended price of $0.80 per million tokens. It's not the absolute cheapest, fastest, or most responsive. It's a jack-of-all-trades that excels by not having a major weakness, making it a superb default choice.

Note: Performance metrics are based on specific benchmark conditions. Your real-world mileage may vary depending on workload, concurrency, and geographic location. Prices are subject to change by the provider.

Real workloads cost table

Theoretical per-token prices can be abstract. To make costs more tangible, let's estimate the price of running common tasks through DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus. For these calculations, we'll use the pricing from our 'Balanced Performance' pick, Eigen AI, which charges $0.40 per 1M input tokens and $2.00 per 1M output tokens. This provides a realistic middle-ground cost estimate.

Scenario Input Output What it represents Estimated cost
Document Summarization 10,000 tokens 500 tokens Condensing a long article or report into key takeaways. A common RAG or document analysis task. ~$0.005
RAG Chat Session 4,100 tokens 300 tokens A user asks a question, with 4k tokens of relevant context retrieved from a knowledge base. ~$0.0022
Code Generation 200 tokens 800 tokens Generating a complex function or class based on a detailed natural language prompt. ~$0.0017
Marketing Email Draft 50 tokens 250 tokens Expanding a few bullet points into a full promotional email. A typical content creation task. ~$0.0005
Multi-turn Conversation 1,500 tokens 1,000 tokens A simulated 5-turn conversation where context is maintained and passed back with each turn. ~$0.0026

These examples demonstrate that for individual tasks, the cost is fractional. However, for applications serving thousands of users, these costs scale linearly, highlighting the importance of choosing the right provider and optimizing usage.

How to control cost (a practical playbook)

Managing inference costs is crucial for deploying any LLM at scale. DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus offers several levers you can pull to optimize your spend without sacrificing too much performance. By being strategic about your provider choice, context usage, and prompting, you can significantly reduce your operational expenses.

Match the Provider to the Job

The most impactful cost-saving measure is selecting the right provider for your workload. Don't default to a single provider for all tasks.

  • For background tasks: Use the ultra-low-cost quantized models from Novita or Deepinfra for batch processing, report generation, or data analysis where latency and speed are not user-facing.
  • For interactive tasks: Use a balanced provider like Eigen AI or Fireworks for chatbots and interactive tools that require a good mix of speed, latency, and reasonable cost.
  • For high-throughput needs: Only use a premium-priced, high-speed provider like SambaNova when the business value of maximum throughput justifies the significant cost increase.
Leverage Quantization Aggressively

Quantization is the process of reducing the precision of the model's weights (e.g., from 16-bit floating point to 4-bit or 8-bit integers). This dramatically reduces the model's size and computational requirements, leading to lower hosting costs that providers pass on to you.

  • The FP4 and FP8 versions from Deepinfra and Novita cut the blended price by nearly 50% compared to the next cheapest non-quantized option.
  • While there can be a minor drop in output quality with quantization, for many tasks, it is imperceptible. Always test a quantized endpoint first to see if it meets your quality bar before opting for a more expensive, full-precision model.
Be Disciplined with Context

The 128k context window is a powerful feature, but it's also a potential budget-breaker if misused. The cost of a request is directly proportional to the number of input tokens.

  • Don't use it if you don't need it: For simple queries or conversations, use a much smaller context. Only send the full 128k tokens when you are genuinely processing a document that large.
  • Implement context management: For chatbots, use summarization techniques or sliding window strategies to keep the context passed with each turn to a manageable size. Don't just append the entire chat history indefinitely.
Prompt for Brevity

Output tokens are consistently more expensive than input tokens. You can control the length of the model's response through careful prompting, directly impacting your costs.

  • Set clear constraints: Add instructions to your prompt like "Be concise," "Respond in three sentences," "Use bullet points," or "Limit the response to 100 words."
  • Refine your prompts: If you find the model is consistently too verbose for a specific task, iterate on the system prompt to guide it toward shorter, more direct answers. This small, one-time effort can lead to significant savings over time.

FAQ

What is DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus?

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus is a large language model from DeepSeek AI. It is an open-weight model, meaning its architecture and weights are publicly available under a specific license. It is designed for a wide range of text-based tasks and is notable for its high intelligence score and very large 128,000-token context window.

What does the "(Non-reasoning)" tag mean?

The "(Non-reasoning)" designation typically implies that this version of the model is optimized for direct instruction-following, text generation, summarization, and comprehension tasks. It may be distinct from other variants in the DeepSeek family that are specifically fine-tuned for complex, multi-step logical reasoning, mathematical problem-solving, or advanced planning. This version is a general-purpose workhorse for content and language processing.

How does it compare to other open-source models?

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus is highly competitive. Its intelligence score of 46 places it among the top performers in its class, outperforming many similarly-sized models. Its key differentiators are the combination of this high intelligence with a 128k context window and the availability of very low-cost quantized endpoints, offering a unique blend of performance and value.

What is quantization (FP8/FP4) and how does it affect performance?

Quantization is a technique to reduce the memory and computational footprint of a model by using lower-precision numbers for its weights (e.g., 4-bit or 8-bit integers instead of 16-bit floats). This has two main effects:

  • Cost: It makes the model much cheaper to run, a saving that providers like Novita and Deepinfra pass on to customers.
  • Performance: It typically results in slower token generation speeds (output tokens/s). It can also slightly increase latency, though some optimized systems (like Deepinfra's) can achieve very low time-to-first-token. There may be a minor, often negligible, impact on output quality.
What is the 128k context window useful for?

A 128,000-token context window allows the model to process and 'remember' a vast amount of information in a single request. This is equivalent to hundreds of pages of text. It is particularly useful for:

  • Analyzing or summarizing entire books, long legal documents, or extensive financial reports.
  • Answering questions about a large codebase without having to break it into smaller chunks.
  • Maintaining long, coherent conversations in a chatbot without losing track of earlier parts of the discussion.
  • Complex retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) where large amounts of source material need to be considered.
Is this model free to use?

The model itself is 'free' in the sense that it has an open license (the DeepSeek License) that allows for commercial use, modification, and self-hosting. However, 'using' the model requires significant computational resources. The prices discussed on this page are for using the model via managed API providers, who handle the hosting and inference for you. Self-hosting is an option for expert teams but involves substantial hardware and operational costs.


Subscribe