DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning)

Top-tier intelligence meets open-source flexibility and competitive pricing.

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning)

An open-weight model from DeepSeek AI, offering elite reasoning capabilities, a massive 128k context window, and a compelling performance-to-price ratio.

Open Model128k ContextText GenerationReasoningHigh Intelligence

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning) emerges as a formidable contender in the landscape of open-weight large language models. Developed by DeepSeek AI, this model is specifically tuned for complex reasoning tasks, positioning it as a powerful tool for developers and enterprises seeking top-tier intelligence without the constraints of proprietary ecosystems. With its generous 128k token context window, it can process and analyze vast amounts of information in a single pass, making it ideal for applications involving long-document comprehension, complex data synthesis, and extended conversational memory.

The model's performance on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index is a standout feature. Scoring an impressive 58, it places firmly in the upper echelon of models, ranking #5 out of 51 benchmarked models. This score is significantly higher than the class average of 42, demonstrating its advanced capabilities in understanding nuance, following intricate instructions, and performing multi-step logical operations. This high level of intelligence makes it a direct competitor to some of the most capable models on the market, both open and closed-source, particularly for tasks that demand deep analytical power.

However, this intelligence comes with a notable characteristic: verbosity. During the Intelligence Index evaluation, DeepSeek V3.1 generated 67 million tokens, roughly three times the average of 22 million. While this can be beneficial for tasks requiring detailed explanations, it's a critical cost factor to consider. The price for output tokens is five times that of input tokens, meaning its tendency for detailed responses can directly impact operational expenses. Developers must balance the need for comprehensive output against budget constraints, potentially employing prompt engineering techniques to encourage conciseness.

From a cost perspective, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus is competitively positioned. Its base pricing of $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens is moderate compared to the market average. This makes its high-end intelligence accessible. The availability through multiple API providers—each with a different balance of price, speed, and latency—offers users the flexibility to choose an infrastructure that best suits their specific application needs, whether prioritizing raw speed, minimizing user-facing latency, or optimizing for the lowest possible cost.

Scoreboard

Intelligence

58 (5 / 51)

Scores 58 on the Intelligence Index, placing it well above the class average of 42 and among the top models for reasoning.
Output speed

155 tokens/s

Speed is provider-dependent. The balanced pick, Eigen AI, delivers a very fast 155 tokens/s. The fastest is SambaNova at 172 t/s.
Input price

$0.40 per 1M tokens

Moderately priced compared to the market average of $0.57. Ranks #17 out of 51 models.
Output price

$2.00 per 1M tokens

Moderately priced compared to the market average of $2.10. Ranks #25 out of 51 models.
Verbosity signal

67M tokens

Significantly more verbose than the average model (22M tokens), which can increase output costs.
Provider latency

1.02 seconds

Latency varies by provider. The fastest provider, Eigen AI, has an excellent time-to-first-token of 1.02 seconds.

Technical specifications

Spec Details
Model Name DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning)
Owner DeepSeek AI
License DeepSeek Model License (Permissive for commercial use, with restrictions)
Context Window 128,000 tokens
Modalities Text-to-Text
Architecture Likely Mixture-of-Experts (MoE)
Intelligence Index Score 58
Intelligence Rank #5 out of 51
Base Input Price $0.40 / 1M tokens
Base Output Price $2.00 / 1M tokens
Verbosity Score 67M tokens (Rank #26 / 51)
Primary Use Cases Complex Reasoning, RAG, Code Generation, Long-form Content Analysis

What stands out beyond the scoreboard

Where this model wins
  • Elite Intelligence: With an Intelligence Index score of 58, it excels at complex reasoning, analysis, and instruction-following tasks, rivaling top-tier models.
  • Massive Context Window: The 128k context window enables processing and analysis of entire books, extensive legal documents, or large codebases in a single prompt.
  • Competitive Open-Source Pricing: Offers high-end performance at a price point that is significantly more accessible than leading proprietary models with similar capabilities.
  • Provider Flexibility: Available through multiple API providers, allowing users to choose the best option for their specific needs, whether it's cost, speed, or low latency.
  • Strong for RAG: The combination of a large context window and strong reasoning makes it an excellent engine for Retrieval-Augmented Generation systems.
Where costs sneak up
  • High Verbosity: The model's tendency to produce detailed, lengthy responses can triple output token counts compared to the average, directly increasing costs.
  • Expensive Output: The 5-to-1 ratio of output-to-input token price means that chatty, generative applications become significantly more expensive than data-processing ones.
  • Underutilized Context: Paying for a 128k context window is wasteful if your application only uses a fraction of it. The input cost for filling the context on every call can be substantial.
  • Provider Price Gaps: Choosing the wrong provider can have a massive impact on your bill. The most expensive provider (SambaNova) is over 7 times the cost of the cheapest (Novita).
  • Overkill for Simple Tasks: Using this powerful model for simple classification or summarization tasks is not cost-effective. A smaller, cheaper model would be more efficient.

Provider pick

Choosing the right API provider for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus depends entirely on your application's primary requirement: minimizing cost, maximizing throughput speed, or ensuring the fastest possible response time for interactive use cases. Our benchmarks of SambaNova, Novita, and Eigen AI reveal clear winners for each priority.

Priority Pick Why Tradeoff to accept
Lowest Cost Novita (FP8) At a blended price of just $0.45 per million tokens, it is dramatically cheaper than any other option, making it ideal for batch processing and background tasks. Very low output speed (26 t/s) and higher latency make it unsuitable for real-time applications.
Highest Speed SambaNova Delivers the highest throughput at 172 tokens/second, perfect for applications that need to generate large amounts of text quickly. Extremely expensive, with a blended price of $3.38 per million tokens—over 7x the cost of Novita.
Balanced Performance Eigen AI The best all-around choice. It offers excellent speed (155 t/s), the lowest latency (1.02s), and a very competitive blended price of $0.80 per million tokens. While a great balance, it is not the absolute cheapest or the absolute fastest option available.
Lowest Latency Eigen AI With a time-to-first-token of just 1.02 seconds, it provides the most responsive, 'snappy' experience for interactive chatbots and user-facing tools. Slightly more expensive than the budget-focused Novita offering.

Provider performance benchmarks are a snapshot in time and can change based on provider optimizations, server load, and network conditions. Prices are based on data at the time of analysis and are subject to change. Blended price assumes a 3:1 input-to-output token ratio.

Real workloads cost table

To understand how costs translate to real-world applications, here are several estimated costs for common scenarios. These examples use the pricing from our 'Balanced Performance' pick, Eigen AI ($0.40/1M input, $2.00/1M output), which offers a great mix of speed and value.

Scenario Input Output What it represents Estimated cost
Long Document Summary 25,000 tokens 1,500 tokens Analyzing a lengthy research paper or legal document. ~$0.013
Multi-Turn Support Chat 6,000 tokens 4,000 tokens A detailed customer service conversation with multiple exchanges. ~$0.0104
Code Generation & Refactoring 2,000 tokens 8,000 tokens Providing a function and asking the model to refactor it and explain the changes. ~$0.0168
Large-Context RAG Query 100,000 tokens 500 tokens Searching a large document loaded into context to find a specific answer. ~$0.041
Content Creation Draft 500 tokens 2,000 tokens Generating a first draft of a blog post from a brief outline. ~$0.0042

The key takeaway is the cost sensitivity to the task type. For RAG and document analysis, the input cost of the large context window dominates. For conversational and generative tasks, the higher output price and the model's verbosity are the primary cost drivers.

How to control cost (a practical playbook)

Given its high intelligence and potential for high verbosity, managing costs for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus is crucial for deploying it at scale. A proactive strategy can yield significant savings without compromising on quality. Here are several effective tactics to control your spending.

Control Verbosity with Prompting

The model's natural tendency is to be verbose, which directly increases output token costs. You can mitigate this by including specific instructions in your prompts.

  • Add constraints like: "Be concise," "Answer in three sentences or less," or "Provide the answer as a JSON object with only the required fields."
  • For classification or extraction, explicitly forbid explanatory text: "Do not provide any explanation or commentary outside of the requested format."
  • Experiment with few-shot examples that demonstrate the desired level of brevity.
Select the Right Provider for the Job

Provider choice has a massive impact on both cost and performance. Don't default to one provider for all tasks.

  • For non-urgent, asynchronous tasks like report generation or data analysis, use the lowest-cost provider (Novita) to save over 85% on costs.
  • For user-facing, interactive applications like chatbots, prioritize low latency and good speed by choosing a balanced provider (Eigen AI).
  • If your application's value is tied directly to generation speed for large payloads, the premium for the fastest provider (SambaNova) might be justified.
Use the 128k Context Window Wisely

The large context window is a powerful but expensive feature. Avoid waste by being strategic.

  • Don't pass the entire chat history or document on every single turn. Implement a summarization layer or a sliding window to manage context size.
  • For RAG, use an efficient retrieval system (e.g., vector search) to pull in only the most relevant document chunks, rather than stuffing the entire document into the context.
  • Batch queries that require the same large context document to avoid repeatedly paying the input cost for loading it.
Implement a Model Cascade

Not every task requires the power of DeepSeek V3.1. A cascade or router system can dramatically lower costs.

  • Use a smaller, much cheaper model (like a fine-tuned 7B model) to handle simple, high-frequency queries.
  • Develop logic to identify complex queries that require advanced reasoning. Only escalate these specific queries to DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus.
  • This approach gives you the best of both worlds: low cost for the majority of traffic and high intelligence when you truly need it.

FAQ

What is DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning)?

It is a large language model from DeepSeek AI, part of their V3.1 series. This specific variant is optimized for tasks requiring complex logic, multi-step reasoning, and deep understanding of instructions. It is an open-weight model, meaning its architecture and weights are publicly available under a specific license.

How does it compare to other open-weight models?

It ranks among the top-performing open-weight models, especially in intelligence and reasoning. Its score of 58 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index places it ahead of many similarly sized models. Its key differentiators are this high intelligence score combined with a very large 128k context window and competitive pricing.

What is the license for this model?

It is released under the DeepSeek Model License. This is a permissive license that allows for commercial use, but it includes certain restrictions and use-based registration requirements. It is crucial to read the full license agreement on DeepSeek's official site to ensure compliance before using it in a commercial product.

What are the best use cases for a 128k context window?

A 128k context window (approximately 95,000 words) is ideal for:

  • Legal and Financial Document Analysis: Processing entire contracts, prospectuses, or court filings in one go to find clauses, risks, or inconsistencies.
  • Advanced RAG: Providing large amounts of retrieved information to the model for more comprehensive and accurate answers.
  • Scientific Research: Analyzing long research papers or multiple articles simultaneously to synthesize findings.
  • Complex Codebase Understanding: Ingesting large parts of a software project's code to answer questions, identify bugs, or suggest refactoring.
Why is there such a large price difference between API providers?

The price difference reflects different business models, hardware, and optimization levels. Some providers compete on raw price, potentially using less expensive hardware or higher quantization (like FP8), which can impact performance. Others invest in premium, high-performance hardware (like latest-gen GPUs) and extensive software optimization to deliver maximum speed and low latency, charging a premium for that performance.

What does 'FP8' mean for the Novita provider?

FP8 stands for 8-bit floating-point, a form of model quantization. It means the model's numerical weights are stored with less precision (8 bits instead of the standard 16 or 32). This reduces the model's memory footprint and can speed up inference on compatible hardware. The trade-off is a potential, though often minor, reduction in accuracy or output quality compared to higher-precision versions. It is a key reason Novita can offer such a low price.


Subscribe