An open-weight model from DeepSeek AI, offering elite reasoning capabilities, a massive 128k context window, and a compelling performance-to-price ratio.
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning) emerges as a formidable contender in the landscape of open-weight large language models. Developed by DeepSeek AI, this model is specifically tuned for complex reasoning tasks, positioning it as a powerful tool for developers and enterprises seeking top-tier intelligence without the constraints of proprietary ecosystems. With its generous 128k token context window, it can process and analyze vast amounts of information in a single pass, making it ideal for applications involving long-document comprehension, complex data synthesis, and extended conversational memory.
The model's performance on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index is a standout feature. Scoring an impressive 58, it places firmly in the upper echelon of models, ranking #5 out of 51 benchmarked models. This score is significantly higher than the class average of 42, demonstrating its advanced capabilities in understanding nuance, following intricate instructions, and performing multi-step logical operations. This high level of intelligence makes it a direct competitor to some of the most capable models on the market, both open and closed-source, particularly for tasks that demand deep analytical power.
However, this intelligence comes with a notable characteristic: verbosity. During the Intelligence Index evaluation, DeepSeek V3.1 generated 67 million tokens, roughly three times the average of 22 million. While this can be beneficial for tasks requiring detailed explanations, it's a critical cost factor to consider. The price for output tokens is five times that of input tokens, meaning its tendency for detailed responses can directly impact operational expenses. Developers must balance the need for comprehensive output against budget constraints, potentially employing prompt engineering techniques to encourage conciseness.
From a cost perspective, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus is competitively positioned. Its base pricing of $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens is moderate compared to the market average. This makes its high-end intelligence accessible. The availability through multiple API providers—each with a different balance of price, speed, and latency—offers users the flexibility to choose an infrastructure that best suits their specific application needs, whether prioritizing raw speed, minimizing user-facing latency, or optimizing for the lowest possible cost.
58 (5 / 51)
155 tokens/s
$0.40 per 1M tokens
$2.00 per 1M tokens
67M tokens
1.02 seconds
| Spec | Details |
|---|---|
| Model Name | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning) |
| Owner | DeepSeek AI |
| License | DeepSeek Model License (Permissive for commercial use, with restrictions) |
| Context Window | 128,000 tokens |
| Modalities | Text-to-Text |
| Architecture | Likely Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) |
| Intelligence Index Score | 58 |
| Intelligence Rank | #5 out of 51 |
| Base Input Price | $0.40 / 1M tokens |
| Base Output Price | $2.00 / 1M tokens |
| Verbosity Score | 67M tokens (Rank #26 / 51) |
| Primary Use Cases | Complex Reasoning, RAG, Code Generation, Long-form Content Analysis |
Choosing the right API provider for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus depends entirely on your application's primary requirement: minimizing cost, maximizing throughput speed, or ensuring the fastest possible response time for interactive use cases. Our benchmarks of SambaNova, Novita, and Eigen AI reveal clear winners for each priority.
| Priority | Pick | Why | Tradeoff to accept |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lowest Cost | Novita (FP8) | At a blended price of just $0.45 per million tokens, it is dramatically cheaper than any other option, making it ideal for batch processing and background tasks. | Very low output speed (26 t/s) and higher latency make it unsuitable for real-time applications. |
| Highest Speed | SambaNova | Delivers the highest throughput at 172 tokens/second, perfect for applications that need to generate large amounts of text quickly. | Extremely expensive, with a blended price of $3.38 per million tokens—over 7x the cost of Novita. |
| Balanced Performance | Eigen AI | The best all-around choice. It offers excellent speed (155 t/s), the lowest latency (1.02s), and a very competitive blended price of $0.80 per million tokens. | While a great balance, it is not the absolute cheapest or the absolute fastest option available. |
| Lowest Latency | Eigen AI | With a time-to-first-token of just 1.02 seconds, it provides the most responsive, 'snappy' experience for interactive chatbots and user-facing tools. | Slightly more expensive than the budget-focused Novita offering. |
Provider performance benchmarks are a snapshot in time and can change based on provider optimizations, server load, and network conditions. Prices are based on data at the time of analysis and are subject to change. Blended price assumes a 3:1 input-to-output token ratio.
To understand how costs translate to real-world applications, here are several estimated costs for common scenarios. These examples use the pricing from our 'Balanced Performance' pick, Eigen AI ($0.40/1M input, $2.00/1M output), which offers a great mix of speed and value.
| Scenario | Input | Output | What it represents | Estimated cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long Document Summary | 25,000 tokens | 1,500 tokens | Analyzing a lengthy research paper or legal document. | ~$0.013 |
| Multi-Turn Support Chat | 6,000 tokens | 4,000 tokens | A detailed customer service conversation with multiple exchanges. | ~$0.0104 |
| Code Generation & Refactoring | 2,000 tokens | 8,000 tokens | Providing a function and asking the model to refactor it and explain the changes. | ~$0.0168 |
| Large-Context RAG Query | 100,000 tokens | 500 tokens | Searching a large document loaded into context to find a specific answer. | ~$0.041 |
| Content Creation Draft | 500 tokens | 2,000 tokens | Generating a first draft of a blog post from a brief outline. | ~$0.0042 |
The key takeaway is the cost sensitivity to the task type. For RAG and document analysis, the input cost of the large context window dominates. For conversational and generative tasks, the higher output price and the model's verbosity are the primary cost drivers.
Given its high intelligence and potential for high verbosity, managing costs for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus is crucial for deploying it at scale. A proactive strategy can yield significant savings without compromising on quality. Here are several effective tactics to control your spending.
The model's natural tendency is to be verbose, which directly increases output token costs. You can mitigate this by including specific instructions in your prompts.
Provider choice has a massive impact on both cost and performance. Don't default to one provider for all tasks.
The large context window is a powerful but expensive feature. Avoid waste by being strategic.
Not every task requires the power of DeepSeek V3.1. A cascade or router system can dramatically lower costs.
It is a large language model from DeepSeek AI, part of their V3.1 series. This specific variant is optimized for tasks requiring complex logic, multi-step reasoning, and deep understanding of instructions. It is an open-weight model, meaning its architecture and weights are publicly available under a specific license.
It ranks among the top-performing open-weight models, especially in intelligence and reasoning. Its score of 58 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index places it ahead of many similarly sized models. Its key differentiators are this high intelligence score combined with a very large 128k context window and competitive pricing.
It is released under the DeepSeek Model License. This is a permissive license that allows for commercial use, but it includes certain restrictions and use-based registration requirements. It is crucial to read the full license agreement on DeepSeek's official site to ensure compliance before using it in a commercial product.
A 128k context window (approximately 95,000 words) is ideal for:
The price difference reflects different business models, hardware, and optimization levels. Some providers compete on raw price, potentially using less expensive hardware or higher quantization (like FP8), which can impact performance. Others invest in premium, high-performance hardware (like latest-gen GPUs) and extensive software optimization to deliver maximum speed and low latency, charging a premium for that performance.
FP8 stands for 8-bit floating-point, a form of model quantization. It means the model's numerical weights are stored with less precision (8 bits instead of the standard 16 or 32). This reduces the model's memory footprint and can speed up inference on compatible hardware. The trade-off is a potential, though often minor, reduction in accuracy or output quality compared to higher-precision versions. It is a key reason Novita can offer such a low price.