DeepSeek V3.2 Exp (Non-reasoning)

High intelligence meets exceptional cost-effectiveness.

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp (Non-reasoning)

An open-weight model delivering top-tier intelligence and competitive pricing, with a notable trade-off in generation speed.

128k ContextOpen ModelText GenerationHigh IntelligenceSlow SpeedCost-Effective

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp (Non-reasoning) emerges as a formidable contender in the open-weight model landscape, carving out a niche for users who prioritize raw intelligence and cost efficiency above all else. Developed by DeepSeek, this model is engineered for high-quality text generation tasks that do not require complex, multi-step reasoning. Its primary strengths lie in its impressive performance on intelligence benchmarks and its remarkably low price point, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious developers and organizations.

On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp achieves a score of 46, placing it at an impressive rank of #4 out of 30 comparable models. This score is significantly higher than the class average of 33, indicating a superior capability in understanding and generating nuanced, high-quality text. During these evaluations, the model generated approximately 11 million tokens, which is on par with the average, suggesting it is fairly concise and does not produce excessive or verbose output. This combination of high intelligence and average verbosity is ideal for tasks where precision and cost control are paramount.

Where the model truly shines is its economic profile. With an input price of approximately $0.28 per million tokens and an output price of $0.42 per million tokens, it is substantially more affordable than its peers, which average $0.56 for input and a staggering $1.67 for output. The total cost to run the comprehensive Intelligence Index evaluation on this model was just $20.83, a testament to its cost-effectiveness for large-scale processing. This pricing makes it accessible for a wide range of applications, from academic research to content generation in startups.

However, this performance comes with a significant trade-off: speed. Clocking in at an average of 28 tokens per second, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp is classified as notably slow, ranking in the bottom half of its class for output speed. This makes it less suitable for real-time, interactive applications like chatbots where low latency is critical. Despite this, its massive 128,000-token context window opens up powerful possibilities for processing and analyzing long documents, a task where raw throughput is often less critical than context capacity and analytical depth. As we'll explore, strategic provider selection can help mitigate some of these performance drawbacks.

Scoreboard

Intelligence

46 (4 / 30)

Ranks among the top models for intelligence, significantly outperforming the class average of 33.
Output speed

27.7 tokens/s

Notably slow compared to peers, ranking in the bottom half of its class for throughput.
Input price

$0.28 / 1M tokens

Highly competitive pricing, well below the class average of $0.56.
Output price

$0.42 / 1M tokens

Extremely cost-effective, priced significantly lower than the class average of $1.67.
Verbosity signal

11M tokens

Fairly concise, generating an average number of tokens during intelligence testing.
Provider latency

0.48s TTFT

Best-in-class latency is achievable via Deepinfra, though the official API is slower.

Technical specifications

Spec Details
Model Owner DeepSeek
License DeepSeek Model License (Open)
Context Window 128,000 tokens
Input Modality Text
Output Modality Text
Model Family DeepSeek V3
Variant Focus Non-Reasoning, General Text Generation
Quantization FP8 available via select providers (e.g., Novita)
Intelligence Index Score 46
Intelligence Index Rank #4 / 30
Base Model This is a base model

What stands out beyond the scoreboard

Where this model wins
  • Exceptional Intelligence: With a score of 46 on the Intelligence Index, it ranks in the top tier of its class, making it ideal for tasks requiring nuanced understanding and high-quality generation.
  • Outstanding Cost-Effectiveness: Its input and output token prices are significantly lower than the market average, enabling large-scale and complex jobs at a fraction of the cost of competitors.
  • Massive Context Window: The 128,000-token context length allows it to process and analyze extensive documents, books, or codebases in a single pass, unlocking sophisticated use cases.
  • Flexible Open License: The DeepSeek Model License permits a wide range of use cases, including commercial applications, giving developers freedom to build and deploy without restrictive licensing.
  • Balanced Verbosity: The model is fairly concise, avoiding unnecessary token generation which helps keep output costs down and responses focused.
Where costs sneak up
  • Slow Generation Speed: With an output speed of under 30 tokens/second, the model is ill-suited for real-time, latency-sensitive applications like conversational AI.
  • Variable Provider Performance: Key metrics like latency and speed vary dramatically between API providers. The official DeepSeek API is slower and has higher latency than third-party options like Deepinfra or Novita.
  • Non-Reasoning Limitation: The model is not optimized for complex, multi-step logical reasoning. Tasks requiring deep causal analysis or planning may necessitate a different, reasoning-focused model.
  • Large Context Cost Trap: While the 128k context window is a powerful feature, fully utilizing it with large inputs can still lead to significant costs, despite the low per-token price.
  • Quantization Dependency: Achieving the highest possible throughput requires using a quantized version (like Novita's FP8 offering), which may not be available from all providers or could introduce subtle changes in output quality.

Provider pick

Choosing the right API provider for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp is crucial, as performance and cost can vary significantly. Your ideal choice depends on whether your priority is minimizing latency (time to first token), maximizing throughput (output tokens per second), or achieving the absolute lowest cost. Our benchmarks of providers like DeepSeek, Deepinfra, and Novita reveal clear winners for different scenarios.

Priority Pick Why Tradeoff to accept
Lowest Latency Deepinfra At 0.48s TTFT, Deepinfra offers the fastest response time, making it ideal for applications where initial responsiveness is key. Slower output speed (18 t/s) compared to other providers.
Fastest Output Novita (FP8) Delivering 31 t/s, Novita's FP8-quantized version provides the highest throughput for processing large batches of text quickly. Slightly higher latency (0.92s) than Deepinfra.
Lowest Overall Cost Deepinfra or Novita (FP8) Both providers offer a blended price of $0.30/M tokens, making them the most cost-effective options. The choice depends on your priority: Deepinfra for lower latency, Novita for higher speed.
Official API DeepSeek Provides direct access from the model's creators, ensuring you are using the canonical version. Highest latency (1.24s), slowest non-quantized speed (27 t/s), and slightly higher price.

Note: Performance and pricing data are based on benchmarks conducted by Artificial Analysis. Provider offerings and performance may change over time. The FP8 quantization on Novita offers a unique speed advantage that may not be present in other versions.

Real workloads cost table

To understand the practical cost implications of using DeepSeek V3.2 Exp, let's estimate the cost for several common workloads. These scenarios illustrate how the model's competitive pricing translates to real-world affordability, especially for tasks involving large amounts of text. Calculations are based on the cost-effective pricing from Deepinfra ($0.27/1M input, $0.40/1M output tokens).

Scenario Input Output What it represents Estimated cost
Summarize a Long Report 25,000 tokens 1,500 tokens Academic or business intelligence task requiring comprehension of a dense document. ~$0.0074
Extended Chatbot Session 4,000 tokens 3,000 tokens A detailed customer support or interactive Q&A session with multiple turns. ~$0.0023
Generate Code from Specs 1,000 tokens 5,000 tokens A software development task where a prompt generates a functional code block. ~$0.0023
Extract Data from Legal Document 80,000 tokens 5,000 tokens A large-context task involving information retrieval from a lengthy contract or filing. ~$0.0236

The model's low per-token cost makes even large-context tasks highly affordable. For most common workloads, the cost per task is measured in fractions of a cent, demonstrating its powerful economic advantage.

How to control cost (a practical playbook)

While DeepSeek V3.2 Exp is already very cost-effective, you can further optimize your spending by making strategic choices about providers, prompts, and application design. The following strategies will help you maximize performance and minimize costs for your specific use case.

Choose the Right Provider for Your Goal

Your choice of API provider has the single biggest impact on both performance and cost. Don't default to the official API without evaluating alternatives.

  • For Interactive Apps: Prioritize low latency. Choose Deepinfra for its best-in-class Time To First Token (TTFT).
  • For Batch Processing: Prioritize high throughput. Choose Novita (FP8) for its superior tokens-per-second generation speed.
  • For Maximum Savings: Both Deepinfra and Novita offer the lowest blended price. Your choice between them should be guided by whether latency or speed is more important for your application.
Leverage Quantization for Speed

Quantization is a technique that reduces the precision of the model's weights, often leading to significant increases in speed with minimal impact on quality. Novita's FP8-quantized version of DeepSeek V3.2 Exp is a prime example.

  • If your application involves generating large volumes of text and can tolerate minor, often imperceptible, variations in output, using a quantized model is a powerful optimization.
  • The speed boost from 27 t/s (standard) to 31 t/s (FP8) can reduce processing time for large jobs by over 10%, directly impacting infrastructure costs and user wait times.
Optimize Prompting for the 128k Context

The 128k context window is a double-edged sword: powerful but potentially expensive if used inefficiently. Every token in the prompt costs money.

  • Use RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation): Instead of feeding an entire 100k-token document into the prompt, use a vector database to find the most relevant chunks of text and include only those in the prompt. This drastically reduces input token count.
  • Summarize Iteratively: For extremely long documents, consider a map-reduce approach. Break the document into sections that fit within a smaller context, summarize each section, and then run a final summary on the concatenated summaries.
  • Be Precise: Craft your prompts to be as concise as possible while still providing all necessary context for the model to generate the desired output.
Monitor and Control Output Length

While DeepSeek V3.2 Exp is fairly concise, output tokens are more expensive than input tokens. Controlling output length is a key cost-saving measure.

  • Use Stop Sequences: Specify stop words or phrases to prevent the model from generating text beyond the desired endpoint.
  • Set Max Tokens: Use the `max_tokens` parameter in your API call to set a hard limit on the length of the generated output.
  • Prompt for Brevity: Include instructions in your prompt to encourage concise answers, such as "Answer in a single paragraph" or "Provide a bulleted list of the top 5 points."

FAQ

What does the "Non-reasoning" tag mean?

The "Non-reasoning" designation indicates that this version of the model is optimized for tasks that rely on pattern recognition, knowledge retrieval, and text generation rather than complex, multi-step logical deduction. It excels at summarization, translation, creative writing, and question-answering where the answer is present in the context. It may struggle with tasks that require planning, solving multi-step math problems, or inferring complex causal relationships not explicitly stated in the text.

How does DeepSeek V3.2 Exp compare to other open models?

It stands out primarily on two axes: intelligence and price. It ranks in the top tier for intelligence, competing with or surpassing many other open models of similar size. Its pricing is among the most competitive on the market, making it a leader in performance-per-dollar. Its main drawback compared to other models is its relatively slow generation speed.

What is the 128k context window useful for?

A 128,000-token context window is exceptionally large and enables a variety of powerful use cases that are impossible with smaller models. These include:

  • Long-Document Analysis: Feeding entire research papers, legal contracts, or financial reports into the model for summarization, data extraction, or comprehensive Q&A.
  • Codebase Comprehension: Providing large sections of a software project's source code to ask questions, generate documentation, or write new, context-aware functions.
  • Book-Length Interaction: Maintaining a coherent conversation or analysis over a very long interaction, effectively allowing the model to "read" a small book and discuss it.
Why is the model relatively slow?

Model speed is a complex function of its architecture, size, and the hardware it runs on. Larger, more complex models naturally take more computational power to generate each token. DeepSeek V3.2 Exp likely prioritizes architectural choices that enhance intelligence and context length over those that maximize raw generation speed. This is a common trade-off in model design. However, as shown by providers like Novita, techniques like FP8 quantization can be applied to significantly improve throughput on specialized hardware.

Is the open license suitable for commercial use?

Yes, the DeepSeek Model License is an open license that generally permits commercial use. However, like any license, it has specific terms and conditions. It is crucial to read the full license text to ensure your specific application complies with its requirements. It is generally considered a permissive license that provides significant flexibility for building commercial products and services.

Which API provider should I choose?

The best provider depends entirely on your application's needs:

  • If you are building a chatbot or another interactive tool where users are waiting for a response, choose Deepinfra for its low latency.
  • If you are doing offline, large-scale data processing where total time is the main concern, choose Novita (FP8) for its high tokens-per-second throughput.
  • If you are extremely budget-sensitive and your needs fall between the two, both Deepinfra and Novita are excellent choices as they share the lowest price point.

Subscribe