DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale

High intelligence meets competitive pricing in this verbose open model.

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale

An open-weight model from DeepSeek that excels in intelligence and affordability but trades off raw speed for extremely detailed, verbose outputs.

Open Model128k ContextHigh IntelligenceLow PriceVerbose OutputText Generation

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale emerges as a formidable contender in the landscape of open-weight large language models. Developed by DeepSeek, it carves out a distinct niche by delivering top-tier intelligence at a remarkably low price point. With a score of 59 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, it significantly outperforms the average model score of 42, placing it in the elite #4 position out of 51 benchmarked models. This intellectual prowess makes it a powerful tool for complex reasoning, analysis, and content generation tasks that demand depth and nuance.

However, the model's profile is one of carefully balanced trade-offs. Its primary strength in intelligence is paired with a highly competitive pricing structure. At just $0.28 per million input tokens and $0.42 per million output tokens, it is substantially cheaper than the class averages of $0.57 and $2.10, respectively. This cost-effectiveness makes it an attractive option for developers and organizations looking to deploy sophisticated AI capabilities without incurring the high costs associated with many proprietary, closed-source models of similar intelligence.

The two most notable characteristics that developers must account for are its speed and verbosity. With an output speed of 35.1 tokens per second, it is slower than the average of 45 tokens/s, which may impact its suitability for real-time, latency-sensitive applications. More significantly, the model is exceptionally verbose. During our intelligence evaluation, it generated a staggering 160 million tokens, dwarfing the average of 22 million. While this can be an asset for tasks requiring exhaustive detail, it can also lead to unexpectedly high costs on output-heavy workloads if not properly managed through careful prompt engineering. This verbosity, combined with its large 128k context window, defines its unique operational character: it's a deep-thinking, thorough, and talkative model, not a fast and concise one.

Scoreboard

Intelligence

59 (#4 / 51)

Scores 59 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it among the top-tier models for reasoning and comprehension.
Output speed

35.1 tokens/s

Slower than the class average of 45 tokens/s, making it less suitable for real-time, high-throughput applications.
Input price

$0.28 / 1M tokens

Highly competitive, ranking #10 out of 51 and significantly cheaper than the average of $0.57.
Output price

$0.42 / 1M tokens

Also very affordable, ranking #9 out of 51 and far below the average of $2.10.
Verbosity signal

160M tokens

Extremely verbose, generating 160M tokens during intelligence testing, far exceeding the average of 22M.
Provider latency

0.71 seconds

A respectable time-to-first-token, ensuring users don't wait long for the initial response to appear.

Technical specifications

Spec Details
Owner DeepSeek
License Open
Context Window 128,000 tokens
Modalities Text-to-Text
Model Family DeepSeek V3
Intelligence Index Score 59 / 100
Intelligence Rank #4 / 51
Median Output Speed 35.1 tokens/second
Time to First Token (TTFT) 0.71 seconds
Input Token Price $0.28 / 1M tokens
Output Token Price $0.42 / 1M tokens
Blended Price (3:1) $0.32 / 1M tokens

What stands out beyond the scoreboard

Where this model wins
  • Top-Tier Intelligence: With an intelligence score of 59, it ranks among the smartest models available, making it ideal for tasks requiring deep reasoning, analysis, and problem-solving.
  • Exceptional Affordability: Its input and output prices are significantly lower than the average for models in its performance class, offering an excellent price-to-performance ratio.
  • Massive Context Window: The 128k context window allows it to process and analyze very large documents, extensive chat histories, or complex codebases in a single pass.
  • Open License Flexibility: As an open-weight model, it offers developers greater flexibility for fine-tuning, research, and deployment compared to proprietary black-box APIs.
  • Thorough and Detailed Responses: Its natural verbosity can be a major advantage for use cases that benefit from exhaustive, comprehensive explanations, such as educational content or detailed report generation.
Where costs sneak up
  • Extreme Verbosity Tax: The model's tendency to generate a high volume of output tokens can quickly inflate costs, potentially negating the low per-token price on tasks that don't require such detail.
  • Output-Heavy Workloads: With output tokens costing 50% more than input tokens, applications that generate large amounts of text (e.g., creative writing, content generation) will see costs rise faster.
  • Slower Throughput: The below-average output speed of 35 tokens/s means processing large batches of requests will take longer, which can translate to higher compute costs or a poorer user experience in interactive settings.
  • Prompt Engineering Overhead: Controlling the model's verbosity to generate concise answers requires careful and sometimes complex prompt engineering, adding to development time and effort.
  • Cost of Unused Context: While the 128k context window is powerful, processing large contexts can be slower and more expensive. Using it for tasks that only require a small context is inefficient.

Provider pick

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale is currently offered directly by its creator, DeepSeek. As the sole provider benchmarked, all performance and pricing data points to this single source. This simplifies the choice for developers, as there is one clear, optimized path to accessing the model's capabilities.

Priority Pick Why Tradeoff to accept
Best Overall DeepSeek As the direct provider, DeepSeek offers the most authentic and optimized implementation of the model. The model's inherent slowness and verbosity are unavoidable.
Lowest Price DeepSeek The pricing is set by the owner and is highly competitive, making it the only and most affordable option. No alternative providers exist to drive prices down further.
Highest Performance DeepSeek Performance metrics for speed and latency are based on the official DeepSeek API, representing the best-case scenario. Performance is still slower than the class average for output tokens per second.
Easiest Integration DeepSeek The official API is well-documented and the standard for integration. No third-party platforms offer potentially simpler SDKs or unified APIs.

Note: All performance and price metrics are based on the official API provided by DeepSeek, the only provider benchmarked for this model in our analysis.

Real workloads cost table

To understand the real-world cost implications of using DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale, it's crucial to consider its unique pricing and verbosity. The following table estimates the cost for several common scenarios, illustrating how the balance of input and output tokens affects the final price.

Scenario Input Output What it represents Estimated cost
Long Document Q&A (RAG) 10,000 input tokens 1,000 output tokens A user asks a question about a large document provided as context. ~$0.0032 (10k * $0.28/M + 1k * $0.42/M)
Creative Content Generation 100 input tokens 2,000 output tokens Generating a short story or blog post from a simple prompt. High verbosity is a factor. ~$0.00087 (100 * $0.28/M + 2k * $0.42/M)
Multi-Turn Chat Session 4,000 input tokens 4,000 output tokens A 10-turn conversation where user and AI contributions are balanced. ~$0.0028 (4k * $0.28/M + 4k * $0.42/M)
Code Refactoring 8,000 input tokens 8,000 output tokens Submitting a large code file and receiving a fully refactored version. ~$0.0056 (8k * $0.28/M + 8k * $0.42/M)
Batch Data Extraction 500,000 input tokens 50,000 output tokens Processing 100 documents of 5k tokens each to extract structured data. ~$0.161 (500k * $0.28/M + 50k * $0.42/M)

The takeaway is clear: despite the low per-token price, costs are heavily influenced by the task's output requirements. Scenarios with high output-to-input ratios, amplified by the model's natural verbosity, can become more expensive than they initially appear. Input-heavy tasks like RAG or data extraction benefit most from its pricing structure.

How to control cost (a practical playbook)

Managing the cost of DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale requires a strategy that embraces its strengths while mitigating its weaknesses. The key is to control its verbosity and leverage its large context window and low input price effectively. Below are several tactics to optimize your usage and keep your budget in check.

Taming Extreme Verbosity

The model's high verbosity is its biggest cost risk. You must actively manage it through prompt engineering to avoid budget overruns on output tokens.

  • Be Explicit: Add instructions like "Be concise," "Answer in three sentences or less," or "Provide only the final code, with no explanation."
  • Use Few-Shot Examples: Provide examples in your prompt that demonstrate the desired length and format of the output.
  • Structure the Output: Request a specific format like JSON or a numbered list. This often forces the model to be less conversational and more direct.
  • Post-Processing: As a last resort, programmatically truncate the output to a desired length, though this is less efficient than preventing the generation in the first place.
Leveraging the 128k Context Window

The large context window is a powerful feature, especially with the low input token price. Use it for tasks that are impossible for smaller-context models.

  • Single-Pass Document Analysis: Analyze entire legal documents, research papers, or financial reports in one go, avoiding the complexity of chunking and embedding.
  • Complex RAG: Provide multiple source documents directly in the context for more accurate and comprehensive answers in Retrieval-Augmented Generation tasks.
  • Maintain Long Conversations: Build chatbots and agents that can remember the entire history of a long, complex interaction without losing context.
Optimizing for Input vs. Output

With output tokens costing 50% more than input tokens, the most cost-effective workloads are input-heavy.

  • Prioritize Analysis and Extraction: Tasks like classification, sentiment analysis, entity recognition, and data extraction from large texts are ideal. The input is large, but the output is small and structured.
  • Be Cautious with Generation: For pure content generation tasks, the high verbosity and higher output cost can be a dangerous combination. Use strong prompting controls (see above) to manage the output length.
Mitigating Slower Speed

The model's 35 tokens/s output speed is not ideal for real-time interfaces. Plan your architecture around this limitation.

  • Use Asynchronous Processing: For non-interactive tasks like report generation or data analysis, process requests in the background. The user doesn't need to wait for the result in real time.
  • Stream the Output: For chat applications, always stream the tokens as they are generated. The 0.71s time-to-first-token is fast enough that the user will see a response starting quickly, which masks the overall lower throughput.
  • Batch Requests: When processing large datasets, send multiple requests in parallel to maximize throughput, rather than sending them one by one.

FAQ

What is DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale?

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale is a large language model from the DeepSeek family. It is an open-weight model, meaning it offers more flexibility than closed, proprietary models. It is characterized by its high intelligence, very low price, large 128k context window, and a tendency to produce very detailed and verbose responses.

How does its intelligence compare to other models?

It is one of the top performers. Scoring 59 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, it ranks #4 out of 51 models tested. This places it in the same league as many top-tier proprietary models, making it an excellent choice for tasks that require complex reasoning and understanding.

Is this model good for a real-time chatbot?

It's a trade-off. Its time-to-first-token (latency) of 0.71 seconds is good, so users will see a response begin quickly. However, its overall output speed of 35 tokens/second is slower than average. For a fast-paced chat, this might feel sluggish. Its extreme verbosity also needs to be controlled with careful prompting to provide concise chat answers.

What does its "Open" license mean?

An open license (often referring to the model weights being available) provides greater freedom for developers. It can allow for self-hosting, fine-tuning on proprietary data, and deeper integration into products without being solely reliant on a third-party API. The specific terms of the license should always be reviewed to ensure compliance with your use case.

Why is it so verbose, and is that a good or bad thing?

The verbosity is a core characteristic of how the model was trained. It's a double-edged sword. It's a 'good' thing for tasks that benefit from exhaustive detail, like writing educational materials, generating in-depth reports, or brainstorming ideas. It's a 'bad' thing when you need a short, direct answer, as it can be frustrating for users and expensive due to the high number of output tokens generated.

How is the blended price calculated?

The blended price is a weighted average that estimates cost for a typical workload. The provided figure of $0.32 per 1M tokens is based on a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens. The calculation is: (3 * Input Price + 1 * Output Price) / 4. For this model: (3 * $0.28 + 1 * $0.42) / 4 = ($0.84 + $0.42) / 4 = $1.26 / 4 = $0.315, which rounds to $0.32.


Subscribe