DeepSeek V3 (Dec) (non-reasoning)

A cost-effective open model with a massive context window.

DeepSeek V3 (Dec) (non-reasoning)

An open-weight model offering a very large 128k context window and competitive pricing, though with below-average intelligence scores.

128k ContextOpen ModelCost-EffectiveHigh-Speed APIsGeneral PurposeConcise Output

DeepSeek V3 (Dec) emerges as a compelling option in the crowded field of open-weight language models, carving out a distinct niche for itself. Developed by DeepSeek, this model is not designed to compete on raw intelligence benchmarks with the top-tier reasoning models. Instead, it focuses on delivering a practical and powerful combination of features: an exceptionally large 128,000-token context window, a developer-friendly open license, and access to highly affordable and performant API providers. This positions it as a workhorse model, ideal for developers building applications that require processing long documents, extensive context for retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), or simply need a cost-effective solution for general-purpose text generation tasks.

The model's performance on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index is a modest 32, placing it slightly below the average of 33 for comparable models. This suggests that for tasks requiring deep, multi-step reasoning or nuanced creative instruction, developers might need to invest more in prompt engineering or consider more powerful, albeit more expensive, alternatives. However, this score doesn't tell the whole story. DeepSeek V3's value proposition is not about topping leaderboards but about enabling new types of applications. Its massive context window unlocks capabilities that are often prohibitively expensive with other models, such as summarizing entire books, analyzing large codebases, or maintaining long, coherent conversations without losing track of details.

Another defining characteristic of DeepSeek V3 is its conciseness. During our intelligence evaluation, it generated 7.5 million tokens, significantly fewer than the class average of 11 million. This low verbosity can be a significant advantage in applications where direct, to-the-point answers are preferred over lengthy, conversational responses. It can lead to faster perceived performance and lower costs on a per-response basis, as fewer output tokens are generated. When combined with its competitive pricing—with some providers offering rates as low as $0.25 per million tokens—DeepSeek V3 presents a strong economic case for a wide range of production workloads.

The availability of DeepSeek V3 through multiple API providers creates a vibrant and competitive ecosystem. Developers can choose a provider that best aligns with their priorities, whether it's raw output speed, minimal latency for interactive use, or the absolute lowest cost. This analysis delves into the performance metrics of providers like Together.ai, Deepinfra, Hyperbolic, and Novita, revealing significant differences. For instance, the price for the same model can vary by 5x, and output speed can differ by more than 3x. Understanding these trade-offs is crucial for any team looking to deploy DeepSeek V3 effectively and economically.

Scoreboard

Intelligence

32 (17 / 30)

Scores 32 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it slightly below the average for its class.
Output speed

97 tokens/s

Top provider Together.ai reaches an impressive 97 t/s, with Deepinfra also offering strong performance at 51 t/s.
Input price

0.25 $/M tokens

Hyperbolic (FP8) offers the lowest input price at just $0.25/M tokens, making large-context tasks highly affordable.
Output price

0.25 $/M tokens

Hyperbolic (FP8) also provides the most affordable output at $0.25/M tokens, ideal for generative workloads.
Verbosity signal

7.5M tokens

Generated 7.5M tokens on the Intelligence Index, indicating a very concise and less verbose output style compared to peers.
Provider latency

0.32 seconds

Deepinfra leads with a very low time-to-first-token of 0.32s, making it an excellent choice for interactive applications.

Technical specifications

Spec Details
Model Owner DeepSeek
License DeepSeek License (Open, Commercial Use)
Context Window 128,000 tokens
Model Family DeepSeek
Release Date December 2024
Architecture Transformer
Primary Use Cases RAG, Long-Document Analysis, General Text Generation
Quantization FP8 and other quantized versions available via API providers
Input Modalities Text
Output Modalities Text

What stands out beyond the scoreboard

Where this model wins
  • Massive Context Window: The 128k context length is a standout feature, enabling sophisticated RAG and analysis of very long documents that would be impractical or expensive on other models.
  • Exceptional Cost-Effectiveness: With providers like Hyperbolic offering FP8-quantized versions at $0.25/M tokens for both input and output, it's one of the most economical models in its class.
  • High-Speed Inference: Top-tier providers like Together.ai deliver extremely high throughput (97 tokens/second), making it suitable for applications that need to generate text quickly.
  • Low-Latency Options: For interactive applications like chatbots, providers such as Deepinfra offer a near-instant time-to-first-token (0.32s), ensuring a responsive user experience.
  • Concise and Direct Outputs: Its tendency towards lower verbosity means it often provides answers without unnecessary filler, which can reduce costs and improve clarity for certain use cases.
  • Vibrant Provider Ecosystem: Competition among API providers gives developers a choice to optimize for speed, latency, or cost, rather than being locked into a single performance profile.
Where costs sneak up
  • Below-Average Intelligence: Its modest score on reasoning benchmarks means it may struggle with complex, nuanced tasks, potentially requiring more sophisticated prompting or multiple generations to achieve the desired result.
  • Extreme Provider Price Variation: The cost can vary by up to 500% between the cheapest (Hyperbolic at $0.25/M) and most expensive (Together.ai at $1.25/M) providers. Choosing the wrong provider for your workload can eliminate its cost advantage.
  • The Large Context Trap: While the 128k context is powerful, using it frequently can still lead to significant costs and slower response times, despite the low per-token price. It's a tool to be used judiciously.
  • Quantization Quality Trade-offs: The most affordable versions of the model often use quantization (like FP8). While excellent for cost savings, this may introduce subtle degradation in output quality that requires testing for production use cases.
  • Asymmetric Pricing Models: Some providers, like Novita Turbo, have significantly different prices for input and output tokens. This can make cost estimation tricky for generative tasks with a high output-to-input ratio.

Provider pick

Choosing the right API provider for DeepSeek V3 is as important as choosing the model itself. The provider landscape offers a clear spectrum of trade-offs between speed, latency, and cost. Your application's specific needs should guide your decision.

For example, a real-time chatbot needs the lowest possible latency to feel responsive, while a batch processing job for document summarization might prioritize the lowest possible cost above all else. We've analyzed the key providers to help you make the best choice for your use case.

Priority Pick Why Tradeoff to accept
Max Speed Together.ai At 97 tokens/second, it's by far the fastest provider, ideal for generating long-form content quickly. It is the most expensive provider, costing 5x more than the cheapest option.
Lowest Latency Deepinfra With a time-to-first-token of just 0.32 seconds, it provides the most responsive experience for interactive applications. While fast, its overall throughput (51 t/s) is lower than the top performer.
Lowest Cost Hyperbolic (FP8) An unbeatable blended price of $0.25/M tokens makes it the definitive choice for budget-sensitive and high-volume workloads. Latency is higher (0.96s), and the FP8 quantization may require quality assurance testing for your specific use case.
Best Overall Balance Deepinfra Offers an excellent blend of very low latency (0.32s), strong output speed (51 t/s), and a competitive price point ($0.51/M blended). It's not the absolute cheapest nor the absolute fastest, but it compromises on very little.
Balanced Alternative Novita Turbo Sits in the middle of the pack on all metrics, offering a reasonable default choice if you're unsure of your primary constraint. Its output token price is over 3x its input price, making it less ideal for highly generative tasks.

Provider benchmarks reflect performance and pricing data collected in December 2024. This data is subject to change as providers update their infrastructure and pricing models. All prices are in USD per 1 million tokens.

Real workloads cost table

To understand the real-world financial impact of using DeepSeek V3, let's estimate the cost for several common application scenarios. These calculations demonstrate how the model's low per-token price, especially when using an economical provider, makes even large-context tasks highly accessible.

For these estimates, we will use the pricing from the most cost-effective provider, Hyperbolic (FP8), at $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens.

Scenario Input Output What it represents Estimated cost
Simple Chatbot Response 1,500 tokens 250 tokens A single turn in a conversation where some chat history is included as context. $0.00044
Email Summarization 3,000 tokens 300 tokens Condensing a long email thread into a few key bullet points. $0.00083
RAG Query (Small Context) 10,000 tokens 500 tokens Answering a user question by searching through a few pages of documentation. $0.00263
RAG Query (Large Context) 100,000 tokens 1,000 tokens A complex query using a large portion of the context window, like asking questions about a 200-page PDF. $0.02525
Code Generation & Refactoring 5,000 tokens 4,000 tokens Providing a large file as context and asking the model to generate a new, complex function. $0.00225
Multi-Document Analysis 120,000 tokens 2,000 tokens Comparing and contrasting several articles or reports provided in a single prompt. $0.03050

The model's low cost structure makes individual tasks remarkably cheap. However, for applications performing thousands of large-context RAG queries per day, costs can still accumulate, reinforcing the need for efficient context management and provider selection.

How to control cost (a practical playbook)

While DeepSeek V3 is inherently cost-effective, you can further optimize your spending and improve performance by adopting a few key strategies. The biggest levers for cost control are provider selection, quantization, and intelligent use of the context window.

Choose Your Provider Based on Workload

Don't default to a single provider for all tasks. The 5x price difference between Hyperbolic and Together.ai is massive. You can dramatically reduce costs by routing tasks based on their requirements.

  • Batch Jobs & Offline Processing: Use the cheapest provider, like Hyperbolic (FP8), where latency is not a concern.
  • User-Facing Chat: Use the lowest-latency provider, like Deepinfra, to ensure a responsive experience.
  • Fast Content Generation: Use the highest-throughput provider, like Together.ai, when you need to generate large amounts of text as quickly as possible and can tolerate the higher cost.
Embrace Quantization for Cost Savings

Quantization is the process of reducing the precision of the model's weights (e.g., from 16-bit to 8-bit floating point), which reduces memory usage and can significantly lower inference costs. Hyperbolic's FP8 offering is a prime example.

  • Test for Quality: Before committing to a quantized model in production, run an evaluation suite to ensure the potential drop in output quality is acceptable for your use case. For many tasks, the difference is negligible.
  • Cost vs. Quality: For internal tools or less critical functions, the cost savings from quantization almost always outweigh any minor quality trade-offs.
Manage the 128k Context Window Intelligently

The 128k context window is a powerful feature, not a default setting. Sending 100k+ tokens with every API call is inefficient and will drive up costs and latency, even at $0.25/M tokens.

  • Use Only What You Need: For simple queries, use a minimal amount of context. Engineer your RAG pipeline to retrieve only the most relevant chunks of information.
  • Context Compression: Before passing a large document to the model, use a smaller, faster model to summarize or extract key information, reducing the token count for the final prompt.
  • Sliding Window Techniques: For processing extremely long texts, use a sliding window approach where you process the document in overlapping 128k chunks to maintain continuity.
Monitor Your Input-to-Output Ratio

Be aware of providers with asymmetric pricing (where input and output costs differ). For example, Novita Turbo's output tokens are 3.25x more expensive than its input tokens.

  • Generative Tasks: If your application generates a lot of text (e.g., writing articles), a provider with expensive output tokens will be costly. Favor providers with symmetric, low output pricing like Hyperbolic.
  • Extraction/Classification Tasks: If your application involves sending large prompts to get a small answer (e.g., classification), a provider with cheap input tokens is more important.

FAQ

What is DeepSeek V3?

DeepSeek V3 is a large language model from the DeepSeek AI research group. It is an open-weight model, meaning its architecture and weights are publicly available under a specific license. It is distinguished by its very large 128,000-token context window and its focus on providing a balance of performance and cost-effectiveness rather than competing at the top of intelligence leaderboards.

How does DeepSeek V3 compare to models like Llama 3 or GPT-4?

DeepSeek V3 generally positions itself as a more specialized, cost-effective alternative. Compared to top-tier proprietary models like GPT-4, it has a lower intelligence score and is less capable at complex reasoning. Compared to other open models like Llama 3, its primary differentiator is its massive 128k context window, which is significantly larger than many standard Llama 3 variants. It's best suited for tasks that can leverage this large context, whereas other models might be better for pure reasoning or creative tasks.

What is the 128k context window useful for?

A large context window is a game-changer for several applications:

  • Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG): You can provide a huge amount of source material (e.g., entire user manuals, legal contracts, research papers) in the prompt for the model to draw upon when answering questions.
  • Long-Document Summarization: The model can 'read' an entire long document in one go to provide a comprehensive summary.
  • Complex Code Analysis: Developers can feed large codebases into the model to ask questions, find bugs, or generate new code that is aware of the entire project's structure.
  • Extended Conversations: Chatbots can maintain a very long memory of the conversation, leading to more coherent and context-aware interactions.
Is DeepSeek V3 free to use?

The model itself is 'open' under the DeepSeek License, which allows for research and commercial use. However, this does not mean it's free to run. Running a model of this size requires significant computational resources (powerful GPUs). Therefore, most users will access it via paid API providers like Together.ai, Deepinfra, or Hyperbolic, who handle the hosting and inference for a per-token fee.

What does "(Dec)" in the name signify?

The "(Dec)" or "(Dec '24)" is a versioning identifier, indicating that this specific version of the model or its analysis corresponds to its release or benchmark in December 2024. This helps distinguish it from past or future versions of DeepSeek V3 that may have different performance characteristics.

What is FP8 quantization and should I use it?

FP8 stands for 8-bit floating-point, a numerical format that uses less memory than the standard FP16 (16-bit) or bfloat16 formats used during model training. Using an FP8-quantized model, like the one offered by Hyperbolic, means the model's size is roughly halved, leading to faster inference and significantly lower operational costs. You should consider using it if cost is a primary concern. However, it's always recommended to test the FP8 version against a higher-precision version to ensure the potential minor reduction in output quality is acceptable for your specific application.


Subscribe