Devstral 2 (non-reasoning)

An open-weight powerhouse for modern software development.

Devstral 2 (non-reasoning)

From Mistral, an open-weight model with elite intelligence and a vast 256k context window, engineered specifically for complex coding tasks.

Open Weight256k ContextDeveloper FocusedHigh IntelligenceCode GenerationText Generation

Devstral 2 emerges from Mistral as a formidable, developer-focused large language model. As an open-weight model, it represents a significant step towards democratizing access to top-tier AI capabilities, allowing developers to either leverage it via managed APIs or self-host it for maximum control and cost efficiency. It is built on three core pillars: exceptional intelligence for understanding complex logic, a massive 256,000-token context window for processing large codebases, and an accessible, open license that fosters innovation and widespread adoption. These characteristics position Devstral 2 not just as another general-purpose model, but as a specialized tool designed to integrate deeply into the software development lifecycle.

The model's primary strength lies in its raw cognitive ability. Scoring an impressive 36 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, Devstral 2 ranks #3 out of 33 comparable models, placing it firmly in the elite tier. This score is significantly higher than the class average of 22, indicating a superior capacity for reasoning, instruction-following, and problem-solving. This intelligence is crucial for its intended purpose, enabling it to grasp the nuances of intricate algorithms, identify subtle bugs, and generate high-quality, relevant code. However, this intelligence comes with a tendency for verbosity. During evaluation, it generated 13 million tokens, well above the average of 8.5 million. While this often translates to more thorough and explanatory answers, it's a factor to manage in applications where conciseness is key.

In terms of performance, Devstral 2 offers a balanced profile. Its time-to-first-token (TTFT), or latency, is a brisk 0.42 seconds, ensuring a responsive feel in interactive applications like chatbots or real-time coding assistants. The output throughput is measured at approximately 60 tokens per second. While not the fastest model in its class, this speed is more than adequate for most development tasks, delivering code and explanations at a comfortable reading pace. It may not be the ideal choice for high-throughput, latency-critical batch processing, but it excels in interactive workflows where initial responsiveness is paramount.

Perhaps the most disruptive feature of Devstral 2 is its pricing structure. The benchmarked data shows a cost of $0.00 for both input and output tokens. This reflects its open-weight nature, where the primary cost is not per-token usage but the hardware and operational overhead of self-hosting. Compared to the average proprietary model costs of $0.20 per million input tokens and $0.54 per million output tokens, Devstral 2 presents an opportunity for dramatic cost savings, especially for workloads involving its large context window. This makes it an economically viable solution for startups and enterprises alike to tackle token-intensive tasks like full-repository code analysis, documentation generation, and complex data migration, which would be prohibitively expensive on pay-per-token models.

Scoreboard

Intelligence

36 (#3 / 33)

Scores 36 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it well above the class average of 22.
Output speed

59.7 tokens/s

Delivers a solid, readable output speed around the class average, suitable for most interactive use cases.
Input price

$0.00 / 1M tokens

Effectively free on benchmarked providers, reflecting its open-weight nature. The class average is $0.20.
Output price

$0.00 / 1M tokens

Also free, offering huge savings compared to the class average of $0.54.
Verbosity signal

13M tokens

Generates more detailed and comprehensive outputs than the average model (8.5M tokens).
Provider latency

0.42 seconds

A fast time-to-first-token ensures a highly responsive experience in real-time applications.

Technical specifications

Spec Details
Model Name Devstral 2
Owner Mistral
License Open (Apache 2.0)
Model Type Text Generation, Code Generation
Context Window 256,000 tokens
Input Modalities Text
Output Modalities Text
Architecture Transformer-based
Key Feature Optimized for software development and coding tasks
Fine-tuning Support Yes (recommended for specialized tasks)
Quantization Support Yes (enables running on less powerful hardware)
Primary API Provider Mistral
Alternative Deployment Self-hosting on-premise or in the cloud

What stands out beyond the scoreboard

Where this model wins
  • Exceptional Intelligence for Code: With a top-tier score of 36 on the Intelligence Index, it excels at understanding complex logic, debugging, and generating sophisticated code, outperforming the vast majority of its peers.
  • Massive Context Window: Its 256k token context is a game-changer, allowing it to analyze entire codebases, process lengthy technical documents, or maintain long, complex conversations without losing track of details.
  • Unbeatable Cost-Effectiveness: As an open-weight model, it can be self-hosted to eliminate per-token fees, making large-scale, token-intensive developer tasks economically feasible.
  • Developer-First Design: The model is not just a generalist; it has been specifically tuned for the nuances of programming languages and software architecture, making its outputs more relevant and useful for developers.
  • Strong Backing and Open License: Being a product of Mistral ensures high-quality research and continuous improvement, while its open license encourages community collaboration and broad adoption without restrictive terms.
Where costs sneak up
  • Self-Hosting Overhead: While free from per-token fees, self-hosting incurs significant costs in terms of powerful GPU hardware, electricity, and the engineering time required for setup, maintenance, and scaling.
  • Moderate Throughput: Its output speed is solid but not class-leading. Applications requiring extremely high throughput for batch processing may find it slower than speed-optimized proprietary models.
  • High Verbosity: The model's tendency to be verbose can be a downside. It may produce longer-than-necessary responses, which consumes more generation time and can require extra parsing to extract the core answer.
  • Hardware Dependencies: To run Devstral 2 effectively, especially with its large context window, you need access to expensive, high-VRAM GPUs. This hardware requirement can be a significant barrier to entry for self-hosting.
  • API Pricing Uncertainty: While currently free on benchmarked APIs, this could be an introductory offer. Commercial API providers, including Mistral, may introduce or change pricing in the future, impacting long-term cost projections.

Provider pick

Choosing how to run Devstral 2 is a critical decision that balances cost, convenience, and control. The primary choice is between using a managed API service, like the one offered by Mistral, or self-hosting the model on your own infrastructure. Your ideal path depends entirely on your team's technical expertise, budget, and performance requirements.

Priority Pick Why Tradeoff to accept
Lowest Cost Self-Hosted Eliminates all per-token fees, making it ideal for high-volume or experimental use. You only pay for hardware and operational costs. Requires significant upfront investment in GPUs and deep technical expertise for setup and maintenance.
Ease of Use Mistral API Provides a fully managed, production-ready endpoint. Integration is as simple as making an API call, with no hardware management. You are subject to per-token usage costs (if/when introduced) and have less control over the underlying environment.
Maximum Performance Self-Hosted (Optimized) Allows for custom optimizations like kernel fusion, quantization, and speculative decoding on dedicated hardware to achieve the lowest possible latency. This is the most complex and expensive path, requiring specialized performance engineering skills.
Reliability & Scale Mistral API Leverages Mistral's production-grade infrastructure, designed for high availability and automatic scaling to handle fluctuating demand. Costs scale directly with usage. You may also encounter rate limits or quotas that constrain peak throughput.

Note: Performance and pricing data is based on benchmarks from the official Mistral API. Self-hosted performance and cost will vary significantly based on your specific hardware, software configuration, and optimization efforts.

Real workloads cost table

To understand Devstral 2's practical application, let's estimate its usage on common software development tasks. These scenarios highlight how its large context window and intelligence can be applied to real-world problems. The costs below are based on the benchmarked price of $0.00, illustrating the model's potential for cost-effective operation.

Scenario Input Output What it represents Estimated cost
Code Review Automation 15,000 tokens (a large pull request with multiple files) 2,500 tokens (detailed comments, bug suggestions, and style fixes) Analyzing a complex code change for potential issues before merging. $0.00
Generate a Full Test Suite 4,000 tokens (a class or module with several functions) 5,000 tokens (comprehensive unit and integration tests with mocks) Improving code coverage and ensuring software reliability. $0.00
Debug Production Error 10,000 tokens (stack trace, server logs, and relevant source code) 1,500 tokens (a step-by-step explanation of the root cause and a suggested code fix) A time-sensitive and critical task for maintaining application stability. $0.00
Document a Legacy API 50,000 tokens (source code for multiple undocumented API endpoints) 10,000 tokens (well-structured Markdown documentation with examples) A high-value task leveraging the large context window for code comprehension. $0.00
Refactor a Monolithic Function 8,000 tokens (a single, overly complex function) 9,000 tokens (the function broken down into smaller, modular, and more readable functions) Improving code maintainability and adhering to best practices. $0.00

Devstral 2's combination of a large context window and zero-cost pricing (on benchmarked providers) makes it exceptionally well-suited for token-heavy developer workflows. Tasks like comprehensive code analysis and documentation, which could be costly on other platforms, become highly accessible.

How to control cost (a practical playbook)

Effectively managing the cost and performance of Devstral 2 revolves around the fundamental choice between managed APIs and self-hosting. Beyond that, several strategies can help you maximize value and efficiency, regardless of your deployment method.

Choose Your Hosting Strategy Wisely

Your first and most important decision is where the model runs. This choice has the largest impact on your total cost of ownership.

  • Mistral API: Best for simplicity, rapid prototyping, and teams without dedicated ML infrastructure expertise. You get a production-ready solution out of the box, but will likely pay per use in the long run.
  • Self-Hosting: Best for teams with the technical skills and hardware to manage their own infrastructure. This path offers maximum control, privacy, and the lowest possible long-term running cost, but requires a significant upfront investment.
Leverage the Large Context Window for Batching

Devstral 2's 256k context window is not just for single large documents. You can use it to batch multiple, independent tasks into a single API call. For example, instead of asking for code reviews on five separate files in five calls, you can concatenate them into a single prompt.

  • Reduces Overhead: Fewer network round-trips and call overheads.
  • Improves Throughput: The model can process the entire batch in parallel internally, which is often more efficient than sequential processing.
Apply Quantization for Self-Hosting

If you choose to self-host, running the full-precision model is extremely demanding. Quantization is a technique that reduces the model's memory footprint and can speed up inference with a minimal impact on quality.

  • Reduces VRAM Usage: Using 4-bit or 8-bit quantized versions can cut memory requirements by 75% or more, allowing you to run the model on more affordable, consumer-grade GPUs.
  • Increases Speed: Operations on smaller data types are faster, leading to higher tokens-per-second throughput.
Optimize Prompts for Conciseness

Even when per-token costs are zero, generation time is not. Devstral 2's verbosity means it can generate more text than you need. You can guide it to be more direct.

  • Use System Prompts: Start your prompts with instructions like, "You are a helpful but concise assistant. Provide only the code requested without explanation."
  • Saves Time: Shorter outputs mean faster responses, which is critical for interactive applications and reduces overall compute load.

FAQ

What is Devstral 2?

Devstral 2 is a large language model created by Mistral. It is an "open-weight" model, meaning its underlying parameters are publicly available. It is specifically optimized for tasks related to software development, such as code generation, debugging, and analysis, and features a very large 256,000-token context window.

Who is Devstral 2 for?

Devstral 2 is primarily designed for software developers, data scientists, DevOps engineers, and anyone involved in the software creation process. Its strong coding and reasoning abilities make it a powerful tool for automating tasks, improving code quality, and accelerating development cycles.

How does Devstral 2 compare to models like GPT-4?

Devstral 2's main differentiators are its open-weight nature and developer focus. While proprietary models like GPT-4 are only accessible via a paid API, Devstral 2 can be self-hosted for greater control and potentially lower cost. It is specifically tuned for code, which may give it an edge in certain programming tasks, whereas models like GPT-4 are often more general-purpose.

What does "open-weight" mean?

"Open-weight" means that the numerical parameters (the "weights") that constitute the trained model are released to the public, typically under an open-source license. This allows anyone to download, modify, and run the model on their own hardware, in contrast to closed-source models where the weights are kept secret and are only accessible through a controlled API.

What hardware do I need to run Devstral 2 myself?

Running Devstral 2 effectively requires significant GPU resources. For the full-precision model, you would typically need high-end data center GPUs like NVIDIA A100s or H100s with high VRAM (80GB+). However, by using quantized versions (e.g., 4-bit), it becomes possible to run the model on high-end consumer GPUs like the NVIDIA RTX 4090 (24GB VRAM), though performance may be reduced, especially with the full context window.

Is Devstral 2 really free to use?

The model itself is free to download and use thanks to its open license. The $0.00 price in the benchmarks reflects its availability on certain platforms without a per-token charge. However, "free" does not mean zero cost. If you self-host, you bear the cost of hardware, electricity, and maintenance. If you use a managed API, the provider may introduce usage-based pricing in the future.

What is the 256k context window useful for?

A 256,000-token context window is exceptionally large and enables powerful new workflows. It allows the model to:

  • Analyze an entire small-to-medium-sized codebase in a single pass.
  • Read and summarize very long technical documents, books, or research papers.
  • Perform complex Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) without needing to split source documents into small chunks.
  • Maintain a very long and detailed history in a conversation or interactive session.

Subscribe