Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high)

Elite intelligence meets impressive speed and massive context.

Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high)

Google's flagship multimodal model, delivering top-tier intelligence and remarkable speed with a massive context window, at a premium price.

Multimodal1M ContextHigh IntelligenceFast ThroughputGoogleProprietary

Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high) represents Google's formidable entry into the highest tier of large language models, designed to compete directly with other frontier models. As a "Pro" model, it is engineered for complex reasoning, nuanced understanding, and sophisticated generation tasks. Its standout feature is its native multimodality, allowing it to seamlessly process and reason over interleaved text, images, audio, and even video streams within a single prompt. This capability, combined with a colossal 1 million token context window, positions it as a powerhouse for analyzing vast and varied datasets.

In performance benchmarks, Gemini 3 Pro establishes itself as a leader. It achieved the #1 rank on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index with a score of 73, significantly outperforming the average score of 44 among comparable models. This demonstrates exceptional capability in handling complex logic, knowledge-based questions, and multi-step reasoning. However, this intelligence comes with extreme verbosity; during testing, it generated 92 million tokens, more than triple the average of 28 million. This verbosity is a critical factor to consider for cost management. Despite its analytical depth, the model is also remarkably fast, delivering an output speed of 114.4 tokens per second, placing it among the faster models in its class.

The pricing structure for Gemini 3 Pro reflects its premium capabilities. At $2.00 per 1 million input tokens and $12.00 per 1 million output tokens, it is positioned on the more expensive side of the market. For context, the average input price for similar models is around $1.60, and the average output price is near $10.00. The high output cost, when combined with the model's high verbosity, can lead to substantial operational expenses. The total cost to evaluate Gemini 3 Pro on the Intelligence Index was a notable $1200.52, underscoring the financial commitment required to leverage this model at scale.

As a "Preview" release, Gemini 3 Pro is best suited for developers and organizations looking to explore the cutting edge of AI. Its capabilities are ideal for applications that require deep analysis of long documents, transcription and interpretation of multimedia content, or the development of sophisticated, autonomous agents that can perceive and reason about the world through multiple modalities. While its performance is impressive, users should be prepared for potential API changes and the high costs associated with its verbose nature and premium pricing tier.

Scoreboard

Intelligence

73 (#1 / 101)

Scores 73 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it at the top of the leaderboard for reasoning and knowledge.
Output speed

114.4 tokens/s

Notably fast performance for a model of this size, ranking #20 out of 101 models benchmarked.
Input price

$2.00 / 1M tokens

Somewhat expensive compared to the market average of $1.60 for comparable models.
Output price

$12.00 / 1M tokens

Also somewhat expensive compared to the market average of $10.00.
Verbosity signal

92M tokens

Extremely verbose during intelligence tests, generating far more tokens than the average model (28M).
Provider latency

32.82 seconds

High time-to-first-token (TTFT), typical for large models processing complex, multimodal inputs.

Technical specifications

Spec Details
Model Owner Google
License Proprietary
Release Status Preview
Context Window 1,000,000 tokens
Input Modalities Text, Image, Speech, Video
Output Modalities Text
Architecture Transformer-based (details undisclosed)
Fine-tuning Supported via Google Cloud Vertex AI
API Providers Google (Vertex AI), Google (AI Studio)
Blended Price $4.50 / 1M tokens (1:3 input/output ratio)

What stands out beyond the scoreboard

Where this model wins
  • Massive Context Analysis: Its 1 million token context window is class-leading, enabling analysis of entire codebases, lengthy legal documents, or hours of video transcripts in a single prompt.
  • True Multimodality: Natively processes interleaved text, images, audio, and video, allowing for sophisticated reasoning across different data types without needing separate models.
  • Top-Tier Intelligence: Achieves a #1 rank on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, demonstrating exceptional capabilities in complex reasoning, problem-solving, and knowledge retrieval.
  • High Throughput Speed: Despite its size and intelligence, it delivers a very fast output speed of over 114 tokens/second, making it viable for more interactive applications once the initial latency is overcome.
  • Complex Instruction Following: Excels at understanding and executing nuanced, multi-step instructions, making it a strong candidate for building autonomous agents and complex workflows.
Where costs sneak up
  • High Output Token Price: The $12.00 per million output token price is significantly higher than many competitors, making verbose or chat-heavy applications expensive.
  • Extreme Verbosity: The model's tendency to be highly verbose (generating over 3x the average tokens in tests) directly multiplies the high output cost, leading to unexpectedly large bills.
  • The Large Context Window Trap: Utilizing the full 1M token context window for input is costly at $2.00 per prompt. Frequent use of large contexts will rapidly increase expenses.
  • Multimodal Input Costs: Processing video and audio inputs is often priced differently and more expensively than text. Each minute of video can add significant cost to a request, separate from token counts.
  • High Latency Impact: With a Time To First Token (TTFT) over 30 seconds, applications requiring near-instantaneous responses will feel sluggish, potentially impacting user experience and requiring careful UI design to manage user expectations.

Provider pick

Gemini 3 Pro is exclusively available through Google's own platforms. The primary choice is between Google AI Studio, designed for rapid prototyping, and Google Cloud Vertex AI, built for production and enterprise applications. While pricing is identical, performance and features differ slightly.

Priority Pick Why Tradeoff to accept
Best Performance Google (Vertex AI) Offers slightly higher output speed (137 t/s vs 114 t/s) and lower latency (32.82s vs 34.32s) in our benchmarks. Requires a Google Cloud project setup, which is more complex than AI Studio.
Lowest Price Tie Both Google (Vertex AI) and Google (AI Studio) offer identical pricing at $2.00 per 1M input and $12.00 per 1M output tokens. No price advantage can be gained by choosing one over the other.
Easiest Start Google (AI Studio) Provides a web-based interface designed for rapid experimentation and often includes a generous free tier for initial development. Slightly lower performance and lacks enterprise-grade features like VPC-SC and advanced MLOps integrations.
Enterprise Scale Google (Vertex AI) Integrates with the full Google Cloud ecosystem, offering data governance, security controls, IAM, and scalable infrastructure. Higher barrier to entry and more complex configuration management.

Provider performance metrics are based on benchmarks conducted by Artificial Analysis. Your actual performance may vary based on workload, region, and other factors. Prices are subject to change.

Real workloads cost table

The premium pricing of Gemini 3 Pro means that understanding real-world costs is crucial. Its high output price and verbosity are the primary drivers of expense. Below are some estimated costs for common high-value tasks that leverage the model's unique strengths.

Scenario Input Output What it represents Estimated cost
Codebase Analysis 250k tokens (code files) 5k tokens (summary & suggestions) Analyzing a medium-sized software project to identify bugs and suggest improvements. ~$0.56
Video Q&A 120k tokens (10-min video) + 1k prompt 2k tokens (answers) Asking detailed questions about the content of a video presentation. ~$0.27
Long Document Summarization 500k tokens (legal document) 10k tokens (detailed summary) Condensing a massive text file into a structured, multi-section summary. ~$1.12
Complex Agentic Task 5k tokens (initial goal) 25k tokens (chain-of-thought & final answer) A multi-step task where the model reasons and generates intermediate thoughts before a final output. ~$0.31
RAG-based Chat Session 10k tokens (user queries) 30k tokens (verbose answers) A 10-turn conversation where the model provides detailed, sourced answers. ~$0.38

The cost for single, high-value tasks that leverage the large context or multimodality is often manageable and provides significant value. However, costs can escalate quickly in high-frequency or conversational applications due to the model's high output price and natural verbosity.

How to control cost (a practical playbook)

Managing the cost of a premium model like Gemini 3 Pro is essential for building a sustainable application. The key is to mitigate its high output cost and verbosity while still leveraging its powerful capabilities. Here are several strategies to keep your spending in check.

Control Verbosity with Prompt Engineering

The most direct way to control cost is to reduce the number of output tokens. Since Gemini 3 Pro is naturally verbose, you must be explicit in your instructions.

  • Specify the desired output format (e.g., "Provide a 3-bullet summary," "Answer with only 'Yes' or 'No'").
  • Request conciseness directly (e.g., "Be brief," "Provide a terse response").
  • Use structured output formats like JSON to eliminate conversational filler. Forcing the model into a strict schema can dramatically reduce token count.
Optimize Context Window Usage

The 1M token context window is powerful but expensive to fill. Avoid sending unnecessary information in your prompts.

  • Use a RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) system to find and inject only the most relevant document chunks into the prompt, rather than sending the entire document.
  • For ongoing conversations, implement a summarization strategy for the chat history instead of including every previous turn in the context.
  • Pre-process data to remove irrelevant information (e.g., HTML tags, boilerplate text) before sending it to the model.
Leverage Google AI Studio for Prototyping

Before deploying to a paid production environment on Vertex AI, use Google's more developer-friendly tools to refine your application logic without incurring costs.

  • Google AI Studio often provides a generous free tier for making API calls.
  • Use this environment to experiment with different prompts, test verbosity controls, and validate your application's core functionality.
  • Once your prompts are optimized for cost and performance, migrate the finalized logic to your production infrastructure on Vertex AI.
Implement Caching and Budget Alerts

For applications with repetitive queries, a simple cache can yield significant savings. For overall cost management, use the tools provided by your cloud platform.

  • Implement a caching layer (like Redis or a simple database) to store and retrieve results for identical prompts. This is highly effective for FAQ bots or common data queries.
  • Set up billing alerts and budgets in your Google Cloud project. This won't reduce your cost, but it will prevent unexpected bill shock and allow you to react quickly if usage spikes.

FAQ

What is Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high)?

Gemini 3 Pro Preview (high) is a top-tier, multimodal large language model from Google. It is designed for complex reasoning tasks and can process text, images, audio, and video. The "Preview" tag indicates it is an early-release version and may be subject to changes.

What does "multimodal" mean for Gemini 3 Pro?

Multimodality means the model can natively understand and process different types of data (modalities) within a single prompt. For example, you can give it a video file and ask text-based questions about what is happening in the video, and it can reason across both the visual/audio information and your text query to provide an answer.

How does the 1 million token context window work?

The context window is the amount of information (measured in tokens) that the model can consider at one time. A 1 million token window allows it to process extremely large amounts of input, equivalent to about 750,000 words, a 1500-page book, or hours of audio. This is useful for analyzing entire codebases, long legal documents, or lengthy transcripts without losing context.

Is Gemini 3 Pro better than models like GPT-4 Turbo?

"Better" depends on the use case. Gemini 3 Pro scored #1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, indicating it is a top performer in reasoning and knowledge. Its key advantages are its massive 1M token context window and native video/audio processing. However, it is also more expensive and has higher latency than some competitors. For many tasks, the performance may be comparable, and the best choice depends on specific needs for modality, context length, speed, and cost.

What's the difference between using Google Vertex AI and Google AI Studio?

Google AI Studio is a web-based tool designed for quick experimentation and prototyping, often with a free tier. Google Cloud Vertex AI is a full-fledged MLOps platform for building, deploying, and scaling AI applications in production. Vertex AI offers better performance, scalability, and enterprise-grade features like security, governance, and integration with other Google Cloud services.

Why is the latency (Time To First Token) so high?

The high latency of over 30 seconds is likely due to the model's immense size and the complexity of processing potentially large, multimodal inputs. The system needs significant time to load the model and process the initial prompt, especially if it includes large amounts of data. While the subsequent token generation is fast, this initial delay makes it less suitable for real-time, interactive chat without a carefully designed user interface to manage expectations.

Is the "Preview" version suitable for production applications?

Using a "Preview" model in production carries some risk. APIs may change, performance could fluctuate, and there might be stricter rate limits or less stability than a Generally Available (GA) product. It is best for applications where developers can tolerate these potential changes. For mission-critical, high-stability applications, it may be wiser to wait for the official GA release.


Subscribe