Gemma 3 270M (non-reasoning)

An ultra-lightweight model for simple, high-volume tasks.

Gemma 3 270M (non-reasoning)

Google's compact open model, offering unparalleled cost-efficiency for basic text generation, classification, and summarization at scale.

Google270M Parameters32k ContextOpen LicenseText GenerationCost-Effective

Gemma 3 270M is the smallest and most efficient entry in Google's latest generation of open models. Designed from the ground up for speed, low resource consumption, and cost-effectiveness, the 270M variant targets on-device applications, edge computing, and high-throughput API tasks where complex reasoning is not a primary requirement. Its release under an open license encourages broad adoption, allowing developers to build, modify, and deploy it commercially with minimal restrictions, democratizing access to capable, if simple, AI.

The model's performance profile is a clear reflection of its design philosophy. With a score of 6 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, it sits at the lower end of the capability spectrum, significantly below the average of 13 for comparable models. This indicates that Gemma 3 270M is not suited for tasks requiring deep understanding, multi-step reasoning, or nuanced instruction following. However, it excels in its intended domain. During evaluation, it generated a concise 5.2 million tokens, less than the 6.7 million average, suggesting an inherent efficiency in its output that can be beneficial for applications where brevity is valued.

Where Gemma 3 270M truly distinguishes itself is its pricing. With an input and output price of $0.00 per million tokens on many platforms, it is effectively free to use for token-based billing. This positions it as an exceptional choice for startups, researchers, and developers experimenting with AI, or for production systems that need to process immense volumes of simple text-based tasks without incurring significant operational costs. This disruptive pricing strategy makes it a go-to option for pre-filtering, classification, and basic content generation, where the cost of larger, more capable models would be prohibitive.

Despite its small parameter count, Google has equipped the Gemma 3 270M with a surprisingly generous 32,000-token context window. This is a significant feature for a model of its class, enabling it to process and reference moderately long documents. This capability opens up use cases like summarizing articles, answering questions over provided text (simple RAG), or maintaining context in extended, straightforward conversations. While its analytical abilities within that context are limited, the sheer size of the window provides a flexibility not often seen in ultra-lightweight models.

Scoreboard

Intelligence

6 (21 / 22)

Scores at the lower end of the spectrum, indicating it is best suited for simple tasks, not complex reasoning or instruction following.
Output speed

N/A tok/sec

Performance data is not yet available for this model. Its small size suggests it will be very fast.
Input price

$0.00 / 1M tokens

Ranked #1 for affordability. Essentially free to use on many API provider platforms.
Output price

$0.00 / 1M tokens

Ranked #1 for affordability. Unbeatable cost for generating text, eliminating a major operational expense.
Verbosity signal

5.2M tokens

Relatively concise output compared to peers. This efficiency can reduce processing time and user reading time.
Provider latency

N/A seconds

Time-to-first-token data is not yet available. Expect very low latency due to the model's small size.

Technical specifications

Spec Details
Owner Google
License Gemma 3 License (Open, Commercial Use)
Parameters ~270 Million
Architecture Transformer-based Decoder-only
Context Window 32,768 tokens
Modalities Text
Intended Use On-device, edge computing, high-throughput simple tasks
Training Data A diverse mix of public web documents, code, and mathematical texts.
Knowledge Cutoff Information generally available before the training period; not specified for this version.
Fine-Tuning Supported via standard frameworks like Hugging Face TRL and LoRA.

What stands out beyond the scoreboard

Where this model wins
  • Unbeatable Cost: Often available for free through API providers, making it the most budget-friendly option on the market for high-volume tasks.
  • High Efficiency: Its small 270M parameter size allows for extremely fast inference, low memory usage, and suitability for on-device or edge deployments.
  • Generous Context Window: A 32k context window is exceptionally large for a model of this size, enabling it to process entire documents for simple summarization or RAG.
  • Simplicity and Speed: Excels at straightforward tasks like text classification, sentiment analysis, keyword extraction, and generating basic, templatized content.
  • Open and Permissive License: The open license allows for commercial use, modification, and distribution, giving developers maximum flexibility.
Where costs sneak up
  • Low Intelligence Ceiling: Fails at tasks requiring nuance, multi-step reasoning, complex instruction following, or creative writing. Not a general-purpose assistant.
  • Prone to Hallucination: Like all models, but especially smaller ones, it can generate plausible-sounding but incorrect information. Fact-checking is essential.
  • Limited World Knowledge: Its smaller training dataset means it has more knowledge gaps about niche topics or very recent events compared to larger models.
  • Requires Careful Prompting: To get reliable results, prompts must be very clear, simple, and direct. It struggles with ambiguity.
  • Output Can Be Generic: The model may produce repetitive or generic text, lacking the flair and creativity of larger counterparts.
  • Hidden Infrastructure Costs: While token costs may be zero, self-hosting requires managing compute, and using APIs may involve rate limits or platform fees.

Provider pick

Choosing a provider for a free model like Gemma 3 270M isn't about finding the lowest price—it's about evaluating other critical factors. The best choice depends on your priorities, whether that's developer experience, reliability, available tooling, or the ability to scale without hitting restrictive rate limits. Since the direct cost is nil, focus on the platform that makes your development process the smoothest.

Priority Pick Why Tradeoff to accept
Lowest Cost Any Provider with a Free Tier The model is often offered at no cost, making any provider that hosts it a winner on price. May come with stricter rate limits, lower uptime guarantees, or fewer enterprise features.
Best Performance Managed Inference Platforms Specialized platforms optimize models for low latency and high throughput, which is crucial for real-time applications. May have usage-based pricing for compute time, even if token costs are zero. Less control over the underlying hardware.
Maximum Control Self-Hosting (Cloud or On-Prem) You have complete control over the model, infrastructure, scaling, and security. No rate limits other than your own hardware's capacity. You are responsible for all infrastructure setup, maintenance, scaling, and associated compute costs. This is the most complex option.
Ease of Use Integrated AI Platforms Providers that bundle models with other services (vector databases, logging, etc.) can accelerate development. You may experience vendor lock-in, and the specific model implementation might not be as optimized as on a specialized service.

Provider offerings, pricing, and performance metrics are subject to change. The 'free' status of this model on various platforms may be a promotional or introductory offer. Always verify current terms before committing to a provider.

Real workloads cost table

The true cost of using a 'free' model isn't in tokens, but in the engineering effort required to make it reliable and the opportunity cost of not using a more capable model. For Gemma 3 270M, the value proposition is clear: apply it to high-volume, low-complexity tasks where its speed and zero cost outweigh its intellectual limitations. Below are examples of workloads where it shines.

Scenario Input Output What it represents Estimated cost
Sentiment Analysis ~50 words ~5 words (e.g., 'Positive') Categorizing customer feedback or social media mentions at massive scale. Effectively $0.00
Keyword Extraction ~300 words ~10 words Identifying key topics from an article for tagging or SEO. Effectively $0.00
Email Triage ~150 words ~5 words (e.g., 'Sales Inquiry') Routing incoming emails to the correct department based on content. Effectively $0.00
Basic Chatbot Greeting ~10 words ~20 words Handling the initial user interaction in a support chat before escalating to a human or larger model. Effectively $0.00
Data Anonymization ~500 words ~500 words Identifying and replacing PII (names, emails) in a block of text with placeholders. Requires strong guardrails. Effectively $0.00

For these scenarios, the token cost is negligible, making Gemma 3 270M an economic powerhouse. The primary investment is in building a robust system around the model to handle its limitations, validate its outputs, and manage edge cases where it might fail.

How to control cost (a practical playbook)

With a model that is often free, the cost-saving playbook shifts from minimizing token usage to maximizing development efficiency and minimizing infrastructure overhead. The goal is to leverage the model's strengths—speed and zero cost—while mitigating the costs associated with its weaknesses, such as the need for extensive validation and error handling.

Use as a First-Pass Filter

Implement a multi-stage pipeline where Gemma 3 270M handles the initial, simple requests. This can dramatically reduce the load on more expensive, powerful models.

  • Triage: Use Gemma to classify incoming requests. Simple queries (e.g., 'What are your business hours?') are answered directly, while complex ones ('Compare your product to a competitor') are escalated to a model like GPT-4o or Claude 3 Opus.
  • Summarization for RAG: Use Gemma to perform a quick, rough summarization of documents before they are passed to a more capable model for detailed analysis. This reduces the context size for the expensive model.
Enforce Strict Output Formats

Developer time is expensive. Reduce parsing and validation headaches by forcing the model to return structured data like JSON. Even small models can be surprisingly good at this with the right prompting.

  • Prompt Engineering: Include explicit instructions in your prompt to return a JSON object with a specific schema. Provide an example.
  • Tool Use/Function Calling: If the serving platform supports it, use tool-calling features to guarantee structured output, which eliminates the need for fragile string parsing.
Self-Host for Predictable Costs

If you have a very high and consistent volume of requests, the rate limits on free API tiers might become a bottleneck. Self-hosting can provide a more predictable cost structure and performance.

  • Dedicated Instance: Run the model on a small, dedicated cloud GPU or CPU instance. The monthly cost is fixed, regardless of how many tokens you process.
  • Batch Processing: For non-real-time tasks, collect jobs and run them in large batches overnight on spot instances to dramatically lower compute costs.
Build Robust Guardrails and Fallbacks

The biggest hidden cost of using a less capable model is handling its failures gracefully. Invest engineering time in building a resilient system.

  • Output Validation: Always validate the model's output. For a classification task, ensure the output is one of the valid categories. If not, either retry or escalate.
  • Fallback Logic: Implement a clear fallback mechanism. If Gemma 3 270M fails to produce a satisfactory response after one or two retries, automatically route the request to a more powerful model or a human agent.

FAQ

What is Gemma 3 270M?

Gemma 3 270M is an ultra-lightweight, open-source text generation model developed by Google. With only 270 million parameters, it's designed for high efficiency, speed, and deployment on resource-constrained environments like mobile devices, browsers, or edge servers.

What are its main use cases?

It is best suited for simple, high-volume tasks where complex reasoning is not required. Ideal use cases include: sentiment analysis, text classification, keyword extraction, basic summarization, routing customer support inquiries, and powering simple, scripted chatbots.

Is it really free to use?

Many API providers offer Gemma 3 270M at a price of $0.00 per million tokens, making it effectively free from a token-cost perspective. However, providers may have rate limits, and self-hosting the model will incur compute and infrastructure costs. Always check the specific terms of the provider you choose.

How does it compare to other small models like Phi-3 Mini?

Gemma 3 270M is significantly smaller than models like Phi-3 Mini (3.8B parameters). While this makes Gemma faster and more resource-efficient, it also means it is less capable in terms of reasoning, knowledge, and instruction-following ability. The choice depends on whether you need maximum efficiency (Gemma) or a better balance of performance and size (Phi-3 Mini).

What does the '270M' in the name mean?

The '270M' refers to the number of parameters in the model, which is approximately 270 million. Parameters are the variables the model learns during training and are a general indicator of its size and complexity. For comparison, large models have hundreds of billions of parameters.

Can I fine-tune Gemma 3 270M?

Yes. As an open model, Gemma 3 270M can be fine-tuned on your own data to specialize it for specific tasks. This can improve its performance for a narrow domain, but it will not fundamentally overcome its inherent limitations in general reasoning.

What is the 32k context window useful for?

The 32,000-token context window allows the model to read and refer to a large amount of text (roughly 24,000 words) in a single prompt. This is useful for 'question answering over a document' (simple RAG), summarizing long articles, or maintaining context in a straightforward, multi-turn conversation without forgetting earlier parts of the discussion.


Subscribe