GPT-4o (Aug) is a fast, multimodal model from OpenAI, offering a massive 128k context window and top-tier speed, but with intelligence and pricing that place it in the middle of the pack.
GPT-4o (Aug), where the 'o' stands for 'omni', represents OpenAI's strategic push towards creating a single, unified model that seamlessly handles text, audio, and image inputs. This August 2024 snapshot is engineered for speed and efficiency, positioning it as a versatile workhorse for a wide array of applications. Its core value proposition lies in a powerful combination of features: exceptionally high output speed, native multimodal understanding, and a vast 128,000-token context window. This makes it a compelling choice for developers building interactive, real-time experiences that need to process and respond to diverse data types quickly.
When examining its performance profile, a clear trade-off emerges. GPT-4o (Aug) is a speed demon, ranking #8 out of 54 models in our benchmarks with an impressive output of 99 tokens per second. This level of throughput is critical for applications like chatbots, live transcription, and interactive content generation, where user experience is directly tied to responsiveness. However, this speed comes at the cost of raw intelligence. With a score of 29 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, it falls slightly below the average for comparable models. This suggests that while it is highly capable for many tasks, it may struggle with deeply complex, multi-step reasoning or nuanced problem-solving where top-tier analytical power is paramount. It is more of a swift 'doer' than a profound 'thinker'.
The pricing structure of GPT-4o (Aug) is another critical consideration. At $2.50 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens, it occupies a middle ground. The input cost is slightly more expensive than the market average, while the output cost is right on par. The significant 4:1 ratio between output and input pricing heavily influences its economic viability for different use cases. It is most cost-effective for tasks that involve processing large volumes of input to generate concise outputs, such as summarization, data extraction, or Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). Conversely, applications that are highly generative and produce lengthy text, like writing long articles or detailed reports, will see costs accumulate rapidly due to the more expensive output tokens.
Beyond the core metrics, GPT-4o's feature set solidifies its role as a flexible tool. The 128k context window is a standout feature, enabling the model to analyze entire books, extensive codebases, or long conversation histories in a single pass. Its native ability to accept image inputs opens up a world of possibilities, from analyzing charts and diagrams to describing real-world scenes. The model's availability through both the OpenAI API and Microsoft Azure provides developers with crucial flexibility, allowing them to choose a provider based on their existing infrastructure, compliance requirements, or specific performance needs like throughput versus latency. The '(Aug)' designation indicates this is a stable, versioned release, but developers should remain mindful of its September 2023 knowledge cutoff, which limits its awareness of more recent events.
29 (29 / 54)
99.0 tokens/s
2.50 $/M tokens
10.00 $/M tokens
N/A output tokens
0.64 seconds
| Spec | Details |
|---|---|
| Owner | OpenAI |
| License | Proprietary |
| Context Window | 128,000 tokens |
| Knowledge Cutoff | September 2023 |
| Model Type | Multimodal (Text, Image) |
| Input Modalities | Text, Image |
| Output Modalities | Text |
| API Providers | OpenAI, Microsoft Azure |
| Input Pricing | $2.50 / 1M tokens |
| Output Pricing | $10.00 / 1M tokens |
| Intelligence Index Score | 29 / 100 |
| Speed Rank | #8 / 54 |
Choosing a provider for GPT-4o (Aug) is a nuanced decision. While both Microsoft Azure and OpenAI offer identical pricing, their performance characteristics and platform features cater to different priorities. Your choice should be guided by whether your application prioritizes lowest latency, highest throughput, or integration with a broader enterprise ecosystem.
| Priority | Pick | Why | Tradeoff to accept |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lowest Latency | OpenAI | Delivers the fastest time-to-first-token (0.64s), making it ideal for highly interactive, conversational applications where initial responsiveness is paramount. | Lower maximum throughput (100 t/s) compared to Azure, which may be a bottleneck for high-volume batch processing. |
| Highest Throughput | Microsoft Azure | Offers significantly higher output speed (158 t/s), perfect for batch jobs, content generation at scale, and maximizing overall processing volume. | Slightly higher latency (0.78s), meaning the first token arrives a fraction of a second slower than with OpenAI. |
| Lowest Price | Tie | Both Azure and OpenAI have the exact same pricing model: $2.50/M input and $10.00/M output tokens. | Price is not a differentiator; the decision must be based on performance, compliance, or ecosystem factors. |
| Easiest Setup | OpenAI | The direct API offers a straightforward, developer-first experience with minimal configuration required to get started. | Lacks the extensive enterprise-grade security, governance, and private networking features inherent to the Azure platform. |
| Enterprise & Compliance | Microsoft Azure | Integrates seamlessly with Azure Active Directory, VNet, and Azure's comprehensive compliance and data residency guarantees. | The initial setup and configuration can be more complex, requiring familiarity with the Azure portal and its services. |
Performance benchmarks represent a snapshot in time and can vary based on region, server load, and specific API configurations. Your own testing is recommended to validate performance for your specific use case.
The theoretical price per million tokens provides a baseline, but real-world costs are determined by the unique input-to-output ratio of your specific tasks. Understanding this balance is key to accurately forecasting and managing your application's operational expenses. Below are cost estimates for several common scenarios.
| Scenario | Input | Output | What it represents | Estimated cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customer Support Chatbot | ~750 input tokens | ~150 output tokens | A typical conversational turn with history. | ~$0.0034 |
| Document Summarization | ~8,000 input tokens | ~500 output tokens | Processing a long article for a concise summary (RAG). | ~$0.0250 |
| Generative Coding | ~300 input tokens | ~1,000 output tokens | Generating a function or code block from a comment. | ~$0.0108 |
| Image Analysis & Description | ~1,200 input tokens (equivalent) | ~250 output tokens | Analyzing a detailed chart and providing insights. | ~$0.0055 |
As the examples show, costs are lowest for input-heavy tasks like summarization and highest for output-heavy tasks like code generation, directly reflecting the model's 4:1 output-to-input price ratio.
Effectively managing the costs of GPT-4o (Aug) requires a proactive strategy that goes beyond simply monitoring your API bill. By implementing specific architectural patterns and operational best practices, you can significantly reduce token consumption and optimize your spend without sacrificing performance.
Given the 4x higher cost of output tokens, the most impactful cost-saving measure is to control output length. Structure your prompts to encourage brevity and precision.
Many applications receive duplicate requests. Caching responses for identical prompts avoids redundant API calls, saving both money and time. This is especially effective for common queries in a customer support bot or standard analysis of popular documents.
The massive context window is a powerful tool, but also a potential cost trap. Sending the full context with every call is rarely necessary and can be very expensive.
If your application does not require immediate, real-time responses, batching multiple requests into a single API call can improve efficiency and reduce overhead. This is particularly effective when using the Azure endpoint, which is optimized for high throughput.
The 'o' stands for 'omni'. It signifies that the model is inherently multimodal, designed from the ground up to natively understand and process a combination of text, audio, and image inputs within a single, unified neural network. This is a departure from older models that often required separate systems to handle different data types.
GPT-4o (Aug) is generally positioned as faster and more cost-effective than models like GPT-4 Turbo, especially for multimodal tasks. However, this comes with a trade-off in raw intelligence. While GPT-4o is very capable, GPT-4 Turbo and other higher-end variants typically score better on complex reasoning and problem-solving benchmarks. GPT-4o is the high-speed, versatile option, while Turbo is the high-power, deep-thinking option.
It's a qualified 'no'. While capable of many tasks, its primary strengths are speed and multimodality, not top-tier reasoning. Its Intelligence Index score of 29 is average. For applications that require deep analytical capabilities, multi-step logical deduction, or nuanced understanding of highly specialized topics, a model with a higher intelligence rating would be a more reliable choice.
GPT-4o excels in applications where speed, multimodality, and a large context are critical. Top use cases include: real-time conversational chatbots, summarizing long documents or meetings (via RAG), analyzing and describing images or charts, extracting structured data from unstructured text, and powering interactive creative tools.
A 128,000-token context window means the model can process and 'remember' a very large amount of information in a single request. This is roughly equivalent to 95,000 words or about 300 pages of a book. It allows the model to maintain context in very long conversations, analyze entire software projects, or answer questions based on a comprehensive legal document, all within one prompt.
This means the model's internal knowledge base was last updated with information from the public internet and other training data up to September 2023. It will not be aware of any events, discoveries, or data that emerged after that date. For tasks requiring up-to-the-minute information, you must provide that recent data within the prompt, typically using a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) system.
The '(Aug)' tag indicates that this is a specific, versioned snapshot of the GPT-4o model, released in August 2024. OpenAI and other providers release such snapshots to provide developers with a stable and predictable model version for a period of time. This helps prevent unexpected behavior changes that can occur as the underlying model is continuously improved, allowing developers to build and test against a consistent target.