OpenAI's cost-effective, multimodal variant of the GPT-4o series, designed for speed and efficiency in less complex tasks.
GPT-4o mini emerges as OpenAI's strategic answer to the growing demand for capable yet economical AI models. Positioned as a smaller, faster, and significantly cheaper sibling to the flagship GPT-4o, it aims to capture a wide range of use cases that require solid performance without the premium cost or reasoning power of top-tier models. It inherits key features from its larger counterpart, including impressive multimodal capabilities—the ability to understand and process both text and images—and a vast 128,000-token context window. This combination makes it a versatile tool for developers building applications that need to handle large documents or visual data on a budget.
However, the 'mini' designation is not just about price. The model's performance on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index places it in the below-average category, with a score of 21 compared to a class average of 28. This indicates that while GPT-4o mini is competent for straightforward tasks like summarization, classification, and simple Q&A, it struggles with complex reasoning, nuanced instruction-following, and multi-step problem-solving. Developers should view it as a high-utility tool for scaled, less-demanding workloads rather than a drop-in replacement for models like GPT-4 Turbo or Claude 3 Opus.
In terms of performance metrics, GPT-4o mini presents a mixed but compelling profile. Its pricing is highly competitive, particularly for input tokens, making it an attractive choice for applications that process large amounts of text. While its output generation speed is notably slower than many competitors, its time-to-first-token (latency) is excellent when served directly from OpenAI, providing a responsive feel for interactive applications. This trade-off between throughput and latency is a critical consideration. The model is best suited for scenarios where quick initial responses are valued over the rapid generation of long-form content. Ultimately, GPT-4o mini carves out a niche as a pragmatic, feature-rich model for developers who need to balance cost, features, and performance for everyday AI tasks.
21 (55 / 77)
51 tokens/s
0.15 $/1M tokens
0.60 $/1M tokens
N/A
0.49 seconds
| Spec | Details |
|---|---|
| Owner | OpenAI |
| License | Proprietary |
| Context Window | 128,000 tokens |
| Knowledge Cutoff | September 2023 |
| Multimodality | Text and Image (Vision) input |
| JSON Mode | Supported |
| Function Calling | Supported |
| API Providers | OpenAI, Microsoft Azure |
| Input Price | $0.15 per 1M tokens |
| Output Price | $0.60 per 1M tokens |
| Intelligence Index | 21 (Ranked #55/77) |
| Output Speed (OpenAI) | ~51 tokens/second |
GPT-4o mini is primarily available through its creator, OpenAI, and as part of Microsoft's Azure AI offerings. While both providers offer identical pricing, their performance characteristics differ in key areas. The choice between them depends entirely on whether your application prioritizes the lowest possible latency or the highest overall throughput.
| Priority | Pick | Why | Tradeoff to accept |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lowest Latency | OpenAI | With a time-to-first-token of just 0.49 seconds, OpenAI's API is more than twice as fast as Azure's (1.09s). This is crucial for interactive applications like chatbots where perceived responsiveness is key. | You sacrifice maximum output speed; Azure is roughly 30% faster at generating tokens after the first one. |
| Highest Throughput | Microsoft Azure | Azure delivers a significantly faster output speed of 67 tokens/second compared to OpenAI's 51 t/s. This is the better choice for batch processing or generating long-form content where total generation time matters most. | The initial delay (latency) is much higher, making it feel sluggish for real-time, conversational use cases. |
| Best Overall Value | OpenAI | Given that pricing is identical, OpenAI's superior latency provides a better user experience for a wider range of common applications without any cost penalty. The throughput difference is only relevant for specific, non-interactive workloads. | Not the ideal choice for pure batch processing tasks where total job completion time is the only metric that matters. |
| Enterprise Integration | Microsoft Azure | Azure often provides benefits for large enterprises, including consolidated billing, private networking, regional data residency, and integration with the broader Azure ecosystem. | Performance trade-offs (higher latency) and potentially more complex initial setup compared to OpenAI's direct API. |
Performance and pricing data are based on benchmarks from June 2024. Provider offerings and performance can change over time. Always conduct your own tests for your specific use case.
To understand the real-world cost of using GPT-4o mini, let's estimate the expense for several common scenarios. These examples are based on the standard pricing of $0.15 per 1M input tokens and $0.60 per 1M output tokens. Note how the cost balance shifts depending on whether the task is input-heavy or output-heavy.
| Scenario | Input | Output | What it represents | Estimated cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Email Classification | 500 tokens | 10 tokens | A simple task to categorize an incoming email into one of several predefined categories. | ~$0.00008 |
| Simple Chatbot Response | 1,500 tokens | 100 tokens | A user asks a question with some conversation history provided as context. | ~$0.00029 |
| Short Document Summary | 5,000 tokens | 300 tokens | Summarizing a 3-4 page document into a few key paragraphs. | ~$0.00093 |
| Image Description (Vision) | 1,200 tokens (est.) | 75 tokens | Analyzing a moderately complex image and providing a descriptive caption. | ~$0.00023 |
| RAG Query | 10,000 tokens | 150 tokens | Answering a question using a large chunk of retrieved text as context. | ~$0.00159 |
The takeaway is clear: GPT-4o mini is exceptionally cheap for tasks that are input-dominant, such as RAG or document analysis. However, for generative tasks that produce a lot of text, the 4x higher output cost becomes the primary driver of expense, and costs can approach those of more capable models if not managed carefully.
While GPT-4o mini is priced attractively, costs can accumulate if not managed proactively. Its unique profile—cheap input, expensive output, large context, and moderate speed—requires specific strategies to maximize value. Here are several tactics to keep your spending in check.
The most significant cost factor is the four-times multiplier on output tokens. Your primary goal should be to minimize generated text wherever possible.
max_tokens parameter to set a hard ceiling on the length of the response, preventing the model from generating excessively long and expensive text.The 128k context window is a powerful feature, but filling it on every API call is a recipe for high costs and slow response times. Use it strategically.
GPT-4o mini's performance profile (low latency, low throughput) makes it suitable for specific interaction patterns. Align your application design with its strengths.
GPT-4o mini is a distilled version of GPT-4o. It is significantly cheaper, particularly for input tokens, and designed to be faster for certain tasks. However, this comes at the cost of intelligence; it scores much lower on reasoning and complex instruction-following benchmarks. Both models share the same 128k context window and multimodal (vision) capabilities.
Multimodality means the model can process more than one type of data in its input. For GPT-4o mini, this specifically refers to its ability to analyze and understand the content of images provided alongside text prompts. You can ask it questions about a picture, have it describe what's happening, or extract text from an image.
No, it is generally not recommended for these tasks. Its intelligence score of 21 is well below average, indicating that it struggles with multi-step reasoning, logical puzzles, and generating complex, correct code. For such tasks, you should use a higher-tier model like GPT-4 Turbo, Claude 3 Opus, or the full GPT-4o.
Choose GPT-4o mini over open-source alternatives when you need its specific commercial features. Key differentiators include its native vision capabilities, the convenience and reliability of the OpenAI or Azure API, and when you are already integrated into that ecosystem. If your task is purely text-based and you have the infrastructure to host your own models, a fine-tuned open-source model might be more cost-effective and performant.
The knowledge cutoff means the model's internal training data does not include information about events, discoveries, or data from after September 2023. It will not be aware of news or developments that have occurred since that time. This is why it's often used in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems, which provide it with up-to-date information in the prompt context.
The large context window allows the model to consider vast amounts of information (over 200 pages of text) in a single prompt. This is a major advantage for analyzing large documents or maintaining long conversations. However, performance is directly affected: the more tokens you include in the context, the longer the model will take to process the input and begin its response, and the higher the cost will be. Effective use requires balancing the need for context with the impact on latency and cost.