GPT-5 (high) (high)

A deep dive into OpenAI's next-generation flagship model.

GPT-5 (high) (high)

OpenAI's flagship model delivers top-tier intelligence and impressive speed, balanced by moderate pricing and high verbosity.

OpenAI400k ContextMultimodal InputProprietary LicenseKnowledge Cutoff: Sep 2024High Intelligence

GPT-5 (high) represents OpenAI's latest entry into the top tier of large language models, establishing a new benchmark for intelligence and capability. Positioned as a flagship offering, it is designed for complex, high-stakes tasks that demand nuanced understanding and sophisticated reasoning. With support for both text and image inputs, a massive 400,000-token context window, and knowledge updated to September 2024, GPT-5 (high) is engineered to tackle a broad spectrum of advanced use cases, from deep document analysis to creative content generation and intricate problem-solving.

On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, GPT-5 (high) achieves a formidable score of 68, placing it significantly above the average of 44 for comparable models and ranking it #6 out of 101 models tested. This score underscores its exceptional ability in areas like logic, mathematics, coding, and instruction following. This intelligence is paired with impressive performance; at 102 tokens per second on its native OpenAI endpoint, it is considerably faster than the class average of 71 tokens/s. This combination of high intelligence and speed makes it a powerful tool for both interactive applications and demanding offline processing.

The model's pricing structure is competitive but requires careful consideration. The input price of $1.25 per million tokens is moderately priced and slightly below the market average of $1.60. The output price, at $10.00 per million tokens, aligns exactly with the market average. However, a key characteristic of GPT-5 (high) is its extreme verbosity. During our intelligence evaluation, it generated 85 million tokens—more than three times the average of 28 million. This tendency to produce detailed, lengthy responses means that output costs can accumulate rapidly, making cost management a critical aspect of its implementation. The total cost to run our intelligence benchmark on the model was a substantial $912.91, highlighting how its verbosity directly impacts budget.

Ultimately, GPT-5 (high) is a model of trade-offs. It offers access to world-class intelligence and a vast context window, enabling tasks that were previously out of reach. Its speed, particularly on optimized infrastructure from providers like Microsoft Azure, makes it suitable for real-time user experiences. However, developers must actively manage its high verbosity and the 8-to-1 cost ratio between output and input tokens to keep operational expenses in check. It is a tool best suited for applications where its superior reasoning capabilities justify the potentially higher costs and the need for careful prompt engineering.

Scoreboard

Intelligence

68 (#6 / 101)

Scores 68 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it in the top tier of models for complex reasoning and understanding.
Output speed

102.0 tokens/s

Faster than the class average of 71 tokens/s, making it suitable for many interactive applications.
Input price

$1.25 / 1M tokens

Slightly more affordable than the average input price of $1.60 for comparable models.
Output price

$10.00 / 1M tokens

Priced exactly at the market average, making output costs a key factor to manage.
Verbosity signal

85M tokens

Extremely verbose, generating over three times the average token count (28M) during intelligence benchmarks.
Provider latency

39.94s TTFT

Best-in-class latency via Azure, though this can vary significantly between API providers.

Technical specifications

Spec Details
Model Owner OpenAI
License Proprietary
Input Modalities Text, Image
Output Modalities Text
Context Window 400,000 tokens
Knowledge Cutoff September 2024
Architecture Transformer-based, details not disclosed
Fine-tuning Support Yes (via provider APIs)
Intelligence Index Score 68 / 100
Avg. Output Speed (OpenAI) 102.0 tokens/s
Input Price $1.25 / 1M tokens
Output Price $10.00 / 1M tokens

What stands out beyond the scoreboard

Where this model wins
  • Top-Tier Intelligence. Its high score on the Intelligence Index makes it a prime choice for the most demanding tasks, including legal analysis, scientific research, and advanced code generation where accuracy and reasoning are paramount.
  • Massive Context Window. The 400k token context window is a game-changer for applications that need to process and reason over huge volumes of information, such as entire codebases, lengthy financial reports, or extensive conversation histories.
  • Impressive Speed for its Class. Despite its size and power, it maintains high output speeds, especially on optimized infrastructure. This makes it viable for user-facing applications like advanced chatbots and AI assistants where responsiveness is key.
  • Multimodal Capabilities. The ability to understand and process images alongside text opens up a wide range of use cases, from analyzing charts and diagrams within reports to describing complex visual scenes or user-uploaded photos.
  • Competitive Latency on Select Providers. When accessed through an optimized provider like Microsoft Azure, it offers very low time-to-first-token, which is critical for creating a fluid and natural-feeling experience in real-time chat applications.
Where costs sneak up
  • Extreme Verbosity. The model's default behavior is to be extremely thorough, which can cause output costs to escalate quickly. A simple query might generate a long, detailed response, multiplying the impact of the per-token output price.
  • High Output-to-Input Price Ratio. With output tokens costing 8 times more than input tokens ($10.00 vs $1.25), applications that generate significant amounts of text will be substantially more expensive than those that are input-heavy.
  • Provider Performance Variance. Your choice of API provider has a major impact on performance. While Azure offers excellent latency and speed, the standard OpenAI endpoint is significantly slower. Failing to choose the right provider can degrade the user experience.
  • The Cost of Large Context. While the 400k context window is powerful, filling it is not cheap. A single prompt that fully utilizes the context window would cost $0.50 in input tokens alone ($1.25/M * 400k), making it expensive for repeated, large-scale processing.
  • Total Cost of Complex Tasks. The combination of high verbosity and a standard output price means the total cost for complex, multi-turn conversations or detailed generation tasks can be much higher than for models with similar intelligence but lower verbosity.

Provider pick

Performance for GPT-5 (high) varies significantly across different API providers. Our benchmarks of OpenAI, Microsoft Azure, and Databricks reveal clear leaders for specific priorities. While pricing is currently uniform across these providers, speed and latency are not. Choosing the right provider is crucial for optimizing both user experience and operational efficiency.

Priority Pick Why Tradeoff to accept
Lowest Latency (Best for Chat) Microsoft Azure Offers the lowest time-to-first-token at just under 40 seconds, which is critical for responsive, real-time user interactions. Slightly lower maximum output speed compared to its own throughput-optimized configuration.
Highest Throughput (Best for Batch) Microsoft Azure Delivers the fastest output speed at 208 tokens/s, making it the ideal choice for processing large volumes of requests quickly in offline jobs. Latency, while still excellent, is not as low as the latency-optimized configuration.
Balanced Performance Databricks Provides a strong all-around profile with good speed (122 t/s) and reasonable latency (~85s) at the same competitive price point. Not the absolute fastest or lowest latency, but a great compromise with no major weaknesses.
Direct from Source OpenAI Provides direct API access from the model's creators, which may offer the earliest access to new features or model updates. Currently the slowest and highest-latency provider in our benchmarks, making it less suitable for performance-critical applications.

Performance metrics are based on benchmarks conducted by Artificial Analysis. Real-world performance may vary based on workload, geographic region, and concurrent API traffic. Prices are as of the last update and subject to change.

Real workloads cost table

Theoretical prices per million tokens only tell part of the story. To understand the real-world financial impact of using GPT-5 (high), we've estimated the cost for several common application scenarios. These examples highlight how the model's characteristics—particularly its high verbosity and 8:1 output-to-input price ratio—affect the final cost.

Scenario Input Output What it represents Estimated cost
Customer Support Chatbot (10 turns) 2,000 tokens 4,000 tokens A typical multi-turn conversation where the AI provides detailed, helpful answers. ~$0.043
Summarize a Research Paper 10,000 tokens 1,500 tokens An input-heavy summarization task where conciseness is key. ~$0.028
Code Generation & Debugging 1,500 tokens 8,000 tokens Generating a complex function and explaining its logic, reflecting the model's high verbosity. ~$0.082
Analyze a Financial Report (in context) 100,000 tokens 5,000 tokens Using a large portion of the context window for in-depth analysis of a provided document. ~$0.175
Simple Q&A 500 tokens 1,000 tokens A single question that elicits a detailed, multi-paragraph answer due to verbosity. ~$0.011

The model's cost profile heavily favors input-heavy tasks like summarization. Output-heavy scenarios, such as detailed explanations or verbose code generation, are significantly more expensive due to the combination of high verbosity and the 8x higher price for output tokens.

How to control cost (a practical playbook)

Given its unique profile of high intelligence, high verbosity, and a significant output-to-input price ratio, managing the cost of GPT-5 (high) is essential for a successful deployment. The following strategies can help you harness its power without incurring runaway expenses.

Control Output Verbosity with Prompting

The single most effective cost-control measure is to manage the model's natural verbosity. Since output tokens are 8x more expensive than input tokens, reducing output length provides direct and substantial savings. Use specific instructions in your prompts to guide the model toward conciseness.

  • Add phrases like "Be concise," "Answer in one sentence," or "Provide a bulleted list of key points only."
  • For structured data, ask for the output in a specific format like JSON with predefined fields to prevent extraneous conversational text.
  • Experiment with temperature settings; lower temperatures often lead to more focused and less creative (and less verbose) responses.
Optimize Workflows for the 8:1 Price Ratio

Design your application's logic to minimize expensive output tokens and maximize cheaper input tokens. This involves reframing problems to be less generative and more analytical.

  • Instead of asking an open-ended question like "Explain this document," provide the document and ask a series of targeted questions that elicit short answers, like "Does this document mention Topic X?" or "Extract the names of all people listed."
  • For classification or routing tasks, instruct the model to return only a single category name or number instead of a full sentence explaining its choice.
Leverage Caching Aggressively

Many applications receive repetitive queries. Caching the high-quality responses from GPT-5 (high) can dramatically reduce API calls, saving money and reducing latency for users.

  • Implement a semantic caching layer that can identify when a new query is functionally identical to a previously answered one.
  • Cache responses for common questions, product descriptions, or explanations. The initial cost to generate the canonical answer is quickly offset by the savings from not having to regenerate it.
Choose the Right Provider for Your Use Case

Don't treat all API providers as equal. The performance differences are significant and have a direct impact on user experience and infrastructure choices.

  • For real-time chat, prioritize low latency by choosing a provider like Microsoft Azure, even if it means a slightly different deployment process.
  • For offline batch processing, prioritize maximum throughput to get jobs done faster, again pointing towards Azure's throughput-optimized endpoints.
  • Only use a slower endpoint like the default OpenAI API if performance is not a primary concern for your application.

FAQ

What is GPT-5 (high)?

GPT-5 (high) is a state-of-the-art, proprietary large language model developed by OpenAI. It is characterized by its top-tier performance on intelligence benchmarks, a very large 400,000-token context window, and multimodal capabilities (text and image input). It is designed for complex reasoning tasks but is also notable for its high verbosity.

How does GPT-5 (high) compare to a model like GPT-4 Turbo?

GPT-5 (high) represents a significant generational leap. Its Intelligence Index score of 68 indicates a major improvement in reasoning, problem-solving, and instruction-following capabilities over the GPT-4 family. It also features a much larger context window (400k vs. 128k for GPT-4 Turbo) and demonstrates higher throughput on optimized infrastructure, making it both smarter and faster for certain workloads.

What does "high verbosity" mean for my application?

High verbosity means the model has a strong tendency to provide longer, more detailed, and comprehensive answers than other models, even when not explicitly asked for them. While this can be beneficial for depth and explanation, it has two main drawbacks: it directly increases costs due to a higher number of output tokens, and it can sometimes overwhelm users with more information than they need.

Is the 400k context window always useful?

The 400k context window is a powerful, specialized feature, not a tool for everyday use. It is most valuable for tasks that require the model to hold and reason over vast amounts of information at once, such as analyzing an entire book, a complex legal case file, or a large software repository. For most common tasks like simple chat or Q&A, this window is overkill, and the cost to fill it with tokens is prohibitive. It should be used strategically for specific, high-value use cases.

Why is there an 8x price difference between input and output tokens?

This pricing model is common for LLMs and reflects the underlying computational costs. Processing existing text provided in a prompt (input) is generally less computationally intensive than generating new, coherent, and contextually relevant text (output). The 8:1 ratio for GPT-5 (high) is a critical economic factor that developers must account for, as it heavily penalizes applications that generate a lot of text.

Which API provider is best for GPT-5 (high)?

The best provider depends on your specific needs. According to our benchmarks, Microsoft Azure offers the best performance, with one configuration optimized for the lowest latency (best for chat) and another for the highest throughput (best for batch processing). Databricks offers a solid, balanced option. The direct OpenAI endpoint is currently the slowest and should only be used if performance is not a critical factor.


Subscribe