GPT-5 mini (high) (high)

A top-tier intelligence model where premium performance meets premium cost.

GPT-5 mini (high) (high)

An exceptionally intelligent and multimodal model from OpenAI that excels at complex reasoning but carries a high price tag for its verbose, high-quality output.

High IntelligenceExpensive OutputMultimodal400k ContextProprietaryOpenAI

GPT-5 mini (high) represents a significant leap in reasoning capability from OpenAI, positioning itself as a premier choice for tasks demanding deep understanding and complex problem-solving. Scoring an impressive 64 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, it ranks #2 out of 134 models, firmly establishing it in the top echelon of AI intelligence. This model is not designed for simple, high-volume tasks; rather, it is a specialized instrument for scenarios where the quality and accuracy of the output are paramount, such as in legal analysis, scientific research, or advanced software development.

While its intelligence is its main selling point, its performance profile presents a more nuanced picture. With an average output speed of 71.5 tokens per second, it operates at a pace slower than the class average of 93 tokens/s. This deliberate pace suggests an architecture optimized for depth of thought over raw speed. Similarly, its latency, or time to first token, is not class-leading. This means that for real-time, interactive applications like a snappy chatbot, GPT-5 mini (high) might introduce a noticeable delay. Users should approach this model with the expectation that they are trading speed for superior cognitive ability.

The cost structure of GPT-5 mini (high) is a critical factor in its evaluation. The input token price of $0.25 per million tokens is moderate and aligns with the market average. However, the output token price is a steep $2.00 per million tokens, placing it among the most expensive models for text generation. This pricing strategy heavily penalizes verbosity. The model's tendency to be verbose—generating 84 million tokens during intelligence testing compared to the 30 million average—exacerbates this cost. The total expense to run the intelligence benchmark, a staggering $181.65, serves as a stark illustration of how quickly costs can accumulate, particularly in generative or conversational use cases.

Beyond its core performance, GPT-5 mini (high) is equipped with a powerful set of features. It supports multimodal inputs, allowing it to analyze and interpret both text and images. This opens up a wide range of applications, from describing visual data to understanding complex diagrams. Its massive 400,000-token context window is another standout feature, enabling it to ingest and reason over entire books, extensive legal documents, or large codebases in a single pass. Combined with a recent knowledge cutoff of May 2024, the model is not only powerful but also current, making it a formidable tool for a variety of advanced AI applications.

Scoreboard

Intelligence

64 (#2 / 134)

Scores 64 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it second overall and significantly above the class average of 36.
Output speed

71.5 tokens/s

Slower than the class average of 93 tokens/s, ranking #78 out of 134 models for output speed.
Input price

$0.25 / 1M tokens

Input pricing is average for its class, ranking #63. It does not present a cost barrier for tasks with large inputs.
Output price

$2.00 / 1M tokens

Output pricing is very expensive, ranking #103. It is 2.5 times the class average of $0.80, making verbose outputs costly.
Verbosity signal

84M tokens

Generated 84M tokens during intelligence testing, nearly three times the class average of 30M, indicating a highly verbose nature.
Provider latency

~94 ms

Average time to first token is around 94ms across providers, which is competent but slower than many top-tier peers.

Technical specifications

Spec Details
Model Owner OpenAI
License Proprietary
Context Window 400,000 tokens
Knowledge Cutoff May 2024
Input Modalities Text, Image
Output Modalities Text
Architecture Transformer-based
Fine-tuning Not Supported
API Providers OpenAI, Microsoft Azure, Databricks
Intelligence Index 64 (#2 / 134)
Input Pricing $0.25 / 1M tokens
Output Pricing $2.00 / 1M tokens

What stands out beyond the scoreboard

Where this model wins
  • Elite Reasoning and Logic: Its #2 rank on the Intelligence Index confirms its status as a top-tier model for complex, multi-step problem-solving, making it ideal for expert-level tasks.
  • Massive Context Processing: The 400,000-token context window allows it to analyze and synthesize information from vast documents, codebases, or conversation histories in a single prompt.
  • Advanced Multimodality: The ability to understand images in conjunction with text unlocks sophisticated use cases in visual data analysis, UI/UX feedback, and content interpretation.
  • Current and Relevant Knowledge: With a knowledge cutoff of May 2024, the model provides insights and information that are up-to-date with recent world events and technological advancements.
  • Robust Provider Availability: Access through major cloud and AI platforms like OpenAI, Microsoft Azure, and Databricks ensures scalable, enterprise-grade reliability and integration options.
Where costs sneak up
  • Punishing Output Costs: At $2.00 per million output tokens, it is one of the most expensive models on the market, making it financially challenging for chat, content creation, or other verbose applications.
  • Inherent Verbosity: The model's tendency to produce long, detailed answers directly multiplies the high output token cost, leading to unexpectedly high bills if not properly managed.
  • Below-Average Speed: A generation speed of ~71 tokens/second can negatively impact user experience in real-time applications, where users expect instant responses.
  • Financial Overkill for Simple Tasks: Using this model for basic classification, extraction, or summarization is highly inefficient. Cheaper, faster models are far more appropriate for these jobs.
  • Large Context, Large Bill: While powerful, filling the 400k context window can be costly. A full context window costs $100 in input tokens alone, before any output is even generated.

Provider pick

While GPT-5 mini (high) has uniform pricing across its main API providers, performance metrics like latency and throughput show slight variations. Your choice of provider may depend on whether your application prioritizes the fastest initial response or the quickest overall generation, or if it needs to integrate seamlessly into an existing cloud ecosystem.

Priority Pick Why Tradeoff to accept
Lowest Latency Microsoft Azure At ~77ms TTFT, Azure provides the quickest initial response, which is vital for interactive applications where every millisecond counts. The throughput advantage over OpenAI is marginal and may not be noticeable in practice.
Highest Throughput Microsoft Azure Generating at 77 tokens/s, Azure is the fastest option for producing long-form content, reducing the total time to receive a complete response. This speed comes with the standard high output cost of the model itself.
Balanced Performance OpenAI As the direct source, OpenAI offers a solid blend of low latency (~90ms) and strong throughput (71 t/s), providing a reliable and well-rounded experience. It is slightly outperformed by Azure on both key speed metrics.
Databricks Ecosystem Databricks The definitive choice if your data, models, and workflows are already hosted on the Databricks platform, simplifying integration and governance. This convenience comes at the cost of performance; it is the slowest of the three providers in both latency and throughput.

*Performance benchmarks are based on data at a specific point in time and can fluctuate based on geographic region, server load, and other factors. We recommend conducting your own tests to determine the best provider for your specific use case.

Real workloads cost table

The abstract pricing of 'dollars per million tokens' can be difficult to translate into tangible business costs. To make this clearer, let's examine several real-world scenarios. These examples highlight how the ratio of input to output tokens dramatically affects the final cost of using GPT-5 mini (high).

Scenario Input Output What it represents Estimated cost
Legal Document Review 350,000 tokens 5,000 tokens Analyzing a large contract to extract key clauses. High-input, low-output. ~$0.098
Customer Support Chat 25,000 tokens 25,000 tokens A lengthy, balanced conversation with a customer. Symmetric input/output. ~$0.056
Blog Post Generation 500 tokens 2,500 tokens Creating a detailed article from a short prompt. Low-input, high-output. ~$0.005
Codebase Refactoring Plan 150,000 tokens 10,000 tokens Ingesting multiple code files to suggest improvements. High-input, medium-output. ~$0.058
Image Analysis & Description 750 tokens (image) 500 tokens Providing a detailed description of a complex diagram. Low-input, low-output. ~$0.001

These scenarios demonstrate that GPT-5 mini (high) offers the best value proposition for 'analytical' tasks that require processing large amounts of input to generate concise, high-value outputs. It becomes progressively more expensive for 'generative' tasks where the output token count is high, making cost management essential.

How to control cost (a practical playbook)

Given its premium output pricing and natural verbosity, controlling the cost of GPT-5 mini (high) is essential for any production application. A proactive approach to cost optimization can yield significant savings without compromising the quality of results. Here are several effective strategies to manage your spend.

Use a Multi-Model Cascade

Design a system that uses cheaper, faster models for initial processing and only escalates to GPT-5 mini (high) when necessary. This is a classic router or cascade pattern.

  • Step 1: Triage. Use a small, inexpensive model (e.g., Haiku, Llama 3 8B) to classify the user's intent. If the query is simple (e.g., a greeting, a simple FAQ), answer it with the cheap model.
  • Step 2: Escalate. If the query is identified as complex, requiring deep reasoning or analysis, route it to GPT-5 mini (high).
  • Benefit: You reserve the expensive model's power for the 10-20% of queries that actually need it, drastically reducing overall costs.
Master Prompt Engineering for Brevity

The most direct way to control output cost is to control output length. Engineer your prompts to explicitly guide the model toward conciseness.

  • Be Direct: Add instructions like "Answer in three sentences or less," "Use bullet points," or "Be concise and direct."
  • Provide Examples: Use few-shot prompting where you provide examples of the concise output format you expect.
  • Structure the Output: Ask the model to return a JSON object with specific, short fields. This forces it to be structured and less conversational.
Implement Aggressive Caching

Many applications receive redundant queries. Caching responses from GPT-5 mini (high) prevents you from paying for the same answer multiple times.

  • Identify Cacheable Queries: Any query that is not highly personalized is a candidate for caching (e.g., "What is your refund policy?", "Explain quantum computing").
  • Set a TTL: Implement a Time-to-Live (TTL) on your cache. For general knowledge, this can be days or weeks. For rapidly changing topics, it might be a few hours.
  • Benefit: Caching saves 100% of the cost and latency for repeat queries, improving both your budget and user experience.
Summarize with a Cheaper Model

If you need the reasoning power of GPT-5 mini (high) but its verbosity is too costly, use a two-step generation process.

  • Step 1: Generate. Let GPT-5 mini (high) produce its detailed, high-quality, but verbose answer in the background.
  • Step 2: Summarize. Take this detailed answer and pass it to a much cheaper model with the prompt, "Summarize this text to its most essential points."
  • Benefit: You get the elite reasoning of the expensive model but only pay the high output cost for an intermediate result, while the final, shorter output for the user is generated cheaply.

FAQ

What is GPT-5 mini (high)?

GPT-5 mini (high) is a hypothetical high-end model from OpenAI. It is characterized by its state-of-the-art intelligence, multimodal (text and image) input capabilities, and a very large context window. The "(high)" designation suggests it is optimized for maximum reasoning ability within a 'mini' series of models.

Who is the ideal user for this model?

The ideal user is a developer, researcher, or business that needs to solve complex problems requiring deep, nuanced reasoning. It is best suited for expert domains like legal tech, scientific research, financial analysis, and advanced software engineering, where the quality of the AI's reasoning justifies the high cost.

Why is the output so expensive?

The high output price of $2.00 per million tokens likely reflects the immense computational resources required to generate its high-quality, nuanced text. This pricing model encourages users to apply it to tasks where the generated text has a very high value, rather than for casual conversation or bulk content generation.

What can I do with a 400k context window?

A 400,000-token context window allows the model to hold and process an enormous amount of information in a single request. This is roughly equivalent to a 300-page book. You can use it to:

  • Analyze an entire codebase for bugs or documentation needs.
  • Review and summarize lengthy legal contracts or court filings.
  • Read a full research paper, including appendices, and answer questions about it.
  • Maintain a very long, coherent conversation without losing track of earlier details.
Is this model fast enough for a real-time chatbot?

Generally, no. Its output speed of ~71 tokens/second is slower than average and may feel sluggish to users accustomed to instant responses. While usable, it is not optimized for low-latency, real-time interaction. It is better suited for asynchronous tasks or applications where users expect a short wait for a high-quality result.

What does 'multimodal input' mean in this context?

It means the model can accept more than one type of data as input. For GPT-5 mini (high), you can provide it with both text and images in the same prompt. For example, you could upload a picture of a meal and ask, "What is a healthy recipe for this dish?" The model understands the image and uses that visual context to answer the text-based question. It still only produces text as output.


Subscribe