An open-weight model from AI21 Labs known for its rapid outputs and huge 256k context window, positioned as a premium option for specialized, context-heavy tasks.
Jamba 1.7 Large, developed by AI21 Labs, represents a significant architectural evolution in the large language model space. It moves beyond the conventional Transformer-only design by incorporating a hybrid structure that blends Transformer layers with State Space Model (SSM) technology, specifically Mamba. This innovative approach aims to deliver the best of both worlds: the powerful reasoning and language understanding capabilities of Transformers, combined with the efficiency and scalability of SSMs. The result is a model that can process an exceptionally large context window of 256,000 tokens while maintaining impressive output speeds.
However, this cutting-edge performance profile comes with a notable trade-off: cost. Jamba 1.7 Large is positioned at a premium price point, with both input and output token costs sitting well above the average for similarly sized open-weight models. Its input price of $2.00 per million tokens is particularly steep, making it a costly choice for applications that rely on feeding large amounts of text into the prompt. The output price of $8.00 per million tokens, while also high, is somewhat mitigated by the model's natural tendency towards conciseness, a trait that can help control total generation costs.
In terms of raw intelligence, Jamba 1.7 Large scores below the median on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index. With a score of 21 against a class average of 33, it is not designed to compete with top-tier reasoning models. Its strengths lie elsewhere. It excels in speed, delivering a median of 47 tokens per second, which is faster than average and highly suitable for real-time, interactive applications. This combination of a massive context window, high speed, and moderate intelligence makes Jamba a specialized tool rather than a general-purpose workhorse. It is best suited for developers building applications that must process and synthesize information from extremely long documents, codebases, or conversation histories, and where the value of this capability justifies the premium cost.
21 (22 / 30)
47 tokens/s
$2.00 / 1M tokens
$8.00 / 1M tokens
4.4M tokens
0.81 seconds
| Spec | Details |
|---|---|
| Model Owner | AI21 Labs |
| License | Open |
| Architecture | Hybrid (SSM-Transformer) |
| Context Window | 256,000 tokens |
| Knowledge Cutoff | August 2024 |
| Input Modalities | Text |
| Output Modalities | Text |
| Blended Price (3:1) | $3.50 / 1M tokens |
| Input Price | $2.00 / 1M tokens |
| Output Price | $8.00 / 1M tokens |
| API Provider (Benchmark) | AI21 Labs |
In this analysis, Jamba 1.7 Large was benchmarked exclusively via its creator, AI21 Labs. As the developer of the model, AI21 Labs provides a canonical, highly optimized implementation. This makes the provider choice straightforward, as performance and pricing are currently defined by a single source.
| Priority | Pick | Why | Tradeoff to accept |
|---|---|---|---|
| Balanced | AI21 Labs | As the sole benchmarked provider, it offers the definitive balance of speed, cost, and features for this model. | No other providers were benchmarked for comparison. |
| Highest Speed | AI21 Labs | The benchmarked speed of 47 tokens/s is achieved on AI21's platform, making it the go-to for performance-critical applications. | The premium pricing is the direct tradeoff for this speed. |
| Lowest Cost | AI21 Labs | Despite its high price point, it is the only available option in this analysis, making it the 'lowest cost' by default. | Users must accept the high input and output costs as there are no cheaper alternatives benchmarked. |
Provider recommendations are based on the performance and pricing data collected for this analysis. The market is dynamic, and other providers may become available over time.
The true cost of using Jamba 1.7 Large becomes apparent when applied to real-world scenarios. Its unique profile—high cost, high speed, and massive context—creates a distinct cost-benefit calculation for different tasks. The following examples illustrate how its pricing structure impacts common workloads, particularly those designed to leverage its primary strength.
| Scenario | Input | Output | What it represents | Estimated cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long Document Summary | 50,000 tokens | 1,000 tokens | Summarizing a lengthy report or academic paper. | ~$0.11 |
| RAG with Large Context | 100,000 tokens | 500 tokens | Answering a question using a large internal document as context. | ~$0.20 |
| Extended Chatbot Session | 20,000 tokens (total) | 5,000 tokens (total) | A long, interactive conversation where history is maintained. | ~$0.08 |
| Codebase Analysis | 150,000 tokens | 2,000 tokens | Analyzing a large codebase to explain functionality or find bugs. | ~$0.32 |
These estimates demonstrate that while individual queries may seem affordable, costs can accumulate rapidly, especially in applications that consistently use large contexts. A single task leveraging the full 256k context window would cost over $0.50 for the input alone, making Jamba a specialized tool where the cost must be justified by the unique value of its massive context capacity.
Managing the costs of Jamba 1.7 Large is crucial for building a sustainable application. Its premium pricing model requires a deliberate strategy to mitigate expenses without sacrificing the model's core benefits. The key is to lean into its strengths, like conciseness, while being mindful of its high per-token rates.
Jamba is one of the most concise models available, generating significantly fewer tokens than average for the same task. This is a powerful, built-in cost-saving mechanism for output tokens.
With an input price of $2.00/1M tokens, every token in your prompt counts. Efficient prompt engineering is not just for better results; it's a primary cost-control lever.
Jamba's cost structure makes it unsuitable as a general-purpose, high-volume model. Instead, treat it as a specialist for tasks that are impossible for models with smaller context windows.
Given the high cost per generation, re-computing the same or similar requests is wasteful. A robust caching layer is essential for any application using Jamba at scale.
Jamba 1.7 Large is a large language model from AI21 Labs. It is notable for its hybrid architecture, which combines Transformer and State Space Model (Mamba) components. This design enables it to have an exceptionally large 256,000-token context window while maintaining high inference speed.
A hybrid architecture combines two different types of neural network structures. Transformers are excellent at complex reasoning and understanding, while State Space Models (SSMs) like Mamba are highly efficient at processing very long sequences of data. Jamba's hybrid model aims to use each for what it does best, providing both power and efficiency, especially for tasks involving large amounts of context.
A 256,000-token context window allows the model to consider a vast amount of information in a single prompt. This is equivalent to hundreds of pages of text. It's a game-changer for tasks like:
The premium pricing reflects several factors. First, the model uses a novel and complex architecture that is likely expensive to train and serve. Second, its 256k context window is a unique, high-value feature that few other models offer. The pricing is set to capture the value of this specialized capability. It is priced for users who have a critical need for massive context and are willing to pay for it.
Based on its score of 21 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (where the average is 33), Jamba 1.7 Large is considered below average for complex reasoning tasks compared to other models in its class. Its primary strengths are speed and context size, not advanced problem-solving or nuanced instruction-following.
The ideal user is a developer or organization building applications that absolutely require the ability to process extremely long text sequences. This includes legal tech, financial analysis, advanced RAG systems, and specialized research tools. Users must have a budget that can accommodate the model's premium pricing and a use case where the value derived from the massive context window outweighs the high operational cost.