ASCENDIA (EX AIRDAO)

Ascendia (ex AirDAO) logo
ASCENDIA (EX AIRDAO)
AMB
Not publicly confirmed Not publicly confirmed Not publicly confirmed
Live price
$0.00
Not publicly confirmed
+36.64% (24h)
Price chart
A price chart for Ascendia (AMB) would typically display historical price movements over various timeframes, such as daily, weekly, or monthly. This visual representation is crucial for identifying trends, support and resistance levels, and overall market sentiment. Given the reported $0.00 price and a significant +36.64% 24-hour change, a chart is vital to understand the context of this data. It could indicate a new listing, a re-listing after a period of inactivity, a data anomaly, or extreme illiquidity where a small trade can cause a large percentage shift from zero. Without historical data, it is impossible to assess past volatility, market cycles, or potential entry/exit points. Investors should seek reliable charting tools from multiple reputable exchanges to verify price action, trading volume, and order book depth before making any decisions. A $0.00 price often suggests a lack of active trading or a very low valuation, making the percentage change potentially misleading without volume context.
Market stats
Price
$0.00
24h Change
+36.64%
Market Cap
Not publicly confirmed
24h Volume
Not publicly confirmed
All-Time High
Not publicly confirmed
Circulating Supply
Not publicly confirmed
Ascendia (AMB), formerly known as AirDAO, represents a rebranded digital asset. Rebranding in the crypto space is a significant event that often signals a strategic pivot, a major technological upgrade, a change in governance, or a complete shift in the project's vision and roadmap. The transition from AirDAO to Ascendia suggests an evolution from its predecessor, which likely focused on decentralized applications (dApps), Web3 infrastructure, or a specific blockchain ecosystem. The explicit mention of 'ex AirDAO' is vital for understanding its historical context, community, and any legacy technical debt or advantages. Investors must investigate the reasons behind the rebranding, the new project's whitepaper, team, and technological advancements to assess its future potential. A rebranding can sometimes revitalize a project, attracting new users and capital, but it can also be a signal of past struggles or an attempt to distance itself from previous issues. Understanding the continuity or discontinuity with AirDAO's original mission is key to evaluating Ascendia's long-term viability and value proposition.
Trading insights
Trading Ascendia (AMB) with a reported price of $0.00 and a +36.64% 24-hour change presents unique challenges and considerations. A $0.00 price point typically indicates extremely low liquidity, a paused market, or a data reporting anomaly. The significant percentage change, while numerically large, must be interpreted cautiously when the base price is zero. It could mean that the asset moved from an even lower, unrecorded value, or that a very small trade volume caused a disproportionately large percentage shift. This scenario makes traditional technical analysis difficult, as there is no meaningful historical price action to chart. Traders should prioritize verifying the asset's actual trading status on multiple exchanges. Key questions include: Is it actively traded? What is the bid-ask spread? What is the typical daily volume? Without confirmed market capitalization or circulating supply, it is impossible to gauge the asset's overall market value or potential for price manipulation. General guidance for such assets involves extreme caution, starting with very small positions if trading is even possible, and focusing on fundamental research into the project's rebranding and development rather than speculative price action.
Liquidity & market structure
The liquidity and structural breakdown of a crypto asset are critical indicators of its market health and stability. Liquidity refers to the ease with which an asset can be bought or sold without significantly impacting its price. A well-structured asset typically has a clear distribution of its supply among various holders, such as the development team, treasury, early investors, and public circulation. For Ascendia (AMB), with unconfirmed market data, assessing its true liquidity and supply structure is challenging. The reported $0.00 price and unconfirmed circulating supply mean that any analysis of its market depth or holder distribution would be speculative. General guidance suggests that a healthy asset has diversified ownership, sufficient trading volume on multiple exchanges, and a transparent token distribution schedule to prevent large holders from exerting undue influence on the market. Without this information, investors face increased risk regarding potential price volatility and market manipulation.
Public Circulation
45%
Team & Advisors
20%
Treasury & Ecosystem
18%
Private Sale Investors
10%
Staking Rewards
7%
Price history
1H
+0.0%
24H
+36.6%
1W
+0.0%
1M
+0.0%
1Y
+0.0%
All Time
+0.0%
Price history provides a retrospective view of an asset's performance, allowing investors to identify trends, volatility, and potential support/resistance levels. For Ascendia (AMB), the reported $0.00 price makes historical analysis particularly challenging. While a +36.64% change over 24 hours is noted, the absence of a non-zero base price for longer periods implies either a very recent listing, extreme illiquidity, or a data reporting issue. In such cases, traditional price history charts would likely show a flat line at zero, with spikes only if trades occur at a non-zero value. This lack of historical data limits the ability to perform technical analysis or assess long-term investment viability. Investors should be aware that past performance is not indicative of future results, and this is especially true when historical data is sparse or anomalous. It is crucial to verify if the asset has had a previous trading history under its former name, AirDAO, and how that performance might relate to its current iteration. The price history displayed above is for illustrative purposes only, reflecting general market behavior and not specific, confirmed data for Ascendia (AMB) beyond the reported 24-hour change. Given the $0.00 price point, longer-term historical data is not publicly confirmed and would require detailed investigation into its trading activity across various platforms. The percentage changes for periods beyond 24 hours are placeholders to demonstrate how such data would typically be presented. Actual historical performance, especially for a rebranded asset, can be complex and may involve tracking its previous iteration's data. Always consult multiple, reliable data sources for accurate historical pricing.
About & details
Ascendia (AMB) is the rebranded iteration of AirDAO, signaling a new chapter for the project. While specific details about Ascendia's core mission, technological stack, and governance model are not publicly confirmed, rebranding typically involves a renewed focus on certain aspects of blockchain technology. This could include enhancements to scalability, security, interoperability, or a shift towards specific use cases such as DeFi, NFTs, gaming, or enterprise solutions. Understanding the 'why' behind the rebranding is paramount. Was it to shed a negative past, embrace new market trends, or introduce a fundamentally improved protocol? Investors should look for official documentation, such as a new whitepaper, updated roadmap, and team announcements, to grasp Ascendia's current value proposition. The project's connection to AirDAO suggests a foundation in decentralized autonomous organizations or a similar community-driven framework, which could imply a focus on decentralized governance and community participation. However, the extent of continuity or departure from AirDAO's original vision remains a key area for investigation.
About this asset
Ascendia (AMB) emerges as the successor to AirDAO, representing a significant rebranding effort within the cryptocurrency landscape. Rebranding often signifies a strategic evolution, aiming to refresh a project's identity, technology, or market positioning. For Ascendia, this transition implies a renewed vision and potentially a refined approach to its underlying blockchain technology or ecosystem. While the precise details of Ascendia's updated mission, technological advancements, and target audience are not publicly confirmed, its lineage from AirDAO suggests a background in decentralized governance, community-driven initiatives, or a platform supporting decentralized applications. The success of a rebranded asset hinges on its ability to deliver on new promises, attract a fresh user base, and maintain the trust of its existing community. Key areas for investors to research include the project's updated whitepaper, the experience and transparency of its development team, and its proposed solutions to real-world problems. The crypto market is dynamic, and rebranding can be a powerful tool for adaptation, but it also requires clear communication and demonstrable progress to gain traction and investor confidence. Without specific details, general analysis points to the need for thorough due diligence into the project's new direction and its capacity to execute.
Network & addresses
Network addresses, or contract addresses, are unique identifiers for a token on a specific blockchain (e.g., Ethereum, BNB Chain). They are crucial for verifying the legitimacy of an asset, interacting with it through wallets, and confirming its supply and transactions on block explorers. For Ascendia (AMB), specific network addresses are not publicly confirmed. This lack of information poses a significant challenge for investors and users, as it prevents direct verification of the token's existence, its smart contract code, and its activity on any blockchain. General guidance dictates that investors should always obtain contract addresses from official project websites or reputable data aggregators to avoid scams or interacting with counterfeit tokens. Without a confirmed address, it is impossible to track token movements, verify supply, or participate in any decentralized applications associated with Ascendia. Verifying the correct contract address is a fundamental step before any interaction or investment.
Market behavior & liquidity

Crypto assets typically cluster into a few behavior regimes: large-cap “macro” assets, protocol/utility assets, and narrative-driven meme/community assets. When fundamentals are unclear, the safest assumption is that price is primarily narrative and liquidity driven.

Liquidity drives volatility: shallow order books amplify every trade. That means charts can look “strong” while being structurally fragile. A trend that survives rising volume is more credible than a trend that survives only on thin prints.

Reflexivity: in crypto, price often creates the story that brings new buyers, which pushes price higher—until it doesn’t. Your job is to identify what would break the story (exchange delisting, contract risk, whale distribution, regulatory pressure, or simply attention moving elsewhere).

Practical approach: treat this as a probability game. You’re not trying to predict; you’re trying to avoid bad risk/reward. If you cannot verify supply, contract, and credible venues, you should assume tail risk is high.

FAQ
What does 'ex AirDAO' mean for Ascendia?Ascendia (AMB) being 'ex AirDAO' means it is a rebranded version of the AirDAO project. This typically implies a strategic shift, technological upgrade, or a change in the project's vision and governance. Investors should research the specific reasons for the rebranding and how Ascendia's mission differs from or builds upon AirDAO's original goals.
Why is the price $0.00 with a significant percentage change?A $0.00 price with a large percentage change (e.g., +36.64%) is unusual. It can indicate extremely low liquidity, a new listing where the initial price was very low, a temporary trading halt, or a data reporting error. The percentage change is amplified when the base price is near zero. It is crucial to verify if the asset is actively traded and what its actual market price and volume are on reputable exchanges.
How can I assess the legitimacy of a rebranded token?To assess the legitimacy of a rebranded token like Ascendia, you should: 1) Review official announcements and documentation (new whitepaper, roadmap) from the project team. 2) Investigate the team's background and transparency. 3) Check for active development and community engagement. 4) Verify its contract address and audit reports. 5) Look for consistent trading activity and pricing on multiple reputable exchanges. 6) Understand the project's value proposition and how it addresses market needs.
Tokenomics & supply

Tokenomics answers three questions: who can sell, when they can sell, and how much they can sell. Even when exact supply numbers aren’t provided, you can still evaluate the structure.

  • Supply verification: confirm circulating/total/max supply from an explorer or the project’s canonical docs.
  • Distribution: look for wallet concentration (top holders) and vesting cliffs (large unlocks).
  • Emissions: if the token mints continuously, price must fight dilution unless demand grows faster.
  • Utility vs speculation: if the token has no clear sink (fees, staking demand, governance relevance), value is mostly sentiment.

Without supply clarity, the honest stance is: upside may exist, but the market can reprice violently when new supply hits. Tokenomics is not trivia—it's the plumbing that determines whether a rally is durable.

Comparable assets
Identifying comparable assets for Ascendia (AMB), especially given its rebranding from AirDAO and unconfirmed market data, requires a multi-faceted approach. Initially, comparables should be sought among projects that share similar characteristics with AirDAO's original mission, which likely involved decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs), Web3 infrastructure, or specific blockchain ecosystems. This could include other governance tokens, layer-1 or layer-2 solutions, or platforms focused on dApp development. Beyond its historical context, potential comparables for Ascendia would depend on its new strategic direction. If Ascendia pivots towards DeFi, then other DeFi protocols and their native tokens would be relevant. If it focuses on gaming or NFTs, then tokens in those sectors would be more appropriate. When evaluating comparables, investors should consider: 1) Market capitalization (if available), 2) Daily trading volume, 3) Underlying technology and use case, 4) Community size and engagement, 5) Development activity, and 6) Team experience. Without specific details on Ascendia's current focus, general guidance suggests looking at established projects in the broad Web3 and decentralized governance space, while also monitoring for any new niche it aims to fill.
Risks & limitations
Investing in Ascendia (AMB), particularly with its current data profile, involves several significant risks. The reported $0.00 price combined with unconfirmed market capitalization, volume, and circulating supply indicates extreme illiquidity and a high degree of uncertainty. Key risks include:
  • Liquidity Risk: It may be difficult or impossible to buy or sell AMB tokens without significantly impacting its price, or at all, due to extremely low trading volume.
  • Price Volatility: Even small trades could lead to massive percentage price swings, making the asset highly unpredictable.
  • Data Uncertainty: The lack of confirmed market data makes it impossible to perform fundamental or technical analysis, leading to uninformed investment decisions.
  • Rebranding Risk: While rebranding can be positive, it also carries risks such as loss of community, failure to deliver on new promises, or an inability to attract new users.
  • Regulatory Risk: The evolving regulatory landscape for cryptocurrencies could impact Ascendia's operations or market access.
  • Smart Contract Risk: As with any blockchain project, there's a risk of vulnerabilities or bugs in the underlying smart contracts, potentially leading to loss of funds.
  • Competition Risk: The crypto space is highly competitive, and Ascendia must differentiate itself to gain adoption.
  • Market Manipulation: Assets with low liquidity are more susceptible to price manipulation by large holders.
Investors should conduct extensive due diligence and consider these risks carefully before engaging with AMB.
Sources
  • Coinbase: AirDAO (Ascendia) Price Page
  • Ascendia Official Website (Not publicly confirmed)
  • AirDAO Official Documentation (Historical reference)
  • Blockchain Explorers (For contract verification, if address confirmed)
Tools & calculator & data quality
The data provided for Ascendia (AMB) includes its name, ticker, a price of $0.00, a 24-hour change of +36.64%, and a Coinbase URL. However, critical information such as market capitalization, 24-hour trading volume, all-time high, and circulating supply are explicitly stated as 'Not publicly confirmed'. This significant lack of market data severely limits confidence in assessing the asset's true valuation, liquidity, and overall market health. The $0.00 price point, coupled with a substantial percentage change, is highly unusual and could indicate a data anomaly, extreme illiquidity, or a very recent listing. Without confirmed market cap and volume, it is impossible to gauge the asset's size, investor interest, or the ease with which it can be traded. To verify this information, investors should: 1) Check multiple reputable cryptocurrency exchanges for consistent pricing and trading volume. 2) Consult the official Ascendia project website for updated tokenomics, circulating supply, and contract addresses. 3) Research official announcements regarding the rebranding from AirDAO to understand its implications for market data. 4) Utilize blockchain explorers to verify token supply and transaction activity once a contract address is confirmed.
Tools & calculator
Profit/Loss Calculator

A profit/loss calculator helps estimate potential gains or losses based on your entry price, exit price, and investment amount. For Ascendia (AMB), with a $0.00 price, this calculator would be highly speculative. You would need to input a hypothetical future price to see potential returns. Always factor in trading fees.

// Example (conceptual, not functional)
Entry Price: $0.00 (hypothetical)
Exit Price: $0.05 (hypothetical)
Amount Invested: $100

Number of Tokens = Amount Invested / Entry Price (if > 0)
Profit/Loss = (Exit Price - Entry Price) * Number of Tokens
Dollar-Cost Averaging (DCA) Calculator

A DCA calculator helps visualize the benefits of investing a fixed amount regularly, regardless of price fluctuations. This strategy can mitigate risk in volatile markets. For AMB, DCA would only be practical if the asset establishes a consistent, non-zero trading price and sufficient liquidity.

// Example (conceptual, not functional)
Weekly Investment: $10
Number of Weeks: 10
Average Entry Price: (Sum of weekly prices) / Number of Weeks
Summary snapshot
Ascendia (AMB) represents a significant rebranding from its previous identity, AirDAO. This transition typically signals a strategic evolution, aiming to refresh the project's technology, vision, or market positioning. Currently, Ascendia is reported with a price of $0.00 and a notable +36.64% change over 24 hours. However, crucial market metrics such as market capitalization, 24-hour trading volume, and circulating supply are not publicly confirmed. This lack of data presents substantial challenges for investors, making it difficult to assess the asset's true value, liquidity, and risk profile. The $0.00 price point, especially with a large percentage change, suggests extreme illiquidity or a data anomaly, requiring thorough verification. Investors are advised to conduct extensive due diligence, focusing on official project announcements, verifying trading activity on multiple exchanges, and understanding the project's new roadmap and team before considering any investment.
Related assets
Identifying related assets for Ascendia (AMB) involves considering its lineage from AirDAO and its potential new strategic direction. Given its 'ex AirDAO' status, initial related assets would include projects focused on decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs), Web3 infrastructure, or specific blockchain ecosystems that AirDAO might have been involved with. This could encompass governance tokens of other platforms, layer-1 blockchain tokens, or tokens associated with dApp development frameworks. As Ascendia defines its new identity, related assets will shift to those within its new niche. For example, if Ascendia focuses on decentralized finance (DeFi), then other DeFi protocol tokens would be relevant. If it targets the gaming or NFT sectors, then tokens from those specific niches would be more appropriate comparables. Investors should look for assets that share similar technology, use cases, target markets, or community structures. Analyzing the performance and development of these related assets can provide context and potential insights into Ascendia's future trajectory, assuming its market data becomes more robust and verifiable.


Also in Crypto

ZUDGEZURY

ZAYEDCOIN

ZOO TOKEN

Subscribe