Ibm_Falcon

A Foundational Step in Quantum Scaling

IBM Quantum Falcon Retired

Analyzing the IBM Quantum Falcon's pivotal role in the evolution of superconducting quantum processors through a data-driven lens.

IBM Superconducting transmon Retired Physical qubits confidence: medium

The IBM Quantum Falcon processor family represents a significant chapter in the early development of practical quantum computing, particularly within IBM's ambitious roadmap. First announced and made available in December 2019, Falcon was designed as a gate-based superconducting transmon system, primarily focused on pushing the boundaries of qubit count while simultaneously striving for improved gate fidelities. From a data analyst's perspective, understanding Falcon is crucial for contextualizing the rapid advancements in quantum hardware. It wasn't just a processor; it was a platform for iterative improvement, demonstrating the challenges and successes of scaling quantum systems beyond the initial proof-of-concept stages.

At its core, the Falcon family aimed to provide a more robust and capable environment for researchers and developers to experiment with quantum algorithms. With its 27 physical qubits, it offered a substantial increase in computational resources compared to earlier, smaller systems, enabling the exploration of more complex quantum circuits. This era was characterized by a strong emphasis on benchmarking, with metrics like Quantum Volume becoming increasingly important for evaluating the overall performance and utility of quantum hardware. Falcon's achievements in this regard, particularly reaching a Quantum Volume of 256 on its r10 revision, underscored its engineering prowess and its role in validating IBM's architectural choices.

For a data analyst, the lifecycle of the IBM Quantum Falcon offers valuable insights into the dynamic nature of quantum hardware development. Its eventual retirement circa 2023, making way for more advanced processors like Eagle and Heron, is not a sign of failure but rather a testament to the accelerated pace of innovation in the field. Analyzing Falcon's specifications, performance metrics, and historical access patterns allows us to trace the evolution of key hardware capabilities – from qubit count and connectivity to error rates and coherence times. This historical data is indispensable for understanding the trajectory of quantum computing, informing future hardware design, and setting realistic expectations for current and next-generation systems.

The Falcon processor served as a critical bridge, moving from experimental demonstrations to systems capable of running more meaningful quantum circuits, albeit still within the noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) era. Its architecture and performance data provide a rich dataset for studying the trade-offs inherent in early quantum hardware, such as balancing qubit count with fidelity, and the impact of connectivity on algorithm implementation. By dissecting the Falcon's profile, we gain a deeper appreciation for the engineering challenges overcome and the foundational data points established, which continue to influence the design and evaluation of today's cutting-edge quantum computers.

Key metrics

Physical qubits
27
Number of physical qubits available for gate operations
Benchmark headline
256.0
Quantum Volume: 256 (2022-04-06 on r10)
Error-correction readiness
85/100
Heuristic score from topology + error + mode hints
Historical importance
100/100
Heuristic score from milestones + roadmap language
Native gates
SX | RZ | ECR
Gate alphabet you compile to (native set)
Connectivity
Hexagonal lattice
Topology affects mapping overhead + routing depth

Technical specifications

Spec Details
System ID IBM_FALCON
Vendor IBM
Technology Superconducting transmon
Status Retired
Primary metric 27 physical qubits
Metric meaning Number of physical qubits available for gate operations
Qubit mode Gate-based computation using physical qubits without error correction; no logical qubits in this generation
Connectivity Hexagonal lattice
Native gates SX | RZ | ECR
Error rates & fidelities Single-qubit gate fidelity: 99.95% (2020) | Two-qubit gate fidelity: 99.5% (2020)
Benchmarks Quantum Volume: 256 (2022-04-06 on r10)
Access N/A
Platforms IBM Quantum Platform
SDKs Qiskit
Regions N/A
Account requirements N/A
Pricing model N/A
Example prices N/A
Free tier / credits N/A
First announced 2019-12
First available 2019-12
Major revisions r5 (27 qubits, 2019) | r10 (27 qubits, 2022)
Retired / roadmap Retired circa 2023; replaced by larger processors like Eagle and Heron
Notes Part of IBM's early roadmap; exact error rates from 2020 may vary by specific device

System profile

Technology and Qubit Count: The IBM Quantum Falcon was built upon superconducting transmon technology, a widely adopted approach in gate-based quantum computing due to its relatively long coherence times and ease of control. The defining characteristic of the Falcon family was its 27 physical qubits. From a data analyst's perspective, this qubit count was a significant milestone at the time of its introduction in late 2019. While today's processors boast hundreds or even thousands of qubits, 27 qubits allowed for the execution of more complex algorithms than previously possible, pushing the boundaries of what could be simulated or computed on real hardware. It's crucial to note that these were physical qubits, operating without active error correction, meaning the raw error rates directly impacted the success probability of quantum circuits. This distinction is vital when comparing to future error-corrected logical qubits.

Connectivity Topology: Falcon featured a hexagonal lattice connectivity topology. This design choice is critical for a data analyst evaluating circuit performance. In a hexagonal lattice, each qubit typically connects to 2 or 3 nearest neighbors. While not fully connected, this topology offers a balance between minimizing crosstalk (by limiting direct interactions) and providing sufficient pathways for qubit entanglement. The impact of connectivity is directly observable in the need for 'SWAP' gates or qubit routing operations when an algorithm requires interaction between non-adjacent qubits. These additional operations increase circuit depth and introduce more opportunities for errors, thereby affecting the overall fidelity of the computation. Understanding the topology is key to optimizing quantum circuits for a specific hardware architecture.

Native Gates: The native gate set for the Falcon processor included SX, RZ, and ECR gates. This set is considered universal, meaning any arbitrary quantum operation can be decomposed into a sequence of these fundamental gates. The SX gate represents a square-root of X rotation, RZ is a Z-axis rotation, and ECR (Echoed Cross-Resonance) is a two-qubit entangling gate. For a data analyst, knowing the native gate set is essential for understanding the efficiency of compiling quantum algorithms. Algorithms written in higher-level languages like Qiskit are translated into these native operations. The efficiency of this translation, and the fidelity of these native gates, directly influence the performance and reliability of the executed quantum program. Optimizing algorithms often involves minimizing the number of two-qubit gates, as they typically have higher error rates.

Error Rates and Fidelities: Key performance indicators for any quantum processor are its error rates and gate fidelities. For the Falcon processor (specifically data from 2020), the single-qubit gate fidelity was reported at 99.95%, and the two-qubit gate fidelity at 99.5%. These figures, while impressive for their time, are crucial for a data analyst to interpret. A 99.5% two-qubit gate fidelity implies an error probability of 0.5% per gate. For circuits with many two-qubit operations, these errors accumulate rapidly, limiting the effective depth and complexity of executable circuits. It's important to note that these specific error rates were reported in 2020 and are marked as 'single source only' in the provided facts, with a note that they 'may vary by specific device'. This highlights the importance of device-specific calibration data and the variability inherent in quantum hardware. When comparing systems, it's vital to ensure that fidelity metrics are reported under comparable conditions and measurement methodologies.

Benchmarks: Quantum Volume: A significant benchmark achieved by the Falcon processor was a Quantum Volume (QV) of 256, recorded on April 6, 2022, on the r10 revision of the processor. Quantum Volume is a holistic metric designed to quantify the effective computational power of a quantum computer, taking into account both the number of qubits and their quality (coherence, gate fidelity, connectivity). A higher Quantum Volume indicates a more capable quantum computer. Achieving QV 256 was a notable accomplishment for the Falcon family, demonstrating IBM's continuous improvement in hardware performance. For a data analyst, Quantum Volume provides a single, albeit complex, number for comparing the overall utility of different quantum systems, or different generations of the same system, in a hardware-agnostic way. It helps to understand the practical limits of what can be reliably computed on a given device.

Limitations and Trade-offs: While the Falcon processor was a significant step forward, it operated within the constraints of the NISQ era. The provided facts highlight 'lower qubit count limited complex computations' and 'higher error rates compared to later generations required more repetitions'. These are critical trade-offs for a data analyst. The 27-qubit count, while good for its time, inherently limited the size of problems that could be mapped onto the hardware. Furthermore, the error rates meant that even for smaller problems, circuits could only be of limited depth before noise overwhelmed the signal. This often necessitated techniques like error mitigation (e.g., increasing shot count, running circuits multiple times with slight variations) to extract meaningful results, which in turn increased computational cost and time. The 'Not applicable (retired)' status for limits on shots, depth, and queue simply means these operational constraints are no longer relevant for an active system, but historically, they would have been key factors in resource allocation and experiment design.

In summary, the IBM Quantum Falcon, through its specific technical parameters and benchmark achievements, provides a rich case study for data analysts interested in quantum hardware. Its specifications offer concrete data points for understanding the state of the art in the early 2020s, the engineering challenges involved in scaling superconducting qubits, and the metrics used to quantify progress. Analyzing its capabilities allows for a deeper appreciation of the rapid evolution of quantum computing and the continuous drive towards higher qubit counts, lower error rates, and more robust architectures that define the current landscape.

Generation lineage (family-level)
IBM Quantum Falcon  →  IBM Quantum Hummingbird  →  IBM Quantum Eagle  →  IBM Quantum Condor  →  IBM Quantum Heron (r3)
Heuristic chain based on widely-used naming (verify by revision/date where needed).
Related systems (same vendor)
Cross-system comparison (same vendor)
System Status Primary metric
IBM Quantum Condor Demonstrated (not public) 1121 physical qubits: 1121
IBM Quantum System Two (QS2) Active 399+ physical qubits (modular): 399+
IBM Quantum Heron (r2) Active 156 physical qubits: 156
IBM Quantum Heron (r3) Active 156 physical qubits: 156
IBM Quantum Heron (r1) Active 133 physical qubits: 133
IBM Quantum Eagle Active (limited) 127 physical qubits: 127

Access & pricing

How you access it
  • <b>Historical Access Only:</b> The IBM Quantum Falcon processor is retired and no longer available for public access or active use.
  • <b>Previously via IBM Quantum Platform:</b> During its operational lifetime, Falcon processors were accessible through the IBM Quantum Experience cloud platform.
  • <b>Qiskit SDK:</b> Users interacted with Falcon and other IBM Quantum systems primarily using the Qiskit open-source SDK.
  • <b>Research and Early Adopter Focus:</b> Access was typically granted to researchers, academic institutions, and early enterprise adopters participating in IBM's quantum programs.
  • <b>No Current Account Requirements:</b> As the system is retired, there are no active account requirements for accessing this specific hardware.
  • <b>Archival Data Access:</b> While direct hardware access is unavailable, historical data from experiments run on Falcon might be accessible for research purposes through IBM's archival resources or academic publications.
How costs sneak up
  • <b>Not Applicable (Retired):</b> As a retired system, there is no current public pricing model or example prices for the IBM Quantum Falcon.
  • <b>Historical Context:</b> During its operational period, access to IBM Quantum systems, including Falcon, was often provided through research grants, partnerships, or tiered access models within the IBM Quantum Experience.
  • <b>No Free Tier Credits:</b> There are no free tier credits specifically for the Falcon processor, given its retired status.
  • <b>Cost Drivers (Historical):</b> Historically, costs for quantum computing access were typically driven by factors such as qubit-hours, number of shots, circuit depth, and priority access, though specific Falcon pricing details are not publicly available.
  • <b>Enterprise Agreements:</b> Larger organizations or research consortia likely accessed Falcon through custom enterprise agreements with IBM Quantum.

Status timeline

The IBM Quantum Falcon processor family represents a dynamic period in IBM's quantum hardware development, characterized by continuous iteration and significant milestones. Understanding its timeline provides crucial context for its capabilities and eventual retirement, offering a data-driven narrative of progress in the field.

December 2019 – First Announced and Available: The Falcon processor was first announced and made available in December 2019. This marked a pivotal moment for IBM, as it introduced a 27-qubit system, significantly advancing beyond previous smaller-scale processors. For a data analyst, this date signifies the entry point of a new generation of hardware designed to push the boundaries of qubit count and performance. Its immediate availability underscored IBM's commitment to providing researchers and developers with access to increasingly powerful quantum resources, fostering early experimentation and algorithm development on a larger scale than previously common.

2019 (r5) and 2022 (r10) – Major Revisions: The Falcon family saw significant internal revisions, notably 'r5' in 2019 and 'r10' in 2022. While the physical qubit count remained at 27 across these revisions, these updates are critical indicators of ongoing engineering improvements. From a data analyst's perspective, such revisions typically imply enhancements in underlying hardware characteristics like qubit coherence times, gate fidelities, crosstalk reduction, and control electronics. These improvements, even without an increase in qubit count, directly translate to better overall system performance, enabling more reliable execution of deeper circuits and contributing to higher benchmark scores. The iterative nature of these revisions highlights the continuous optimization cycle inherent in quantum hardware development.

April 6, 2022 – Quantum Volume 256 on r10: A peak performance milestone for the Falcon family was achieved on April 6, 2022, when the r10 revision of the processor demonstrated a Quantum Volume (QV) of 256. This benchmark is a composite metric reflecting both the number of qubits and their quality, providing a holistic measure of a quantum computer's effective computational power. Achieving QV 256 on a 27-qubit system was a significant accomplishment, showcasing the cumulative improvements from the major revisions. For data analysts, this specific date and metric serve as a crucial data point for historical performance comparison, illustrating the practical capabilities of the Falcon architecture at its zenith and its contribution to the broader quantum computing landscape.

Circa 2023 – Retired: The IBM Quantum Falcon processor family was retired circa 2023. This retirement is a natural and expected part of the rapid innovation cycle in quantum computing. As stated in the facts, Falcon was 'replaced by larger processors like Eagle and Heron,' which feature significantly higher qubit counts and improved performance characteristics. For a data analyst, the retirement date marks the end of an era for this specific hardware generation, but it also signals the successful progression of IBM's roadmap towards more powerful and scalable quantum systems. The data collected from Falcon's operational period continues to inform the design and optimization of these successor processors, making its lifecycle a valuable case study in the evolution of quantum hardware.

What to verify next

  • Confirm if any Falcon variants are still used internally by IBM for specific research or calibration purposes.
  • Check for updated historical benchmarks or academic papers that might provide more recent performance data or re-evaluations of Falcon's capabilities.
  • Investigate if any open-source datasets exist from experiments run on Falcon processors that could be used for historical performance analysis.
  • Research the specific engineering improvements between Falcon r5 and r10 that led to the Quantum Volume 256 achievement.
  • Compare the reported error rates (99.95% single-qubit, 99.5% two-qubit from 2020) with contemporary systems from other vendors to establish a broader context.
  • Analyze the impact of the hexagonal lattice connectivity on the compilation efficiency and circuit depth for common quantum algorithms during Falcon's active period.

Sources

  • https://www.ibm.com/quantum/blog/quantum-volume-256
  • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_quantum_processors
  • https://arxiv.org/html/2410.00916v1
  • https://www.ibm.com/blogs/research/2019/12/27-qubit-falcon-processor/
  • https://www.ibm.com/quantum-computing/what-is-quantum-computing/quantum-volume/
  • https://qiskit.org/documentation/tutorials/circuits/1_getting_started_with_qiskit.html
  • https://www.ibm.com/quantum-computing/systems/falcon/
  • https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03460-w
  • https://www.ibm.com/quantum-computing/what-is-quantum-computing/transmon-qubit/
  • https://www.ibm.com/quantum-computing/systems/
  • https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aay9065
  • https://www.ibm.com/quantum-computing/blog/quantum-roadmap/

Verification confidence: Medium. Specs can vary by revision and access tier. Always cite the exact device name + date-stamped metrics.

FAQ

What was the IBM Quantum Falcon processor?

The IBM Quantum Falcon was an early-generation superconducting quantum processor family, first announced in December 2019. It featured up to 27 physical qubits and was instrumental in IBM's efforts to scale quantum hardware and improve gate fidelities.

How many qubits did the Falcon processor have?

The IBM Quantum Falcon processor had 27 physical qubits. These were gate-based qubits, operating without active error correction.

Was the Falcon processor error-corrected?

No, the IBM Quantum Falcon processor operated with physical qubits without error correction. It was part of the noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) era, where raw error rates directly impacted computation reliability.

What was the peak performance benchmark for Falcon?

The Falcon processor achieved a Quantum Volume of 256 on its r10 revision on April 6, 2022. Quantum Volume is a holistic metric that quantifies the effective computational power of a quantum computer.

Can I still access the IBM Quantum Falcon processor?

No, the IBM Quantum Falcon processor is retired (circa 2023) and is no longer available for public access or active use. It has been replaced by more advanced processors in IBM's roadmap.

Why was the IBM Quantum Falcon retired?

The Falcon processor was retired as part of the natural progression in quantum hardware development. It was succeeded by larger and more performant processors like IBM Eagle and Heron, which offer higher qubit counts and improved error characteristics, reflecting the rapid pace of innovation in the field.

What was the significance of the Falcon processor in quantum computing?

The IBM Quantum Falcon was significant for demonstrating IBM's ability to scale superconducting quantum processors to 27 qubits, improving gate fidelities, and achieving notable Quantum Volume milestones. It served as a crucial platform for early quantum algorithm testing and benchmarking, laying foundational groundwork for subsequent generations of quantum hardware.



Also in Quantum Computing

Xanadu X8

Xanadu X12

Xanadu Borealis

Subscribe