Ibm_Qs2

IBM Quantum System Two: A Modular Leap Towards Quantum-Centric Supercomputing

IBM Quantum System Two (QS2) Active

IBM Quantum System Two (QS2) is a pioneering modular quantum computing system designed for large-scale hybrid computations and parallel quantum tasks, aggregating over 399 physical qubits from interconnected processors.

IBM Superconducting transmon Active Physical qubits (aggregated) public access confidence: high

The advent of IBM Quantum System Two (QS2), first announced and made available in December 2023, marks a significant architectural shift in the landscape of quantum computing hardware. From a data analyst's perspective, QS2 is not merely an incremental upgrade but a foundational step towards scalable quantum computation, fundamentally altering how we approach problem decomposition and resource allocation in the quantum domain. Unlike previous generations that focused on increasing qubit counts on a single monolithic chip, QS2 embraces a modular design, linking multiple 'Heron' processors to achieve an aggregated qubit count exceeding 399 physical qubits. This modularity is critical for overcoming the inherent physical limitations of single-chip scaling, such as manufacturing yield, cooling requirements, and signal routing complexity.

IBM's strategic vision for QS2 positions it as the cornerstone for what they term 'quantum-centric supercomputing' by 2029. This implies a future where quantum processors operate in concert with classical high-performance computing resources, leveraging real-time links for hybrid classical-quantum workflows. For data analysts, this means evaluating not just the raw qubit count, but also the efficiency of inter-module communication, the latency introduced by distributed operations, and the robustness of the software stack (Qiskit Runtime) in orchestrating these complex, multi-processor jobs. The system's status as 'Active' and its continuous roadmap, including the integration of Heron r2/r3 processors in 2024-2025, underscores IBM's commitment to evolving this architecture.

The core innovation of QS2 lies in its ability to support multi-processor jobs, enabling parallelization and advanced techniques like circuit knitting. This capability is paramount for tackling problems that exceed the coherence time or qubit capacity of a single quantum processor. A data analyst must consider how algorithms can be effectively partitioned and executed across these linked modules, and what overheads (e.g., communication latency, data transfer) are incurred. The system's deployment in global data centers, with regions like us-east and eu-west, further highlights its enterprise-grade ambition, promising reliable execution environments and potentially lower latency for geographically distributed users.

Understanding QS2 requires a shift in perspective from single-processor metrics to system-level performance indicators. While individual Heron processors contribute their specific error rates and gate fidelities, the overall system performance is a function of these individual characteristics combined with the efficiency of the inter-module connections. This introduces new layers of complexity for performance evaluation and benchmarking. The 'aggregated' nature of metrics like qubit count and CLOPS (Circuit Layer Operations Per Second) necessitates careful interpretation, as they represent the collective capability rather than the performance of any single, isolated component. This profile aims to provide a concrete, metrics-aware analysis of IBM Quantum System Two, emphasizing comparability challenges and key considerations for data-driven decision-making in quantum computing.

The superconducting transmon technology underpinning QS2 is a mature and widely-adopted qubit modality, known for its relatively long coherence times and high gate fidelities compared to some other quantum computing approaches. However, scaling these systems brings significant engineering challenges, particularly in maintaining cryogenic environments and managing control electronics for hundreds of qubits. QS2's modular approach directly addresses these challenges by distributing the complexity across multiple, smaller units that can be independently managed and then interconnected. This distributed architecture also offers potential benefits in terms of fault tolerance and resilience, as the failure of one module might not necessarily bring down the entire system. For a data analyst, this implies a need to understand the system's operational stability and the potential for partial system availability, which could impact job scheduling and resource allocation strategies. The system's design, enabling hybrid classical-quantum computation via real-time links, is a crucial enabler for practical applications, allowing for dynamic feedback loops between classical optimization routines and quantum circuit execution, a paradigm essential for variational quantum algorithms and error mitigation techniques.

Key metrics

Physical qubits (aggregated)
399+
Total physical qubits across linked processors in modular setup
Benchmark headline
3.7
EPLG: 3.7e-3 per module (2025) | CLOPS: 250K+ aggregated (2025)
Error-correction readiness
15/100
Heuristic score from topology + mode + error hints
Historical importance
0/100
Heuristic score from milestones + roadmap language
Native gates
SX | RZ | ECR
Gate alphabet you compile to
Connectivity
Inter-module l-couplers | Tunable within modules
Mapping overhead + routing depth sensitivity

Technical specifications

Spec Details
System ID IBM_QS2
Vendor IBM
Technology Superconducting transmon
Status Active
Primary metric 399+ physical qubits (modular)
Metric meaning Total physical qubits across linked processors in modular setup
Qubit mode Gate-based with physical qubits; enables hybrid classical-quantum via real-time links
Connectivity Inter-module l-couplers | Tunable within modules
Native gates SX | RZ | ECR
Error rates & fidelities Derived from Heron: two-qubit ~1-3e-3 (2025) | Specifics vary by linked processors
Benchmarks EPLG: 3.7e-3 per module (2025) | CLOPS: 250K+ aggregated (2025)
How to access Via IBM Quantum Platform
Platforms IBM Quantum Platform | Qiskit Runtime
SDKs Qiskit
Regions us-east | eu-west
Account requirements Free signup
Pricing model Pay-per-minute
Example prices $96/min pay-as-you-go (2025) | $48/min premium (2025)
Free tier / credits 10 min/month free (open plan)
First announced 2023-12
First available 2023-12
Major revisions Integration of Heron r2/r3 (2024-2025)
Retired / roadmap Active; roadmap to larger multi-chip by 2026
Notes Not a single processor; system-level; qubit count example with 3 Herons

System profile

Qubit Architecture and Scaling: IBM Quantum System Two (QS2) is characterized by its modular architecture, aggregating 399+ physical qubits. This metric, 'Physical qubits (aggregated)', signifies the total number of superconducting transmon qubits across all linked processors within the system. It's crucial to understand that this is not a single chip with 399+ qubits, but rather a system-level count derived from interconnecting multiple 'Heron' processors. Each Heron processor contributes its own set of qubits, and the system's strength lies in its ability to coordinate these distributed resources. The qubit mode is gate-based, enabling universal quantum computation, with a strong emphasis on hybrid classical-quantum computation facilitated by real-time links. This allows for dynamic interaction between classical control systems and the quantum processors, a key feature for algorithms like VQE and QAOA.

Connectivity and Topology: The system employs 'Inter-module l-couplers' for communication between different Heron processors, while connectivity 'Tunable within modules' describes the intra-processor qubit-to-qubit connections. The l-couplers are a critical innovation, enabling quantum entanglement and information transfer across physically distinct modules. For a data analyst, understanding the latency and fidelity of these inter-module connections is paramount, as they directly impact the performance of algorithms requiring distributed entanglement or circuit knitting. The tunable connectivity within modules offers flexibility in circuit design, allowing for optimization of gate placement to minimize swap operations and reduce error accumulation.

Native Gate Set: QS2 supports a standard native gate set comprising SX, RZ, and ECR gates. The SX gate (single-qubit X-rotation by π/2) and RZ gate (single-qubit Z-rotation) are fundamental for single-qubit operations, while the ECR gate (Echoed Cross-Resonance) is a high-fidelity two-qubit entangling gate. This gate set is universal, meaning any quantum algorithm can be decomposed into these operations. The efficiency and fidelity of these native gates are foundational to overall system performance, with the ECR gate being particularly important for generating entanglement, which is often the most error-prone operation.

Error Rates and Fidelities: Performance metrics are largely 'Derived from Heron', with two-qubit gate error rates projected to be around ~1-3e-3 by 2025. It's important to note that 'Specifics vary by linked processors', meaning that the overall system's effective error rate for a multi-module computation will depend on the individual performance of each Heron processor involved and the fidelity of the inter-module couplers. For data analysis, this implies that circuit mapping and resource allocation strategies should ideally account for the heterogeneous error profiles across the system. Single-qubit gate fidelities and measurement fidelities, while not explicitly stated for QS2, are typically higher than two-qubit fidelities in superconducting systems and are crucial for overall algorithm success.

Benchmarking and Performance Indicators: IBM provides two key benchmarks for QS2: EPLG (Error Per Logical Gate) of 3.7e-3 per module (2025) and CLOPS (Circuit Layer Operations Per Second) of 250K+ aggregated (2025). The EPLG metric, reported 'per module', gives an indication of the quality of operations on individual Heron processors. The CLOPS metric, being 'aggregated', reflects the system's throughput when executing quantum circuits across its linked processors. For a data analyst, the 'aggregated' nature of CLOPS suggests that it measures the total computational work capacity, which is vital for assessing the system's ability to handle large workloads. However, it's noted that 'Benchmarks specifics' are 'not confirmed' in all details, suggesting a need for ongoing verification and deeper understanding of how these aggregated metrics are derived and what they truly represent for complex, multi-module algorithms. The distinction between 'per module' and 'aggregated' is critical for accurate performance comparison and resource planning.

System Limits and Job Execution: QS2 offers 'Unlimited shots per job (time-based)', meaning users are billed for execution time rather than a fixed number of shots, providing flexibility for statistical sampling. Circuit depth and duration limits are substantial, supporting 'Up to 5000+ gates per module (2025)'. This high gate count per module allows for the execution of complex algorithms on individual processors. The system also boasts a 'Queue wait <1 hour', indicating relatively quick access to resources, which is crucial for iterative algorithm development and rapid prototyping. Significantly, QS2 'Supports multi-processor jobs', enabling users to leverage the full modular architecture for parallel computation or circuit knitting. This capability is a core differentiator, allowing for the execution of quantum programs that would be impossible on a single, smaller processor.

Tradeoffs and Considerations: While modularity offers significant scaling advantages, it also introduces specific tradeoffs. The primary concern is that 'Modularity adds latency' to operations that span across different processors. This inter-module communication overhead can impact the effective speed and coherence of distributed quantum circuits. Furthermore, the overall system performance 'Depends on individual processor errors', meaning that the weakest link in a multi-module computation can dictate the overall fidelity. Data analysts must factor in these tradeoffs when designing and optimizing quantum algorithms for QS2, potentially favoring algorithms that minimize inter-module communication or are robust to distributed errors. The challenge of maintaining coherence and entanglement across physically separated modules, even with l-couplers, is a continuous area of research and engineering focus.

Generation lineage (family-level)
Heuristic chain based on common naming. Verify by revision/date for strict claims.
Related systems (same vendor)
Cross-system comparison (same vendor)
System Status Primary metric
IBM Quantum Condor Demonstrated (not public) 1121 physical qubits: 1121
IBM Quantum Heron (r2) Active 156 physical qubits: 156
IBM Quantum Heron (r3) Active 156 physical qubits: 156
IBM Quantum Heron (r1) Active 133 physical qubits: 133
IBM Quantum Eagle Active (limited) 127 physical qubits: 127
IBM Quantum Hummingbird Retired 65 physical qubits: 65

Access & pricing

How you access it
  • Public access is available through the IBM Quantum Platform.
  • Access is primarily facilitated via the IBM Quantum Platform and Qiskit Runtime.
  • The system is deployed in global data centers, with regions including us-east and eu-west.
  • Users can interact with the system using the Qiskit SDK, IBM's open-source quantum computing framework.
  • A free signup is required to create an account and access the platform.
  • The modular system links Heron processors, allowing for distributed computation.
  • Access notes emphasize the system's modular nature and its deployment across global data centers.
How costs sneak up
  • Public pricing is available for IBM Quantum System Two.
  • The primary pricing model is 'Pay-per-minute' for quantum processor usage.
  • Example prices for 2025 include $96/min for pay-as-you-go and $48/min for premium plans.
  • The main cost drivers are the actual usage time on the quantum processors and the chosen plan type (e.g., pay-as-you-go vs. premium).
  • A free tier is available, offering 10 minutes per month of free access under the open plan.
  • Pricing notes indicate that billing is per linked time, and quotes are available for larger, more extensive jobs.
  • The pay-per-minute model encourages efficient algorithm design and resource utilization.

Status timeline

The journey of IBM Quantum System Two (QS2) began with its official announcement and initial availability in December 2023. This marked a pivotal moment in IBM's quantum roadmap, signaling a strategic shift towards modular, scalable architectures. The immediate availability underscored IBM's readiness to deploy this next-generation system for research and development.

Looking ahead, the system is slated for significant enhancements through major revisions in 2024-2025, specifically involving the integration of Heron r2/r3 processors. These updates are expected to further refine the system's performance, potentially improving qubit fidelities, increasing coherence times, and enhancing inter-module communication capabilities. Such continuous hardware iterations are typical in the rapidly evolving field of quantum computing and are crucial for pushing the boundaries of what's computationally feasible.

IBM's long-term vision for QS2 is deeply integrated into its broader roadmap, which projects the development of larger multi-chip systems by 2026. This trajectory is aimed at achieving 'quantum-centric supercomputing' by 2029, where quantum processors operate seamlessly alongside classical supercomputers. QS2 is not merely a standalone system but a foundational component of this ambitious long-term strategy, designed to evolve and scale over time. Its active status and clear roadmap demonstrate IBM's commitment to sustained development and deployment in the quantum computing space.

  • December 2023: IBM Quantum System Two (QS2) officially announced and made available.
  • 2024-2025: Major revisions planned, including the integration of Heron r2/r3 processors to enhance system capabilities.
  • By 2026: Roadmap includes the development of larger multi-chip systems, building upon the modular foundation of QS2.
  • By 2029: Strategic goal to achieve 'quantum-centric supercomputing', with QS2 serving as a critical enabler.

What to verify next

  • Verify the specifics of aggregated benchmarks, particularly how CLOPS and EPLG are measured across multiple modules and the variance observed in real-world workloads.
  • Investigate the detailed expansion plans for QS2, including the number of modules expected to be linked, the types of future processors, and the timeline for these upgrades beyond 2026.
  • Quantify the inter-module latency and its impact on various quantum algorithms, especially those requiring frequent entanglement or data transfer between processors.
  • Assess the real-world performance of QS2 on application-specific benchmarks, moving beyond generic metrics to evaluate its efficacy for problems in chemistry, materials science, or optimization.
  • Examine the fault tolerance and error mitigation strategies implemented at the system level, considering how errors propagate and are managed across linked processors.
  • Evaluate the stability and uptime of the modular system, particularly how individual module failures or maintenance affect overall system availability and job execution.

Sources

  • https://www.ibm.com/quantum/roadmap
  • https://research.ibm.com/blog/ibm-quantum-roadmap-2025
  • https://www.ibm.com/quantum/hardware

Verification confidence: High. Specs can vary by revision and access tier. Always cite the exact device name + date-stamped metrics.

FAQ

What is IBM Quantum System Two (QS2)?

IBM Quantum System Two (QS2) is a modular quantum computing system, not a single monolithic chip. It links multiple 'Heron' quantum processors to create a larger, more powerful system capable of handling complex quantum computations. It was first announced and made available in December 2023.

How many qubits does QS2 have?

QS2 features 399+ physical qubits, which is an aggregated count across all its linked Heron processors. This modular approach allows for scalability beyond the limits of single-chip designs.

What technology does QS2 use for its qubits?

The system utilizes superconducting transmon qubits, a well-established and high-performance quantum computing technology known for its relatively long coherence times and high gate fidelities.

How do I access IBM Quantum System Two?

Public access to QS2 is available through the IBM Quantum Platform and Qiskit Runtime. Users can sign up for a free account and use the Qiskit SDK to program and execute jobs on the system, which is deployed in global data centers (e.g., us-east, eu-west).

What are the typical error rates for QS2?

Derived from its Heron processors, two-qubit gate error rates are projected to be around 1-3e-3 by 2025. It's important to note that specific error rates can vary between individual linked processors and for inter-module operations.

What is the pricing model for using QS2?

IBM Quantum System Two operates on a pay-per-minute pricing model. For 2025, example rates are $96/min for pay-as-you-go and $48/min for premium plans. A free tier offering 10 minutes per month is also available for open plan users.

What are the main advantages of QS2's modular architecture?

The modular design offers several key advantages, including enhanced scalability beyond single-chip limitations, the ability to perform distributed computations and parallelize tasks, and support for advanced techniques like circuit knitting. This architecture is foundational for IBM's long-term vision of quantum-centric supercomputing.

Are there any tradeoffs with a modular quantum system like QS2?

Yes, modularity can introduce tradeoffs. Notably, inter-module communication may add latency to operations that span across different processors. Additionally, the overall system's performance and error rates can be influenced by the individual performance characteristics of each linked processor.



Also in Quantum Computing

Xanadu X8

Xanadu X12

Xanadu Borealis

Subscribe