Pasqal Rubis

Europe's Hybrid HPC-Quantum Frontier

Pasqal Rubis / Ruby Quantum Processor Deployed on-premise

Pasqal's Rubis/Ruby processor, leveraging neutral atom technology, integrates with the Joliot-Curie supercomputer to pioneer hybrid quantum-classical computation in Europe.

Pasqal Neutral atoms (Rubidium) Deployed on-premise Physical atoms public access confidence: medium

The Pasqal Rubis (also referred to as Ruby) quantum processor represents a significant milestone in the European quantum computing landscape, particularly through its integration into the High-Performance Computing and Quantum Simulation (HPCQS) initiative. As data analysts, our interest in such systems is rooted not just in their theoretical promise, but in their tangible, measurable capabilities and their practical accessibility for solving complex computational challenges. Rubis stands out due to its foundational technology: neutral atoms, specifically Rubidium, which offers a distinct approach compared to more commonly discussed superconducting or trapped-ion platforms. This choice of technology brings with it a unique set of advantages, including inherent scalability potential and the ability to operate at room temperature, significantly reducing the infrastructural overhead typically associated with quantum hardware.

Deployed on-premise at the Très Grand Centre de Calcul (TGCC) in France, Rubis is not merely a standalone quantum computer; it is an integral component of a hybrid quantum-classical computing architecture. This integration with the Joliot-Curie supercomputer is a strategic move, designed to leverage the strengths of both paradigms: the classical supercomputer for data management, pre- and post-processing, and classical optimization, and the quantum processor for tackling specific, computationally intensive quantum tasks. From an analytical perspective, this hybrid model is crucial. It acknowledges the current limitations of quantum hardware while paving the way for practical applications that can benefit from quantum acceleration, even if only for specific subroutines. Understanding the interface and workflow between the classical and quantum components is paramount for any data analyst looking to utilize such a system effectively.

The primary metric for Rubis, as reported, is its capacity of '100+ neutral atoms.' This metric, representing physical atoms, is a direct indicator of the system's raw computational potential. However, for a data analyst, the raw atom count is just the starting point. We must delve deeper into what these atoms can actually achieve in terms of coherent operations, connectivity, and the types of quantum algorithms they can execute. The system operates in an 'analog quantum simulation' mode, which implies a different programming paradigm than the gate-based, digital quantum computers. This distinction is critical for problem mapping and algorithm selection, guiding users towards applications like optimization, materials science simulations, and certain machine learning tasks where analog approaches can be highly effective.

Pasqal's commitment to neutral atom technology, particularly with Rubidium, is driven by its promise of scalability. Unlike superconducting qubits that require ultra-low temperatures (millikelvin range) and complex cryogenic infrastructure, neutral atom systems can operate at room temperature. This significantly simplifies the engineering challenges associated with scaling up qubit counts and maintaining system stability. For data analysts evaluating the long-term viability and operational costs of quantum platforms, the 'low power, room temp' characteristic of Rubis is a compelling advantage. It suggests a path towards more energy-efficient and potentially more accessible quantum computing resources in the future, reducing the barrier to entry for wider adoption.

The '100+ neutral atoms' metric, while impressive, needs to be contextualized within the analog simulation paradigm. In analog quantum simulation, the atoms are arranged in a programmable 2D array and interact directly to simulate physical systems or solve optimization problems, rather than executing a sequence of discrete quantum gates on individual qubits in a universal gate model. This means that while the system can handle a large number of 'qubits' (atoms), the types of problems it can efficiently address are often those that can be naturally mapped onto the physics of interacting atomic systems. This is a powerful approach for specific domains but requires a different mindset for algorithm development and performance evaluation compared to gate-model quantum computing.

Ultimately, for data analysts, the Pasqal Rubis processor represents a tangible, operational quantum resource within Europe's burgeoning quantum ecosystem. Its integration with HPC infrastructure, its unique neutral atom technology, and its focus on analog simulation capabilities present both opportunities and challenges. While certain performance metrics remain unconfirmed, the system's deployment and active use within the HPCQS consortia underscore its readiness for research and development. The task for analysts is to understand its specific strengths, identify suitable applications, and rigorously evaluate its performance as more data becomes publicly available, contributing to the broader understanding of quantum advantage in real-world scenarios.

Key metrics

Physical atoms
100+
Number of trapped neutral atoms
Benchmark headline
100
Not publicly confirmed (HPCQS demos with >100 qubits)
Error-correction readiness
20/100
Heuristic score from topology + mode + error hints
Historical importance
0/100
Heuristic score from milestones + roadmap language
Native gates
Optical tweezers | Rydberg interactions
Gate alphabet you compile to
Connectivity
Programmable 2D array
Mapping overhead + routing depth sensitivity

Technical specifications

Spec Details
System ID Pasqal Rubis
Vendor Pasqal
Technology Neutral atoms (Rubidium)
Status Deployed on-premise
Primary metric Neutral atoms
Metric meaning Number of trapped neutral atoms
Qubit mode Analog quantum simulation
Connectivity Programmable 2D array
Native gates Optical tweezers | Rydberg interactions
Error rates & fidelities Not publicly confirmed (checked searches, no rates)
Benchmarks Not publicly confirmed (HPCQS demos with >100 qubits)
How to access Via HPCQS consortia | SLURM integration
Platforms HPC environments (TGCC)
SDKs Pulser SDK
Regions France (TGCC)
Account requirements Research proposals
Pricing model Grant-funded
Example prices Not applicable
Free tier / credits None
First announced 2025-11-13
First available 2025-11 (inauguration)
Major revisions From 35 atoms (2025-03) to 100+
Retired / roadmap Active, part of HPCQS
Notes Rubis likely Ruby; checked for error rates, not found

System profile

The Pasqal Rubis processor, leveraging neutral atom technology, presents a distinct set of capabilities and operational characteristics that are crucial for data analysts to understand when evaluating its potential for specific computational tasks. Its design philosophy emphasizes scalability and a unique approach to quantum computation, primarily through analog simulation.

Technology Deep Dive: Neutral Atoms

Rubis utilizes neutral atoms, specifically Rubidium, as its fundamental qubit. These atoms are trapped and manipulated using highly focused laser beams, known as optical tweezers, which allow for precise positioning in a programmable 2D array. The quantum information is encoded in the internal electronic states of these atoms. Interactions between qubits, essential for entanglement and computation, are mediated by exciting atoms to highly energetic 'Rydberg states.' When an atom is in a Rydberg state, its electron orbits far from the nucleus, leading to a significantly larger atomic radius and strong, long-range dipole-dipole interactions with other nearby Rydberg atoms. This mechanism, known as 'Rydberg blockade,' allows for controlled entanglement operations between selected pairs or groups of atoms. This approach offers inherent advantages in terms of potential scalability, as thousands of atoms can be trapped and manipulated in a vacuum chamber, and the system operates at room temperature, avoiding the complex and expensive cryogenic infrastructure required by superconducting qubits.

Qubit Count and Mode of Operation

The system boasts '100+ neutral atoms,' which directly translates to the number of physical qubits available for computation. This is a significant number in the current quantum hardware landscape. However, it's critical to note that Rubis operates in an 'analog quantum simulation' mode. Unlike universal gate-based quantum computers where arbitrary quantum circuits can be constructed from a set of universal gates, analog quantum simulators are designed to directly mimic the behavior of other quantum systems or to solve optimization problems by mapping them onto the natural dynamics of the atomic ensemble. This means that while it can handle a large number of 'qubits,' its programming paradigm is different, focusing on preparing initial states and letting the system evolve under controlled interactions, rather than executing a sequence of discrete gates. This mode is particularly well-suited for problems in quantum chemistry, materials science, and certain combinatorial optimization tasks where the problem structure can be naturally encoded into the atomic interactions.

Connectivity Topology

Rubis features a 'programmable 2D array' connectivity. This means that the optical tweezers can arrange the atoms in various geometric configurations on a 2D plane, allowing for flexible and reconfigurable connectivity between qubits. The ability to dynamically reconfigure the qubit layout is a powerful feature, enabling the system to adapt to the specific interaction requirements of different algorithms. For instance, problems requiring nearest-neighbor interactions can be mapped efficiently, and with Rydberg interactions, longer-range interactions can also be engineered, albeit with potential trade-offs in fidelity or speed. This programmable connectivity is a key differentiator, offering more flexibility than fixed-topology architectures found in some other quantum computing modalities.

Native Gates and Operations

The fundamental operations on Rubis are based on 'Optical tweezers' for individual atom manipulation and 'Rydberg interactions' for creating entanglement. Optical tweezers allow for precise control over individual atom positions, enabling the creation of custom geometries and the selection of specific atoms for interaction. Rydberg interactions are the workhorse for generating entanglement, leveraging the strong, long-range interactions between highly excited atoms. These native operations are optimized for the analog simulation paradigm, allowing for the creation of complex many-body quantum states and the exploration of quantum dynamics. While not 'gates' in the traditional digital sense, these operations form the basis of the system's computational power.

Performance Metrics: The Critical Gaps for Data Analysts

From a data analyst's perspective, the most significant challenge with Pasqal Rubis, as with many emerging quantum systems, lies in the availability of comprehensive performance metrics. The provided facts explicitly state that 'Error rates/fidelities' and 'Benchmarks' are 'Not publicly confirmed.' This lack of concrete, published data is a critical hurdle for rigorous performance evaluation and comparability across different quantum platforms.

  • Error Rates and Fidelities: For any practical quantum computation, understanding the error rates (e.g., single-qubit gate fidelity, two-qubit gate fidelity, measurement fidelity, coherence times like T1 and T2) is paramount. Without these figures, it is exceedingly difficult to predict the success probability of an algorithm, estimate the impact of noise, or compare the system's quality against other quantum processors. While the 'low power, room temp' operation is an advantage, it doesn't inherently guarantee low error rates. Data analysts require these metrics to assess the 'noise budget' for algorithms and to determine if a problem can be solved within the system's coherence limits.
  • Benchmarks: Similarly, the absence of publicly confirmed benchmarks makes it challenging to quantify the system's performance on standardized tasks. While 'HPCQS demos with >100 qubits' indicate operational capability, these are typically specific demonstrations rather than generalized benchmarks. Data analysts rely on standardized benchmarks (e.g., quantum volume, Qiskit Runtime primitives, application-specific benchmarks) to objectively compare the computational power and efficiency of different quantum hardware. Without such data, performance claims remain largely qualitative.
  • Limits (Shots, Depth, Duration, Queue): The facts also state that 'limits_shots', 'limits_depth_duration', and 'limits_queue_other' are 'Not publicly confirmed.' These operational limits are crucial for job planning, resource allocation, and understanding the practical constraints of running quantum programs. For instance, the maximum number of shots determines the statistical significance of measurement outcomes, while depth and duration limits impact the complexity of the quantum evolution that can be sustained. Queue limits affect accessibility and turnaround times.

Operational Advantages and Trade-offs

A significant advantage of Rubis is its 'Low power, room temp' operation. This contrasts sharply with superconducting qubit systems that require massive cryostats to reach millikelvin temperatures, consuming substantial energy and requiring complex infrastructure. This inherent efficiency makes neutral atom systems attractive for scaling and potentially for broader deployment. The primary trade-off, as highlighted, is its 'Scalable but analog' nature. While scalability is a strong point, the analog mode means it's not a universal gate-based quantum computer, limiting the types of algorithms it can run directly. This necessitates careful problem formulation and mapping to leverage its strengths.

Comparability Challenges

Comparing Rubis with other quantum systems is complex due to its analog nature and the lack of public performance metrics. Direct comparisons with gate-based systems using metrics like Quantum Volume are not straightforward. Instead, evaluation often needs to be application-specific, focusing on how well Rubis solves particular optimization or simulation problems compared to classical methods or other quantum approaches tailored for those specific tasks. Data analysts must adopt a nuanced approach, focusing on the system's demonstrated capabilities for its intended use cases rather than relying solely on generalized, cross-platform metrics that may not fully capture its unique strengths.

Generation lineage (family-level)
Heuristic chain based on common naming. Verify by revision/date for strict claims.
Related systems (same vendor)
Cross-system comparison (same vendor)
System Status Primary metric
Pasqal Orion Alpha Quantum Processor Public cloud access Neutral atoms: 100

Access & pricing

How you access it
  • Public access is available through specific channels.
  • Access is primarily facilitated via the HPCQS consortia.
  • Integration with SLURM allows for job submission within HPC environments.
  • The system is deployed on HPC environments, specifically at TGCC in France.
  • Geographic access is currently limited to the France (TGCC) region.
  • Users can interact with the system using the Pulser SDK.
  • Account requirements typically involve submitting research proposals.
  • The Rubis processor is notably integrated with the Joliot-Curie supercomputer, enabling hybrid workflows.
How costs sneak up
  • Public pricing information for direct access is not available.
  • The operational model is primarily grant-funded, reflecting its research and development focus.
  • There are no example prices provided, as it's not a commercial pay-per-use service.
  • Direct cost drivers for end-users are not applicable under the current model.
  • No free tier or credits are offered for individual users in a commercial sense.
  • The project benefits from significant EU funding, supporting its development and deployment.

Status timeline

The Pasqal Rubis processor's journey from concept to deployment within a major European HPC infrastructure illustrates a rapid and strategic development trajectory, firmly positioning it as a key asset in the continent's quantum computing ambitions. Understanding this timeline is crucial for data analysts to contextualize the system's current capabilities and anticipate future developments.

The initial public announcement regarding the Pasqal Rubis/Ruby system, or at least its significant deployment milestones, can be traced to November 13, 2025, when its inauguration was celebrated. This date marks a pivotal moment, signifying the official operational readiness and integration of the quantum processing unit (QPU) into the broader High-Performance Computing and Quantum Simulation (HPCQS) ecosystem. While specific 'first announced' dates for the project's inception might predate this, the inauguration date serves as the primary marker for its public availability and operational status.

The 'first available' date is also closely tied to this inauguration in November 2025. This means that from this point, the Rubis processor became accessible to researchers and consortia members via the established HPCQS framework, specifically through its integration with the Joliot-Curie supercomputer at TGCC. This immediate availability upon inauguration underscores a mature development process, moving directly from deployment to active use within a critical research infrastructure.

A significant aspect of Rubis's development timeline is the 'major revisions' it underwent, particularly the progression from an initial capacity of '35 atoms' in March 2025 to the '100+' atoms by the time of its inauguration in November 2025. This rapid increase in qubit count within a span of less than a year highlights Pasqal's aggressive development roadmap and the inherent scalability of neutral atom technology. For data analysts, this progression is a strong indicator of the technology's potential for further scaling. It suggests that the underlying engineering and control mechanisms are robust enough to accommodate a substantial increase in the number of trapped and manipulated atoms, which is a critical factor for tackling more complex problems and achieving quantum advantage.

The 'retired roadmap' status is explicitly stated as 'Active, part of HPCQS.' This is a vital piece of information, confirming that Rubis is not a one-off project but an ongoing, evolving component of a larger, strategic initiative. Its active status within HPCQS implies continuous development, upgrades, and integration efforts. For users, this means that the system is likely to see further enhancements in terms of qubit count, coherence times, gate fidelities (once confirmed), and software capabilities. The long-term vision of HPCQS is to establish a robust European hybrid quantum-classical computing infrastructure, and Rubis plays a central role in this vision, ensuring its continued relevance and development for the foreseeable future.

In summary, the timeline for Pasqal Rubis showcases a rapid development cycle culminating in a significant deployment within a strategic European initiative. The quick scaling from 35 to over 100 atoms within months demonstrates the technological maturity and scalability potential of Pasqal's neutral atom platform. Its active status within HPCQS ensures ongoing development and integration, making it a dynamic and evolving resource for quantum research and application development in Europe.

What to verify next

  • Actual, publicly confirmed error rates for single-qubit and two-qubit operations, including coherence times (T1, T2).
  • Standardized quantum benchmarks (e.g., Quantum Volume, application-specific benchmarks) to allow for objective performance comparison with other quantum systems.
  • Detailed performance reports from ongoing HPCQS projects, showcasing real-world application efficacy and resource utilization.
  • Throughput metrics, such as jobs processed per hour or qubit utilization rates, to assess operational efficiency.
  • Specific limits on the number of shots per experiment, maximum circuit depth, and job duration.
  • Roadmap for further qubit scaling and improvements in connectivity or control mechanisms.
  • Comparative studies demonstrating quantum advantage or performance benefits over classical methods for specific problem instances.

FAQ

What is Pasqal Rubis and what technology does it use?

Pasqal Rubis (also known as Ruby) is a quantum processor developed by Pasqal. It utilizes neutral atom technology, specifically trapping and manipulating Rubidium atoms with optical tweezers. This technology allows for scalability and room-temperature operation, distinguishing it from superconducting or trapped-ion systems.

How many qubits does the Pasqal Rubis processor have?

The Pasqal Rubis processor features '100+' neutral atoms. This metric refers to the number of physical atoms that serve as qubits, indicating a significant raw computational capacity for quantum simulation tasks.

What kind of problems is Rubis best suited for?

Rubis operates in an 'analog quantum simulation' mode, making it particularly well-suited for problems that can be mapped onto the natural dynamics of interacting atomic systems. This includes applications in optimization, quantum simulation (e.g., materials science, quantum chemistry), and certain machine learning tasks.

How can researchers and developers access Pasqal Rubis?

Access to Pasqal Rubis is primarily facilitated through the HPCQS consortia. It is integrated with the Joliot-Curie supercomputer at TGCC in France, allowing users to submit jobs via SLURM. Access typically requires submitting research proposals, and interaction is managed using the Pulser SDK.

What are the main advantages of neutral atom technology as implemented in Rubis?

Key advantages include its potential for high scalability (demonstrated by the 100+ atom count), and its ability to operate at room temperature, which significantly reduces the need for complex and energy-intensive cryogenic cooling infrastructure. This 'low power, room temp' operation makes it a more energy-efficient and potentially more accessible quantum computing platform.

Are there any public benchmarks or error rates available for Pasqal Rubis?

As of the latest information, specific error rates, fidelities, and standardized benchmarks for Pasqal Rubis are 'Not publicly confirmed.' While HPCQS has conducted demos with over 100 qubits, detailed performance metrics crucial for rigorous data analysis and comparison are not yet widely available. This is a key area for future verification.

What is the significance of Rubis's integration with the HPCQS initiative?

Its integration with HPCQS (High-Performance Computing and Quantum Simulation) is highly significant. It positions Rubis as a core component of Europe's strategy to develop hybrid quantum-classical computing capabilities. This allows for leveraging classical supercomputing power alongside quantum processing, enabling more complex workflows and accelerating research in various scientific and industrial domains within a robust, grant-funded framework.



Also in Quantum Computing

Xanadu X8

Xanadu X12

Xanadu Borealis

Subscribe