Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)

Qwen3 235B: High Intelligence, High Verbosity

Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)

An exceptionally intelligent and fast Qwen3 variant, known for its high verbosity and premium pricing among open-weight models.

High IntelligenceFast OutputHigh VerbosityPremium Pricing256k ContextOpen LicenseAlibaba Model

The Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) model stands out as a formidable contender in the landscape of large language models. Developed by Alibaba, this open-license model is engineered for advanced reasoning tasks, showcasing a remarkable blend of intelligence and speed. While it delivers top-tier performance, its operational characteristics, particularly its high verbosity and premium pricing, warrant careful consideration for deployment in cost-sensitive applications.

Achieving a score of 57 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) significantly surpasses the average intelligence of comparable models (average 42), placing it among the top 6 out of 51 models benchmarked. This superior intelligence is often accompanied by highly detailed and comprehensive outputs, as evidenced by the 110 million tokens generated during its Intelligence Index evaluation, far exceeding the average of 22 million tokens.

Beyond its intellectual prowess, the model demonstrates impressive operational speed. With an average output rate of 70.7 tokens per second, it ensures efficient content generation, making it suitable for applications requiring rapid response times. Furthermore, its expansive 256k token context window provides ample capacity for processing and generating long-form, complex documents, enabling sophisticated understanding and coherent, extended narratives.

However, the model's advanced capabilities come with a notable cost. Priced at $0.70 per 1 million input tokens (somewhat expensive compared to the average of $0.57) and a substantial $8.40 per 1 million output tokens (significantly higher than the average of $2.10), Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) is positioned at the higher end of the pricing spectrum. The total cost to evaluate this model on the Intelligence Index amounted to $934.45, underscoring the financial implications of its verbose nature.

As an open-license model from Alibaba, Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) offers developers the flexibility to integrate and customize it within their ecosystems. Its blend of high intelligence, speed, and a vast context window makes it a powerful tool for complex reasoning, detailed content creation, and applications demanding deep contextual understanding, provided the associated costs are managed strategically.

Scoreboard

Intelligence

57 (#6 / 51 / 235B)

Scores well above average, demonstrating top-tier reasoning capabilities.
Output speed

70.7 tokens/s

Notably fast, ensuring efficient generation for demanding tasks.
Input price

$0.70 per 1M tokens

Somewhat expensive compared to the average for similar models.
Output price

$8.40 per 1M tokens

Significantly higher than average, impacting cost for verbose outputs.
Verbosity signal

110M tokens

Generates a very high volume of tokens during evaluation, indicating detailed responses.
Provider latency

0.39 seconds

Achieves competitive time-to-first-token, crucial for interactive applications.

Technical specifications

Spec Details
Model Name Qwen3 235B A22B 2507
Model Variant Reasoning
Developer Alibaba
License Open
Context Window 256k tokens
Input Modality Text
Output Modality Text
Intelligence Index Score 57 (Rank #6/51)
Average Output Speed 70.7 tokens/s
Input Token Price $0.70 per 1M tokens
Output Token Price $8.40 per 1M tokens
Verbosity (Intelligence Index) 110M tokens
Total Evaluation Cost $934.45

What stands out beyond the scoreboard

Where this model wins
  • Top-tier intelligence and reasoning capabilities, ranking among the best.
  • Exceptional output speed, enabling efficient generation for demanding tasks.
  • Extremely large 256k token context window, ideal for complex, long-form content.
  • Open license offers significant flexibility for deployment and customization.
  • Strong performance across multiple providers, offering diverse integration options.
  • Achieves very low latency from select providers, enhancing real-time user experience.
Where costs sneak up
  • High output token price, making verbose responses particularly expensive.
  • Overall blended price can be significantly higher than many open-weight alternatives.
  • Its inherent verbosity during evaluation suggests higher operational costs for typical use.
  • Input token price is above average, contributing to the base cost of interactions.
  • Specific providers may have even higher output costs, requiring careful selection.
  • While FP8 options exist, they might introduce minor quality trade-offs for cost savings.

Provider pick

Selecting the right API provider for Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) involves balancing performance, latency, and cost. The model's characteristics mean that provider choice can significantly impact both user experience and operational expenditure. Here’s a breakdown of optimal providers based on different priorities:

Priority Pick Why Tradeoff to accept
Max Output Speed Fireworks Achieves an unmatched 146 tokens/s, ideal for high-throughput applications. While not the absolute lowest latency, it's still excellent at 0.51s, and blended price is competitive.
Lowest Latency (TTFT) Together.ai Offers the best time-to-first-token at 0.39s, crucial for highly interactive use cases. Output speed is slower at 51 tokens/s, which might increase overall generation time for long outputs.
Lowest Blended Cost Nebius Most cost-effective with a blended price of $0.35 per 1M tokens, and very low input price ($0.20). Output speed is not explicitly listed in the top performers, and latency is average at 0.65s.
Best Output Token Value (FP8) Hyperbolic (FP8) Provides the lowest output token price at $0.40 per 1M tokens, combined with good speed (93 t/s) and blended price ($0.40). FP8 quantization might introduce minor quality differences for highly sensitive applications, though often negligible.

Note: Provider performance and pricing are dynamic and can vary based on region, specific API configurations, and real-time load. Always verify current rates and test performance for your specific use case.

Real workloads cost table

Understanding the real-world cost implications of Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) requires analyzing various common workloads. Given its high output token price and verbosity, scenarios with extensive generation will incur higher costs. The following estimates use the model's average pricing ($0.70/M input, $8.40/M output).

Scenario Input Output What it represents Estimated cost
Short Q&A 200 tokens 100 tokens Concise, direct answers to simple queries. ~$0.0010
Content Generation (Medium) 500 tokens 2,000 tokens Drafting blog posts, marketing copy, or detailed explanations. ~$0.0172
Long Document Summarization 100,000 tokens 500 tokens Condensing extensive reports or articles into brief summaries. ~$0.0742
Complex Reasoning Task 5,000 tokens 1,000 tokens Solving intricate problems or generating structured analysis. ~$0.0119
Chatbot Interaction (Verbose) 100 tokens 500 tokens A single turn in a detailed, conversational AI interaction. ~$0.0043
Code Generation (Moderate) 1,000 tokens 3,000 tokens Generating a medium-sized code snippet or function. ~$0.0259

These examples highlight that while input costs are manageable, the high output token price of Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) means that any task involving significant text generation will quickly accumulate costs. Workloads requiring extensive output, such as long-form content creation or verbose chatbot responses, will be particularly impacted.

How to control cost (a practical playbook)

To effectively leverage the intelligence and speed of Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) without incurring excessive costs, strategic planning and optimization are essential. Here are key strategies to manage expenditures:

Optimize Output Length

Given the model's high output token price and inherent verbosity, controlling the length of generated responses is paramount.

  • Prompt Engineering: Craft prompts to explicitly request concise answers, specific formats, or to limit the number of sentences/words.
  • Post-Processing: Implement automated post-processing steps to trim unnecessary introductory phrases, redundant information, or conversational filler.
  • Task-Specific Models: For tasks where brevity is critical and deep reasoning is less important, consider using a less verbose or smaller model.
Strategic Provider Selection

The choice of API provider significantly impacts both performance and cost. Evaluate providers based on your primary optimization goal.

  • Cost-First: Prioritize providers like Nebius for lowest blended price or Hyperbolic (FP8) for lowest output token price if cost is the absolute top concern.
  • Performance-First: Opt for Fireworks for maximum output speed or Together.ai for lowest latency if responsiveness is critical.
  • FP8 Utilization: Explore FP8 quantization options where available (e.g., Deepinfra, Hyperbolic) to reduce costs, ensuring the quality impact is acceptable for your application.
Context Window Management

While the 256k context window is powerful, feeding it excessively long inputs can increase input token costs and processing time.

  • Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG): Use RAG techniques to retrieve only the most relevant information for the model, rather than feeding entire documents.
  • Summarization: Pre-summarize long documents or conversation histories before passing them to the model for specific queries.
  • Dynamic Context: Implement logic to dynamically adjust the context window size based on the complexity and requirements of each query.
Monitor and Analyze Usage

Continuous monitoring of token usage and associated costs is crucial for identifying inefficiencies and areas for optimization.

  • Detailed Logging: Log input and output token counts for every API call.
  • Cost Dashboards: Build or utilize dashboards to visualize spending patterns by model, application, and user.
  • Alerts: Set up alerts for unexpected spikes in token usage or costs to react quickly to potential issues.

FAQ

What is Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)?

Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) is an advanced, open-license large language model developed by Alibaba. It is specifically designed for complex reasoning tasks, offering high intelligence, fast output speeds, and an exceptionally large 256k token context window.

How does its intelligence compare to other models?

The model scores 57 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it at #6 out of 51 benchmarked models. This score is significantly above the average of 42, indicating its superior reasoning capabilities and ability to handle complex intellectual challenges.

Is Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 considered expensive?

Yes, it is considered expensive, particularly due to its high output token price of $8.40 per 1 million tokens, which is substantially above the average. Its input token price of $0.70 per 1 million tokens is also somewhat above average, contributing to higher overall operational costs, especially for verbose outputs.

What is its context window size?

Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) features an exceptionally large 256k token context window. This allows it to process and generate very long and complex documents, maintaining coherence and understanding over extensive narratives.

Which provider offers the best performance for this model?

For maximum output speed, Fireworks leads with 146 tokens/s. If lowest latency (time-to-first-token) is your priority, Together.ai offers the best at 0.39 seconds.

Which provider is most cost-effective for Qwen3 235B A22B 2507?

Nebius offers the lowest blended price at $0.35 per 1 million tokens. For the absolute lowest output token price, Hyperbolic (FP8) is the most cost-effective at $0.40 per 1 million tokens, often balancing cost with good performance.

What are the implications of its high verbosity?

While high verbosity can lead to detailed and comprehensive responses, it directly translates to significantly higher output token costs. Users must carefully manage prompt engineering and potentially implement post-processing to control output length and optimize expenses.


Subscribe