K2-295 b

K2-295 b — Exoplanet profile
Exoplanet profile

K2-295 b

Host star: K2-295 • Discovery: 2018 • Method: Transit
confirmed planet • updated: 2019-05-20
confirmed planet transit modeled atmosphere derived

K2-295 b circles the star K2-295, which is smaller and cooler than our Sun. Scientists spotted it using the transit method — watching for tiny, regular dips in the star’s light as the planet crosses in front.

What this page represents

This page summarizes a catalog entry. If a measurement is missing, it is not shown or guessed. Some values can differ slightly between studies; when that happens, we describe the range rather than picking a favorite without evidence.

Scientific context

Scientific context: This profile layers interpretation on top of archival measurements. Modeled bands appear where direct detections (like spectra or transits) are not listed.

Signal quality
strong
Distance
759.3 ly
Star temp
4444 K
Mass
0.3 MJ (m·sin i)
What we can infer: broad planet class (rocky vs gas), rough irradiation band via star temperature + distance, and signal robustness.
What we can’t claim: surface conditions, biology, or breathable atmosphere without direct spectra.
overview
plain-language interpretation + what’s missing made explicit

K2-295 b orbits its star every 4 days, very close in. It’s about 10 times wider than Earth and has a mass roughly 106 times Earth’s — making it a gas giant, like Jupiter. Its orbit is likely circular. The planet’s temperature is estimated at around 852 Kelvin (about 579°C or 1074°F), based on the star’s brightness and distance.

Glossary (plain English)
  • AU: the average Earth–Sun distance.
  • Semi-major axis: the planet’s average distance from its star.
  • Eccentricity: how oval the orbit is (0 = circle).
  • Radial velocity: finding a planet by measuring a star’s tiny “wobble.”
  • m·sin i: a minimum mass estimate; the true mass can be higher if the orbit is tilted.
  • Equilibrium temperature: a rough estimate from starlight alone, not a surface reading.
Semi-major axis
0.05 AU
Meaning: average distance from the star (Earth = 1 AU).
Eccentricity
0.00
Meaning: how oval the orbit is (0 is a circle).
Host star type
K5 V
A spectral label that summarizes temperature and color.
Host star radius
0.70 R
Bigger stars can change how “hot” a planet’s orbit feels.
Metallicity
0.14
Meaning: how “heavy-element rich” the star is vs the Sun.
Distance
759.3 ly
How far the system is from Earth (in light-years).
About the numbers on this page: this profile combines measurements reported across multiple published studies. It uses the most consistent values and explains where estimates vary.
discovery and follow-up
why the same planet can appear in multiple catalog rows

K2-295 b was first reported in 2018 using the Transit method. The discovery is linked to observations from K2.

In transit work, astronomers watch for tiny, repeating dips in a star’s light as the planet passes in front of it. Follow-up observations help rule out false positives and refine the orbit.

orbit and long-term stability
a plain-English read of the orbit, plus what “uncertainty” means here

The catalog lists an orbital period of about 4.02 days, a semi-major axis near 0.045 AU.

The orbit’s eccentricity is 0.00, which describes how stretched the orbit is.

Reader tip: small differences across studies usually reflect better data and improved fitting — not that the planet “changed.”
mass, “minimum mass,” and why estimates differ
radial velocity usually measures a minimum mass unless the orbit tilt is known

The archive reports a mass scale of 0.3 MJ.

A catalog radius is also listed, which (together with mass) helps constrain density and interior structure.

Why “m·sin i” shows up on RV planets
Radial velocity detects a star’s wobble. If we don’t know the orbit’s tilt (inclination), the wobble gives a minimum mass. The true mass can be higher.
the host star in plain terms
star properties affect temperature estimates and “how intense” the orbit feels

K2-295 b orbits K2-295. The star is classified as K5 V, which is a shorthand for temperature and color.

A temperature near 4444 K places it on the cool side of the main sequence. The system is about 759.3 light‑years away.

what we still don’t know
missing measurements that limit what anyone can responsibly claim

Several key parameters are not present in this single catalog row.

Missing fields don’t mean the science is unknown—only that this particular snapshot doesn’t carry the values. As new observations arrive, archives often refresh these entries (and sometimes revise earlier numbers).

Why this matters: without a measured radius or direct spectra, we can’t reliably infer density, surface conditions, or detailed chemistry.
observation charts
visual summaries from method + uncertainty bands (no spectra required)
radial velocity curve
Dashed segment indicates modeled RV window. Period: 4 d • e: 0.00 • a: 0.05 AU
orbit stability
signal-to-noise proxy
62% stability
Transit fit
Noise floor
Data density
This is a UI metric for confidence presentation — not a formal astrophysics rating.
what it might be made of (model-based)
If spectra is missing, these bars are browsing aids — not confirmed chemistry.
Mostly hydrogen & helium (gas giant envelope)

80% modeled
High clouds / haze (possible)

26% modeled
Carbon-bearing bands (possible)

38% modeled
These are presentation layers derived from planet class + irradiation band — not direct detections. Confirmed atmosphere claims require direct measurements (spectra).
Why scientists keep revisiting systems like this:

Scientists keep revisiting systems like this because each new instrument pass can tighten uncertainties: better timing improves the orbit, better spectra improves the star, and better follow‑up can confirm or refute competing solutions. Even when a planet is well‑established, refined stellar properties can shift the inferred planet size, temperature, and habitability context. Transit systems are especially valuable because they can be re‑observed for decades to detect subtle changes in timing or additional planets.

discovery timeline
a readable story of how this planet entered the catalog
2018
First reported as a planet candidate by multiple teams using data from the K2 mission.
2019
Confirmed and detailed in a study by Smith et al., which provided mass and size estimates.
2019-05-20
Catalog row updated (parameters may change as analyses improve).
2026-02-01
Profile rendered from the current catalog snapshot.
sources
NASA Exoplanet Archive (row-level fields)
Method metadata and derived UI bands (model-only)
No spectral claims are made without spectra.
Transparency: This page is a plain-language summary built from published catalog values. If newer studies revise any numbers, this profile will evolve with them.

Subscribe